UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934

 

Filed by the Registrant ☒

 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

 

Check the appropriate box:

 

☐    Preliminary Proxy Statement

☐    Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☒    Definitive Proxy Statement

☐    Definitive Additional Materials

☐    Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

  

CONYERS PARK ACQUISITION CORP.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

☒	No fee required.

 

☐	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i) (1) and 0-11.

 

	(1)	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
	(2)	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
	(3)	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
	(4)	Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
	(5)	Total fee paid:

 

☐	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

☐	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

	(1)	Amount Previously Paid:
	(2)	Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.
	(3)	Filing Party:
	(4)	Date Filed:

 

  

CONYERS PARK ACQUISITION CORP.
1 Greenwich Office Park, 2nd Floor
Greenwich, CT 06831

Dear Conyers Park Acquisition Corp. Stockholders:

You are cordially invited to attend the special meeting in lieu of the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders of Conyers Park Acquisition Corp., which is referred to as “Parent,” “Conyers Park” or the “Company,” on July 5, 2017, at 11:00 a.m., Eastern time, to be held at the offices of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, located at 601 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10022. This proxy statement/prospectus is dated June 15, 2017 and is first being mailed to stockholders of the Company on or about June 15, 2017.

At the special meeting, Conyers Park stockholders will be asked to consider and vote upon a proposal, which is referred to collectively herein as the “Business Combination Proposal” or “Proposal No. 1,” to approve and adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 10, 2017, as it may be amended from time to time, which is referred to as the “Merger Agreement,” a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex A, pursuant to which (a) Conyers Park Parent Merger Sub, Inc. (“Parent Merger Sub”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Simply Good Foods Company, a Delaware corporation (“Simply Good Foods”), will merge with and into Parent, with Parent surviving such merger (the “Parent Merger”), and (b) immediately after the Parent Merger, Conyers Park Merger Sub 1, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Simply Good Foods (“Atkins Merger Sub,” together with Parent Merger Sub, the “Merger Subs”), will merge with and into NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. (“Atkins”), with Atkins surviving such merger (the “Atkins Merger,” and together with the Parent Merger, the “Business Combination”), as a result of which Parent and Atkins will become wholly-owned subsidiaries of Simply Good Foods.

Subject to the terms of the Merger Agreement and customary adjustments set forth therein, the aggregate purchase price for the Business Combination and related transactions is expected to be approximately $730,125,000 of cash and equity consideration, which amount will be reduced by, among other things, the aggregate amount of funds used to repay certain debt obligations of Atkins as set forth in the Merger Agreement. The consideration will be paid to holders of equity interests in Atkins as of the time immediately after the Business Combination, which are referred to as “Selling Equityholders.” The amount of cash consideration is the sum of (i) cash available to Conyers Park from the trust account, which is referred to as Conyers Park’s “Trust Account,” that holds the proceeds (including interest) of Conyers Park’s initial public offering that closed on July 20, 2016, which is referred to as “Conyers Park’s IPO,” after giving effect to taxes payable, any redemptions that may be elected by any of Conyers Park’s public stockholders for their pro rata share of the aggregate amount of funds on deposit prior to closing the Business Combination (which instructions to redeem are further discussed in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus) and certain transaction fees and expenses in connection with the Business Combination, including the payment of deferred underwriting commissions agreed to at the time of Conyers Park’s IPO, (ii) the net proceeds of our anticipated debt financing that is described in this proxy statement/prospectus and (iii) the net proceeds from the sale of shares of newly issued Conyers Park common stock in a private placement (the “Common Stock Private Placement”). The amount of stock consideration is a number of newly issued shares of Simply Good Foods’ common stock, payable to Selling Equityholders for their ownership interests therein and which is referred to as the “Stock Consideration.” To the extent not utilized to consummate the Business Combination or to repay the remainder of certain of Atkins’ existing debt at the closing of the Business Combination, the proceeds from the Trust Account, debt financing and Common Stock Private Placement will be used by Simply Good Foods for general corporate purposes, including, but not limited to, working capital for operations, capital expenditures and future potential acquisitions.

At the closing of the Business Combination, Simply Good Foods will enter into the Tax Receivable Agreement with Roark Capital Acquisition LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (the “Stockholders’ Representative”) (on behalf of the Selling Equityholders). The Tax Receivable Agreement will generally provide for the payment by Simply Good Foods to the Selling Equityholders for certain federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax benefits deemed realized (as described in more detail in the section entitled “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — The Tax Receivable Agreement”) in post-closing taxable periods by Simply Good Foods, the Company, Atkins and Atkins eligible subsidiaries from the use of up to $100 million of the following tax attributes: (i) net operating losses available to be carried forward as of the closing of the Business Combination; (ii) certain deductions generated by the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; and (iii) remaining depreciable tax basis from the 2003 acquisition of Atkins Nutritionals, Inc. In addition, Simply Good Foods will pay the Selling Equityholders for the use of 75% of up to $7.6 million of alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards. The preliminary estimated fair value of the contingent payments associated with the Tax Receivable Agreement are valued at $16,058,000.

 

At closing, Simply Good Foods and Conyers Park Sponsor LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Sponsor”), will enter into an Investor Rights Agreement, substantially in the form attached hereto as Annex D, providing for, among other things, certain customary registration rights to Sponsor. See the section entitled “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — The Investor Rights Agreement with Conyers Park.”

Additionally, Simply Good Foods, Sponsor and Atkins Holdings LLC, a Georgia limited liability company, will enter into an Investor Rights Agreement, substantially in the form attached hereto as Annex E, providing for, among other things, subject to the terms thereof, customary registration rights and information rights in favor of Atkins Holdings LLC. Pursuant thereto, Atkins Holdings LLC will agree not to sell, transfer, pledge or otherwise dispose of its shares of common stock acquired in connection with the Business Combination for 180 days from the closing of the Business Combination. Atkins Holdings LLC will also have the right to nominate one director to serve on the board of directors of Simply Good Foods subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Investor Rights Agreement. See the section entitled “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — The Investor Rights Agreement with Atkins Holdings LLC.”

You will also be asked to consider and vote upon whether to adjourn the special meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies if, based upon the tabulated vote at the time of the special meeting, there are not sufficient votes to approve the Business Combination Proposal, which is referred to as the “Adjournment Proposal” or “Proposal No. 2.”

Each of these proposals is more fully described in this proxy statement/prospectus, which each stockholder is encouraged to review carefully.

Conyers Park common stock, units and warrants are currently listed on The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) under the symbols “CPAA,” “CPAA.U” and “CPAA.W,” respectively. Simply Good Foods has applied to list its common stock and warrants on NASDAQ under the symbols “SMPL” and “SMPL.W,” respectively, upon the closing of the Business Combination.

Pursuant to Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, the Company is providing Conyers Park public stockholders with the opportunity to redeem, upon the closing of the Business Combination, shares of the Conyers Park’s common stock then held by them for cash equal to their pro rata share of the aggregate amount on deposit (as of two business days prior to the closing of the Business Combination) in the Trust Account that holds the proceeds (including interest but less taxes payable and any interest that we may withdraw for working capital) of Conyers Park’s IPO. For illustrative purposes, based on funds in the Trust Account of approximately $403.1 million on March 31, 2017, $402.5 million of which Conyers Park intends to use for the purposes of consummating a business combination, the estimated per share redemption price would have been approximately $10.00, excluding the impact of up to $1,000,000 of interest income available to us for working capital requirements. Public stockholders may elect to redeem their shares even if they vote for the Business Combination Proposal. A public stockholder, together with any of his, her or its affiliates or any other person with whom it is acting in concert or as a “group” (as defined under Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), will be restricted from redeeming in the aggregate his, her or its shares or, if part of such a group, the group’s shares, in excess of 10% of the shares of common stock included in the units sold in Conyers Park’s IPO. Holders of Conyers Park’s outstanding public warrants do not have redemption rights in connection with the Business Combination. Sponsor, officers and directors have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to any shares of Conyers Park capital stock they may hold (“Founder Shares”) in connection with the consummation of the Business Combination, and the Founder Shares will be excluded from the pro rata calculation used to determine the per-share redemption price. Currently, Sponsor owns 20% of Parent’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock, including all of the Founder Shares. Sponsor, directors and officers have agreed to vote any shares of Conyers Park common stock owned by them in favor of the Business Combination Proposal.

Conyers Park is providing this proxy statement/prospectus and accompanying proxy card to Conyers Park stockholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies to be voted at the special meeting in lieu of the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders and at any adjournments or postponements of the special meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting, Conyers Park urges you to read this proxy statement/prospectus (and any documents incorporated into this proxy statement by reference) carefully. Please pay particular attention to the section entitled “Risk Factors.”

 

After careful consideration, the board of directors of Conyers Park has unanimously approved and adopted the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated therein and unanimously recommends that Conyers Park stockholders vote “FOR” adoption and approval of the Business Combination Proposal and “FOR” all other proposals presented to Conyers Park stockholders in this proxy statement/prospectus. When you consider the board of directors’ recommendation of these proposals, you should keep in mind that the directors and officers of Conyers Park have interests in the Business Combination that may conflict with your interests as a stockholder. See the section entitled “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — Interests of Certain Persons in the Business Combination.”

Approval of the Business Combination Proposal requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Conyers Park common stock that are voted at the special meeting. Approval of the Adjournment Proposal requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Conyers Park common stock represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote thereon at the special meeting. The board of directors and Selling Equityholders have already approved the Business Combination.

Each redemption of shares of Conyers Park common stock by Conyers Park public stockholders will decrease the amount in the Trust Account, which held total assets of approximately $403.1 million as of March 31, 2017, $402.5 million of which Conyers Park intends to use for the purposes of consummating a business combination within the time period described in this proxy statement/prospectus, with approximately $14.1 million in deferred underwriting commissions to the underwriters of Conyers Park’s IPO. In no event will Conyers Park redeem public shares in an amount that would cause the net tangible assets of Conyers Park to be less than $5,000,001.

Your vote is very important. If you are a registered stockholder, please vote your shares as soon as possible to ensure that your vote is counted, regardless of whether you expect to attend the special meeting in person, by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided. If you hold your shares in “street name” through a bank, broker or other nominee, you will need to follow the instructions provided to you by your bank, broker or other nominee to ensure that your shares are represented and voted at the special meeting. The transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement will be consummated only if the Business Combination Proposal is approved at the special meeting. Unless waived by the parties to the Merger Agreement, the closing of the Business Combination is conditioned upon the approval of the Business Combination Proposal at the special meeting. The Adjournment Proposal is not conditioned on the approval of any other proposal set forth in this proxy statement/prospectus.

If you sign, date and return your proxy card without indicating how you wish to vote, your proxy will be voted “FOR” each of the proposals presented at the special meeting. If you fail to return your proxy card or fail to submit your proxy by telephone or over the Internet, or fail to instruct your bank, broker or other nominee how to vote, and do not attend the special meeting in person, the effect will be that your shares will not be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the special meeting and, if a quorum is present, will have no effect on the proposals. If you are a stockholder of record and you attend the special meeting and wish to vote in person, you may withdraw your proxy and vote in person.

TO EXERCISE YOUR REDEMPTION RIGHTS, YOU MUST AFFIRMATIVELY VOTE EITHER “FOR” OR “AGAINST” THE BUSINESS COMBINATION PROPOSAL AND DEMAND THAT CONYERS PARK REDEEM YOUR SHARES FOR A PRO RATA PORTION OF THE FUNDS HELD IN THE TRUST ACCOUNT AND TENDER YOUR SHARES TO CONYERS PARK’S TRANSFER AGENT AT LEAST TWO BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE VOTE AT SUCH MEETING. YOU MAY TENDER YOUR SHARES BY EITHER DELIVERING YOUR SHARE CERTIFICATE TO THE TRANSFER AGENT OR BY DELIVERING YOUR SHARES ELECTRONICALLY USING DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY’S DWAC (DEPOSIT WITHDRAWAL AT CUSTODIAN) SYSTEM. IF THE BUSINESS COMBINATION IS NOT COMPLETED, THEN THESE SHARES WILL NOT BE REDEEMED FOR CASH. IF YOU HOLD THE SHARES IN STREET NAME, YOU WILL NEED TO INSTRUCT THE ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE AT YOUR BANK OR BROKER TO WITHDRAW THE SHARES FROM YOUR ACCOUNT IN ORDER TO EXERCISE YOUR REDEMPTION RIGHTS.

 

On behalf of the Conyers Park board of directors, I would like to thank you for your support and look forward to the successful completion of the Business Combination.

		Sincerely,
June 15, 2017
		James M. Kilts
		Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors

NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES REGULATORY AGENCY HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED THE TRANSACTIONS DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS, PASSED UPON THE MERITS OR FAIRNESS OF THE BUSINESS COMBINATION OR RELATED TRANSACTIONS OR PASSED UPON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THE DISCLOSURE IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY CONSTITUTES A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

This proxy statement/prospectus is dated June 15, 2017 and is first being mailed to stockholders on or about June 15, 2017.

 

CONYERS PARK ACQUISITION CORP.
1 Greenwich Office Park, 2nd Floor
Greenwich, CT 06831

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING IN LIEU OF 2017 ANNUAL MEETING
OF STOCKHOLDERS OF CONYERS PARK ACQUISITION CORP.

To Be Held on July 5, 2017

To the Stockholders of Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting in lieu of the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, referred to as the “special meeting,” of Conyers Park Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation, which is referred to as “Parent,” “Conyers Park” or the “Company,” will be held on July 5, 2017, at 11:00 a.m., Eastern time, to be held at the offices of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, located at 601 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10022. You are cordially invited to attend the special meeting for the following purposes:

1.       The Business Combination Proposal — to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve and adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 10, 2017, as it may be amended from time to time, which is referred to as the “Merger Agreement,” a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex A, pursuant to which (a) Conyers Park Merger Sub, Inc., (“Parent Merger Sub”) a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Simply Good Foods Company (“Simply Good Foods”), will merge with and into Parent with Parent surviving such merger (the “Parent Merger”), and (b) immediately after the Parent Merger, Conyers Park Merger Sub 1, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Simply Good Foods (“Atkins Merger Sub,” together with Parent Merger Sub, the “Merger Subs”), will merge with and into NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. (“Atkins”), with Atkins surviving such merger (the “Atkins Merger,” and together with the Parent Merger, the “Business Combination”), as a result of which Parent and Atkins will become wholly-owned subsidiaries of Simply Good Foods (this proposal is referred to herein as the “Business Combination Proposal” or “Proposal No. 1”); and

2.       The Adjournment Proposal — to consider and vote upon a proposal to adjourn the special meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies if there are insufficient votes for, or otherwise in connection with, the approval of the Business Combination Proposal (this proposal is referred to herein as the “Adjournment Proposal” or “Proposal No. 2”).

Only holders of record of Conyers Park common stock at the close of business on May 26, 2017 are entitled to notice of the special meeting and to vote at the special meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the special meeting. A complete list of Conyers Park stockholders of record entitled to vote at the special meeting will be available for ten days before the special meeting at the principal executive offices of Conyers Park for inspection by stockholders during ordinary business hours for any purpose germane to the special meeting.

Pursuant to Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, Conyers Park will provide holders of its public shares with the opportunity to redeem their shares of Conyers Park common stock for cash equal to their pro rata share of the aggregate amount on deposit in the trust account, which is referred to as the “Trust Account,” which holds the proceeds of Conyers Park’s IPO as of two business days prior to the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Proposal (less taxes payable and any interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to Conyers Park to pay up to $1,000,000 of the Company’s working capital requirements) upon the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement. For illustrative purposes, based on funds in the Trust Account of approximately $403.1 million on March 31, 2017, $402.5 million of which Conyers Park intends to use for the purposes of consummating a business combination, the estimated per share redemption price would have been approximately $10.00, excluding the impact of up to $1,000,000 of interest income available to us for working capital requirements. Public stockholders may elect to redeem their shares even if they vote for the Business Combination Proposal. A public stockholder, together with any of his, her or its affiliates or any other person with whom it is acting in concert or as a “group” (as defined under Section 13 of the Exchange Act), will be restricted from redeeming his, her or its shares with respect to more than an aggregate of 10% of the public shares. The holders of Conyers Park shares issued prior to its initial public offering (“Founder Shares”) have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to their Founder Shares and any other shares they may hold in connection with the consummation of the Business Combination, and the Founder Shares will be excluded from the pro rata calculation used to determine the per-share

 

redemption price. Currently, Conyers Park Sponsor LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Sponsor”), certain of its affiliates and Conyers Park’s independent directors and officers own approximately 20% of the issued and outstanding shares of Conyers Park common stock, consisting of all of the Founder Shares. Sponsor and other founders have agreed to vote any shares of Conyers Park common stock owned by them in favor of the Merger Agreement.

Approval of the Business Combination Proposal requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Conyers Park common stock that are voted at the special meeting. Approval of the Adjournment Proposal requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Conyers Park common stock represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote thereon at the special meeting. The board of directors and Selling Equityholders have already approved the Business Combination.

As of March 31, 2017, there was approximately $403.1 million in the Trust Account, $402.5 million of which Conyers Park intends to use for the purposes of consummating a business combination within the time period described in this proxy statement/prospectus, with approximately $14.1 million in deferred underwriting commissions to the underwriters of Conyers Park’s IPO. Each redemption of shares of Conyers Park common stock by its public stockholders will decrease the amount in the Trust Account. In no event, however, will Conyers Park redeem public shares in an amount that would cause its net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001.

Your attention is directed to the proxy statement/prospectus accompanying this notice (including the annexes thereto) for a more complete description of the proposed Business Combination and related transactions and each of the proposals. We encourage you to read this proxy statement/prospectus carefully. If you have any questions or need assistance voting your shares, please call us at (212) 429-2211.

		By Order of the Board of Directors,
June 15, 2017
		James M. Kilts
		Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY TERM SHEET		1
FREQUENTLY USED TERMS		3
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROPOSALS FOR STOCKHOLDERS		5
SUMMARY OF THE PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS		15
SUMMARY HISTORICAL AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF ATKINS		24
SUMMARY HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF THE COMPANY		26
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS		27
RISK FACTORS		29
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION		57
COMPARATIVE SHARE INFORMATION		70
SPECIAL MEETING IN LIEU OF 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF COMPANY STOCKHOLDERS		71
PROPOSAL NO. 1 — APPROVAL OF THE BUSINESS COMBINATION		76
PROPOSAL NO. 2 — THE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL		104
INFORMATION ABOUT PARENT		105
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF THE COMPANY		118
THE COMPANY’S MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS		119
INFORMATION ABOUT ATKINS		124
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF ATKINS		144
ATKINS’ MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS		145
MANAGEMENT AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS AFTER THE BUSINESS COMBINATION		163
DESCRIPTION OF PARENT SECURITIES		170
DESCRIPTION OF THE SIMPLY GOOD FOODS COMPANY’S SECURITIES		181
COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS OF CONYERS PARK AND SIMPLY GOOD FOODS		184
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES		193
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS		196
PRICE RANGE OF SECURITIES AND DIVIDENDS		199
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM		200
APPRAISAL RIGHTS		200
LEGAL MATTERS		200
EXPERTS		200
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR		200
SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS		200
FUTURE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS		200
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION		201
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		F-1

Annexes

Annex A — Agreement and Plan of Merger

Annex B — Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of The Simply Good Foods Company

Annex C — Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of The Simply Good Foods Company

Annex D — Investor Rights Agreement between The Simply Good Foods Company and Conyers Park Sponsor LLC

Annex E — Investor Rights Agreement among The Simply Good Foods Company, Conyers Park Sponsor LLC and Atkins Holdings LLC

i

SUMMARY TERM SHEET

This Summary Term Sheet, together with the sections entitled “Questions and Answers About the Proposals for Stockholders” and “Summary of the Proxy Statement/Prospectus,” summarize certain information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus, but do not contain all of the information that is important to you. You should read carefully this entire proxy statement/prospectus, including the attached annexes, for a more complete understanding of the matters to be considered at the Special Meeting. In addition, for definitions of terms commonly used throughout this proxy statement/prospectus, including this Summary Term Sheet, see the section entitled “Frequently Used Terms.”

•         Conyers Park is a special purpose acquisition company formed for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses. There currently are 40,250,000 shares of Conyers Park’s Class A common stock issued and outstanding and 10,062,500 shares of Class B common stock that were issued to Sponsor prior to Conyers Park’s IPO (of which 100,000 shares were subsequently transferred to the independent directors of Conyers Park). In addition, there currently are 20,116,667 warrants of Conyers Park outstanding, consisting of 13,416,667 public warrants originally sold as part of units in Conyers Park’s IPO and 6,700,000 private placement warrants sold to Sponsor in a private placement simultaneously with the consummation of Conyers Park’s IPO. Each warrant entitles its holder to purchase one share of Conyers Park Class A common stock at an exercise price of $11.50 per share. The public warrants will become exercisable on the later of 30 days after the completion of Conyers Park’s initial business combination or 12 months from the consummation of Conyers Park’s IPO, and expire at 5:00 p.m., New York time, five years after the completion of Conyers Park’s initial business combination or earlier upon redemption or liquidation. For the purposes of Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and the warrant agreement governing Conyers Park’s outstanding warrants, the Business Combination constitutes a “business combination.” Once the warrants become exercisable, Conyers Park may redeem the outstanding public warrants at a price of $0.01 per warrant, if the last sale price of our common stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading day period ending on the third business day before Conyers Park sends the notice of redemption to the public warrant holders. The private placement warrants, however, are non-redeemable so long as they are held by Sponsor or its permitted transferees. For more information about Conyers Park and its securities, see the sections entitled “Information About Parent,” “The Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Description of Parent Securities.”

•         Atkins is a growing developer, marketer and seller of branded nutritional foods and snacking products, whose product portfolio consists primarily of nutrition bars, ready-to-drink (“RTD”) shakes, snacks and confectionery products marketed under the Atkins®, SimplyProtein®, Atkins Harvest Trail, Atkins Endulge® and Atkins Lift brand names. For more information about Atkins, see the sections entitled “Information About Atkins” and “Atkins’ Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

•         The management and board of directors of Conyers Park considered various factors in determining whether to approve the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including, among other things, that the Atkins brand is in alignment with consumer mega trends, Atkins’ proven track record of growth, and its experienced and proven management team. For more information about Conyers Park’s decision-making process, see the section entitled “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — The Company’s Board of Directors’ Reasons for the Approval of the Business Combination.”

•         Pursuant to Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, holders of its public shares may elect to have their Class A common stock redeemed for cash at $10.00 per share. Such a holder will be entitled to receive cash for its public shares only if it properly demands redemption and delivers its shares (either physically or electronically) to Conyers Park’s transfer agent at least two business days prior to the Special Meeting. Please see the section entitled “Special Meeting in Lieu of 2017 Annual Meeting of Company Stockholders — Redemption Rights.”

1

•         In addition to voting on the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the transactions contemplated thereunder, including the Business Combination, at the Special Meeting, the stockholders of Conyers Park will be asked to vote on:

•         a proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting to a later date, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies in the event that there are insufficient votes for, or otherwise in connection with, the approval of the Business Combination Proposal (Proposal No. 2). Please see the section entitled “Proposal No. 2 — The Adjournment Proposal.”

•         The proposed Business Combination involves numerous risks. For more information about these risks, please see the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 29.

•         In considering the recommendation of the Conyers Park board of directors to vote for the proposals presented at the Special Meeting, including the Business Combination Proposal, you should be aware that aside from their interests as stockholders, Sponsor and certain members of its board of directors and officers have interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of Conyers Park’s stockholders generally. The Company’s board of directors was aware of and considered these interests, among other matters, in evaluating and negotiating the Business Combination and transaction agreements and in recommending to its stockholders that they vote in favor of the proposals presented at the Special Meeting, including the Business Combination Proposal. Stockholders should take these interests into account in deciding whether to approve the proposals presented at the Special Meeting, including the Business Combination Proposal. These interests include, among other things:

•         the continued right of Sponsor to hold Simply Good Foods common stock;

•         the fact that Sponsor paid an aggregate of $10,050,000 for its private placement warrants at the time of Conyers Park’s IPO and such securities will expire worthless if an initial business combination is not consummated by July 20, 2018;

•         the fact that Sponsor has agreed not to redeem any of its Founder Shares in connection with a stockholder vote to approve a proposed initial business combination;

•         the fact that Sponsor paid an aggregate of $25,000 for its Founder Shares and such securities will have a significantly higher value at the time of the Business Combination;

•         if the Trust Account is liquidated, including in the event Conyers Park is unable to complete an initial business combination within the required time period, Sponsor has agreed to indemnify Conyers Park to ensure that the proceeds in the Trust Account are not reduced below $10.00 per public share, or such lesser per public share amount as is in the Trust Account on the liquidation date, by the claims of prospective target businesses with which Conyers Park has entered into an acquisition agreement or claims of any third party for services rendered or products sold to Conyers Park, but only if such a vendor or target business has not executed a waiver of any and all rights to seek access to the Trust Account;

•         the continuation of all seven of Conyers Park’s existing directors as directors of the post-combination company; and

•         the continued indemnification of Conyers Park’s existing directors and officers and the continuation of Conyers Park’s directors’ and officers’ liability insurance after the Business Combination.

2

FREQUENTLY USED TERMS

In this document:

“Agreement and Plan of Merger” or “Merger Agreement” refers to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 10, 2017, by and among Conyers Park Acquisition Corp., The Simply Good Foods Company, Conyers Park Parent Merger Sub Inc., Conyers Park Merger Sub 1, Inc., Conyers Park Merger Sub 2, Inc., Conyers Park Merger Sub 3, Inc., Conyers Park Merger Sub 4, Inc., NCP-ATK HOLDINGS, INC., Atkins Holdings LLC, solely in its capacity as the Majority Stockholder and, solely in its capacity as the Stockholders’ Representative, Roark Capital Acquisition.

“Atkins” refers to NCP-ATK HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation.

“Atkins Group Companies” refers to, collectively, Atkins and each of Atkins’ subsidiaries.

“Atkins Subsidiary” means any subsidiary of Atkins.

“Business Combination” refers to the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger.

“Business Combination Proposal” refers to the proposal to approve and adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger.

“Closing” refers to the consummation of the Business Combination.

“Code” refers to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

“Common Stock Private Placement” refers to the sale of shares of newly issued Conyers Park common stock in a private placement.

“Company Merger Sub 1” refers to Conyers Park Merger Sub 1, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intermediateco.

“Company Merger Sub 2” refers to Conyers Park Merger Sub 2, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Company Merger Sub 1.

“Company Merger Sub 3” refers to Conyers Park Merger Sub 3, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Company Merger Sub 2.

“Company Merger Sub 4” refers to Conyers Park Merger Sub 4, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Company Merger Sub 3.

“Company Surviving Subsidiary” refers to the surviving corporation in the merger with Company Merger Sub 1.

“Conyers Park” refers to Conyers Park Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation.

“DGCL” refers to the Delaware General Corporation Law.

“Equity Holders” means Atkins’ stockholders, option holders and warrant holders.

“Exchange Act” refers to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

“Intermediateco” refers to Atkins Intermediate Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly-owned subsidiary of Simply Good Foods.

“IRI” refers to Information Resources, Inc.

“Merger Subs” refers to, collectively, Company Merger Sub 1, Company Merger Sub 2, Company Merger Sub 3, Company Merger Sub 4 and Company Merger Sub 5.

“NASDAQ” refers to the Nasdaq Stock Market.

“Parent” refers to Conyers Park Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation.

3

“Parent Merger Sub” refers to Conyers Park Parent Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intermediateco.

“Parent Parties” means, collectively, the Merger Subs, together with Simply Good Foods, Parent and Parent Merger Sub.

“Roark Capital Acquisition” refers to Roark Capital Acquisition LLC, a Georgia limited liability company.

“Selling Equityholders” refers to holders of equity interests in Atkins as of the time immediately before the Business Combination.

“Simply Good Foods” refers to The Simply Good Foods Company, a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Conyers Park.

“Trust Account” refers to the trust account which holds the proceeds of Conyers Park’s initial public offering, and which has Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company as trustee.

“U.S. Multi-Outlet Retail Sales” means the dollar value of sales of Atkins products, as recorded at the register of groceries, drug stores, mass merchants and club stores, as reported by IRI (for the period from 2012 to present) and by Nielsen FDMx and Retail Link (for the period from 2008 to 2011).

4

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROPOSALS FOR STOCKHOLDERS

The following questions and answers briefly address some commonly asked questions about the proposals to be presented at the special meeting, including with respect to the proposed Business Combination. The following questions and answers do not include all the information that is important to our stockholders. Unless otherwise indicated, references in this Questions and Answers About the Proposals for Stockholders to “we,” “us” or “our” refer to The Simply Good Foods Company. References to the “Company” refer to Conyers Park Acquisition Corp. We urge stockholders to read carefully this entire proxy statement/prospectus, including the annexes and the other documents referred to herein.

Q:      Why am I receiving this proxy statement/prospectus?

A:      Conyers Park stockholders are being asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement, among other proposals. Conyers Park has entered into the Merger Agreement as a result of which Parent Merger Sub shall merge with and into Parent with Parent surviving such merger and immediately after the Parent Merger, Atkins Merger Sub shall merge with and into Atkins, with Atkins surviving such merger, as a result of which Parent and Atkins will become wholly-owned subsidiaries of Simply Good Foods. We refer to these mergers collectively as the “Business Combination.” Subject to the terms of the Merger Agreement and customary adjustments set forth therein, the aggregate purchase price for the Business Combination and related transactions is expected to be approximately $730,125,000, of cash and equity consideration, which amount will be reduced by, among other things, the aggregate amount of funds used to repay certain debt obligations of Atkins as set forth in the Merger Agreement. We refer to such aggregate amount as the “Aggregate Purchase Price.” A copy of the Merger Agreement is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex A.

Conyers Park Class A common stock, units and warrants are currently listed on NASDAQ under the symbols “CPAA,” “CPAA.U” and “CPAA.W,” respectively. Simply Good Foods has applied to list its common stock and warrants on NASDAQ under the symbols “SMPL” and “SMPL.W,” respectively, upon the closing of the Business Combination.

This proxy statement/prospectus and its annexes contain important information about the proposed Business Combination and the other matters to be acted upon at the special meeting. You should read this proxy statement/prospectus and its annexes carefully and in their entirety.

Your vote is important. You are encouraged to submit your proxy as soon as possible after carefully reviewing this proxy statement/prospectus and its annexes.

Q:      What is being voted on at the special meeting?

A:      Below are proposals on which Conyers Park stockholders are being asked to vote.

1.       Business Combination Proposal — To approve and adopt the Business Combination and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; and

2.       Adjournment Proposal — To approve the adjournment of the special meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies in the event that there are insufficient votes for, or otherwise in connection with, the approval of the Business Combination Proposal. This proposal will only be presented at the special meeting if there are not sufficient votes to approve the Business Combination Proposal.

Q:      Are the proposals conditioned on one another?

A:      The Business Combination is conditioned on the approval of the Business Combination Proposal. The Adjournment Proposal is not conditioned on the approval of any other proposal set forth in this proxy statement/prospectus. It is important for you to note that in the event that the Business Combination Proposal does not receive the requisite vote for approval, then we will not consummate the Business Combination. If Conyers Park does not consummate the Business Combination and fails to complete an initial business combination by July 20, 2018, Conyers Park will be required to dissolve and liquidate its Trust Account by returning the then remaining funds in such account to its public stockholders.

5

Q:      Why is the Company providing stockholders with the opportunity to vote on the Business Combination?

A:      Under its current certificate of incorporation, Conyers Park must provide all holders of its public shares with the opportunity to have their public shares redeemed upon the consummation of Conyers Park’s initial business combination either in conjunction with a tender offer or in conjunction with a stockholder vote. For business and other reasons, Conyers Park has elected to provide its stockholders with the opportunity to have their public shares redeemed in connection with a stockholder vote rather than a tender offer. Therefore, Conyers Park is seeking to obtain the approval of its stockholders of the Business Combination Proposal in order to allow its public stockholders to effectuate redemptions of their public shares in connection with the closing of its Business Combination. It is also a condition in the Merger Agreement.

Q:      What will happen in the Business Combination?

A:      At the closing of the Business Combination, (i) Parent Merger Sub will merge with and into Parent, with Parent surviving such merger, as a result of which equity holders of Parent will receive shares of Simply Good Foods, and (ii) immediately after the Parent Merger, Company Merger Sub will merge with and into Atkins, with Atkins surviving such merger, as a result the Selling Equityholders will receive, among other things, shares of Simply Good Foods. Upon consummation of the Business Combination, Parent and Atkins will become wholly-owned subsidiaries of Simply Good Foods. In connection with the Business Combination, the cash held in the Trust Account, the proceeds from the Common Stock Private Placement and the proceeds of the Debt Financing will be used to repay existing debt of Atkins, to pay consideration to the Selling Equityholders, to pay certain fees and expenses in connection with the Business Combination, and for working capital and general corporate purposes. A copy of the Merger Agreement is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex A.

Q:      What equity stake will current stockholders of the Company and Selling Equityholders hold in the post-combination company after the closing?

A:      It is anticipated that, upon completion of the Business Combination, the Company’s public stockholders (other than the Common Stock Private Placement investors) will retain an ownership interest of approximately 57% in the post-combination company, the Common Stock Private Placement investors will own approximately 14% of the post-combination company (such that public stockholders, including Common Stock Private Placement investors, will own approximately 71% of the post-combination company), Sponsor will retain an ownership interest of approximately 14% in the post-combination company and the Selling Equityholders will own approximately 13% of the outstanding common stock of the post-combination company. The ownership percentage with respect to the post-combination company following the Business Combination does not take into account (i) the redemption of any shares by Conyers Park’s public stockholders, (ii) warrants to purchase common stock that may remain outstanding following the Business Combination or (iii) the issuance of any shares upon completion of the Business Combination under the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan, which is intended to be entered into following consummation of the Business Combination. If the actual facts are different than these assumptions (which they are likely to be), the percentage ownership retained by the Company’s existing stockholders in the post-combination company will be different.

See the section entitled “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information” for further information.

Q:      Will the Company obtain new financing in connection with the Business Combination?

A:      Yes. We have obtained a debt commitment letter from a syndicate of lenders to provide debt financing, which we refer to as the “Debt Financing,” to the post-combination company, consisting of a senior secured term loan in an aggregate principal amount of up to $300 million and a senior secured revolving facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $75 million. The proceeds of the Debt Financing are expected to be used to repay a portion of Atkins’ existing indebtedness and to pay certain fees and expenses in connection with the Business Combination, and for working capital and general corporate purposes.

6

Q:      What conditions must be satisfied to complete the Business Combination?

A:      There are a number of closing conditions in the Merger Agreement, including the approval by the stockholders of the Company of the Business Combination Proposal. For a summary of the conditions that must be satisfied or waived prior to completion of the Business Combination, see the section entitled “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — The Merger Agreement.”

Q:      Are there any arrangements to help ensure that the Company will have sufficient funds, together with the proceeds in its Trust Account and from the Debt Financing, to fund the Aggregate Purchase Price?

A:      Yes. In April 2017, the Company entered into subscription agreements with the investors named therein providing for the issuance by the Company of 10,000,000 shares of Conyers Park common stock at $10.00 per share in a private placement (subject to certain conditions, including the closing of the Business Combination) for gross proceeds to the Company of $100,000,000, which we refer to as the “Common Stock Private Placement.”

To the extent not utilized to consummate the Business Combination, the proceeds from the Trust Account, Debt Financing and Common Stock Private Placement will be used for general corporate purposes, including, but not limited to, working capital for operations, capital expenditures and future acquisitions. The Common Stock Private Placement is contingent upon stockholder approval, and the consummation, of the Business Combination.

The Subscription Agreements also provide that in the event the shares purchased in the Common Stock Private Placement are not registered in connection with the consummation of the Business Combination, Conyers Park agrees that it (or its successor) will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement registering such resale and use its commercially reasonable efforts to have the registration statement declared effective as soon as practicable.

Q:      What happens if I sell my shares of common stock before the special meeting?

A:      The record date for the special meeting is earlier than the date that the Business Combination is expected to be completed. If you transfer your shares of common stock after the record date, but before the special meeting, unless the transferee obtains from you a proxy to vote those shares, you will retain your right to vote at the special meeting. However, you will not be able to seek redemption of your shares because you will no longer be able to deliver them for cancellation upon consummation of the Business Combination. If you transfer your shares of common stock prior to the record date, you will have no right to vote those shares at the special meeting or redeem those shares for a pro rata portion of the proceeds held in our Trust Account.

Q:      What vote is required to approve the proposals presented at the special meeting?

A:      The approval of the Business Combination Proposal requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Conyers Park common stock that are voted at the special meeting. Accordingly, a Company stockholder’s failure to vote by proxy or to vote in person at the special meeting will not be counted towards the number of shares of common stock required to validly establish a quorum, and if a valid quorum is otherwise established, it will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the Business Combination Proposal. Abstentions will be counted in connection with the determination of whether a valid quorum is established and will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Business Combination Proposal.

The approval of the Adjournment Proposal requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Conyers Park common stock represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote thereon at the special meeting. Accordingly, a Company stockholder’s failure to vote by proxy or to vote in person at the special meeting will not be counted towards the number of shares of common stock required to validly establish a quorum, and if a valid quorum is otherwise established, it will have no effect on the outcome of any vote on the Adjournment Proposal. Abstentions will be counted in connection with the determination of whether a valid quorum is established and will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Adjournment Proposal.

7

Q:      May the Company, Sponsor or the Company’s directors, officers, advisors or their affiliates purchase shares in connection with the Business Combination?

A:      In connection with the stockholder vote to approve the proposed Business Combination, Sponsor, directors, officers or advisors or their respective affiliates may privately negotiate transactions to purchase shares from stockholders who would have otherwise elected to have their shares redeemed in conjunction with a proxy solicitation pursuant to the proxy rules for a per-share pro rata portion of the Trust Account. None of Conyers Park’s directors, officers or advisors or their respective affiliates will make any such purchases when they are in possession of any material non-public information not disclosed to the seller or during a restricted period under Regulation M under the Exchange Act. Such a purchase would include a contractual acknowledgement that such stockholder, although still the record holder of Conyers Park shares, is no longer the beneficial owner thereof and therefore agrees not to exercise its redemption rights, and could include a contractual provision that directs such stockholder to vote such shares in a manner directed by the purchaser. In the event that Sponsor, directors, officers or advisors or their affiliates purchase shares in privately negotiated transactions from public stockholders who have already elected to exercise their redemption rights, such selling stockholders would be required to revoke their prior elections to redeem their shares. Any such privately negotiated purchases may be effected at purchase prices that are below or in excess of the per-share pro rata portion of the Trust Account.

Q:      How many votes do I have at the special meeting?

A:      Conyers Park stockholders are entitled to one vote at the special meeting for each share of common stock held of record as of May 26, 2017, the record date for the special meeting. As of the close of business on the record date, there were 50,312,500 outstanding shares of Conyers Park common stock.

Q:      What constitutes a quorum at the special meeting?

A:      Holders of a majority in voting power of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, constitute a quorum. In the absence of a quorum, the chairman of the meeting has power to adjourn the special meeting. As of the record date for the special meeting, 25,156,251 shares of Conyers Park common stock would be required to achieve a quorum.

Q:      How will Sponsor, directors and officers vote?

A:      The Company’s initial stockholders have agreed to vote their Founder Shares, as well as any public shares purchased during or after Conyers Park’s IPO in favor of the initial business combination. Accordingly, if Conyers Park seeks stockholder approval of its initial business combination, it is more likely that the necessary stockholder approval will be received than would be the case if Conyers Park’s initial stockholders agreed to vote their Founder Shares in accordance with the majority of the votes cast by Conyers Park public stockholders.

Q:      What interests do the Company’s current officers and directors have in the Business Combination?

A:      Sponsor, members of Conyers Park’s board of directors and its executive officers have interests in the Business Combination that are different from or in addition to (and which may conflict with) your interest. These interests include:

•         the continued right of Sponsor to hold Simply Good Foods common stock;

•         the fact that Sponsor paid an aggregate of $10,050,000 for its private placement warrants at the time of Conyers Park’s IPO and such securities will expire worthless if an initial business combination is not consummated by July 20, 2018;

•         the fact that Sponsor has agreed not to redeem any of the Founder Shares in connection with a stockholder vote to approve a proposed initial business combination;

•         the fact that Sponsor paid an aggregate of $25,000 for its Founder Shares and such securities will have a significantly higher value at the time of the Business Combination;

8

•         if the Trust Account is liquidated, including in the event Conyers Park is unable to complete an initial business combination within the required time period, Sponsor has agreed to indemnify Conyers Park to ensure that the proceeds in the Trust Account are not reduced below $10.00 per public share, or such lesser per public share amount as is in the Trust Account on the liquidation date, by the claims of prospective target businesses with which Conyers Park has entered into an acquisition agreement or claims of any third party for services rendered or products sold to Conyers Park, but only if such a vendor or target business has not executed a waiver of any and all rights to seek access to the Trust Account;

•         the continuation of all seven of Conyers Park’s existing directors as directors of the post-combination company; and

•         the continued indemnification of Conyers Park’s existing directors and officers and the continuation of Conyers Park’s directors’ and officers’ liability insurance after the Business Combination.

These interests may influence Conyers Park’s directors in making their recommendation that you vote in favor of the approval of the Business Combination.

Q:      What happens if I vote against the Business Combination Proposal?

A:      Pursuant to Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, if the Business Combination Proposal is not approved and Conyers Park does not otherwise consummate an alternative business combination by July 20, 2018, Conyers Park will be required to dissolve and liquidate its Trust Account by returning the then remaining funds in such account to the public stockholders.

Q:      Do I have redemption rights?

A:      Pursuant to Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, holders of public shares may elect to have their shares redeemed for cash at the applicable redemption price per share calculated in accordance with Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation. As of March 31, 2017, based on funds in the Trust Account of approximately $403.1 million, $402.5 million of which Conyers Parks intends to use for the purposes of consummating a business combination, this would have amounted to approximately $10.00 per share, excluding the impact of up to $1,000,000 of interest income available to us for working capital requirements. If a holder exercises its redemption rights, then such holder will be exchanging its shares of Conyers Park common stock for cash and will no longer own shares of the Company. Such a holder will be entitled to receive cash for its public shares only if it properly demands redemption and delivers its shares (either physically or electronically) to Conyers Park’s transfer agent prior to the special meeting of stockholders. See the section entitled “Special Meeting in Lieu of 2017 Annual Meeting of Company Stockholders — Redemption Rights” for the procedures to be followed if you wish to redeem your shares for cash.

Q:      Will how I vote affect my ability to exercise redemption rights?

A:      No. You may exercise your redemption rights whether you vote your shares of common stock “FOR” or “AGAINST” the Business Combination Proposal or any other proposal described by this proxy statement/prospectus. As a result, the Merger Agreement can be approved by stockholders who will redeem their shares and no longer remain stockholders, leaving stockholders who choose not to redeem their shares holding shares in a company with a potentially less liquid trading market, fewer stockholders, potentially less cash and the potential inability to meet the listing standards of NASDAQ.

9

Q:      How do I exercise my redemption rights?

A:      In order to exercise your redemption rights, you must (i) affirmatively vote either “FOR” or “AGAINST” the Business Combination Proposal, (ii) check the box on the enclosed proxy card to elect redemption, and (iii) prior to 5:00 PM, Eastern time, on June 30, 2017 (two (2) business days before the special meeting), tender your shares physically or electronically and submit a request in writing that we redeem your public shares for cash to Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, our transfer agent, at the following address:

Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company
One State Street Plaza, 30th Floor
New York, New York 10004
Attn:    Mark Zimkind
E-mail:  mzimkind@continentalstock.com

Please check the box on the enclosed proxy card marked “Stockholder Certification” if you are not acting in concert or as a “group” (as defined in Section 13d-3 of the Exchange Act) with any other stockholder with respect to shares of common stock. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a holder of the public shares, together with any affiliate of his or any other person with whom he is acting in concert or as a “group” (as defined in Section 13d-3 of the Exchange Act) will be restricted from seeking redemption rights with respect to more than 10% of the shares of common stock included in the units sold in Conyers Park’s IPO, which we refer to as the “10% threshold.” Accordingly, all public shares in excess of the 10% threshold beneficially owned by a public stockholder or group will not be redeemed for cash.

Stockholders seeking to exercise their redemption rights and opting to deliver physical certificates should allot sufficient time to obtain physical certificates from the transfer agent and time to effect delivery. It is Conyers Park’s understanding that stockholders should generally allot at least two weeks to obtain physical certificates from the transfer agent. However, Conyers Park does not have any control over this process and it may take longer than two weeks. Stockholders who hold their shares in street name will have to coordinate with their bank, broker or other nominee to have the shares certificated or delivered electronically.

Any demand for redemption, once made, may be withdrawn at any time until the deadline for exercising redemption requests and thereafter, with Conyers Park’s consent, until the vote is taken with respect to the Business Combination. If you delivered your shares for redemption to Conyers Park’s transfer agent and decide within the required timeframe not to exercise your redemption rights, you may request that Conyers Park’s transfer agent return the shares (physically or electronically). You may make such request by contacting Conyers Park’s transfer agent at the phone number or address listed under the question “Who can help answer my questions?” below.

Q:      What are the U.S. federal income tax consequences of exercising my redemption rights?

A:      The U.S. federal income tax consequences of exercising your redemption rights depend on your particular facts and circumstances. See the section entitled “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations to Conyers Park Common Stockholders and Warrant Holders.” Conyers Park urges you to consult your tax advisor regarding the tax consequences of exercising your redemption rights.

Q:      What are the U.S. federal income tax consequences as a result of the Business Combination?

A:      It is anticipated that the Parent Merger will constitute a tax-deferred transaction pursuant to Section 351 or Section 368 of the Code, and that holders of Conyers Park common stock generally will not recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a result of the exchange of their Conyers Park common stock for Simply Good Foods common stock. You are strongly urged to consult with a tax advisor to determine the particular U.S. federal, state or local or foreign income or other tax consequences of the Business Combination to you. See the section entitled “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations to Conyers Park Common Stockholders and Warrant Holders” beginning on page 94.

10

Q:      If I am a Company warrant holder, can I exercise redemption rights with respect to my warrants?

A:      No. The holders of Conyers Park warrants have no redemption rights with respect to Conyers Park warrants.

Q:      Do I have appraisal rights if I object to the proposed Business Combination?

A:      No. There are no appraisal rights available to holders of common stock in connection with the Business Combination.

Q:      What happens to the funds held in the Trust Account upon consummation of the Business Combination?

A:      If the Business Combination is consummated, the funds held in the Trust Account will be released to pay (i) a portion of the Merger Consideration pursuant to the Merger Agreement, (ii) Company stockholders who properly exercise their redemption rights, (iii) up to $8,100,313 in deferred underwriting commissions to the underwriters of Conyers Park’s IPO in connection with the Business Combination (this reflects the waiver by Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. of the underwriting fee they were entitled to from Conyers Park’s IPO), (iv) certain other fees, costs and expenses (including regulatory fees, legal fees, accounting fees, printer fees, and other professional fees) that were incurred by the Company or Atkins in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Business Combination and pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, (v) certain permitted transaction expenses of Atkins, (vi) unpaid franchise and income taxes of the Company and (vii) for general corporate purposes including, but not limited to, working capital for operations, capital expenditures and future potential acquisitions.

Q:      What happens if the Business Combination is not consummated?

A:      There are certain circumstances under which the Merger Agreement may be terminated. See the section entitled “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — The Merger Agreement” for information regarding the parties’ specific termination rights.

If, as a result of the termination of the Merger Agreement or otherwise, Conyers Park is unable to complete the Business Combination or another initial business combination transaction by July 20, 2018, Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that it will (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible, subject to lawfully available funds therefor, redeem 100% of the public shares in consideration of a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (A) the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account, including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to it to pay up to $1,000,000 of the Company’s working capital requirements as well as to pay the Company’s franchise and income taxes (less up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), by (B) the total number of then outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish rights of the public stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidation distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemptions, subject to the approval of the remaining stockholders and the board of directors in accordance with applicable law, dissolve and liquidate, subject (in the case of (ii) and (iii) above) to its obligations under the DGCL to provide for claims of creditors and other requirements of applicable law.

Conyers Park expects that the amount of any distribution its public stockholders will be entitled to receive upon its dissolution will be approximately the same as the amount they would have received if they had redeemed their shares in connection with the Business Combination, subject in each case to Conyers Park’s obligations under the DGCL to provide for claims of creditors and other requirements of applicable law. Holders of Conyers Park’s Founder Shares have waived any right to any liquidation distribution with respect to those shares.

In the event of liquidation, there will be no distribution with respect to Conyers Park’s outstanding warrants. Accordingly, the warrants will expire worthless.

11

Q:      When is the Business Combination expected to be completed?

A:      The closing of the Business Combination is expected to take place (a) in June 2017 or (b) if later, the second business day following the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions described below under the section entitled “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — Structure of the Business Combination — Conditions to Closing of the Business Combination”; provided that if the marketing period under the Merger Agreement, which is referred to as the “Marketing Period,” has not ended at the time that the closing would otherwise have occurred, the closing will instead occur at (i) the earlier to occur of (A) any business day after such date during the Marketing Period to be specified by the Company to Atkins on no less than two (2) business days’ notice and (B) the first business day following the last day of the Marketing Period, provided that if the Marketing Period would otherwise be completed prior to the date on which the approval of the stockholders of the Company is obtained, then the Marketing Period shall be automatically extended to the date that is five (5) business days following the date of such approval or (ii) such other date as agreed to by the parties to the Merger Agreement in writing, in each case, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the closing conditions. The Merger Agreement may be terminated by either the Company or Atkins if the closing of the Business Combination has not occurred by August 21, 2017.

For a description of the conditions to the completion of the Business Combination, see the section entitled “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination.”

Q:      What do I need to do now?

A:      You are urged to read carefully and consider the information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus, including the annexes, and to consider how the Business Combination will affect you as a stockholder. You should then vote as soon as possible in accordance with the instructions provided in this proxy statement/prospectus and on the enclosed proxy card or, if you hold your shares through a brokerage firm, bank or other nominee, on the voting instruction form provided by the broker, bank or nominee.

Q:      How do I vote?

A:      If you were a holder of record of Conyers Park common stock on May 26, 2017, the record date for the special meeting, you may vote with respect to the proposals in person at the special meeting, or by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided. If you hold your shares in “street name,” which means your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee, you should follow the instructions provided by your broker, bank or nominee to ensure that votes related to the shares you beneficially own are properly counted. In this regard, you must provide the record holder of your shares with instructions on how to vote your shares or, if you wish to attend the special meeting and vote in person, obtain a proxy from your broker, bank or nominee.

Q:      What will happen if I abstain from voting or fail to vote at the special meeting?

A:      At the special meeting, Conyers Park will count a properly executed proxy marked “ABSTAIN” with respect to a particular proposal as present for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Business Combination Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal. Broker non-votes, while considered present for the purposes of establishing a quorum, will have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” the Business Combination Proposal, but will have no effect on the Adjournment Proposal. Additionally, if you abstain from voting or fail to vote at the special meeting, you will not be able to exercise your redemption rights (as described above).

Q:      What will happen if I sign and return my proxy card without indicating how I wish to vote?

A:      Signed and dated proxies received by Conyers Park without an indication of how the stockholder intends to vote on a proposal will be voted “FOR” each proposal presented to the stockholders. The proxyholders may use their discretion to vote on any other matters which properly come before the special meeting.

12

Q:      If I am not going to attend the special meeting in person, should I return my proxy card instead?

A:      Yes. Whether you plan to attend the special meeting or not, please read the enclosed proxy statement/prospectus carefully, and vote your shares by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided.

Q:      If my shares are held in “street name,” will my broker, bank or nominee automatically vote my shares for me?

A:      No. Under the rules of various national and regional securities exchanges, your broker, bank or nominee cannot vote your shares with respect to non-discretionary matters unless you provide instructions on how to vote in accordance with the information and procedures provided to you by your broker, bank or nominee. Conyers Park believes the proposals presented to the stockholders will be considered non-discretionary and therefore your broker, bank or nominee cannot vote your shares without your instruction. Your bank, broker or other nominee can vote your shares only if you provide instructions on how to vote. You should instruct your broker to vote your shares in accordance with directions you provide.

Q:      May I change my vote after I have mailed my signed proxy card?

A:      Yes. You may change your vote by sending a later-dated, signed proxy card to Conyers Park’s secretary at the address listed below so that it is received by Conyers Park’s secretary prior to the special meeting or attend the special meeting in person and vote. You also may revoke your proxy by sending a notice of revocation to Conyers Park’s secretary, which must be received by Conyers Park’s secretary prior to the special meeting.

Q:      What should I do if I receive more than one set of voting materials?

A:      You may receive more than one set of voting materials, including multiple copies of this proxy statement/prospectus and multiple proxy cards or voting instruction cards. For example, if you hold your shares in more than one brokerage account, you will receive a separate voting instruction card for each brokerage account in which you hold shares. If you are a holder of record and your shares are registered in more than one name, you will receive more than one proxy card. Please complete, sign, date and return each proxy card and voting instruction card that you receive in order to cast your vote with respect to all of your shares.

Q:      Who will solicit and pay the cost of soliciting proxies?

A:      The Company will pay the cost of soliciting proxies for the special meeting. The Company has engaged Morrow Sodail LLC to assist in the solicitation of proxies for the special meeting. The Company has agreed to pay Morrow Sodali LLC a fee of $22,500, plus disbursements. The Company will reimburse Morrow Sodali LLC for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and will indemnify Morrow Sodali LLC and its affiliates against certain claims, liabilities, losses, damages and expenses. The Company will also reimburse banks, brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries representing beneficial owners of shares of the Company’s common stock for their expenses in forwarding soliciting materials to beneficial owners of the Company’s common stock and in obtaining voting instructions from those owners. Our directors, officers and employees may also solicit proxies by telephone, by facsimile, by mail, on the Internet or in person. They will not be paid any additional amounts for soliciting proxies.

Q:      Who can help answer my questions?

A:      If you have questions about the proposals or if you need additional copies of this proxy statement/prospectus or the enclosed proxy card you should contact:

Brian Ratzan
Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
c/o Conyers Park Sponsor LLC
1 Greenwich Office Park, 2nd Floor
Greenwich, CT 06831
Tel: (212) 429-2211
E-mail: bratzan@centerviewcapital.com

13

You may also contact our proxy solicitor at:

Morrow Sodali LLC

470 West Avenue

Stamford, CT 06902

Individuals call toll-free: (800) 662-5200
Banks and brokerage, please call: (203) 658-9400
Email: CPAA.info@morrowsodali.com

To obtain timely delivery, Conyers Park stockholders must request the materials no later than five (5) business days prior to the special meeting.

You may also obtain additional information about Conyers Park from documents filed with the SEC by following the instructions in the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information.”

If you intend to seek redemption of your public shares, you will need to send a letter demanding redemption and deliver your stock (either physically or electronically) to Conyers Park’s transfer agent prior to the special meeting in accordance with the procedures detailed under the question “How do I exercise my redemption rights?” If you have questions regarding the certification of your position or delivery of your stock, please contact:

Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company
One State Street Plaza, 30th Floor
New York, New York 10004
Attn:    Mark Zimkind
E-mail:  mzimkind@continentalstock.com

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This proxy statement/prospectus contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements relate to expectations for future financial performance, business strategies or expectations for our business, and the timing and ability for Conyers Park and Atkins to complete the Business Combination. Specifically, forward-looking statements may include statements relating to:

•         the benefits of the Business Combination;

•         the future financial performance of the post-combination company following the Business Combination;

•         changes in the market for Atkins products;

•         expansion plans and opportunities; and

•         other statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “forecast,” “intend,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “seek,” “target” or similar expressions.

These forward-looking statements are based on information available as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, and current expectations, forecasts and assumptions, and involve a number of judgments, risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any subsequent date, and neither Conyers Park nor Atkins undertakes any obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date they were made, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.

You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements in deciding how to grant your proxy or instruct how your vote should be cast or vote your shares on the proposals set forth in this proxy statement/prospectus. As a result of a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties, our actual results or performance may be materially different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Some factors that could cause actual results to differ include, but are not limited to:

•         the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could delay the Business Combination or give rise to the termination of the Merger Agreement;

•         the outcome of any legal proceedings that may be instituted against Atkins or the Company following announcement of the proposed Business Combination and transactions contemplated thereby;

•         the inability to complete the transactions contemplated by the proposed Business Combination due to the failure to obtain approval of the stockholders of the Company, or other conditions to closing in the Merger Agreement;

•         the inability to obtain or maintain the listing of the post-combination Company’s common stock on NASDAQ following the Business Combination;

•         the risk that the proposed Business Combination disrupts current plans and operations as a result of the announcement and consummation of the transactions described herein;

•         the ability to recognize the anticipated benefits of the Business Combination, which may be affected by, among other things, competition, the ability to integrate the Atkins and the Company businesses, and the ability of the combined business to grow and manage growth profitably;

•         costs related to the Business Combination;

•         changes in applicable laws or regulations;

•         the possibility that Atkins or the Company may be adversely affected by other economic, business, and/or competitive factors; and

•         other risks and uncertainties indicated in this proxy statement/prospectus, including those set forth under the section entitled “Risk Factors.”

27

Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Neither Conyers Park nor Atkins undertakes any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.

Before you grant your proxy or instruct how your vote should be cast or voted on the proposals set forth in this proxy statement/prospectus, you should be aware that the occurrence of the events described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus could have a material adverse effect on Conyers Park or Atkins.

28

RISK FACTORS

By voting in favor of Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination, you will be choosing to invest in shares of Simply Good Foods’ common stock. An investment in Simply Good Foods’ common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before you vote, you should carefully consider the risks described below, those described in the section entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” beginning on page 27 of this proxy statement/prospectus and the other information contained herein.

Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, references to “the combined company,” “we,” “our,” “us” and other similar terms refer to The Simply Good Foods Company and its consolidated subsidiaries after giving effect to the Business Combination. References to the “Company” refer to Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.

Risks Related to Atkins’ Operations

Atkins may not be able to compete successfully in the highly competitive nutritional snacking industry.

The market for nutritious snacking is large and intensely competitive because consumers are seeking simpler, “cleaner” and more sustainable eating habits. Atkins’ business is committed to providing people a more nutritious way to eat. As a result, Atkins competes in the nutritional snacking industry, a subcategory of the general snack foods industry. Competitive factors in the nutritional snacking industry include product quality and taste, brand awareness among consumers, nutritional content, simpler and less processed ingredients, innovation of “on-trend” snacks, variety of snacks offered, grocery aisle placement, access to retailer shelf space, price, advertising and promotion, product packaging and package design. Atkins competes in this market against numerous multinational, regional and local companies principally on the basis of its low-carb, low-sugar and protein-rich nutritional content, product taste and quality, its brand recognition and loyalty, marketing, advertising, price and the ability to satisfy specific consumer dietary needs. An increasing focus on healthy and simpler products in the marketplace will likely increase these competitive pressures within the category in future periods.

Atkins’ competitors in the nutritional snacking industry also include companies selling branded weight loss programs who support these programs by offering a wide variety of diet foods and meal replacement bars and shakes and nutritional supplements, and through the promotion of weight loss and weight management approaches such as paleo, vegan, gluten free, vegetarian and others. Views towards nutritional snacking, weight loss and management, and other nutritional approaches, are cyclical and trendy in nature, with constantly changing consumer perceptions. In addition to remaining competitive through the quality of its products, consumer perceptions of Atkins’ weight management approach and the effectiveness of a low-carb, low-sugar and protein-rich diet must continue to be viewed favorably, or Atkins’ business and reputation may be adversely affected. If other weight management approaches become more popular, or generally perceived to be more effective than Atkins’, Atkins may be unable to compete effectively. Some of Atkins’ competitors have substantially greater financial and other resources than Atkins and sell brands that may be more widely recognized than Atkins’ brands. Atkins’ current and potential competitors may offer products similar to its products or a wider range of products than Atkins offers, and may offer such products at more competitive prices than Atkins does. Local or regional markets often have significant smaller competitors, many of whom offer products similar to Atkins’ and may have unique ties to regional or national retail chains. Any increased competition from new entrants into the nutritional snacking industry or any increased success by existing competition could result in reductions in Atkins’ sales, require Atkins to reduce its prices, or both, which could adversely affect Atkins’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

If Atkins does not continually enhance its brand recognition, increase distribution of its products, attract new customers to its brands and introduce new and innovative products, either on a timely basis or at all, its business may suffer.

The nutritional snacking industry is subject to rapid and frequent changes in consumer demands. Because consumers in this industry are constantly seeking new products and strategies to achieve their healthy eating goals, Atkins’ success relies heavily on its ability to continue to develop and market new and innovative products and extensions. New product sales represent a growing and important portion of its net sales. In order to respond to new and evolving consumer demands, achieve market acceptance and keep pace with new nutritional, weight management, technological and other developments, Atkins must constantly introduce new and innovative products into the market, some of which may be sent to market prematurely and may not be consistent with its quality and

29

taste standards. Accordingly, Atkins may not be successful in developing, introducing on a timely basis or marketing any new or enhanced products. If Atkins is unable to commercialize new products, its revenue may not grow as expected, which would adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Atkins’ growth may be limited if it is unable to add additional shelf or retail space for its products.

Atkins’ results will depend on its ability to drive revenue growth, in part, by expanding the distribution channels for its products. However, Atkins’ ability to do so may be limited by an inability to secure additional shelf or retail space for its products. Shelf and retail space for nutritional snacks is limited and subject to competitive and other pressures, and there can be no assurance that retail operators will provide sufficient shelf space nor that online retailers will provide Atkins online access to their platform to enable Atkins to meet its growth objectives.

Changes in consumer preferences, perceptions of healthy food products and discretionary spending may negatively impact Atkins’ brand loyalty and net sales, and adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Atkins focuses on products that are, or that Atkins believes are, perceived to have positive effects on health, and compete in a market that relies on innovation and evolving consumer preferences. However, the processed food industry, and the nutritional snacking industry in particular, are subject to changing consumer trends, demands and preferences. Emerging science, Atkins’ nutritional approach and theories regarding health are constantly evolving. Therefore, products or methods of eating once considered healthy may over time become disfavored by consumers or no longer be perceived as healthy. Trends within the food industry change often and Atkins’ failure to anticipate, identify or react to changes in these trends could, among other things, lead to reduced consumer demand and price reductions, and could adversely impact Atkins’ business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, certain ingredients used in Atkins’ products may become negatively perceived by consumers, resulting in reformulation of existing products to remove such ingredients, which may negatively affect taste or other qualities. Factors that may affect consumer perception of healthy products include dietary trends and attention to different nutritional aspects of foods, concerns regarding the health effects of specific ingredients and nutrients, trends away from specific ingredients in products and increasing awareness of the environmental and social effects of product production. Consumer perceptions of the nutritional profile of low-carb, low-sugar and protein-rich eating practices and products may shift, and consumers may no longer perceive food products with fewer carbohydrates, higher levels of protein, higher levels of fat and additional fiber as healthy. Approaches regarding weight management and healthy lifestyles are the subject of numerous studies and publications, often with differentiating views and opinions, some of which may be adverse to Atkins. Conflicting scientific information on what constitutes good nutrition, diet fads and other weight loss trends may also adversely affect Atkins’ business from time to time. Atkins’ success depends, in part, on its ability to anticipate the tastes and dietary habits of consumers and other consumer trends and to offer products that appeal to their needs and preferences on a timely and affordable basis. A change in consumer discretionary spending, due to economic downturn or other reasons may also adversely affect Atkins’ sales, and its business, financial condition and results of operations.

If Atkins’ brands or reputation are damaged, the attractive characteristics that it offers its consumers, distributors and retailers may diminish, which could adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Atkins believes it has built its reputation on the efficacy of its nutritional approach, as well as the high quality flavor and nutritional content of its food, and it must protect and grow the value of its brands to continue to be successful in the future. Any incident that erodes consumer affinity for Atkins’ brands could significantly reduce its value and damage its business. For example, negative third-party reports regarding the Atkins nutritional approach, whether accurate or not, may adversely impact consumer perceptions. Atkins’ brand value could suffer and its business could be adversely affected if its consumers perceive a reduction in the effectiveness of its nutritional approach or the quality of its food. In addition, if Atkins is forced, or voluntarily elects, to recall certain products, including frozen foods or other licensed products over which Atkins may not have full quality control, the public perception of the quality of its food may be diminished. Atkins may also be adversely affected by news reports or other negative publicity, regardless of their accuracy, regarding other aspects of its business, such as public health concerns, illness, safety, security breaches of confidential consumer or employee information, employee related claims relating to alleged employment discrimination, health care and benefit issues or government or industry findings concerning its retailers, distributors, manufacturers or others across the food industry supply chain.

30

In addition, as part of Atkins’ marketing initiatives, Atkins has entered into agreements with certain public figures to market and endorse its products on both a national and local level. While Atkins maintains specific selection criteria and are diligent in our efforts to seek out public figures that resonate genuinely and effectively with our consumer audience, the individuals it chooses to market and endorse its products may fall into negative favor with the general public. Because Atkins’ consumers may associate the public figures that market and endorse its products with Atkins, any negative publicity on behalf of such individuals may result in negative publicity about Atkins and its products. This negative publicity could adversely affect Atkins’ brand and reputation as well as its revenue and profits.

Also, there has been a marked increase in the use of social media platforms and similar channels, including weblogs (blogs), websites and other forms of internet-based communications that provide individuals with access to a broad audience of consumers and other interested persons. The availability of information on social media platforms is virtually immediate as is its impact. Many social media platforms immediately publish the content their subscribers and participants post, often without filters or checks on accuracy of the content posted. The opportunity for dissemination of information, including inaccurate information, is seemingly limitless. Information concerning Atkins’ business and/or products may be posted on such platforms at any time. Negative views regarding its products and the efficacy of a low-carb, low-sugar and protein-rich diet approach have been posted on various social media platforms, and may continue to be posted in the future, which Atkins cannot control. Regardless of their accuracy or authenticity, such information and views may be adverse to Atkins’ interests, which may harm Atkins’ reputation and brand. The harm may be immediate without affording Atkins an opportunity for redress or correction.

Ultimately, the risks associated with any such negative publicity cannot be eliminated or completely mitigated and may adversely affect Atkins business, financial condition and results of operations.

Atkins must expend resources to maintain consumer awareness of its brands, build brand loyalty and generate interest in its products.

Atkins believes that the Atkins nutritional approach is broadly known and followed in the United States and in many of the other countries in which it operates. In order to remain competitive and to expand and keep shelf placement for its products, Atkins may need to increase its marketing and advertising spending in order to maintain and increase consumer awareness, protect and grow its existing market share or to promote new products, which could impact its operating results. Substantial advertising and promotional expenditures may be required to maintain or improve its brand’s market position or to introduce new products to the market, and participants in Atkins’ industry are engaging with non-traditional media, including consumer outreach through social media and web-based channels. An increase in Atkins’ marketing and advertising efforts may not maintain its current reputation, or lead to an increase in brand awareness. Moreover, Atkins may be unable to maintain current awareness of its brand due to fragmentation of its marketing efforts as it continues to focus on a low-carb, low-sugar and protein-rich nutritional approach for everyday snacking consumers. In addition, Atkins consistently evaluates its product lines to determine whether or not to discontinue certain products. Discontinuing product lines may increase Atkins’ profitability but could reduce its sales and hurt its brands, and a reduction in sales of certain products could result in a reduction in sales of other products. The discontinuation of product lines may have an adverse effect on Atkins’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, unattractive shelf placement and pricing may put Atkins’ products at a disadvantage to those of its competitors. Even if Atkins obtains shelf space or preferable shelf placement, Atkins’ new and existing products may fail to achieve the sales expectations set by its retailers, potentially causing these retailers to remove its products from their shelves. Additionally, an increase in the quantity and quality of private-label products in the product categories in which Atkins compete could create more pressure for shelf space and placement for branded products within each such category, which could adversely affect Atkins’ sales.

Atkins may not be successful in implementing its growth strategies, including expanding its emphasis on a low-carb, low-sugar and protein-rich healthy lifestyle, while maintaining the traditional identity of its brands and the loyalty of its consumers.

Atkins’ future success depends in large part on its ability to implement its growth strategies effectively. In the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, Atkins transitioned from a single- to multi-brand portfolio with the addition of its nutritional snacking platform, and it expects to focus on nutritional snacking in the future. As a multi-brand business, Atkins faces increased complexities and greater uncertainty with respect to consumer trends and demands

31

than as a single-brand business. Atkins’ ability to successfully expand Atkins’ nutritional snacking brands and other growth strategies depends, among other things, on its ability to identify, and successfully cater to, new demographics and consumer trends, develop new and innovative products, identify and acquire additional product lines and businesses, secure shelf space in grocery stores, wholesale clubs and other retailers, increase consumer awareness of its brands, enter into distribution and other strategic arrangements with third-party retailers and other potential distributors of its products and compete with numerous other companies and products. In addition, self-directed lifestyle consumers of its nutritional snacking products may have different preferences and spending habits than the consumers of traditional weight loss products, and Atkins may not be successful in reaching and maintaining the loyalty of new consumers to the same extent, or at all, as it has with its historical consumers. Traditional weight management consumers actively on the Atkins program represent approximately 15% of Atkins’ current consumer base whereas the remaining 85% of Atkins’ consumers are not currently on a program diet. Furthermore, Atkins may not be successful in evolving its advertising and other efforts to appeal to both its branded weight loss consumers and self-directed healthy lifestyle consumers. If Atkins is unable to identify and capture new audiences and demographics, its ability to successfully integrate additional brands will be adversely affected. Accordingly, Atkins may not be able to successfully implement its growth strategies, expand its brands, or continue to maintain growth in its sales at its current rate, or at all. If Atkins fails to implement its growth strategies, its sales and profitability may be negatively impacted, which would adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Atkins intends to grow through acquisitions or joint ventures and it may not successfully integrate, operate or realize the anticipated benefits of such business combinations.

As part of its strategic initiatives, Atkins intends to pursue selected acquisitions or joint ventures, such as its acquisition of Wellness Foods, Inc., including its SimplyProtein® brand, in 2016. Atkins’ acquisition strategy is based on identifying and acquiring brands with products that complement its existing products and identifying and acquiring brands in new categories and in new geographies for the purpose of expanding its platform of nutritional snacks and potentially other food products. However, although Atkins regularly evaluates multiple acquisition candidates, it cannot be certain that it will be able to successfully identify suitable acquisition candidates, negotiate acquisitions of identified candidates on favorable terms, or integrate acquisitions that it completes.

Acquisitions involve numerous risks and uncertainties, including intense competition for suitable acquisition targets, which could increase target prices and/or adversely affect our ability to consummate deals on favorable or acceptable terms, the potential unavailability of financial resources necessary to consummate acquisitions in the future, the risk that Atkins improperly value and price a target, the potential inability to identify all of the risks and liabilities inherent in a target company notwithstanding its diligence efforts, the diversion of management’s attention from the operations of its business and strain on its existing personnel, increased leverage due to additional debt financing that may be required to complete an acquisition, dilution of the net current book value per share if Atkins issues additional equity securities to finance an acquisition, difficulties in identifying suitable acquisition targets or in completing any transactions identified on sufficiently favorable terms and the need to obtain regulatory or other governmental approvals that may be necessary to complete acquisitions.

In addition, any future acquisitions may pose risks associated with entry into new geographic markets, including outside the United States and Atkins’ current international markets, distribution channels, lines of business or product categories, where Atkins may not have significant prior experience and where it may not be as successful or profitable as it is in businesses and geographic regions where it has greater familiarity and brand recognition. Potential acquisitions may also entail significant transaction costs and require a significant amount of management time, even where Atkins is unable to consummate or decides not to pursue a particular transaction.

Even when acquisitions, such as the acquisition of SimplyProtein®, are completed, integration of acquired entities can involve significant difficulties, such as failure to achieve financial or operating objectives with respect to an acquisition, strain on Atkins’ personnel, systems and operational and managerial controls and procedures, the need to modify systems or to add management resources, difficulties in the integration and retention of consumers or personnel and the integration and effective deployment of operations or technologies, amortization of acquired assets (which would reduce future reported earnings), possible adverse short-term effects on cash flows or operating results, diversion of management’s attention from the operations of the business, integrating personnel with diverse backgrounds and organizational cultures, coordinating sales and marketing functions and failure to obtain and retain key personnel of an acquired business. Failure to manage these acquisition growth risks could have an adverse effect on Atkins’ business.

32

All of Atkins’ products must comply with regulations of the Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, as well as state and local regulations. Any non-compliance with the FDA or other applicable regulations could harm Atkins’ business.

Atkins’ products must comply with various FDA rules and regulations, including those regarding product manufacturing, food safety, required testing and appropriate labeling of its products. The FDA has not defined nutrient content claims with respect to carbohydrates, but has not objected to the use of net carbohydrate information on food labels if the label adequately explains how the term is used so that it would not be false or misleading to consumers. The FDA requires all carbohydrates per serving to be listed on the Nutrition Facts Panel (“NFP”) of a package. In addition to the information on the NFP, Atkins uses the term “net carbohydrate” (or “net carbs”) on its packaging to assist consumers in tracking the carbohydrates in that serving of food that impact a person’s blood sugar (glucose) levels. Atkins determines the number of net carbs in a serving of food by subtracting fiber, and sugar alcohols, if any, from the actual number of carbohydrates listed on the NFP. Fiber and sugar alcohols can be subtracted from the carbohydrates because they minimally impact blood sugar. It is possible that FDA regulations and/or their interpretations may change related to, for example, definitions of certain of Atkins’ core ingredients, such as fiber; labeling requirements for describing other ingredients or nutrients, such as sugar alcohols or protein; or disclosures of any ingredient labeled as genetically modified, or GMO. As such, there is a risk that Atkins’ products could become non-compliant with the FDA’s regulations, and any such non-compliance could harm its business. In addition, if FDA or other regulations restrict Atkins from labeling and marketing certain ingredients or product attributes, such as fiber or “net carb” count, Atkins may be unable to effectively reach its target demographics, promote what it believes to be the benefits of its products or communicate that its products are composed of what it considers to be low-carb, low-sugar and protein-rich ingredients.

Atkins’ does not manufacture its products directly, but rather, relies on a pool of contract manufacturers who produces Atkins’ products in their own facilities. Therefore, Atkins must rely on these manufacturers to maintain compliance with regulatory requirements. Although Atkins requires its contract manufacturers to be compliant, Atkins does not have direct control over such facilities. Failure of Atkins’ contract manufacturers to comply with applicable regulation could have an adverse effect on its business.

Conflicts between state and federal law regarding definitions of Atkins’ core ingredients, as well as labeling requirements, may lead to non-compliance with state and local regulations. For example, certain states may maintain narrower definitions of certain ingredients, as well as more stringent labeling requirements, of which Atkins is unaware. Any non-compliance at the state or local level could also adversely affect Atkins’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

Changes in the legal and regulatory environment could limit Atkins’ business activities, increase its operating costs, reduce demand for its products or result in litigation.

Elements of Atkins’ businesses, including the production, storage, distribution, sale, display, advertising, marketing, labeling, health and safety practices, transportation and use of many of our products, are subject to various laws and regulations administered by federal, state and local governmental agencies in the United States, as well as the laws and regulations administered by government entities and agencies outside the United States in markets in which Atkins’ products or components thereof (such as packaging) may be made, manufactured or sold. These laws and regulations and interpretations thereof may change, sometimes dramatically, as a result of a variety of factors, including political, economic or social events. Such changes may include changes in:

•         food and drug laws (including FDA regulations);

•         laws related to product labeling;

•         advertising and marketing laws and practices;

•         laws and programs restricting the sale and advertising of certain of Atkins’ products;

•         laws and programs aimed at reducing, restricting or eliminating ingredients present in certain of Atkins’ products;

•         laws and programs aimed at discouraging the consumption of products or ingredients or altering the package or portion size of certain of Atkins’ products;

33

•         state consumer protection and disclosure laws;

•         taxation requirements, including the imposition or proposed imposition of new or increased taxes or other limitations on the sale of its products; competition laws;

•         anti-corruption laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, or FCPA, and the UK Bribery Act of 2010, or Bribery Act;

•         economic sanctions and anti-boycott laws, including laws administered by the U.S. Department of Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control and the European Union;

•         laws relating to export, reexport, transfer, and import controls, including the Export Administration Regulations, the EU Dual Use Regulation, and the customs and import laws administered by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection;

•         employment laws;

•         privacy laws;

•         laws regulating the price we may charge for Atkins’ products; and

•         farming and environmental laws.

New laws, regulations or governmental policies and their related interpretations, or changes in any of the foregoing, including taxes or other limitations on the sale of Atkins’ products, ingredients contained in Atkins’ products or commodities used in the production of our products, may alter the environment in which it does business and, therefore, may impact Atkins’ operating results or increase its costs or liabilities. In addition, if Atkins fails to adhere to such laws and regulations, Atkins could be subject to regulatory investigations, civil or criminal sanctions, as well as class action litigation, which has increased in its industry in recent years.

Atkins relies on sales to a limited number of retailers for the substantial majority of its net sales, and the loss of one or more such retailers may harm its business. In addition, Atkins maintains “at will” contracts with these retailers, which do not require recurring or minimum purchase amounts of its products.

A substantial majority of Atkins’ sales are generated from a limited number of retailers. For the 52 week period ended August 27, 2016, sales to Atkins’ largest retailer, Walmart Stores, Inc., represented approximately 41% of Atkins’ sales. Although the composition of Atkins’ significant retailers may vary from period to period, Atkins expects that most of its net sales and accounts receivable will continue to come from a relatively small number of retailers for the foreseeable future. These retailers may take actions that affect Atkins for reasons that it cannot always anticipate or control, such as their financial condition, changes in their business strategy, operations or the introduction of competing products or the perceived quality of its products.

In addition, Atkins’ retailers typically do not provide it with firm, long-term or short-term volume purchase commitments. As a result, Atkins could have periods with little to no orders for its products while still incurring costs related to workforce maintenance, marketing, general corporate expenses and debt service. Furthermore, despite operating in different channels, Atkins’ retailers sometimes compete for the same consumers. As a result of actual or perceived conflicts resulting from this competition, retailers may take actions that negatively affect it. Atkins may not be able to find new retailers to supplement periods where it experiences no or limited purchase orders or that it can recover fixed costs as a result of experiencing reduced purchase orders. Periods of no or limited purchase orders for its products could adversely affect Atkins’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

Conversely, from time to time, Atkins may experience unanticipated increases in orders of its products from these retailers that can create supply chain problems and may result in unfilled orders. If Atkins is unable to meet such increased orders of its products, its reputation with its retail partners may be harmed. Unanticipated fluctuations in product requirements by its retailers could result in fluctuations in Atkins’ results from quarter to quarter.

Consolidation among retailers may also adversely affect Atkins’ results. An increase in the concentration of Atkins’ sales to large customers may negatively affect its profitability due to the impact of higher shelving fees and reduced volumes of product sold. Furthermore, as retailers consolidate, they may reduce the number of branded products they offer in order to accommodate private label products and generate more competitive terms from branded suppliers.

34

The loss of, or disruption in, or Atkins’ inability to efficiently operate its fulfillment network could adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.

For Atkins’ U.S. operations, it utilizes a single distribution center in Greenfield, Indiana. Substantially all of its inventory is shipped directly to its retailers from this center by the third-party operator. Atkins relies significantly on the orderly operation of this center, and if complications arise or if the facility is severely damaged or destroyed, Atkins’ ability to deliver inventory on a timely basis will be significantly impaired. Such delays could adversely impact its business.

Atkins also relies on a single-sourced logistics provider for distribution and product shipments in the United States. Atkins’ utilization of delivery services for shipments is subject to risks, including increases in fuel prices, which would increase in shipping costs, and employee strikes and inclement weather, which may impact the ability of providers to provide delivery services that adequately meet its shipping needs. Atkins may, from time to time, change third-party transportation providers, and it could therefore face logistical difficulties that could adversely affect deliveries. In addition, Atkins could incur costs and expend resources in connection with such change, and fail to obtain terms as favorable as those it currently receives.

Disruptions in operations due to natural or man-made disasters, fire, flooding, terrorism or other catastrophic events, system failure, labor disagreements or shipping problems may result in delays in the delivery of products to retailers.

Atkins relies on a limited number of third-party suppliers and manufacturers to supply its core ingredients and produce its products.

The core ingredients used in manufacturing Atkins’ products include soy, nuts, dairy and cocoa. There may be a limited market supply of any of its core ingredients and Atkins relies on a limited number of third party suppliers to provide these ingredients, a portion of which are international companies. Any disruption in the supply could adversely affect Atkins’ business, particularly its profitability and its margins. Events that adversely affect Atkins’ suppliers could impair its ability to obtain core ingredient inventories in the quantities that it desires. Such events include problems with Atkins’ suppliers’ businesses, finances, labor relations, ability to import core ingredients, costs, production, insurance, reputation and weather conditions during growing, harvesting or shipping, including flood, drought, frost and earthquakes, as well as natural or man-made disasters or other catastrophic occurrences.

Atkins’ financial performance depends in large part on its ability to purchase core ingredients in sufficient quantities at competitive prices. Atkins may not have continued supply, pricing or exclusive access to core ingredients from these sources. Any of its suppliers could discontinue or seek to alter their relationships with Atkins. Additionally, Atkins may be adversely affected if there is increased demand for the specific core ingredients it uses in its products, there is a reduction in overall supply of its required core ingredients, its suppliers raise their prices, stop selling to it or its contract manufacturer or enter into arrangements that impair their abilities to provide us or our contract manufacturers with core ingredients or increases in the cost of packaging and distributing its core ingredients.

Atkins also relies on a limited number of contract manufacturers to manufacture its products. Currently, Atkins has two contract manufacturers for its ready-to-drink shakes and numerous contract manufacturers for its nutrition bars. If any of its manufacturers experience adverse effects on their businesses or are unable to continue manufacturing its products at required levels, on a timely basis, or at all, it may be forced to seek other manufacturers to manufacture its products. In addition, Atkins’ contract manufacturers independently contract for and obtain some of the core ingredients in its products. If its contract manufactures are unable to obtain these core ingredients in the required amounts or at all, their ability to manufacture Atkins’ products would be adversely affected. It could take a significant period of time to locate and qualify such alternative production sources. Atkins may not be able to identify and qualify new manufacturers in a timely manner or that such manufacturers could allocate sufficient capacity in order to meet its requirements, which could adversely affect its ability to make timely deliveries of its products. Furthermore, Atkins may be unable to negotiate pricing or other terms with its existing or new manufacturers as favorable as what it currently enjoys. There is also no guarantee a new manufacturing partner could accurately replicate the production process and taste profile of its existing products.

35

Atkins is also subject to risks associated with protection of its trade secrets by its third party contract manufacturers. If Atkins’ contract manufacturers fail to protect its trade secrets, either intentionally or unintentionally, Atkins business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

If Atkins experiences significant increased demand for its products, or needs to replace an existing supplier or manufacturer, additional supplies of core ingredients or manufacturers to produce its products may not be available when required on acceptable terms, or at all, or that any supplier would allocate sufficient capacity to Atkins in order to meet its requirements, fill its orders in a timely manner or meet Atkins’ strict quality standards. Even if Atkins’ existing suppliers and manufacturers are able to expand their capacities to meet its needs or Atkins is able to find new sources of core ingredients or new manufacturers to produce its products, we may encounter delays in production, inconsistencies in quality and added costs. We may not be able to pass increased costs onto the consumer immediately, if at all, which may decrease or eliminate our profitability in any period. Any manufacturing and/or supply disruptions or cost increases could have an adverse effect on Atkins’ ability to meet consumer demand for its products and result in lower net sales and profitability both in the short and long term.

Atkins relies, in part, on its third-party co-manufacturers to maintain the quality of its products. The failure or inability of these co-manufacturers to comply with the specifications and requirements of its products could result in product recall, which could adversely affect its reputation and subject Atkins to significant liability should the consumption of any of its products cause or be claimed to cause illness or physical harm.

Atkins sells products for human consumption, which involves risks such as product contamination or spoilage, product tampering, other adulteration, mislabeling and misbranding. All of Atkins’ products are manufactured by independent third-party contract manufacturers. Atkins also licenses certain products that contain its brand and logo, but which are produced and distributed exclusively by third parties. In addition, Atkins does not own its warehouse facility, but it is managed for Atkins by a third party. Under certain circumstances, Atkins may be required to, or may voluntarily, recall or withdraw products. For example, in 2016, as part of a larger national recall by several other food companies, Atkins incurred losses, including recalled product as a result of potential contamination from an ingredient supplied to one of its third-party manufacturers at its manufacturing center. While the contamination did not result in any consumer illness, and Atkins was indemnified for a substantial portion of its direct product loss, any future recall may be more costly.

A widespread recall or withdrawal of any of Atkins’ or Atkins’ licensed products may negatively and significantly impact its sales and profitability for a period of time and could result in significant losses depending on the costs of the recall, destruction of product inventory, reduction in product availability, and reaction of competitors and consumers. Atkins may also be subject to claims or lawsuits, including class actions lawsuits (which could significantly increase any adverse settlements or rulings), resulting in liability for actual or claimed injuries, illness or death. Any of these events could adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations. Even if a product liability claim or lawsuit is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, the negative publicity surrounding any assertion that Atkins’ products caused illness or physical harm could adversely affect its reputation with existing and potential consumers and its corporate and brand image. Moreover, claims or liabilities of this sort might not be covered by Atkins’ insurance or by any rights of indemnity or contribution that Atkins may have against others. Atkins maintains product liability insurance in an amount that it believes to be adequate. However, Atkins may incur claims or liabilities for which it is not insured or that exceed the amount of its insurance coverage. A product liability judgment against Atkins or a product recall could adversely affect Atkins’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

Ingredient and packaging costs are volatile and may rise significantly, which may negatively impact the profitability of Atkins’ business.

Atkins negotiates the prices for large quantities of core ingredients, such as soy, nuts, dairy and cocoa, as well as packaging materials. A number of these ingredients are manufactured and packaged in Canada. Costs of ingredients and packaging are volatile and can fluctuate due to conditions that are difficult to predict, including global competition for resources, fluctuations in currency and exchange rates, weather conditions, natural or man-made disasters, consumer demand and changes in governmental trade and agricultural programs. Continued volatility in the prices of the core ingredients and other supplies we purchase could increase Atkins’ cost of goods sold and reduce its profitability.

36

Atkins does not use hedges or forward pricing for availability of any core ingredients. As such, any material upward movement in core ingredient pricing could negatively impact its margins if it is not able to pass these costs on to its consumers, or its sales if it is forced to increase its prices. If Atkins is not successful in managing its ingredient and packaging costs, if it is unable to increase its prices to cover increased costs or if such price increases reduce its sales volumes, then such increases in costs will adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Certain of Atkins’ core ingredient contracts have minimum volume commitments that could require purchases without matching revenues during weaker sales periods. Future core ingredient prices may be impacted by new laws or regulations, suppliers’ allocations to other purchasers, interruptions in production by suppliers, natural disasters, volatility in the price of crude oil and related petrochemical products and changes in exchange rates.

Atkins’ international operations expose it to regulatory, economic, political and social risks in the countries in which it operates.

The international nature of Atkins’ operations involves a number of risks, including changes in U.S. and foreign regulations, tariffs, taxes and exchange controls, economic downturns, inflation and political and social instability in the countries in which it operates and Atkins’ dependence on foreign personnel. Moreover, although Atkins’ products in its foreign operations typically mirror those in the United States, consumers in countries outside the United States may have different tastes, preferences and nutritional approaches than U.S. consumers. In addition, Atkins’ international business is small in comparison to its U.S. business, and as a result, its operations are more spread out and less consolidated which can limit its ability to effectively and timely react to adverse events. Atkins cannot be certain that it will be able to enter and successfully compete in additional foreign markets or that it will be able to continue to compete in the foreign markets in which it currently operates.

Doing business outside the United States requires Atkins to comply with the laws and regulations of the U.S. government and various foreign jurisdictions, which place restrictions on Atkins’ operations, trade practices, partners and investment decisions. In particular, Atkins’ operations are subject to U.S. and foreign anti-corruption and trade control laws and regulations, such as the FCPA or the Bribery Act, export controls and economic sanctions programs, including those administered by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, OFAC and the EU. As a result of doing business in foreign countries and with foreign partners, Atkins is exposed to a heightened risk of violating anti-corruption and trade control laws and sanctions regulations. The FCPA prohibits Atkins from providing anything of value to foreign officials for the purposes of obtaining or retaining business or securing any improper business advantage. In addition, the Bribery Act extends beyond bribery of foreign public officials and also applies to transactions with private persons. The provisions of the Bribery Act are also more onerous than the FCPA in a number of other respects, including jurisdictional reach, non-exemption of facilitation payments and, potentially, penalties.

Atkins’ continued expansion outside the United States, including in developing countries, and its development of new partnerships and joint venture relationships worldwide, could increase the risk of FCPA, OFAC, Bribery Act or EU Sanctions violations in the future. Violations of anti-corruption and trade control laws and sanctions regulations are punishable by civil penalties, including fines, denial of export privileges, injunctions, asset seizures, debarment from government contracts and revocations or restrictions of licenses, as well as criminal fines and imprisonment.

Disruptions in the worldwide economy may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Adverse and uncertain economic conditions may impact distributor, retailer and consumer demand for Atkins’ products. In addition, Atkins’ ability to manage normal commercial relationships with its suppliers, contract manufacturers, distributors, retailers, consumers and creditors may suffer. Consumers may shift purchases to lower-priced or other perceived value offerings during economic downturns, making it more difficult to sell its premium products. During economic downturns, it may be more difficult to convince consumers to switch to or continue to use Atkins’ brands or convince new users to choose its brands without expensive sampling programs and price promotions. In particular, consumers may reduce their purchases of products without GMOs, gluten, or preservatives when there are conventional offerings of similar products, which generally have lower retail prices. In addition, consumers may choose to purchase private-label products rather than branded products because

37

they are generally less expensive. Distributors and retailers may become more conservative in response to these conditions and seek to reduce their inventories. Atkins’ results of operations depend upon, among other things, its ability to maintain and increase sales volume with its existing distributors and retailers, to attract new consumers and to provide products that appeal to consumers at prices they are willing and able to pay. Prolonged unfavorable economic conditions may have an adverse effect on Atkins’ sales and profitability.

Atkins’ international operations expose it to fluctuations in exchange rates, which may adversely affect its operating results.

Atkins sources large quantities of its core ingredients from foreign suppliers, and as a result, any material upward movement in foreign exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar will adversely affect its profitability. Furthermore, the substantial majority of Atkins’ revenues are generated domestically, while a substantial portion of Atkins’ third party manufacturing is completed in Canada. Any U.S. dollar weakness may therefore adversely affect revenues and cash flows while also increasing supply and manufacturing costs.

Atkins’ geographic focus makes it particularly vulnerable to economic and other events and trends in North America.

Atkins operates mainly in North America and, therefore, is particularly susceptible to adverse regulations, economic climate, consumer trends, market fluctuations, including commodity price fluctuations or supply shortages of its key ingredients, and other adverse events. The concentration of its businesses in North America could present challenges and may increase the likelihood that an adverse event in North America would materially and adversely affect its product sales, financial condition and operating results.

Atkins’ business could be negatively impacted by changes in the U.S. political environment.

The recent presidential and congressional elections in the United States have resulted in significant uncertainty with respect to, and could result in changes in, legislation, regulation and government policy at the federal, state and local levels. Any such changes could significantly impact Atkins’ business as well as the markets in which it competes. Specific legislative and regulatory proposals discussed during and after the 2016 U.S. elections that might materially impact Atkins include, but are not limited to, changes to existing trade agreements, import and export regulations, tariffs, particularly with respect to tariffs on Canadian imports (where Atkins sources a large number of its nutritional bars), and customs duties, income tax regulations and the federal tax code, healthcare delivery and spending, public company reporting requirements, environmental regulation and antitrust enforcement. To the extent changes in the political environment have a negative impact on Atkins or on its markets, its business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Litigation or legal proceedings could expose Atkins to significant liabilities and have a negative impact on its reputation.

From time to time, Atkins may be party to various claims and litigation proceedings. Atkins evaluates these claims and litigation proceedings to assess the likelihood of unfavorable outcomes and to estimate, if possible, the amount of potential losses. Based on these assessments and estimates, we establish reserves, as appropriate. These assessments and estimates are based on the information available to management at the time and involve a significant amount of management judgment. Actual outcomes or losses may differ materially from Atkins’ current assessments and estimates.

There is an additional risk that these types of suits may lead to consumer confusion, distrust and additional legal challenges for Atkins. Should Atkins become subject to related or additional unforeseen lawsuits, including claims related to its products or their labeling or advertising, consumers may avoid purchasing Atkins’ products or seek alternative products, even if the basis for the claims against it is unfounded. For example, state and federal rules and regulations vary with respect to certain labeling requirements.

Additionally, adverse publicity about any lawsuit in which Atkins is involved may further discourage consumers from buying Atkins’ products. Any consumer loss of confidence in the truthfulness of Atkins’ labeling or ingredient claims would be difficult and costly to overcome and may significantly reduce its brand value. For example, publications and other third-party commentary may vary in opinion with respect to calculations of net

38

carbs and vary on approach to calculations of net carbs, which may lead to reports questioning the accuracy of Atkins’ calculations and reporting the amount of net carbs contained in certain of its products. Uncertainty among consumers as to the nutritional content or the ingredients used in Atkins’ products, regardless of the cause, may have a substantial and adverse effect on its brands and its business, results of operations and financial condition.

Atkins may not be able to adequately protect its intellectual property and other proprietary rights that are material to its business.

Atkins’ ability to compete effectively depends in part upon protection of its rights in trademarks, trade dress, trade secrets, copyrights and other intellectual property and other proprietary rights that it owns or licenses. Atkins’ use of contractual provisions, confidentiality procedures and agreements, and trademark, copyright, unfair competition, trade secret and other laws to protect its intellectual property and other proprietary rights may be inadequate. Atkins may not be able to preclude third parties from using its intellectual property rights with respect to food or beverage products, and may not be able to leverage its branding beyond its current product offerings. In addition, Atkins’ trademark or other intellectual property applications may not always be granted. Third parties may oppose Atkins’ intellectual property applications, or otherwise challenge its use of its trademarks or other intellectual property. Third parties may infringe, misappropriate, or otherwise violate Atkins’ intellectual property, and changes in applicable laws could serve to lessen or remove the current legal protections available for its intellectual property. Any legal action that Atkins may bring to protect its brand and other intellectual property could be unsuccessful and expensive and could divert management’s attention from other business concerns. Any litigation or claims brought against Atkins, for trademark infringement or related matters, even without merit, could result in substantial costs and diversion of Atkins’ resources. A successful claim of trademark, copyright or other intellectual property infringement, misappropriation, or other violation against Atkins could prevent it from providing its products or services, or could require Atkins, if it is unable to license such third-party intellectual property on reasonable terms, to redesign or rebrand its products or product packaging. Certain of Atkins’ intellectual property licenses have fixed terms, and even for those that do not, Atkins cannot guarantee that all of its intellectual property licenses will remain in effect indefinitely. Termination of intellectual property licenses granted by or to Atkins could result in the loss of profits generated pursuant to such licenses. Any of the foregoing results could harm our business, financial condition or results of Atkins’ operations.

Atkins relies on information technology systems, and any inadequacy, failure or interruption of those systems may harm Atkins’ ability to effectively operate its business, and its business is subject to online security risks, including security breaches and identity theft.

Atkins is dependent on various information technology systems, and a failure of its information technology systems to perform as it anticipates could disrupt Atkins’ business. Like many other companies, Atkins’ information technology systems may be vulnerable to damage or interruption from circumstances beyond its control, including natural disasters, terrorist attacks, telecommunications failures, computer viruses, hackers, and other security issues. Despite safeguards Atkins has implemented that are designed to prevent unauthorized access to its information technology systems, Atkins cannot be certain that its information technology systems are free from vulnerability to security breaches (especially as the sophistication of cyber-security threats continues to increase), or from vulnerability to inadvertent disclosures of sensitive data by third parties or by Atkins.

Unauthorized users who penetrate Atkins’ information security systems could misappropriate proprietary employee or consumer information or data. As a result, it may become necessary to expend additional amounts of capital and resources to protect against, or to alleviate, problems caused by unauthorized access, and such data security breaches could also result in lost profit due to reduced demand for Atkins’ products. These expenditures, however, may not prove to be a timely remedy against breaches by unauthorized users who are able to penetrate Atkins’ information security. In addition to purposeful security breaches, the inadvertent transmission of computer viruses could adversely affect Atkins’ computer systems and, in turn, harm its business.

A significant number of states require that consumers be notified if a security breach results in the disclosure of their personal financial account or other information. Additional states and governmental entities are considering such “notice” laws. In addition, other public disclosure laws may require that material security breaches be reported. If Atkins experiences a security breach and such notice or public disclosure is required in the future, Atkins reputation and its business may be harmed.

39

With the exception of limited information voluntarily submitted by users of Atkins’ website, Atkins typically does not collect or store consumer data or personal information. However, third-party providers, including Atkins licensees, contract manufacturers, ecommerce contractors and third-party sellers may do so. The website operations of such third parties may be affected by reliance on other third-party hardware and software providers, technology changes, risks related to the failure of computer systems through which these website operations are conducted, telecommunications failures, data security breaches and similar disruptions. If Atkins or its third-party providers fail to maintain or protect Atkins’ or their information technology systems and data integrity effectively, fail to implement new systems and/or update or expand existing systems or fail to anticipate, plan for or manage significant disruptions to systems involved in Atkins’ operations, Atkins could lose existing customers, have difficulty preventing, detecting, and controlling fraud, have disputes with customers, suppliers, distributors or others, and be subject to regulatory sanctions, including sanctions stemming from violations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, and as a result, have increases in operating expense.

If Atkins does not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, it could fail to report our financial results accurately.

Effective internal control over financial reporting is necessary for Atkins to provide reliable financial reports. In the future Atkins may discover areas of its internal control over financial reporting that need improvement. Atkins has not historically documented its internal controls, and if in the future Atkins identifies a control deficiency that rises to the level of a material weakness in its internal controls over financial reporting, this material weakness may adversely affect Atkins’ ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information timely and accurately and, as a result, Atkins’ financial statements may contain material misstatements or omissions. A material weakness is defined as a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In addition, Atkins’ internal financial and accounting team is leanly staffed, which can lead to inefficiencies with respect to segregation of duties. If Atkins fails to properly and efficiently maintain an effective internal control over financial reporting, Atkins could fail to report its financial results accurately.

If Atkins is unable to implement appropriate systems, procedures and controls, it may not be able to successfully offer its products and grow its business and account for transactions in an appropriate and timely manner.

Atkins’ ability to successfully offer its products, grow its business and account for transactions in an appropriate and timely manner requires an effective planning and management process and certain other automated management and accounting systems. Atkins currently does not have an integrated enterprise resource planning system and certain other automated management and accounting systems. Atkins periodically updates its operations and financial systems, procedures and controls; however; Atkins still relies on manual processes and procedures that may not scale proportionately with our business growth. Atkins’ systems will continue to require automation, modifications and improvements to respond to current and future changes in its business. Failure to implement in a timely manner appropriate internal systems, procedures and controls could adversely affect Atkins’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

Severe weather conditions and natural disasters such as fires, floods, droughts, hurricanes, earthquakes and tornadoes can affect crop supplies, manufacturing facilities and distribution activities, and negatively impact the operating results of our business.

Severe weather conditions and natural disasters, such as fires, floods, droughts, frosts, hurricanes, earthquakes, tornadoes, insect infestations and plant disease, may affect the supply of core ingredients on which Atkins depends to make food products, or may curtail or prevent the manufacturing or distribution of food products by third parties. Competing manufacturers might be affected differently by weather conditions and natural disasters, depending on the location of their sources of supplies and manufacturing or distribution facilities. If supplies of core ingredients available to Atkins are reduced, it may not be able to find enough supplemental supply sources on favorable terms,

40

which could adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, because Atkins relies on two co-manufacturers for a majority of its manufacturing needs and a single distribution warehouse, adverse weather conditions could impact the ability for those third-party operators to manufacture and store our products.

The seasonal nature of our business could cause Atkins’ operating results to fluctuate.

Atkins has experienced and expects to continue to experience fluctuations in its quarterly results of operations due to the seasonal nature of its business. The months of January to May result in the greatest retail sales due to renewed consumer focus on healthy living following New Year’s Day, as well as significant customer merchandising around that time. This seasonality could cause the post combination company’s share price to fluctuate as the results of an interim financial period may not be indicative of its full year results. Seasonality also impacts relative revenue and profitability of each quarter of the year, both on a quarter-to-quarter and year-over-year basis.

Loss of Atkins’ key executive officers or other personnel, or an inability to attract and retain such management and other personnel, could negatively impact Atkins’ business.

Atkins’ future success depends to a significant degree on the skills, experience and efforts of its key executive officers. The loss of the services of any of these executives could adversely affect Atkins’ business and prospects, as Atkins may not be able to find suitable individuals to replace them on a timely basis, if at all. Additionally, Atkins also depends on its ability to attract and retain qualified personnel to operate and expand its business. If Atkins fails to attract talented new employees, its business and results of operations could be negatively affected.

Atkins has not been managed as a public company and our current resources may not be sufficient to fulfill our public company obligations.

Following the completion of the Business Combination, we will be subject to various regulatory requirements, including those of the SEC and Nasdaq. These requirements include record keeping, financial reporting and corporate governance rules and regulations. While certain members of our management team have experience in managing a public company, Atkins has not historically had the resources typically found in a public company. Atkins’ internal infrastructure may not be adequate to support its increased reporting obligations, and Atkins may be unable to hire, train or retain necessary staff and may be reliant on engaging outside consultants or professionals to overcome Atkins’ lack of experience or employees. The post-combination company’s business could be adversely affected if our internal infrastructure is inadequate, if we are unable to engage outside consultants or if we are otherwise unable to fulfill our public company obligations.

We will incur significantly increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to compliance efforts.

We will incur significant legal, accounting, insurance and other expenses as a result of being a public company. The Dodd-Frank Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as related rules implemented by the SEC, have required changes in corporate governance practices of public companies. In addition, rules that the SEC is implementing or is required to implement pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act are expected to require additional change. We expect that compliance with these and other similar laws, rules and regulations, including compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, will substantially increase our expenses, including our legal and accounting costs, and make some activities more time-consuming and costly. We also expect these laws, rules and regulations to make it more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage, which may make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as officers. Although the JOBS Act may, for a limited period of time, somewhat lessen the cost of complying with these additional regulatory and other requirements, we nonetheless expect a substantial increase in legal, accounting, insurance and certain other expenses in the future, which will negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.

41

Risks Related to the Company and the Business Combination

Following the consummation of the Business Combination, our only significant asset will be ownership of 100% of Atkins and such ownership may not be sufficient to pay dividends or make distributions or loans to enable us to pay any dividends on our common stock or satisfy our other financial obligations, including our obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement.

Following the consummation of the Business Combination, we will have no direct operations and no significant assets other than the ownership of 100% of Atkins. We will depend on Atkins for distributions, loans and other payments to generate the funds necessary to meet our financial obligations, including our expenses as a publicly traded company, and to pay any dividends with respect to our common stock. Legal and contractual restrictions in agreements governing the Debt Financing and future indebtedness of Atkins, as well as the financial condition and operating requirements of Atkins. The earnings from, or other available assets of, Atkins may not be sufficient to pay dividends or make distributions or loans to enable us to pay any dividends on our common stock or satisfy its other financial obligations.

Subsequent to the consummation of the Business Combination, we may be required to take writedowns or write-offs, restructuring and impairment or other charges that could have a significant negative effect on our financial condition, results of operations and stock price, which could cause you to lose some or all of your investment.

Although Conyers Park has conducted due diligence on Atkins, Conyers Park cannot assure you that this diligence revealed all material issues that may be present in Atkins’ business, that it would be possible to uncover all material issues through a customary amount of due diligence, or that factors outside of Conyers Park’s and Atkins’ control will not later arise. As a result, we may be forced to later writedown or write-off assets, restructure its operations, or incur impairment or other charges that could result in losses. Even if Conyers Park’s due diligence successfully identifies certain risks, unexpected risks may arise and previously known risks may materialize in a manner not consistent with Conyers Park’s preliminary risk analysis. Even though these charges may be non-cash items and may not have an immediate impact on our liquidity, the fact that we report charges of this nature could contribute to negative market perceptions about the post-combination company or its securities. In addition, charges of this nature may cause us to be unable to obtain future financing on favorable terms or at all.

Sponsor has agreed to vote in favor of the Business Combination, regardless of how Conyers Park’s public stockholders vote.

Unlike many other blank check companies in which the founders agree to vote their Founder Shares in accordance with the majority of the votes cast by the public stockholders in connection with an initial business combination, Sponsor has agreed to vote any shares of common stock owned by it in favor of its initial business combination. As of the date hereof, Sponsor owns shares equal to 20.0% of Conyers Park issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Accordingly, it is more likely that the necessary stockholder approval will be received for the Business Combination than would be the case if Sponsor agreed to vote any shares of common stock owned by it in accordance with the majority of the votes cast by Conyers Park’s public stockholders.

Conyers Park will incur significant transaction and transition costs in connection with the Business Combination.

Conyers Park has and we expect to incur significant, non-recurring costs in connection with consummating the Business Combination and operating as a public company following the consummation of the Business Combination. All expenses incurred in connection with the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (including the Business Combination), including all legal, accounting, consulting, investment banking and other fees, expenses and costs, will be for the account of the party incurring such fees, expenses and costs, subject to our agreement in the Merger Agreement to assume certain permitted transaction expenses of Atkins, subject to certain adjustments.

The Company’s transaction expenses as a result of the Business Combination are currently estimated at approximately $25 million, including $8.1 million in deferred underwriting commissions to the underwriters of

42

Conyers Park’s IPO (which reflects the waiver of the fee by Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. of the underwriting fee they were entitled to from Conyers Park’s IPO).

Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and ability to operate our company, and we may incur additional debt.

Assuming there are no redemptions, Simply Good Foods expects to have $200 million of indebtedness which may increase to $300 million depending on a number of factors including the number of redemptions received and borrowings to have cash on hand. In addition, upon consummation of the initial business combination, Simply Good Foods expects to have a revolving credit facility of $75 million. Our debt level and the terms of our financing arrangements could adversely affect our financial condition and limit our ability to successfully implement our growth strategies. In addition, under the credit facilities, we have granted the lenders a security interest in substantially all of our assets, including the assets of our subsidiaries and an affiliate.

Our ability to meet our debt service obligations will depend on our future performance, which will be affected by the other risk factors described herein. If we do not generate enough cash flow to pay our debt service obligations, we may be required to refinance all or part of our existing debt, sell our assets, borrow more money or raise equity. We may not be able to take any of these actions on a timely basis, on terms satisfactory to us, or at all.

Simply Good Foods’ credit facilities will contain financial and other covenants. The failure to comply with such covenants could have an adverse effect on us.

Simply Good Foods’ credit facilities contemplated by the Debt Financing will contain certain financial and other covenants including a maximum total net leverage ratio equal to or less than 6.25:1.00 (with a reduction to 6:00:1.00 on and after the third anniversary of the closing date of the credit facilities) contingent on credit extensions in excess of 30% of the total amount of commitments available under the revolving credit facility, and limitations on Simply Good Foods’ and its subsidiaries’ abilities to, among other things, incur and/or undertake asset sales and other dispositions, liens, indebtedness, certain acquisitions, and investments, consolidations, mergers, reorganizations and other fundamental changes payment of dividends and other distributions to equity and warrant holders and prepayments of material subordinated debt, in each case, subject to customary exceptions materially consistent with credit facilities of such type and size. Assuming there are no redemptions, Simply Good Foods expects to have $200 million of indebtedness which may increase to $300 million depending on a number of factors including the number of redemptions received and borrowings to have cash on hand. In addition, upon consummation of the initial business combination, Simply Good Foods expects to have a revolving credit facility of $75 million. Any failure to comply with the restrictions of the credit facilities may result in an event of default under the agreement. Simply Good Foods’ contemplated credit facilities bear interest at variable rates. If market interest rates increase, variable rate debt will create higher debt service requirements, which could adversely affect our cash flow.

Simply Good Foods may need additional capital in the future, and it may not be available on acceptable terms.

Atkins has historically relied upon cash generated by our operations to fund its operations and strategy. Simply Good Foods may also need to access the debt and equity capital markets. However, these sources of financing may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Simply Good Foods’ ability to obtain additional financing will be subject to a number of factors, including market conditions, our operating performance, investor sentiment and its ability to incur additional debt in compliance with agreements governing our then-outstanding debt. These factors may make the timing, amount, terms or conditions of additional financings unattractive to us. If we are unable to generate sufficient funds from operations or raise additional capital, our growth could be impeded.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information included in this document may not be indicative of what our actual financial position or results of operations would have been.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information in this proxy statement/prospectus is presented for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of what our actual financial position or

43

results of operations would have been had the Business Combination been completed on the dates indicated. See the section entitled “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information” for more information.

The financial statements of the Company included in this proxy statement/prospectus do not take into account the consequences to the Company of a failure to complete a business combination by July 20, 2018.

The financial statements of the Company included in this proxy statement/prospectus have been prepared assuming that Conyers Park would continue as a going concern. Conyers Park is required to complete the Business Combination or another initial business combination by July 20, 2018, unless Conyers Park amends its charter to extend the life of the Company and certain other agreements it has entered into. The possibility of the Business Combination not being consummated raises doubt as to Conyers Park’s ability to continue as a going concern and the financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Conyers Park may waive one or more of the conditions to the Business Combination.

Conyers Park may agree to waive, in whole or in part, one or more of the conditions to its obligations to complete the Business Combination, to the extent permitted by its current certificate of incorporation and bylaws and applicable laws. For example, it is a condition to Conyers Park’s obligations to close the Business Combination that there be no breach of Atkins’ representations and warranties as of the closing date. However, if Conyers Park’s board of directors determines that any such breach is not material to the business of Atkins, then the board may elect to waive that condition and close the Business Combination. Conyers Park is not able to waive the condition that its stockholders approve the Business Combination.

If Conyers Park is unable to complete an initial business combination, its public stockholders may receive only approximately $10.00 per share on the liquidation of its Trust Account (or less than $10.00 per share in certain circumstances where a third party brings a claim against Conyers Park that its Sponsor is unable to indemnify), and its warrants will expire worthless.

If Conyers Park is unable to complete an initial business combination, its public stockholders may receive only approximately $10.00 per share on the liquidation of its Trust Account (or less than $10.00 per share in certain circumstances where a third party brings a claim against Conyers Park that its Sponsor is unable to indemnify (as described below)), and its warrants will expire worthless.

Sponsor and the Selling Equityholders will have significant influence over us after completion of the Business Combination.

Upon completion of the Business Combination, Sponsor will beneficially own approximately 14% of our common stock and the Selling Equityholders will beneficially own approximately 13% of our common stock. As long as Sponsor and the Selling Equityholders own or control a significant percentage of outstanding voting power, they will have the ability to strongly influence all corporate actions requiring stockholder approval, including the election and removal of directors and the size of our board of directors, any amendment of our certificate of incorporation or bylaws, or the approval of any merger or other significant corporate transaction, including a sale of substantially all of our assets. See the section entitled “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — The Investor Rights Agreement with Conyers Park” for additional information.

Additionally, Sponsor’s and the Selling Equityholders’ interests may not align with the interests of our other stockholders. Sponsor and the Selling Equityholders are in the business of making investments in companies and may acquire and hold interests in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with us. Sponsor or the Selling Equityholders may also pursue acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to our business, and, as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us. In addition, our certificate of incorporation provides that we renounce any interest or expectancy in the business opportunities of our Sponsor and of their officers, directors, agents, stockholders, members, partners, affiliates and subsidiaries and each such party shall not have any obligation to offer us those opportunities unless presented to one of our directors or officers in his or her capacity as a director or officer.

44

Conyers Park has no operating history and is subject to a mandatory liquidation and subsequent dissolution requirement. As such, there is a risk that it will be unable to continue as a going concern and consummate an initial business combination by July 20, 2018.

Conyers Park is a development stage blank check company, and as it has no operating history and is subject to a mandatory liquidation and subsequent dissolution requirement, there is a risk that Conyers Park will be unable to continue as a going concern and consummate an initial business combination. Unless Conyers Park amends its charter to extend its life and certain other agreements it has entered into, if Conyers Park does not complete an initial business combination by July 20, 2018, it will (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible, subject to lawfully available funds therefor, redeem 100% of the public shares in consideration of a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (A) the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account, including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to it to pay up to $1,000,000 of the Company’s working capital requirements as well as to pay the Company’s franchise and income taxes (less up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), by (B) the total number of then outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish rights of the public stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidation distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemptions, subject to the approval of the remaining stockholders and the board of directors in accordance with applicable law, dissolve and liquidate, subject (in the case of (ii) and (iii) above) to its obligations under the DGCL to provide for claims of creditors and other requirements of applicable law. In the event of such distribution, it is possible that the per share value of the residual assets remaining available for distribution (including Trust Account assets) will be less than the initial public offering price per unit in the IPO. In addition if Conyers Park fails to complete an initial business combination by July 20, 2018, there will be no redemption rights or liquidating distributions with respect to its warrants, which will expire worthless, unless Conyers Park amends its charter to extend its life and certain other agreements it has entered into.

If third parties bring claims against Conyers Park, the proceeds held in Conyers Park’s Trust Account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received by stockholders may be less than $10.00 per share.

Conyers Park’s placing of funds in its Trust Account may not protect those funds from third-party claims against it. Although Conyers Park will seek to have all vendors, service providers (other than its independent auditors), prospective target businesses or other entities with which it does business execute agreements with it waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies held in Conyers Park’s Trust Account for the benefit of its public stockholders, such parties may not execute such agreements, or even if they execute such agreements they may not be prevented from bringing claims against Conyers Park’s Trust Account, including, but not limited to, fraudulent inducement, breach of fiduciary responsibility or other similar claims, as well as claims challenging the enforceability of the waiver, in each case in order to gain advantage with respect to a claim against Conyers Park’s assets, including the funds held in its Trust Account. If any third party refuses to execute an agreement waiving such claims to the monies held in Conyers Park’s Trust Account, Conyers Park’s management will perform an analysis of the alternatives available to it and will only enter into an agreement with a third party that has not executed a waiver if management believes that such third party’s engagement would be significantly more beneficial to it than any alternative.

Examples of possible instances where Conyers Park may engage a third party that refuses to execute a waiver include the engagement of a third party consultant whose particular expertise or skills are believed by Conyers Park’s management to be significantly superior to those of other consultants that would agree to execute a waiver or in cases where Conyers Park’s management is unable to find a service provider willing to execute a waiver. In addition, there is no guarantee that such entities will agree to waive any claims they may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with Conyers Park and will not seek recourse against Conyers Park’s Trust Account for any reason. Upon redemption of Conyers Park’s public shares, if Conyers Park is unable to complete its Business Combination within the prescribed timeframe, or upon the exercise of a redemption right in connection with its Business Combination, Conyers Park will be required to provide for payment of claims of creditors that were not waived that may be brought against Conyers Park within the 10 years following redemption. Accordingly, the per-share redemption amount received by Conyers Park public stockholders could be less than the $10.00 per share initially held in Conyers Park’s Trust Account, due to claims of such creditors. Sponsor has agreed that it will be liable to Conyers Park if and to the extent any claims by a vendor for services rendered or products sold to Conyers Park, or a prospective target business with which Conyers Park has discussed entering into a transaction agreement, reduce the amount of funds in Conyers Park’s Trust Account to below (i) $10.00 per

45

public share or (ii) such lesser amount per public share held in Conyers Park’s Trust Account as of the date of the liquidation of Conyers Park’s Trust Account due to reductions in the value of the trust assets, in each case net of the interest which may be withdrawn to pay taxes, except as to any claims by a third party who executed a waiver of any and all rights to seek access to Conyers Park’s Trust Account and except as to any claims under Conyers Park’s indemnity of the underwriters of its IPO against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. Moreover, in the event that an executed waiver is deemed to be unenforceable against a third party, Sponsor will not be responsible to the extent of any liability for such third party claims. Conyers Park has not independently verified whether its Sponsor has sufficient funds to satisfy their indemnity obligations and believe that its Sponsor’s only assets are securities of Conyers Park and, therefore, Sponsor may not be able to satisfy those obligations. Conyers Park has not asked its Sponsor to reserve for such eventuality.

If, after Conyers Park distributes the proceeds in its Trust Account to its public stockholders, Conyers Park files a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against it that is not dismissed, a bankruptcy court may seek to recover such proceeds, and the members of Conyers Park’s board of directors may be viewed as having breached their fiduciary duties to its creditors, thereby exposing the members of its board of directors and Conyers Park to claims of punitive damages.

If, after Conyers Park distributes the proceeds in its Trust Account to its public stockholders, Conyers Park files a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against Conyers Park that is not dismissed, any distributions received by stockholders could be viewed under applicable debtor/creditor and/or bankruptcy laws as either a “preferential transfer” or a “fraudulent conveyance.” As a result, a bankruptcy court could seek to recover all amounts received by Conyers Park’s stockholders. In addition, Conyers Park’s board of directors may be viewed as having breached its fiduciary duty to its creditors and/or having acted in bad faith, thereby exposing itself and Conyers Park to claims of punitive damages, by paying public stockholders from Conyers Park’s Trust Account prior to addressing the claims of creditors.

If, before distributing the proceeds in Conyers Park’s Trust Account to its public stockholders, Conyers Park files a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against Conyers Park that is not dismissed, the claims of creditors in such proceeding may have priority over the claims of Conyers Park’s stockholders and the per-share amount that would otherwise be received by Conyers Park stockholders in connection with its liquidation may be reduced.

If, before distributing the proceeds in Conyers Park’s Trust Account to its public stockholders, Conyers Park files a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against Conyers Park that is not dismissed, the proceeds held in Conyers Park’s Trust Account could be subject to applicable bankruptcy law, and may be included in its bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third parties with priority over the claims of Conyers Park’s stockholders. To the extent any bankruptcy claims deplete Conyers Park’s Trust Account, the per-share amount that would otherwise be received by Conyers Park’s stockholders in connection with its liquidation may be reduced.

Even if Conyers Park consummates the Business Combination, there is no guarantee that the public warrants will ever be in the money, and they may expire worthless and the terms of Conyers Park’s warrants may be amended.

The exercise price for Conyers Park’s warrants is $11.50 per share of Class A common stock. There is no guarantee that the public warrants will ever be in the money prior to their expiration, and as such, the warrants may expire worthless.

In addition, Conyers Park’s warrants were issued in registered form under a warrant agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent, and Conyers Park. The warrant agreement provides that the terms of the warrants may be amended without the consent of any holder to cure any ambiguity or correct any defective provision, but requires the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants to make any change that adversely affects the interests of the registered holders. Accordingly, Conyers Park may amend the terms of the warrants in a manner adverse to a holder if holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants approve of such amendment. Although Conyers Park’s ability to amend the terms of the warrants with the consent of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants is unlimited, examples of such amendments could be amendments to, among other things, increase the exercise price of the warrants, shorten the

46

exercise period or decrease the number of shares and their respective affiliates and associates have of common stock purchasable upon exercise of a warrant.

Sponsor, directors and officers have interests in the Business Combination which may be different from or in addition to (and which may conflict with) the interests of its stockholders.

Sponsor, officers and directors and their respective affiliates and associates have interests in and arising from the Business Combination that are different from or in addition to (and which may conflict with) the interests of Conyers Park’s public stockholders, which may result in a conflict of interest. These interests include:

•         the continued right of Sponsor to hold Simply Good Foods common stock;

•         the fact that Sponsor paid an aggregate of $10,050,000 for its private placement warrants at the time of the Company’s IPO and such securities will expire worthless if an initial business combination is not consummated by July 20, 2018;

•         the fact that Sponsor has agreed not to redeem any of the Founder Shares in connection with a stockholder vote to approve a proposed initial business combination;

•         the fact that Sponsor paid an aggregate of $25,000 for its Founder Shares and such securities will have a significantly higher value at the time of the Business Combination;

•         if the Trust Account is liquidated, including in the event Conyers Park is unable to complete an initial business combination within the required time period, Sponsor has agreed to indemnify Conyers Park to ensure that the proceeds in the Trust Account are not reduced below $10.00 per public share, or such lesser per public share amount as is in the Trust Account on the liquidation date, by the claims of prospective target businesses with which Conyers Park has entered into an acquisition agreement or claims of any third party for services rendered or products sold to Conyers Park, but only if such a vendor or target business has not executed a waiver of any and all rights to seek access to the Trust Account;

•         the continuation of all seven of Conyers Park’s existing directors as directors of the post-combination company; and

•         the continued indemnification of Conyers Park’s existing directors and officers and the continuation of Conyers Park’s directors’ and officers’ liability insurance after the Business Combination.

Our ability to successfully effect the Business Combination and successfully operate the business thereafter will be largely dependent upon the efforts of certain key personnel, including the key personnel of Atkins, all of whom we expect to stay with Atkins following the Business Combination. The loss of such key personnel could negatively impact the operations and profitability of the post-combination business.

Our ability to successfully effect the Business Combination and successfully operate the business is dependent upon the efforts of certain key personnel, including the key personnel of Atkins. Although we expect all of such key personnel to remain with Atkins following the Business Combination, it is possible that we will lose some key personnel, the loss of which could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business. Furthermore, while Conyers Park has evaluated individuals we intend to engage to stay with Atkins following the Business Combination, our assessment of these individuals may not prove to be correct. These individuals may be unfamiliar with the requirements of operating a company regulated by the SEC, which could cause us to have to expend time and resources helping them become familiar with such requirements.

A market for our securities may not continue, which would adversely affect the liquidity and price of our securities.

Following the Business Combination, the price of our securities may fluctuate significantly due to the market’s reaction to the Business Combination and general market and economic conditions. An active trading market for our securities following the Business Combination may never develop or, if developed, it may not be sustained. In addition, the price of our securities after the Business Combination can vary due to general economic conditions and forecasts, our general business condition and the release of our financial reports. Additionally, if our securities are not listed on, or become delisted from, NASDAQ for any reason, and are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, an

47

inter-dealer automated quotation system for equity securities that is not a national securities exchange, the liquidity and price of our securities may be more limited than if we were quoted or listed on NASDAQ or another national securities exchange. You may be unable to sell your securities unless a market can be established or sustained.

There can be no assurance that our common stock that will be issued in connection with the Business Combination will be approved for listing on NASDAQ following the closing of the Business Combination, or that we will be able to comply with the continued listing standards of NASDAQ.

Our common stock, units and warrants will be listed on NASDAQ following the Business Combination. Our continued eligibility for listing may depend on the number of our shares that are redeemed. If, after the Business Combination, NASDAQ delists our common stock from trading on its exchange for failure to meet the listing standards, we and our stockholders could face significant material adverse consequences including:

•         a limited availability of market quotations for our securities;

•         a determination that our common stock is a “penny stock” which will require brokers trading in our common stock to adhere to more stringent rules, possibly resulting in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our common stock;

•         a limited amount of analyst coverage; and

•         a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.

Conyers Park is not required to obtain and has not obtained an opinion from an independent investment banking or accounting firm, and consequently, you may have no assurance from an independent source that the price Conyers Park is paying for Atkins is fair to the Company from a financial point of view.

Conyers Park is not required to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking or accounting firm that the price it is paying to acquire Atkins is fair to the Company from a financial point of view. The Company’s board of directors did not obtain a third-party valuation or fairness opinion in connection with their determination to approve the Business Combination with Atkins. In analyzing the Business Combination, the Company’s board of directors and management conducted due diligence on Atkins and researched the industry in which Atkins operates and concluded that the Business Combination was in the best interest of the Company’s stockholders. Accordingly, investors will be relying solely on the judgment of the Company’s board of directors in valuing Atkins’ business, and the Company’s board of directors may not have properly valued the business. The lack of a third-party valuation or fairness opinion may also lead an increased number of public stockholders to vote against the Business Combination or demand redemption of their shares, which could potentially impact Conyers Park’s ability to consummate the Business Combination.

For more information about the Company’s decision-making process, see the section entitled “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — The Company’s Board of Directors’ Reasons for the Approval of the Business Combination.”

If the Business Combination’s benefits do not meet the expectations of investors, stockholders or financial analysts, the market price of Conyers Park’s securities may decline.

If the benefits of the Business Combination do not meet the expectations of investors or securities analysts, the market price of the Company’s securities prior to the closing of the Business Combination may decline. The market values of Conyers Park’s securities at the time of the Business Combination may vary significantly from their prices on the date the Merger Agreement was executed, the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, or the date on which Conyers Park’s stockholders vote on the Business Combination.

In addition, following the Business Combination, fluctuations in the price of our securities could contribute to the loss of all or part of your investment. Prior to the Business Combination, there has not been a public market for Atkins’ stock and trading in the shares of the Company’s common stock has not been active. Accordingly, the valuation ascribed to Atkins and our common stock in the Business Combination may not be indicative of the price that will prevail in the trading market following the Business Combination. If an active market for our securities develops and continues, the trading price of our securities following the Business Combination could be volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. Any of the factors

48

listed below could have a material adverse effect on your investment in our securities and our securities may trade at prices significantly below the price you paid for them. In such circumstances, the trading price of our securities may not recover and may experience a further decline.

Factors affecting the trading price of the post-combination company’s securities following the Business Combination may include:

•         actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly financial results or the quarterly financial results of companies perceived to be similar to us;

•         changes in the market’s expectations about our operating results;

•         success of competitors;

•         our operating results failing to meet the expectation of securities analysts or investors in a particular period;

•         changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts concerning the post-combination company or the market in general;

•         operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to the post-combination company;

•         our ability to market new and enhanced products on a timely basis;

•         changes in laws and regulations affecting our business;

•         commencement of, or involvement in, litigation involving the post-combination company;

•         changes in the post-combination company’s capital structure, such as future issuances of securities or the incurrence of additional debt;

•         the volume of shares of our common stock available for public sale;

•         any major change in our board or management;

•         sales of substantial amounts of common stock by our directors, executive officers or significant stockholders or the perception that such sales could occur; and

•         general economic and political conditions such as recessions, interest rates, fuel prices, international currency fluctuations and acts of war or terrorism.

Broad market and industry factors may materially harm the market price of our securities irrespective of our operating performance. The stock market in general and NASDAQ have experienced price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the particular companies affected. The trading prices and valuations of these stocks, and of our securities, may not be predictable. A loss of investor confidence in the market for retail stocks or the stocks of other companies which investors perceive to be similar to the post-combination company could depress our stock price regardless of our business, prospects, financial conditions or results of operations. A decline in the market price of our securities also could adversely affect our ability to issue additional securities and our ability to obtain additional financing in the future.

Following the Business Combination, if securities or industry analysts do not publish or cease publishing research or reports about the post-combination company, its business, or its market, or if they change their recommendations regarding our common stock adversely, the price and trading volume of our common stock could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts may publish about us, our business, our market, or our competitors. Securities and industry analysts do not currently, and may never, publish research on the Company or the post-combination company. If no securities or industry analysts commence coverage of the post-combination company, our stock price and trading volume would likely be negatively impacted. If any of the analysts who may cover the post-combination company change their recommendation regarding our stock adversely, or provide more favorable relative

49

recommendations about our competitors, the price of our common stock would likely decline. If any analyst who may cover the Company were to cease coverage of the post-combination company or fail to regularly publish reports on it, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

We have not registered the shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants under the Securities Act or states securities laws at this time, and such registration may not be in place when an investor desires to exercise warrants, thus precluding such investor from being able to exercise its warrants and causing such warrants to expire worthless.

We have not registered the public shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants under the Securities Act or any state securities laws at this time. However, under the terms of the warrant agreement, we have agreed, as soon as practicable, but in no event later than fifteen (15) business days after the closing of an initial business combination, to use our best efforts to file a registration statement under the Securities Act covering such shares and maintain a current prospectus relating to the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants, until the expiration of the warrants in accordance with the provisions of the warrant agreement. We cannot assure you that we will be able to do so if, for example, any facts or events arise which represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement or prospectus, the financial statements contained or incorporated by reference therein are not current or correct or the SEC issues a stop order. If the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants are not registered under the Securities Act, we would be required to permit holders to exercise their warrants on a cashless basis. However, no warrant will be exercisable for cash or on a cashless basis, and we will not be obligated to issue any shares to holders seeking to exercise their warrants, unless the issuance of the shares upon such exercise is registered or qualified under the securities laws of the state of the exercising holder, unless an exemption is available. Notwithstanding the above, if common stock is at the time of any exercise of a warrant not listed on a national securities exchange such that it satisfies the definition of a “covered security” under Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act, we may, at our option, require holders of public warrants who exercise their warrants to do so on a “cashless basis” in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act and, in the event we so elect, we will not be required to file or maintain in effect a registration statement or register or qualify the shares under blue sky laws. In no event will we be required to net cash settle any warrant, or issue securities or other compensation in exchange for the warrants in the event that we are unable to register or qualify the shares underlying the warrants under the Securities Act or applicable state securities laws. If the issuance of the shares upon exercise of the warrants is not so registered or qualified or exempt from registration or qualification, the holder of such warrant shall not be entitled to exercise such warrant and such warrant may have no value and expire worthless. In such event, holders who acquired their warrants as part of a purchase of units will have paid the full unit purchase price solely for the shares of common stock included in the units. If and when the warrants become redeemable by us, we may exercise our redemption right even if we are unable to register or qualify the underlying shares of common stock for sale under all applicable state securities laws.

A significant portion of our total outstanding shares are restricted from immediate resale but may be sold into the market in the near future. This could cause the market price of our common stock to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of common stock in the public market could occur at any time. These sales, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of shares intend to sell shares, could reduce the market price of common stock. After the Business Combination, Sponsor will hold approximately 14% of our common stock and the Selling Equityholders will hold approximately 13%. While the Investor Rights Agreement between Simply Good Foods, Sponsor and Atkins Holdings LLC will restrict Atkins Holdings LLC from transferring any of its common stock acquired pursuant to the Business Combination until 180 days following the date of the consummation of the Business Combination, these shares may be sold after the expiration of the lock-up. Pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement between Simply Good Foods and Sponsor, no later than 180 days following the acquisition, Simply Good Foods is required to file a shelf registration statement relating to the offer and sale of the Registrable Securities (as defined in the Investor Rights Agreement between Simply Good Foods and Sponsor) owned by Sponsor and certain of their permitted transferees. Pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement between Simply Good Foods, Sponsor and Atkins Holdings LLC, at any time Simply Good Foods is eligible to register the shares of common stock of Atkins Holdings LLC acquired pursuant to the Business Combination, Simply Good Foods will use commercially reasonable efforts to do so. As restrictions on resale end, the market price of common stock could decline if the holders of currently restricted shares sell them or are

50

perceived by the market as intending to sell them. See the sections entitled “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — The Investor Rights Agreement with Conyers Park” and “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — The Investor Rights Agreement with Atkins Holdings LLC” for additional information.

Warrants will become exercisable for Conyers Park common stock, which would increase the number of shares eligible for future resale in the public market and result in dilution to Conyers Park stockholders.

Conyers Park issued warrants to purchase 13,416,667 shares of common stock as part of its IPO and simultaneously with the commencement of its IPO on July 20, 2016, Conyers Park issued an aggregate of 6,700,000 private placement warrants to Sponsor, each exercisable to purchase one share of Conyers Park Class A common stock at $11.50 per share. In addition, prior to consummating an initial business combination, nothing prevents Conyers Park from issuing additional securities in a private placement so long as they do not participate in any manner in the Trust Account or vote as a class with the common stock on a business combination. To the extent such warrants are exercised, additional shares of our common stock will be issued, which will result in dilution to the then existing holders of common stock of the Company and increase the number of shares eligible for resale in the public market. Sales of substantial numbers of such shares in the public market could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

The private placement warrants are identical to the warrants sold as part of the units issued in our IPO except that, so long as they are held by our Sponsor or its permitted transferees, (i) they will not be redeemable by us, (ii) they (including the common stock issuable upon exercise of these warrants) may not, subject to certain limited exceptions, be transferred, assigned or sold by our Sponsor until 30 days after the completion of an initial business combination and (iii) they may be exercised by the holders on a cashless basis.

The Company’s public stockholders may experience dilution as a consequence of, among other transactions, the issuance of common stock as consideration in the Business Combination and the Common Stock Private Placement. Having a minority share position may reduce the influence that our current stockholders have on the management of the post-combination company.

It is anticipated that, upon completion of the Business Combination, the Company’s public stockholders will retain an ownership interest of approximately 71% in the post-combination company, Sponsor will retain an ownership interest of approximately 14% in the post-combination company and Selling Equityholders will own approximately 13% of the outstanding common stock of the post-combination company. This ownership interest assumes that no shares of common stock are elected to be redeemed. The ownership percentage with respect to the post-combination company following the Business Combination does not take into account (i) any shares of common stock equal to the number of Excess Shares that may be issued by the Company in the future to fund Deferred Cash Consideration payable to Selling Equityholders, (ii) warrants to purchase common stock that may remain outstanding following the Business Combination or (iii) the issuance of any shares upon completion of the Business Combination under the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan, which is intended to be entered into following the consummation of the Business Combination. If the actual facts are different than these assumptions (which they are likely to be), the percentage ownership retained by the Company’s existing stockholders in the post-combination company will be different. See the section entitled “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information” for further information. To the extent that any of the warrants are exercised for shares of common stock, or any shares of common stock are issued under the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan, current stockholders may experience substantial dilution. Such dilution could, among other things, limit the ability of our current stockholders to influence management of the post-combination company through the election of directors following the Business Combination.

We may redeem the unexpired warrants prior to their exercise at a time that is disadvantageous to warrant holders, thereby making their warrants worthless.

We have the ability to redeem outstanding warrants at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at a price of $0.01 per warrant, provided that the last reported sales price of the common stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading-day period ending on the third trading day prior to the date we send the notice of redemption to the warrant holders. If and when the warrants become redeemable by us, we may exercise our redemption right even if we are unable to register or qualify the underlying securities for sale under all applicable state securities laws. Redemption of the outstanding warrants could force you (i) to

51

exercise your warrants and pay the exercise price therefor at a time when it may be disadvantageous for you to do so, (ii) to sell your warrants at the then-current market price when you might otherwise wish to hold your warrants or (iii) to accept the nominal redemption price which, at the time the outstanding warrants are called for redemption, is likely to be substantially less than the market value of your warrants. None of the private placement warrants will be redeemable by us so long as they are held by their initial purchasers or their permitted transferees.

Anti-takeover provisions contained in our proposed amended and restated certificate of incorporation and proposed amended and restated bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, could impair a takeover attempt.

The combined company’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws will contain provisions that may discourage unsolicited takeover proposals that stockholders may consider to be in their best interests. We are also subject to anti-takeover provisions under Delaware law, which could delay or prevent a change of control. Together these provisions may make more difficult the removal of management and may discourage transactions that otherwise could involve payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our securities. These provisions will include:

•         a staggered board providing for three classes of directors, which limits the ability of a stockholder or group to gain control of our board;

•         no cumulative voting in the election of directors, which limits the ability of minority stockholders to elect director candidates;

•         the right of our board of directors to elect a director to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the board of directors or the resignation, death, or removal of a director in certain circumstances, which prevents stockholders from being able to fill vacancies on our board of directors;

•         the ability of our board of directors to determine whether to issue shares of our preferred stock and to determine the price and other terms of those shares, including preferences and voting rights, without stockholder approval, which could be used to significantly dilute the ownership of a hostile acquirer;

•         a prohibition on stockholder action by written consent, which forces stockholder action to be taken at an annual or special meeting of our stockholders;

•         a prohibition on stockholders calling a special meeting, which forces stockholder action to be taken at an annual of our stockholders or at a special meeting of our stockholders called by the chairman of the board, the chief executive officer of the board of directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the board of directors;

•         the requirement that a meeting of stockholders may be called only by the board of directors, which may delay the ability of our stockholders to force consideration of a proposal or to take action, including the removal of directors;

•         providing that directors may be removed prior to the expiration of their terms by stockholders only for cause and upon the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of all outstanding shares of the combined company;

•         a requirement that changes or amendments to the certificate of incorporation or the bylaws must be approved by at least 75% of the voting power of outstanding common stock of the combined company; and

•         advance notice procedures that stockholders must comply with in order to nominate candidates to our board of directors or to propose matters to be acted upon at a stockholders’ meeting, which may discourage or deter a potential acquirer from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirer’s own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of the Company.

52

Activities taken by affiliates of the Company to purchase, directly or indirectly, public shares of the Company’s common stock will increase the likelihood of approval of the Business Combination Proposal and other proposals and may affect the market price of the Company’s securities.

Sponsor, directors, officers, advisors or their affiliates may purchase shares in privately negotiated transactions either prior to or following the consummation of the Business Combination. None of Sponsor, directors, officers, advisors or their affiliates will make any such purchases when such parties are in possession of any material non-public information not disclosed to the seller or during a restricted period under Regulation M under the Exchange Act. Although none of Sponsor, directors, officers, advisors or their affiliates currently anticipate paying any premium purchase price for such public shares, in the event such parties do, the payment of a premium may not be in the best interest of those stockholders not receiving any such additional consideration. There is no limit on the number of shares that could be acquired by Sponsor, directors, officers, advisors or their affiliates, or the price such parties may pay.

If such transactions are effected, the consequence could be to cause the Business Combination to be approved in circumstances where such approval could not otherwise be obtained. Purchases of shares by the persons described above would allow them to exert more influence over the approval of the Business Combination Proposal and other proposals and would likely increase the chances that such proposals would be approved. If the market does not view the Business Combination positively, purchases of public shares may have the effect of counteracting the market’s view, which would otherwise be reflected in a decline in the market price of Conyers Park’s securities. In addition, the termination of the support provided by these purchases may materially adversely affect the market price of Conyers Park’s securities.

As of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, no agreements with respect to the private purchase of public shares by the Company or the persons described above have been entered into with any such investor or holder. Conyers Park’s will file a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC to disclose private arrangements entered into or significant private purchases made by any of the aforementioned persons that would affect the vote on the Business Combination Proposal or other proposals.

Changes in laws or regulations, or a failure to comply with any laws and regulations, may adversely affect Conyers Park’s business, investments and results of operations.

Conyers Park is subject to laws, regulations and rules enacted by national, regional and local governments. In particular, Conyers Park is required to comply with certain SEC, NASDAQ and other legal or regulatory requirements. Compliance with, and monitoring of, applicable laws, regulations and rules may be difficult, time consuming and costly. Those laws, regulations and rules and their interpretation and application may also change from time to time and those changes could have a material adverse effect on Conyers Park’s business, investments and results of operations. In addition, a failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and rules, as interpreted and applied, could have a material adverse effect on Conyers Park’s business and results of operations.

It is a condition to closing the Business Combination that redemptions by our Class A stockholders do not exceed 15,000,000 shares of Conyers Park common stock. The existence of this condition may make it less likely that the Business Combination is ultimately completed.

The Agreement and Plan of Merger includes as a condition to closing the Business Combination that holders of Conyers Park common stock do not redeem more than 15,000,000 shares of Conyers Park common stock. If there are substantial redemptions by Conyers Park’s public stockholders, we may be unable to consummate the Business Combination. Such condition makes it more difficult for us to consummate a business combination with which a substantial number of our stockholders do not agree.

We may be subject to a variety of additional risks that may negatively impact our operations because Atkins has operations and opportunities outside of the United States.

If we effect the Business Combination with Atkins, which has operations and opportunities outside of the United States, we may be subject to special considerations and risks associated with companies operating in an international setting, including any of the following:

•         costs and difficulties inherent in managing cross-border business operations;

53

•         rules and regulations regarding currency redemption;

•         complex corporate withholding taxes on individuals;

•         laws governing the manner in which future Business Combinations may be effected;

•         tariffs and trade barriers;

•         regulations related to customs and import/export matters;

•         longer payment cycles;

•         tax issues, such as tax law changes and variations in tax laws as compared to the United States;

•         currency fluctuations and exchange controls;

•         rates of inflation;

•         challenges in collecting accounts receivable;

•         cultural and language differences;

•         employment regulations;

•         crime, strikes, riots, civil disturbances, terrorist attacks and wars; and

•         deterioration of political relations with the United States.

We may not be able to adequately address these additional risks. If we are unable to do so, our operations might suffer, which may adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

There may be tax consequences of the Business Combination that adversely affect Conyers Park stockholders and warrant holders.

Conyers Park anticipates that the Business Combination can be effected such that Conyers Park stockholders do not recognize gain or loss pursuant to Section 351 of the Code or Section 368 of the Code. To the extent the Parent Merger does not qualify as an exchange pursuant to Section 351 of the Code or a “reorganization” pursuant to Section 368 of the Code, the Business Combination could result in the imposition of substantial taxes on Conyers Park stockholders. You are strongly urged to consult with a tax advisor to determine the particular U.S. federal, state or local or foreign income or other tax consequences of the Business Combination to you. For a description of material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Business Combination, see the section entitled “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations to Conyers Park Common Stockholders and Warrant Holders” beginning on page 94.

Risks Related to the Redemption

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Conyers Park may not be able to consummate the Business Combination in the event redemptions exceed 15,000,000 shares of Conyers Park common stock.

Conyers Park’s current amended and restated certificate of incorporation does not provide a specified maximum redemption threshold, except that in no event will Conyers Park redeem public shares in an amount that would cause Conyers Park’s net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 (such that Conyers Park is not subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules) or any greater net tangible asset or cash requirement which may be contained in the agreement relating to Conyers Park’s initial business combination. The Agreement and Plan of Merger includes as a condition to closing the Business Combination that holders of Conyers Park common stock do not redeem more than 15,000,000 shares of Conyers Park common stock. As a result, Conyers Park may be able to complete the Business Combination even though a substantial majority of its public stockholders do not agree with the transaction and have redeemed their shares or, if Conyers Park seeks stockholder approval of the initial business combination and does not conduct redemptions in connection with the business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, has entered into privately negotiated agreements to sell their shares to Sponsor, officers, directors, advisors or their affiliates.

54

If you or a “group” of stockholders of which you are a part are deemed to hold an aggregate of more than 10.0% of Conyers Park’s common stock issued in the IPO, you (or, if a member of such a group, all of the members of such group in the aggregate) will lose the ability to redeem all such shares in excess of 10.0% of Conyers Park’s common stock issued in the IPO.

A public stockholder, together with any of his, her or its affiliates or any other person with whom it is acting in concert or as a “group” (as defined under Section 13 of the Exchange Act), will be restricted from redeeming in the aggregate his, her or its shares or, if part of such a group, the group’s shares, in excess of 10% of the shares of common stock included in the units sold in Conyers Park’s IPO. Conyers Park refers to such shares in excess of an aggregation of 10% or more of the shares sold in its IPO as “Unredeemable Shares.” In order to determine whether a stockholder is acting in concert or as a group with another stockholder, the Company will require each public stockholder seeking to exercise redemption rights to certify to the Company whether such stockholder is acting in concert or as a group with any other stockholder. Such certifications, together with other public information relating to stock ownership available to the Company at that time, such as Section 13D, Section 13G and Section 16 filings under the Exchange Act, will be the sole basis on which the Company makes the above-referenced determination. Your inability to redeem any Unredeemable Shares will reduce your influence over Conyers Park’s ability to consummate the Business Combination and you could suffer a material loss on your investment in Conyers Park if you sell Unredeemable Shares in open market transactions. Additionally, you will not receive redemption distributions with respect to the Unredeemable Shares if Conyers Park consummates the Business Combination. As a result, you will continue to hold that number of shares aggregating to more than 10.0% of the shares sold in Conyers Park’s IPO and, in order to dispose of such shares, would be required to sell your stock in open market transactions, potentially at a loss. Notwithstanding the foregoing, stockholders may challenge the Company’s determination as to whether a stockholder is acting in concert or as a group with another stockholder in a court of competent jurisdiction.

There is no guarantee that a stockholder’s decision whether to redeem their shares for a pro rata portion of the Trust Account will put the stockholder in a better future economic position.

Conyers Park can give no assurance as to the price at which a stockholder may be able to sell its public shares in the future following the completion of the Business Combination or any alternative business combination. Certain events following the consummation of any initial business combination, including this Business Combination, may cause an increase in Conyers Park’s share price, and may result in a lower value realized now than a stockholder of the Company might realize in the future had the stockholder redeemed their shares. Similarly, if a stockholder does not redeem their shares, the stockholder will bear the risk of ownership of the public shares after the consummation of any initial business combination, and there can be no assurance that a stockholder can sell its shares in the future for a greater amount than the redemption price set forth in this proxy statement/prospectus. A stockholder should consult the stockholder’s own tax and/or financial advisor for assistance on how this may affect his, her or its individual situation.

If Conyers Park stockholders fail to comply with the redemption requirements specified in this proxy statement/prospectus, they will not be entitled to redeem their shares of Conyers Park common stock for a pro rata portion of the funds held in Conyers Park’s Trust Account.

Holders of Conyers Park’s public shares are required to affirmatively vote either for or against the Business Combination Proposal in order to exercise their rights to redeem their shares for a pro rata portion of the Trust Account. In addition, in order to exercise their redemption rights, they are required to submit a request in writing and deliver their stock (either physically or electronically) to Conyers Park’s transfer agent at least two (2) business days prior to the special meeting. Stockholders electing to redeem their shares will receive their pro rata portion the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account, including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to it to pay up to $1,000,000 of the Company’s working capital requirements as well as to pay the Company’s franchise and income taxes, calculated as of two (2) business days prior to the anticipated consummation of the Business Combination. See the section entitled “Special Meeting in Lieu of 2017 Annual Meeting of Company Stockholders — Redemption Rights” for additional information on how to exercise your redemption rights.

55

Stockholders of the Company who wish to redeem their shares for a pro rata portion of the Trust Account must comply with specific requirements for redemption that may make it more difficult for them to exercise their redemption rights prior to the deadline.

Public stockholders who wish to redeem their shares for a pro rata portion of the Trust Account must, among other things as fully described in the section entitled “Special Meeting in Lieu of 2017 Annual Meeting of Company Stockholders — Redemption Rights,” tender their certificates to Conyers Park’s transfer agent or deliver their shares to the transfer agent electronically through the DTC prior to June 30, 2017. In order to obtain a physical stock certificate, a stockholder’s broker and/or clearing broker, DTC and Conyers Park’s transfer agent will need to act to facilitate this request. It is Conyers Park’s understanding that stockholders should generally allot at least two weeks to obtain physical certificates from the transfer agent. However, because Conyers Park does not have any control over this process or over the brokers, which Conyers Park refers to as “DTC,” it may take significantly longer than two weeks to obtain a physical stock certificate. If it takes longer than anticipated to obtain a physical certificate, stockholders who wish to redeem their shares may be unable to obtain physical certificates by the deadline for exercising their redemption rights and thus will be unable to redeem their shares.

The ability to execute our strategic plan could be negatively impacted to the extent a significant number of stockholders choose to redeem their shares in connection with the Business Combination.

In the event the aggregate cash consideration Conyers Park would be required to pay for all shares of Class A common stock that are validly submitted for redemption plus any amount required to satisfy cash conditions pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement exceeds the aggregate amount of cash available to Conyers Park, we may be required to increase the financial leverage our business would have to support. This may negatively impact our ability to execute on our future strategic plan.

56

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Conyers Park is providing the following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information to aid you in your analysis of the financial aspects of the Business Combination.

Upon consummation of the Business Combination, Conyers Park will be delisted. Simply Good Foods will be the registrant on a prospective basis and its fiscal year end will be the last Saturday in August. The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information has therefore been prepared from the perspective of Atkins and its fiscal year end of August 27, 2016. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of February 25, 2017 combines the unaudited historical condensed consolidated balance sheet of Atkins as of February 25, 2017 with the unaudited historical condensed balance sheet of Conyers Park as of March 31, 2017, giving effect to the Business Combination as if it had been consummated as of that date. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined income statement for the 52 weeks ended August 27, 2016 combines the audited historical condensed consolidated statement of operations of Atkins for the 52 weeks ended August 27, 2016 with the unaudited historical condensed statement of operations of Conyers Park for the period from April 20, 2016 (inception) through September 30, 2016, giving effect to the Business Combination as if it had occurred on August 30, 2015. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined income statement for the 26 weeks ended February 25, 2017 combines the unaudited historical condensed consolidated statement of operations of Atkins for the 26 weeks ended February 25, 2017 with the unaudited historical condensed statement of operations of Conyers Park for the six months ended March 31, 2017, giving effect to the Business Combination as if it had occurred on August 28, 2016. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined income statement for the 26 weeks ended February 27, 2016 has been prepared based on the unaudited historical condensed consolidated statement of operations of Atkins for the 26 weeks ended February 27, 2016, giving effect to the Business Combination as if it had occurred on August 30, 2015. Financial results for Conyers Park are not included in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined income statement for the 26 weeks ended February 27, 2016 as this period is prior to Conyers Park’s inception.

Conyers Park and Atkins have different fiscal year ends. Atkins’ year end is the last Saturday in August, or August 27, 2016, and Conyers Park’s year end is December 31, 2016. As the fiscal years differ by more than 93 days, financial information for Conyers Park as of March 31, 2017 has been used in the preparation of the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet. Financial information for Conyers Park for the period from April 20, 2016 (inception) through September 30, 2016 and for the six months ended March 31, 2017 have been used in the preparation of the unaudited pro forma condensed combined income statements for the 52 weeks ended August 27, 2016 and the 26 weeks ended February 25, 2017, respectively.

The unaudited pro forma financial statements give effect to the Business Combination in accordance with the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations. The historical financial information has been adjusted to give pro forma effect to events that are related and/or directly attributable to the Business Combination, are factually supportable and are expected to have a continuing impact on the results of the combined company. The adjustments presented on the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements have been identified and presented to provide relevant information necessary for an accurate understanding of the combined company upon consummation of the Business Combination.

The historical financial information of Atkins was prepared from the unaudited financial statements of Atkins as of February 25, 2017. The historical financial information of Conyers Park was derived from the unaudited financial statements of Conyers Park as of March 31, 2017. This information should be read together with Atkins’ and Conyers Park’s financial statements and related notes, “The Company’s Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Atkins Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and other financial information included elsewhere in this proxy statement.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information is for illustrative purposes only. The financial results may have been different had the companies always been combined. You should not rely on the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information as being indicative of the historical results that would have been achieved had the companies always been combined or the future results that the combined company will experience. Atkins and Conyers Park have not had any historical relationship prior to the Business Combination. Accordingly, no pro forma adjustments were required to eliminate activities between the companies.

57

Accompanied with the Business Combination, there is a change in capitalization regarding the debt refinancing and common stock subject to possible redemption that will occur at the effective date or the close of the transaction. Upon closing of the transaction, the Selling Equityholders are receiving cash and 10,250,000 shares of common stock valued at $10 per share, Conyers Park founders are receiving 10,062,500 shares of common stock valued at $10 per share, and 10,000,000 shares valued at $10 per share are expected to be issued through a private placement. Conyers Park’s existing public investors are entitled to receive up to 40,250,000 shares in Simply Good Foods. Conyers Park cannot predict how many of its public stockholders will elect to convert their shares into cash. As a result, it has elected to provide pro forma financial statements under the following two circumstances: (1) no holders of Conyers Park common stock exercise their right to have their shares redeemed upon consummation of the Business Combination and (2) holders of no more than 15,000,000 shares of Conyers Park common stock elect to have their shares converted upon consummation of the Business Combination at a conversion price of approximately $10.00 per share, which represents the maximum redemption amount. The actual results are likely to be in between the results shown, but there can be no assurance that will be the case.

Below are the pro forma financial information and related notes thereto which give effect to the Business Combination and related financing transactions.

58

PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)

		As of February 25, 2017 Historical Atkins				As of March 31, 2017 Historical Conyers Park				Pro Forma Adjustments Assuming No Redemptions				Pro Forma Balance Sheet Assuming No Redemptions				Pro Forma Adjustments Assuming Maximum Redemptions				Pro Forma Balance Sheet Assuming Maximum Redemptions
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	72,917			$	702			$	(22,437	)(a)		$	51,182			$	(22,437	)(a)		$	51,182
Accounts receivable, net			42,153				—								42,153								42,153
Inventories, net			22,381				—								22,381								22,381
Other current assets			13,547				283				(283	)(b)			13,547				(283	)(b)			13,547
Total current assets			150,998				985				(22,720	)			129,263				(22,720	)			129,263
Long-term assets:
Property and equipment, net			2,014				—								2,014								2,014
Intangible assets, net			185,874				—				159,926	(c)			345,800				159,926	(c)			345,800
Goodwill			55,053				—				324,537	(d)			379,590				324,537	(d)			379,590
Investments held in trust account			—				403,147				(403,147	)(e)			—				(403,147	)(e)			—
Other long-term assets			2,299				—								2,299								2,299
Total long-term assets			245,240				403,147				81,316				729,703				81,316				729,703
Total assets		$	396,238			$	404,132			$	58,596			$	858,966			$	58,596			$	858,966
Liabilities and stockholders’ (deficit)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	13,308			$	344			$	(344	)(b)		$	13,308			$	(344	)(b)		$	13,308
Current portion of tax receivable liability			—				—				5,226	(f)			5,226				5,226	(f)			5,226
Accrued interest			4,077				—				(4,077	)(g)			—				(4,077	)(g)			—
Other current liabilities			20,470				106				(106	)(b)			20,470				(106	)(b)			20,470
Current maturities of long-term debt			—				—				2,001	(g)			2,001				2,001	(g)			2,001
Total current liabilities			37,855				450				2,700				41,005				2,700				41,005
Long-term liabilities:
Long-term debt, less current maturities			330,437				—				(136,800	)(g)			193,637				13,200	(g)			343,637
Warrant liabilities			16,119				—				(16,119	)(h)			—				(16,119	)(h)			—
Tax receivable liability			—				—				10,832	(f)			10,832				10,832	(f)			10,832
Deferred income taxes			27,823				—								27,823								27,823
Deferred underwriting compensation			—				14,088				(14,088	)(i)			—				(14,088	)(i)			—
Total long-term liabilities			374,379				14,088				(156,175	)			232,292				(6,175	)			382,292
Common stock subject to possible redemption			—				384,594				(384,594	)(k)			—				(384,594	)(k)			—
Stockholders’ (deficit):
Common stock			5				1				202,495	(j)			202,501				202,495	(j)			202,501
Additional paid-in capital			(42,379	)			5,282				432,961	(k)			395,864				282,961	(k)			245,864
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)			26,405				(283	)			(38,818	)(l)			(12,696	)			(38,818	)(l)			(12,696	)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)			(27	)			—				27	(m)			—				27	(m)			—
Total stockholders’ (deficit)			(15,996	)			5,000				596,665				585,669				446,665				435,669
Total liabilities and stockholders’ (deficit)		$	396,238			$	404,132			$	58,596			$	858,966			$	58,596			$	858,966
Book value per share														$	8.30							$	7.84

59

PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

52-Week Period Ended August 27, 2016
(In thousands, except for share information)

		52 Weeks Ended August 27, 2016												Period from April 20, 2016 (Inception to September 30, 2016				Pro Forma Adjustments				Pro Forma Income Statement				Pro Forma Adjustments				Pro Forma Income Statement
		Historical Atkins				Frozen License Adjustments (Note 4)				Atkins’ Pro Forma				Historical Conyers Park				Assuming No Redemptions				Assuming No Redemptions				Assuming Maximum Redemptions				Assuming Maximum Redemptions
Net sales		$	427,858			$	(58,819	)		$	369,039			$	—			$	—			$	369,039			$	—			$	369,039
Cost of goods sold			248,464				(48,977	)			199,487				—								199,487								199,487
Gross profit			179,394				(9,842	)			169,552				—				—				169,552								169,552
Freight			18,489				(5,079	)			13,410				—								13,410								13,410
Selling			18,513				(384	)			18,129				—								18,129								18,129
Marketing			37,751				(1,487	)			36,264				—								36,264								36,264
General and administrative			46,961				(2,897	)			44,064				158				—				44,222				—				44,222
Depreciation and amortization			10,179				—				10,179				—				(2,992	)(c)			7,187				(2,992	)(c)			7,187
Other expense			1,542				(493	)			1,049				—								1,049								1,049
Income (loss) from operations			45,959				498				46,457				(158	)			2,992				49,291				2,992				49,291
Interest income			118				—				118				93								211								211
Licensing revenue							—				—				—								—								—
Miscellaneous income			—				—				—				—								—								—
Change in contingent consideration			(722	)			—				(722	)			—				722	(h)			—				722	(h)			—
Interest expense			(27,195	)			—				(27,195	)			—				16,288	(g)			(10,907	)			8,788	(g)			(18,407	)
Loss on foreign currency transactions			(619	)			—				(619	)			—								(619	)							(619	)
Income before income taxes			17,541				498				18,039				(65	)			20,002				37,975				12,502				30,476
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes			7,507				197				7,704				—				7,921	(o)			15,625				4,951	(o)			12,655
Net (loss) income		$	10,034			$	301			$	10,335			$	(65	)		$	12,081			$	22,351			$	7,551			$	17,821
Common stock outstanding															10,847,491								70,562,500								55,562,500
Basic and diluted earnings per share														$	(0.01	)						$	0.32							$	0.32

60

PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
26-Week Period Ended February 25, 2017

(In thousands, except for share information)

		26 Weeks Ended February 25, 2017				Six Months Ended March 31, 2017				Pro Forma Adjustments				Pro Forma Income Statement				Pro Forma Adjustments Assuming				Pro Forma Income Statement Assuming
		Historical Atkins				Historical Conyers Park				Assuming No Redemptions				Assuming No Redemptions				Maximum Redemptions				Maximum Redemptions
Net sales		$	202,111			$	—			$	—			$	202,111			$	—			$	202,111
Cost of goods sold			106,826				—								106,826								106,826
Gross profit			95,285				—				—				95,285								95,285
Freight			9,329				—								9,329								9,329
Selling			8,271				—								8,271								8,271
Marketing			19,236				—								19,236								19,236
General and administrative			21,699				771				(169	)(n)			22,301				(169	)(n)			22,301
Depreciation and amortization			4,927				—				(1,323	)(c)			3,604				(1,323	)(c)			3,604
Other expense			58				—								58								58
Income (loss) from operations			31,765				(771	)			1,492				32,486				1,492				32,486
Interest income			118				553								671								671
Licensing revenue			81				—								81								81
Miscellaneous income			—				—								—								—
Change in contingent consideration			(397	)			—				397	(h)			—				397	(h)			—
Interest expense			(13,629	)			—				8,176	(g)			(5,454	)			4,426	(g)			(9,204	)
Loss on foreign currency transactions			(718	)			—								(718	)							(718	)
Income before income taxes			17,220				(218	)			10,065				27,067				6,315				23,317
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes			6,970				—				3,986	(o)			10,956				2,501	(o)			9,471
Net (loss) income		$	10,250			$	(218	)		$	6,079			$	16,111			$	3,814			$	13,846
Common stock outstanding							11,837,703								70,562,500								55,562,500
Basic and diluted earnings per share						$	(0.02	)						$	0.23							$	0.25

61

PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

26-Week Period Ended February 27, 2016
(In thousands, except for share information)

		26 Weeks Ended February 27, 2016(1)												Pro Forma Adjustments				Pro Forma Income Statement				Pro Forma Adjustments				Pro Forma Income Statement
		Historical Atkins				Frozen License Adjustments (Note 4)				Atkins’ Pro Forma				Assuming No Redemptions				Assuming No Redemptions				Assuming Maximum Redemptions				Assuming Maximum Redemptions
Net sales		$	219,777			$	(29,023	)		$	190,754			$	—			$	190,754			$	—			$	190,754
Cost of goods sold			126,489				(24,029	)			102,460								102,460								102,460
Gross profit			93,288				(4,994	)			88,294				—				88,294								88,294
Freight			9,075				(2,544	)			6,531								6,531								6,531
Selling			9,369				(116	)			9,253								9,253								9,253
Marketing			19,464				(549	)			18,915								18,915								18,915
General and administrative			21,865				(1,337	)			20,528				—				20,528				—				20,528
Depreciation and amortization			5,247				—				5,247				(1,667	)(c)			3,580				(1,667	)(c)			3,580
Other expense			425				—				425								425								425
Income (loss) from operations			27,843				(448	)			27,395				1,667				29,062				1,667				29,062
Interest income			116				—				116								116								116
Licensing revenue							—				—								—								—
Miscellaneous income			—				—				—								—								—
Change in contingent consideration			—				—				—				—				—				—				—
Interest expense			(13,733	)			—				(13,733	)			8,280	(g)			(5,454	)			4,530	(g)			(9,204	)
Loss on foreign currency transactions			(401	)			—				(401	)							(401	)							(401	)
Income before income taxes			13,825				(448	)			13,377				9,947				23,324				6,197				19,574
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes			5,726				(177	)			5,549				3,939	(o)			9,487				2,454	(o)			8,002
Net (loss) income		$	8,099			$	(271	)		$	7,828			$	6,008			$	13,836			$	3,743			$	11,571
Common stock outstanding																			70,562,500								55,562,500
Basic and diluted earnings per share																		$	0.20							$	0.21

____________

(1)      As the formation of Conyers Park had not yet occurred, there are no results for Conyers Park to combine with the 26 week period ended February 27, 2016.

62

NOTE 1 — DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS COMBINATION

Description of the Business Combination

The Merger Agreement provides for the business combination of Conyers Park and Atkins under Simply Good Foods. Parent Merger Sub, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Simply Good Foods will merge with and into Parent with Parent surviving such merger, and (b) immediately after the Parent Merger, Atkins Merger Sub, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Simply Good Foods with and into Atkins, with Atkins surviving such merger, as a result of which Parent and Atkins will become wholly-owned subsidiaries of Simply Good Foods.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of February 25, 2017 combines the unaudited historical condensed consolidated balance sheet of Atkins as of February 25, 2017 with the unaudited historical condensed balance sheet of Conyers Park as of March 31, 2017, giving effect to the Business Combination as if it had been consummated as of that date. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined income statement for the 52 weeks ended August 27, 2016 combines the audited historical condensed consolidated statement of operations of Atkins for the 52 weeks ended August 27, 2016 with the unaudited historical condensed statement of operations of Conyers Park for the period from April 20, 2016 (inception) through September 30, 2016, giving effect to the Business Combination as if it had occurred on August 30, 2015. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined income statement for the 26 weeks ended February 25, 2017 combines the unaudited historical condensed consolidated statement of operations of Atkins for the 26 weeks ended February 25, 2017 with the unaudited historical condensed statement of operations of Conyers Park for the six months ended March 31, 2017, giving effect to the Business Combination as if it had occurred on August 28, 2016. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined income statement for the 26 weeks ended February 27, 2016 has been prepared based on the unaudited historical condensed consolidated statement of operations of Atkins for the 26 weeks ended February 27, 2016, giving effect to the Business Combination as if it had occurred on August 30, 2015. Financial results for Conyers Park are not included in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined income statement for the 26 weeks ended February 27, 2016 as this period is prior to Conyers Park’s inception.

Conyers Park and Atkins have different fiscal year ends. Atkins’ year end is the last Saturday in August, or August 27, 2016, and Conyers Park’s year end is December 31, 2016. As the fiscal years differ by more than 93 days, financial information for Conyers Park as of March 31, 2017 has been used in the preparation of the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet. Financial information for Conyers Park for the period from April 20, 2016 (inception) through September 30, 2016 and for the six months ended March 31, 2017 have been used in the preparation of the unaudited pro forma condensed combined income statements for the 52 weeks ended August 27, 2016 and the 26 weeks ended February 25, 2017, respectively. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined income statement for Conyers Park for the six months ended March 31, 2017 was prepared by subtracting the unaudited period from April 20, 2016 (inception) through September 30, 2016 as filed on Form 10-Q from the audited period from April 20, 2016 (inception) through December 31, 2016 as filed on Form 10-K and adding the unaudited three months ended March 31, 2017 as filed on Form 10-Q.

Restructuring costs of $1,542, $57 and $424 were historically recorded as of the 52 weeks ended August 27, 2016, the 26 weeks ended February 25, 2017 and the 26 weeks ended February 27, 2016, respectively. A material historical restructuring cost should not be removed as a pro forma adjustment as it is not attributable to the acquisition; however, those costs should be disclosed as a note to the pro forma financials.

Upon closing of the Business Combination, Atkins anticipates incurring incremental general and administrative expenses of approximately $2,000 per year as a result of being a public company, including costs associated with annual and quarterly reporting, Sarbanes-Oxley compliance expenses, expenses associated with listing on the NASDAQ, independent auditor fees, legal fees, investor relations expenses, registrar and transfer agent fees, director and officer liability insurance expenses, compensation for independent directors, and other administrative costs. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements do not reflect this incremental general and administrative expense.

The pro forma combined financial statements do not necessarily reflect what the combined company’s financial condition or results of operations would have been had the acquisition occurred on the dates indicated. They also may not be useful in predicting the future financial condition and results of operations of the combined company. The actual financial position and results of operations may differ significantly from the pro forma amounts reflected herein due to a variety of factors.

63

NOTE 2 — PRELIMINARY ALLOCATION OF PURCHASE PRICE

The Business Combination has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). ASC 805 requires, among other things, that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their fair values, as determined in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements, as of the Business Combination date. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed will be recorded at the effective time of the Business Combination at their respective fair values and added to those of Conyers Park.

The following is a preliminary estimate of the purchase consideration to be paid to effect the Business Combination (in thousands, except per share data):

Cash paid to Selling Equityholders		$	627,625
Equity consideration paid to Selling Equityholders			102,500
Total cash and equity consideration			730,125
Tax Receivable Agreement to Selling Equityholders			16,058
Total consideration		$	746,183
Accounts receivable, net		$	42,153
Inventories, net			22,381
Other current assets			13,547
Property and equipment, net			2,014
Intangible assets, net			345,800
Goodwill			379,590
Other long-term assets			2,299
Accounts payable			(13,308	)
Other current liabilities			(20,470	)
Deferred income taxes			(27,823	)
Total assets acquired and liabilities assumed		$	746,183

Atkins debt will not be assumed or repaid by Conyers Park as part of the Business Combination. Additionally, Atkins cash will not be assumed by Conyers Park. Atkins debt will be repaid in connection with the Business Combination and has therefore been excluded from the determination of the fair value of liabilities assumed. Certain executive officers of Atkins are entitled to benefits upon a change of control. Such payments are the obligation of the Selling Equityholders.

Conyers Park has made preliminary purchase price allocations based on currently available information. The final determination of the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is expected to be completed as soon as practicable after completion of the Business Combination.

At the closing of the Business Combination, Simply Good Foods will enter into the Tax Receivable Agreement with the Stockholders’ Representative (on behalf of the Selling Equityholders). The Tax Receivable Agreement will be treated as contingent consideration for accounting purposes and included as part of the consideration transferred in the business combination. The Tax Receivable Agreement obligation will be recorded at its acquisition-date fair value and classified as a liability. The Tax Receivable Agreement will generally provide for the payment by Simply Good Foods to the Selling Equityholders for certain federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax benefits deemed realized (as described in more detail in the section entitled “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — The Tax Receivable Agreement”) in post-closing taxable periods by Simply Good Foods, Conyers Park, Atkins and Atkins eligible subsidiaries from the use of up to $100 million of the following tax attributes: (i) net operating losses available to be carried forward as of the closing of the Business Combination; (ii) certain deductions generated by the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; and (iii) remaining depreciable tax basis from the 2003 acquisition of Atkins Nutritionals, Inc. As of February 25, 2017, the estimated fair value of these contingent payments is $16,058 which has been recorded as a liability and represents 100% of the value of the recorded tax attributes. Subsequent changes in fair value of the contingent liability will be recognized in earnings.

64

NOTE 2 — PRELIMINARY ALLOCATION OF PURCHASE PRICE (cont.)

The amounts allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Business Combination could differ materially from the preliminary amounts presented in these unaudited pro forma financial statements. A decrease in the fair value of assets acquired or an increase in the fair value of liabilities assumed in the Business Combination from those valuations presented in these unaudited pro forma financial statements would result in a corresponding increase in the amount of goodwill that will result from the Business Combination. In addition, if the value of the acquired assets is higher than indicated, it may result in higher amortization and depreciation expense than is presented in these unaudited pro forma financial statements.

NOTE 3 — RECONCILIATION OF CONYERS PARK’S UNAUDITED HISTORICAL STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

A reconciliation of Conyers Park’s unaudited historical statement of operations for the six months ended March 31, 2017 is as follows:

CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)

		Period from April 20, 2016 (inception) through December 31, 2016				Period from April 20, 2016 (inception) through September 30, 2016				Three Months Ended March 31, 2017				Six Months Ended March 31, 2017
Revenues		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—
General and administrative expenses			487				158				442				771
Loss from operations			(487	)			(158	)			(442	)			(771	)
Interest Income			294				93				352				553
Net Loss		$	(193	)		$	(65	)		$	(90	)		$	(218	)

NOTE 4 — PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS TO NET SALES FOR THE ATKINS LICENSE ARRANGEMENT

The unaudited pro forma financial statements also reflect the impact of the Atkins license arrangement for frozen meals sold in the U.S. by Bellisio.  This agreement was effective September 1, 2016 and is a seven-year license with Bellisio to license its frozen meals business. Bellisio manufactures, distributes, markets, promotes and sells Atkins frozen food products under the Atkins licensed mark. The effects of the license agreement are presented in the “Frozen License Adjustments” and “Pro Forma Atkins” columns in the unaudited historical condensed consolidated statement of operations for the 52 weeks ended August 27, 2016 and the 26 weeks ended February 27, 2016.

The adjustments to net sales were determined as follows:

		52-Weeks Ended August 27, 2016				26-Weeks Ended February 27, 2016
Reverse historical Atkins net sales for frozen business		$	(62,819	)		$	(31,023	)
Pro forma frozen license revenue			4,000				2,000
Pro forma net sales frozen license adjustment		$	(58,819	)		$	(29,023	)

The adjustments to income (loss) from operations were determined as follows:

		52-Weeks Ended August, 27, 2016				26-Weeks Ended February 27, 2016
Reverse historical income  from operations for frozen business		$	(3,502	)		$	(2,448	)
Pro forma frozen licensing revenue			4,000				2,000
Pro forma licensing (Income) loss from operations adjustment		$	498			$	(448	)

65

NOTE 5 — PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS

Adjustments included in the unaudited pro forma financial statements are as follows:

(a)      Represents the preliminary net adjustment to cash in connection with the Business Combination. A reconciliation of the pro forma cash adjustments assuming no redemptions and assuming maximum redemptions follows:

Cash paid to Selling Equityholders		$	(627,625	)
Shares issued in private placement			100,000
Transaction fees and expenses			(20,513	)
Reverse Atkins historical cash balance remaining with Selling Equityholders			(72,917	)
Proceeds from new borrowings, net of $4,500 of debt issuance costs on new borrowings			195,638
Investments held in trust accounts used to fund the Business Combination			403,147
Reimbursements due to Conyers Park upon consummation of the Business Combination			(167	)
Pro forma adjustment assuming no redemptions		$	(22,437	)
Proceeds from additional borrowings			150,000
Cash paid to Conyers Park’s public investors			(150,000	)
Pro forma adjustment assuming maximum redemptions		$	(22,437	)

(b)     Represents settlement of certain Conyers Park assets and liabilities upon consummation of the Business Combination.

(c)      Represents the adjustment to intangible assets to reflect the preliminary fair market value and the amortization expense:

		Preliminary Fair Value			Estimated Useful Life in Years		52 Weeks Ended August 27, 2016 Amortization Expense				26 Weeks Ended February 25, 2017 Amortization Expense				26 Weeks Ended February 27, 2016 Amortization Expense
Customer relationships		$	61,400		20		$	3,070			$	1,535			$	1,535
Trademarks and tradenames			254,400		Indefinite			—				—				—
Bellisio licensing agreement			23,100		14			1,650				825				825
Formula and recipes			6,900		5			1,380				690				690
Total		$	345,800				$	6,100			$	3,050			$	3,050
Less: Atkins historical intangibles and amortization expense			185,874					9,092				4,373				4,717
Pro forma adjustments		$	159,926				$	(2,992	)		$	(1,323	)		$	(1,667	)

(d)     Represents the estimated adjustment to goodwill as a result of the Business Combination:

Preliminary purchase price		$	746,183
Less: fair value of net assets acquired			366,593
Total estimated goodwill			379,590
Less: Atkins historical goodwill			55,053
Pro forma adjustment		$	324,537

66

NOTE 5 — PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS (cont.)

Conyers Park believes that a 10% fluctuation in the market price of its common stock is reasonably possible based on average market volatility. Disclosed below is the sensitivity of the purchase price and goodwill to a 10% change in the price of Conyers Park’s common stock.

		Purchase Price			Estimated Goodwill
As presented in the pro forma combined results		$	746,183		$	379,590
10% increase in common stock price		$	756,433		$	389,840
10% decrease in common stock price		$	735,933		$	369,340

(e)      Represents the relief of restrictions on the investments held in the trust account upon consummation of the Business Combination.

(f)      We expect to be able to utilize net operating losses, tax basis and certain other tax attributes that arose prior to the Business Combination, assuming generation of future income. These net operating loss carryforwards, depreciation and amortization deductions in respect of tax basis and certain other tax attributes will reduce the amount of tax that we and our subsidiaries would otherwise be required to pay in the future.  Realization of these net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income prior to their expiration. Although a portion of these carryforwards are subject to the provisions of Internal Revenue Code Section 382, Atkins has not performed a formal study to determine the amount of the limitation. The use of the net operating loss carryforwards may have additional limitations resulting from future ownership changes or other factors under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. The technical guidelines in this area are complex and subject to significant judgment and interpretation and the IRS may disagree with our conclusion, once formed via a Section 382 study. With other transactions affecting the ownership of our stock (of which we may not be aware) that have occurred over the past three years, Atkins may have already triggered an “ownership change” that would result in a limitation on our ability to use the pre-change net operating loss carryforwards to offset U.S. federal taxable income.

Prior to or at the closing of the Business Combination, the combined entity will also enter into the Tax Receivable Agreement with the Stockholders’ Representative. For a description of the Tax Receivable Agreement, see the section entitled “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — The Tax Receivable Agreement.” The combined entity has recorded a liability related to the Tax Receivable Agreement equal to $16,058, of which $5,226 is the current portion.

If we did not enter into the Tax Receivable Agreement, we would generally be entitled to realize and retain the full economic benefit of the tax attributes covered by the Tax Receivable Agreement, aside from any historical Sec. 382 limitations, as discussed above. However, the Tax Receivable Agreement generally will cause our annual cash costs attributable to income taxes (together with the amounts payable under the Tax Receivable Agreement) to be not less than the amount that we would have paid if such tax attributes were not available to offset our taxable income. As a result, stockholders of the combined entity will not be entitled to the economic benefit of the tax attributes covered by the Tax Receivable Agreement.

Realization of stock compensation deferred tax assets is dependent on underlying limitations related to the employment contracts of certain executives, which include change in control payments. These payments may be subject to IRC Sec. 280G deductibility limitations. Atkins has not performed detailed procedures to determine the amount of the limitations, should shareholder approval not be attained, and the IRC Sec. 280G limitations apply.

67

NOTE 5 — PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS (cont.)

(g)     Represents the net debt adjustment related to the financing transactions:

Repayment of Atkins debt, including $3,226 of deferred financing fees		$	(330,437	)
Proceeds from new borrowings			200,138
Deferred financing fees on new borrowings			(4,500	)
Net change related to financing transactions			(134,799	)
Current portion of long-term debt			(2,001	)
Pro forma adjustment to long-term debt assuming no redemptions			(136,800	)
Additional borrowings assuming maximum redemptions			150,000
Pro forma adjustment to long-term debt assuming maximum redemptions		$	13,200

In relation to the repayment of Atkins debt, a payment of $4,077 for accrued interest was also made.

The adjustments to interest expense for the 52 weeks ended August 27, 2016 resulting from the financing transactions is determined as follows:

		Assuming No Redemptions				Assuming Maximum Redemptions
Outstanding debt		$	200,138			$	350,138
Interest rate			5.0	%			5.0	%
Interest on debt		$	10,007			$	17,507
Amortization of deferred financing fees			900				900
Atkins historical interest			(27,195	)			(27,195	)
Pro forma adjustment		$	(16,288	)		$	(8,788	)

The adjustments to interest expense for the 26 weeks ended February 25, 2017 and February 27, 2016 resulting from the financing transactions is determined as follows:

		26 Weeks Ended February 25, 2017								26 Weeks Ended February 25, 2016
		Assuming No Redemptions				Assuming Maximum Redemptions				Assuming No Redemptions				Assuming Maximum Redemptions
Outstanding debt		$	200,138			$	350,138			$	200,138			$	350,138
Interest rate			5.0	%			5.0	%			5.0	%			5.0	%
Interest on debt		$	5,004			$	8,754			$	5,004			$	8,754
Amortization of deferred financing fees			450				450				450				450
Atkins historical interest			(13,629	)			(13,629	)			(13,733	)			(13,733	)
Pro forma adjustment		$	(8,176	)		$	(4,426	)		$	(8,280	)		$	(4,530	)

In connection with the Business Combination, Conyers Park will enter into a term loan facility of $200.1 million that matures in seven years and accrues interest at LIBOR plus 4.0%. An increase in the interest rate of 50 basis points increases interest expense $1,751 and $1,001 assuming no redemptions and assuming maximum redemptions, respectively, annually. Principal payments equal to 1% of the original principal amount will be due quarterly. Deferred financing costs of $4,500 will be amortized over the remaining term of the loan. An additional $100 million on the term loan will be utilized to partially fund the Business Combination assuming maximum redemptions.

In connection with the Business Combination, Conyers Park will enter into a new revolving credit facility agreement that provides for a $50,000,000 facility that matures in five years and accrues interest at LIBOR plus 4.0%.

(h)      Represents the reversal of Atkins warrants not included in the Business Combination and the reversal of the associated changes in fair value of the warrants.

68

NOTE 5 — PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS (cont.)

(i)       Represents underwriter fees that were deferred until closing of the Business Combination.

(j)       Upon closing of the transaction, the Selling Equityholders are receiving 10,250,000 shares of Simply Good Foods common stock valued at $10 per share.

Equity consideration paid to Selling Equityholders		$	102,500
Shares issued in private placement			100,000
Atkins historical equity			(5	)
Pro forma adjustment		$	202,495

Additionally, as part of the merger agreement, Conyers Park founders 10,062,500 shares of Conyers Park’s Class B common stock will convert to 10,062,500 shares of Simply Good Foods common stock.

(k)      Represents the pro forma adjustments to additional paid-in capital (APIC).

Conyers Park’s public investors have 38,468,481 shares of Company Class A common stock subject to possible redemption at a value of $10 per share. Under the assumption of no redemption, the full $384,685 is transferred to permanent equity. Under the assumption of maximum redemption, $150,000 is paid to investors as reflected below.

Reverse Atkins historical APIC		$	42,379
Conversion of redeemable shares held by Conyers Park’s public investors to permanent equity			384,594
Write off deferred underwriting fee waived as part of the Business Combination			5,988
Pro forma adjustment to APIC assuming no redemptions		$	432,961
Redemption to investors			(150,000	)
Pro forma adjustment to APIC assuming maximum redemptions		$	282,961

 (l)     Represents the pro forma adjustments to retained earnings.

Reverse Atkins historical retained earnings		$	(26,405	)
Transaction fees and expenses, net of $8,100 deferred underwriting			(12,413	)
Pro forma adjustment to retained earnings		$	(38,818	)

 (m)  Represents the elimination of Atkins’ historical accumulated other comprehensive loss.

(n)      Represents the reversal of $169 of transaction costs related to the Business Combination during the 26 weeks ended February 25, 2017. There were no transaction costs related to the Business Combination incurred during the 52 weeks ended August 27, 2016 or the 26 weeks ended February 27, 2016.

(o)     Represents the pro forma adjustment for income taxes, applying an effective tax rate of 39.6%.

69

COMPARATIVE SHARE INFORMATION

The following tables set forth:

•         historical per share information of Conyers Park for the year ended December 31, 2016;

•         historical per share information of Atkins for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017; and

•         unaudited pro forma per share information of the combined company for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 after giving effect to the Business Combination, assuming two redemption scenarios as follows:

•         Assuming No Redemptions: This scenario assumes that no shares of common stock of Conyers Park are redeemed; and

•         Assuming Maximum Redemption: This scenario assumes that 15,000,000 million shares of Conyers Park common stock are redeemed at a redemption price of approximately $10.00 per share, resulting in an aggregate payment of $150 million out of the Trust Account. This maximum redemption scenario does not result in any pro forma adjustments to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet or the respective cash and cash equivalents, common stock, additional paid-in capital, pro forma shares outstanding or net income (loss) per share.

Net income (loss) and cash dividends per share information reflects the Business Combination contemplated by the Merger Agreement as if it had occurred on January 1, 2016.

This information is based on, and should be read together with, the selected historical consolidated financial information, the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information and the historical consolidated financial information of Conyers Park and Atkins, that has been presented in its filings with the SEC that are included or incorporated herein by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined per share data are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of actual or future financial position or results of operations that would have been realized if the Business Combination had been completed as of the dates indicated or will be realized upon the completion of the Business Combination.

		Conyers Park				Atkins				Pro Forma Combined (Assuming No Redemptions)			Pro Forma Combined (Assuming Max Redemptions)
Book value per share(a)		$	0.45			$	(31.46	)		$	14.15		$	10.43
Basic net income (loss) per common share		$	(0.02	)		$	20.16			$	0.61		$	0.58
Diluted net income (loss) per common share		$	(0.02	)		$	19.76			$	0.61		$	0.58
Cash Dividends.			—				—				—			—

____________

(a)      Book value per share is calculated using the following formula: Total stockholder’s equity/shares outstanding.

70

SPECIAL MEETING IN LIEU OF 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF COMPANY STOCKHOLDERS

General

Conyers Park is furnishing this proxy statement/prospectus to its stockholders as part of the solicitation of proxies by its board of directors for use at the special meeting in lieu of 2017 annual meeting of stockholders to be held on July 5, 2017, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. This proxy statement/prospectus is first being furnished to Conyers Park stockholders on or about June 15, 2017. This proxy statement/prospectus provides you with information you need to know to be able to vote or instruct your vote to be cast at the special meeting.

Date, Time and Place of Special Meeting

The special meeting will be held at 11:00 a.m., Eastern time, on July 5, 2017, at the offices of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, located at 601 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10022, or such other date, time and place to which such meeting may be adjourned or postponed, to consider and vote upon the proposals.

Voting Power; Record Date

You will be entitled to vote or direct votes to be cast at the special meeting if you owned shares of Conyers Park common stock at the close of business on May 26, 2017, which is the record date for the special meeting. You are entitled to one vote for each share of Conyers Park common stock that you owned as of the close of business on the record date. If your shares are held in “street name” or are in a margin or similar account, you should contact your broker, bank or other nominee to ensure that votes related to the shares you beneficially own are properly counted. On the record date, there were 50,312,500 shares of common stock outstanding, of which 40,250,000 are public shares and 10,062,500 are Founder Shares held by Sponsor.

Vote of the Company’s Sponsor, Directors and Officers

In connection with Conyers Park’s IPO, Conyers Park entered into agreements with each of its Sponsor, directors and officers pursuant to which each agreed to vote any shares of common stock owned by it in favor of the Business Combination Proposal. In addition, Sponsor agreed to vote any shares of common stock owned by them in favor of the Business Combination Proposal and for all other proposals presented to Conyers Park stockholders in this proxy statement/prospectus. These agreements apply to Sponsor as it relates to the Founder Shares and the requirement to vote its Founder Shares in favor of the Business Combination Proposal and for all other proposals presented to Conyers Park stockholders in this proxy statement/prospectus.

Sponsor, directors and officers have waived any redemption rights, including with respect to shares of common stock purchased in Conyers Park’s IPO or in the aftermarket, in connection with Business Combination. The Founder Shares held by Sponsor have no redemption rights upon Conyers Park’s liquidation and will be worthless if no business combination is effected by us by July 20, 2018. However, Sponsor is entitled to redemption rights upon Conyers Park’s liquidation with respect to any public shares it may own.

Quorum and Required Vote for Proposals for the Special Meeting

A quorum of Conyers Park stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. A quorum will be present at the special meeting if a majority of the common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting is represented in person or by proxy. Abstentions will count as present for the purposes of establishing a quorum.

The approval of the Business Combination Proposal requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Conyers Park common stock that are voted at the special meeting. Accordingly, a Company stockholder’s failure to vote by proxy or to vote in person at the special meeting will not be counted towards the number of shares of common stock required to validly establish a quorum, and if a valid quorum is otherwise established, it will have no effect on the outcome of any vote on the Business Combination Proposal. Abstentions will be counted in connection with the determination of whether a valid quorum is established and will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Business Combination Proposal.

The approval of the Adjournment Proposal requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Conyers Park common stock represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote thereon at the special meeting.

71

Accordingly, a Company stockholder’s failure to vote by proxy or to vote in person at the special meeting will not be counted towards the number of shares of common stock required to validly establish a quorum, and if a valid quorum is otherwise established, it will have no effect on the outcome of any vote on the Adjournment Proposal. Abstentions will be counted in connection with the determination of whether a valid quorum is established and will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Adjournment Proposal.

The Business Combination is conditioned on the approval of the Business Combination Proposal at the special meeting. The Adjournment Proposals not conditioned on the approval of any other proposal set forth in this proxy statement/prospectus.

It is important for you to note that in the event the Business Combination Proposal does not receive the requisite vote for approval, then Conyers Park will not consummate the Business Combination. If Conyers Park does not consummate the Business Combination and fails to complete an initial business combination by July 20, 2018, Conyers Park will be required to dissolve and liquidate its Trust Account by returning the then remaining funds in such account to the public stockholders.

Recommendation to Company Stockholders

Conyers Park’s board of directors believes that each of the Business Combination Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal to be presented at the special meeting is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders and unanimously recommends that its stockholders vote “FOR” each of the proposals.

When you consider the recommendation of Conyers Park’s board of directors in favor of approval of the Business Combination Proposal, you should keep in mind that Sponsor, members of Conyers Park’s board of directors and officers have interests in the Business Combination that are different from or in addition to (or which may conflict with) your interests as a stockholder. These interests include, among other things:

•         the continued right of Sponsor to hold its common stock;

•         the fact that Sponsor paid an aggregate of $10,050,000 for its private placement warrants at the time of the Conyers Park’s IPO and such securities will expire worthless if an initial business combination is not consummated by July 20, 2018;

•         the fact that Sponsor has agreed not to redeem any of the Founder Shares in connection with a stockholder vote to approve a proposed initial business combination;

•         the fact that Sponsor paid an aggregate of $25,000 for its Founder Shares and such securities will have a significantly higher value at the time of the Business Combination;

•         if the Trust Account is liquidated, including in the event Conyers Park is unable to complete an initial business combination within the required time period, Sponsor has agreed to indemnify Conyers Park to ensure that the proceeds in the Trust Account are not reduced below $10.00 per public share, or such lesser per public share amount as is in the Trust Account on the liquidation date, by the claims of prospective target businesses with which Conyers Park has entered into an acquisition agreement or claims of any third party for services rendered or products sold to Conyers Park, but only if such a vendor or target business has not executed a waiver of any and all rights to seek access to the Trust Account;

•         the continuation of all seven of Conyers Park’s existing directors as a director of the post-combination company; and

•         the continued indemnification of Conyers Park’s existing directors and officers and the continuation of Conyers Park’s directors’ and officers’ liability insurance after the Business Combination.

Abstentions

Abstentions are considered present for the purposes of establishing a quorum but will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Business Combination Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal. Broker non-votes, while considered present for the purposes of establishing a quorum, will have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” the Business Combination Proposal, but will have no effect on the Adjournment Proposal.

72

Voting Your Shares

Each share of Conyers Park’s common stock that you own in your name entitles you to one vote on each of the proposals for the special meeting. Your one or more proxy cards show the number of shares of Conyers Park common stock that you own. There are several ways to vote your shares of common stock:

•         You can vote your shares by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided. If you hold your shares in “street name” through a bank, broker or other nominee, you will need to follow the instructions provided to you by your bank, broker or other nominee to ensure that your shares are represented and voted at the special meeting. If you vote by proxy card, your “proxy,” whose name is listed on the proxy card, will vote your shares as you instruct on the proxy card. If you sign and return the proxy card but do not give instructions on how to vote your shares, your shares of Conyers Park common stock will be voted as recommended by Conyers Park’s board of directors. Conyers Park’s board of directors recommends voting “FOR” the Business Combination Proposal and “FOR” the Adjournment Proposal.

•         You can attend the special meeting and vote in person even if you have previously voted by submitting a proxy pursuant to any of the methods noted above. You will be given a ballot when you arrive. However, if your shares of common stock are held in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, you must get a proxy from the broker, bank or other nominee. That is the only way we can be sure that the broker, bank or nominee has not already voted your shares of common stock.

Revoking Your Proxy

If you give a proxy, you may revoke it at any time before the special meeting or at such meeting by doing any one of the following:

•         you may send another proxy card with a later date;

•         you may notify the Company’s Secretary in writing to Conyers Park Acquisition Corp, c/o Conyers Park Sponsor LLC, 1 Greenwich Office Park, 2nd Floor, Greenwich, CT 06831, before the special meeting that you have revoked your proxy; or

•         you may attend the special meeting, revoke your proxy, and vote in person, as indicated above.

No Additional Matters May Be Presented at the Special Meeting

The special meeting has been called only to consider the approval of the Business Combination Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal. Under Conyers Park’s bylaws, other than procedural matters incident to the conduct of the special meeting, no other matters may be considered at the special meeting if they are not included in this proxy statement/prospectus, which serves as the notice of the special meeting.

Who Can Answer Your Questions About Voting

If you have any questions about how to vote or direct a vote in respect of your shares of Conyers Park common stock, you may call Morrow Sodali LLC, Conyers Park’s proxy solicitor, at (800) 662-5200 (toll free) or Banks and Brokerage Firms, please call collect: (203) 658-9400.

Redemption Rights

Pursuant to Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, any holders of Conyers Park public shares may demand that such shares be redeemed in exchange for a pro rata share of the aggregate amount on deposit in the Trust Account, less franchise and income taxes payable, calculated as of two (2) business days prior to the consummation of the Business Combination. If demand is properly made and the Business Combination is consummated, these shares, immediately prior to the Business Combination, will cease to be outstanding and will represent only the right to receive a pro rata share of the aggregate amount on deposit in the Trust Account which holds the proceeds of Conyers Park’s IPO (calculated as of two (2) business days prior to the consummation of the Business Combination, including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to it to pay up to $1,000,000 of the Company’s working capital requirements as well as to

73

pay the Company’s franchise and income taxes). For illustrative purposes, based on funds in the Trust Account of approximately $403.1 million on March 31, 2017, $402.5 million of which Conyers Park intends to use for the purposes of consummating an initial business combination, the estimated per share redemption price would have been approximately $10.00, excluding the impact of up to $1,000,000 of interest income available to us for working capital requirements.

In order to exercise your redemption rights, you must:

•         affirmatively vote either for or against the Business Combination Proposal;

•         check the box on the enclosed proxy card to elect redemption;

•         check the box on the enclosed proxy card marked “Stockholder Certification” if you are not acting in concert or as a “group” (as defined in Section 13d-3 of the Exchange Act) with any other shareholder with respect to shares of common stock;

•         prior to 5:00 PM Eastern time on June 30, 2017 (two (2) business days before the special meeting), tender your shares physically or electronically and submit a request in writing that we redeem your public shares for cash to Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, Conyers Park’s transfer agent, at the following address:

Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company
One State Street Plaza, 30th Floor
New York, New York 10004
Attn: Mark Zimkind
E-mail: mzimkind@continentalstock.com

and

•         deliver your public shares either physically or electronically through DTC to Conyers Park’s transfer agent at least two (2) business days before the special meeting. Stockholders seeking to exercise their redemption rights and opting to deliver physical certificates should allot sufficient time to obtain physical certificates from the transfer agent and time to effect delivery. It is Conyers Park’s understanding that stockholders should generally allot at least two weeks to obtain physical certificates from the transfer agent. However, Conyers Park does not have any control over this process and it may take longer than two weeks. Stockholders who hold their shares in street name will have to coordinate with their bank, broker or other nominee to have the shares certificated or delivered electronically. If you do not submit a written request and deliver your public shares as described above, your shares will not be redeemed.

Any demand for redemption, once made, may be withdrawn at any time until the deadline for exercising redemption requests (and submitting shares to the transfer agent) and thereafter, with Conyers Park’s consent, until the vote is taken with respect to the Business Combination. If you delivered your shares for redemption to Conyers Park’s transfer agent and decide within the required timeframe not to exercise your redemption rights, you may request that Conyers Park’s transfer agent return the shares (physically or electronically). You may make such request by contacting Conyers Park’s transfer agent at the phone number or address listed above.

Prior to exercising redemption rights, stockholders should verify the market price of Conyers Park’s common stock as they may receive higher proceeds from the sale of their common stock in the public market than from exercising their redemption rights if the market price per share is higher than the redemption price. We cannot assure you that you will be able to sell your shares of Conyers Park’s common stock in the open market, even if the market price per share is higher than the redemption price stated above, as there may not be sufficient liquidity in Conyers Park’s common stock when you wish to sell your shares.

If you exercise your redemption rights, your shares of Conyers Park common stock will cease to be outstanding immediately prior to the Business Combination and will only represent the right to receive a pro rata share of the aggregate amount on deposit in the Trust Account. You will no longer own those shares and will have no right to participate in, or have any interest in, the future growth of the post-combination company, if any. You will be entitled to receive cash for these shares only if you properly and timely demand redemption.

74

If the Business Combination is not approved and Conyers Park does not consummate an initial business combination by July 20, 2018, Conyers Park will be required to dissolve and liquidate its Trust Account by returning the then remaining funds in such account to the public stockholders and Conyers Park’s warrants will expire worthless.

Appraisal Rights

Appraisal rights are not available to holders of shares of Conyers Park’s common stock in connection with the Business Combination.

Proxy Solicitation Costs

The Company is soliciting proxies on behalf of its board of directors. This solicitation is being made by mail but also may be made by telephone or in person. The Company and its directors, officers and employees may also solicit proxies in person. The Company will file with the SEC all scripts and other electronic communications as proxy soliciting materials. The Company will bear the cost of the solicitation.

The Company has hired Morrow Sodali LLC to assist in the proxy solicitation process. The Company will pay that firm a fee of $22,500, plus disbursements.

The Company will ask banks, brokers and other institutions, nominees and fiduciaries to forward the proxy materials to their principals and to obtain their authority to execute proxies and voting instructions. The Company will reimburse them for their reasonable expenses.

75

PROPOSAL NO. 1 — APPROVAL OF THE BUSINESS COMBINATION

Holders of Conyers Park common stock are being asked to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Business Combination. Conyers Park stockholders should read carefully this proxy statement/prospectus in its entirety for more detailed information concerning the Merger Agreement, which is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement/prospectus. Please see the section entitled “ — The Merger Agreement” below, for additional information and a summary of certain terms of the Merger Agreement. You are urged to read carefully the Merger Agreement in its entirety before voting on this proposal.

Because Conyers Park is holding a stockholder vote on the Business Combination, Conyers Park may consummate the Business Combination only if it is approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Conyers Park’s common stock that are voted at the special meeting.

The Merger Agreement

This section of the proxy statement/prospectus describes the material provisions of the Merger Agreement, but does not purport to describe all of the terms of the Merger Agreement. The following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the Merger Agreement, which is attached as Annex A hereto. You are urged to read the Merger Agreement in its entirety because it is the primary legal document that governs the Business Combination.

The Merger Agreement contains representations, warranties and covenants that the respective parties made to each other as of the date of the Merger Agreement or other specific dates. The assertions embodied in those representations, warranties and covenants were made for purposes of the contract among the respective parties and are subject to important qualifications and limitations agreed to by the parties in connection with negotiating the Merger Agreement. The representations, warranties and covenants in the Merger Agreement are also modified in important part by the underlying disclosure schedules, which we refer to as the “Schedules,” which are not filed publicly and which are subject to a contractual standard of materiality different from that generally applicable to stockholders and were used for the purpose of allocating risk among the parties rather than establishing matters as facts. Conyers Park does not believe that the Schedules contain information that is material to an investment decision.

Description of the Merger Agreement

On April 10 2017, Conyers Park entered into the Merger Agreement with Simply Good Foods, Intermediateco, Parent Merger Sub, Atkins Merger Sub 1, Atkins Merger Sub 2, Atkins Merger Sub 3, Atkins Merger Sub 4, Atkins, Atkins Holdings LLC, in its capacity as the Majority Stockholder, and Roark Capital Acquisition, in its capacity as the Stockholders’ Representative, pursuant to which, among other things and subject to the terms and conditions contained in the Merger Agreement, (i) Conyers Park and Atkins will continue as wholly-owned subsidiaries of Intermediateco, (ii) Atkins Nutritionals Holdings, Inc. will continue as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Atkins Surviving Subsidiary, (iii) Atkins Nutritionals Holdings II, Inc. will continue as the wholly-owned subsidiary of Atkins Nutritionals Holdings, Inc., and (iv) Atkins Nutritionals, Inc. will continue as the wholly-owned subsidiary of Atkins Nutritionals Holdings II, Inc. After giving effect to the Business Combination, each of the Atkins Group Companies and Conyers Park will continue as indirect subsidiaries of Simply Good Foods and certain of the Equity Holders will hold a portion of Simply Good Foods’ common stock.

The consideration to be paid to the Equity Holders will be funded through a combination of cash and stock consideration.

Conyers Park has agreed to provide its stockholders with the opportunity to redeem shares of Class A common stock upon completion of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.

Structure of the Business Combination

The Merger Agreement provides for the business combination of Conyers Park and Atkins under Simply Good Foods. The Merger Agreement is attached as Annex A hereto. You are encouraged to read the Merger Agreement in its entirety. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement:

76

Prior to the closing of the Business Combination contemplated by the Merger Agreement, the parties will undertake the following transactions: (i) the merger of Parent Merger Sub with and into Conyers Park, with Conyers Park continuing as the surviving entity; (ii) the merger of Atkins Merger Sub 1 with and into Atkins, with Atkins continuing as the surviving entity; (iii) Atkins Merger Sub 2 shall merge with and into Atkins Nutritionals Holdings, Inc., with Atkins Nutritionals Holdings, Inc. continuing as the surviving entity; (iv) Atkins Merger Sub 3 shall merge with and into Atkins Nutritionals Holdings II, Inc., with Atkins Nutritionals Holdings II, Inc. continuing as the surviving entity; and (v) Merger Sub 4 shall merge with and into Atkins Nutritionals, Inc., with Atkins Nutritionals, Inc. continuing as the surviving entity. As a result of the foregoing transactions, at the closing of the Business Combination, (w) Conyers Park and Atkins will continue as wholly-owned subsidiaries of Intermediateco, (x) Atkins Nutritionals Holdings, Inc. will continue as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Atkins Surviving Subsidiary, (y) Atkins Nutritionals Holdings II, Inc. will continue as the wholly-owned subsidiary of Atkins Nutritionals Holdings, Inc., and (z) Atkins Nutritionals, Inc. will continue as the wholly-owned subsidiary of Atkins Nutritionals Holdings II, Inc.

Consideration to the Equity Holders in the Business Combination

The consideration to be paid to the Equity Holders will be funded through a combination of cash and stock consideration. The amount of cash consideration payable to the Equity Holders on the Closing Date is the sum of (A) (i) $730,125,000 of cash and equity consideration, plus (ii) the Estimated Net Working Capital Surplus, if any, plus (iii) the Estimated Closing Cash, plus (iv) the Tail Premium, to the extent paid by a Group Atkins prior to or at the Closing, plus (v) the Reimbursed Transaction Expenses, minus (vi) the Estimated Closing Indebtedness; minus (vii) the Estimated Net Working Capital Deficit, if any, minus (viii) the Estimated Closing Atkins Transaction Expenses, minus (ix) the Administrative Expense Amount, minus (x) the Escrow Amount, minus (xi) the Warrant Payment Amount, minus (xii) the Contingent Stock Purchase Payment Amount, minus (B) the Total Stock Value. The remainder of the consideration paid to the Equity Holders will be stock consideration, consisting of 10,250,000 shares of Simply Good Foods common stock. After the Closing the cash consideration will be adjusted to account for the Closing Net Working Capital, Closing Cash, Closing Indebtedness and Closing Atkins Transaction Expenses, which were estimated at Closing for the purposes of the payment of the Merger Consideration. The foregoing consideration to be paid to the Equity Holders may be further increased by amounts payable under the Tax Receivable Agreement.

Material Adverse Effect

Under the Merger Agreement, certain representations and warranties of the Atkins Group Companies are qualified in whole or in part by a material adverse effect standard for purposes of determining whether a breach of such representations and warranties has occurred. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, a “Material Adverse Effect” means any event, change, development, effect or occurrence that, individually or in the aggregate with all other events, changes, developments, effects or occurrences, has had or would reasonably be expected to be materially adverse to the business, assets, liabilities, financial condition or results of operations of Atkins and the Atkins Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.

Closing and Effective Time of the Business Combination

The closing of the Business Combination is expected to take place at 10:00 a.m., local time, at the offices of King & Spalding LLP or at such other place or time as mutually agreed in writing, no later than the later of (i) three (3) Business Days following the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions described below under the section entitled “— Conditions to Closing of the Business Combination,” (ii) three (3) Business Days following the final day of the Marketing Period (subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions described below under the section entitled “— Conditions to Closing of the Business Combination,”) or (iii) on such other date as mutually agreed in writing. The closing of the Business Combination will be deemed effective at such time as the Parties duly file the Atkins Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware or at such other date or time as Conyers Park and Atkins mutually agree in writing and specify in the Atkins Certificate of Merger.

77

Conditions to Closing of the Business Combination

Conditions to Each Party’s Obligations

The respective obligations of the Parties to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the Business Combination, are subject to the satisfaction, or written waiver by the Parties, at or prior to the Closing of the following conditions:

•         there must not be in effect any Order prohibiting the consummation of either of the Mergers and no Law adopted that makes consummation of either of the Mergers illegal or otherwise prohibited;

•         the waiting period applicable to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement under the HSR Act must have expired or been terminated;

•         the approval of the Transaction Proposals must have been obtained in accordance with the DGCL, each Parent Party’s Organizational Documents and the rules and regulations of NASDAQ;

•         the Registration Statement must have become effective and no stop order suspending the effectiveness of the Registration Statement be in effect and no proceedings for that purpose pending before or threatened by the SEC; all necessary permits and authorizations under state securities or “blue sky” laws, the Securities Act and the Exchange Act relating to the issuance and trading of Simply Good Foods common stock to be issued in the Mergers shall have been obtained and shall be in effect and such shares of Simply Good Foods common stock shall have been approved for listing on NASDAQ; and

•         the Offer will have been completed in accordance with the terms of this proxy statement and the Merger Agreement.

Conditions to the Obligations of Atkins

The obligations of Atkins to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement are subject to the satisfaction, or written waiver by Atkins, at or prior to the Closing, the following conditions:

•         the representations and warranties of the Parent Parties, disregarding qualifications contained therein relating to materiality, must be true and correct as of the Closing Date as if made at and as of such time (or, if given as of an earlier date, as of such earlier date), except that this condition will be satisfied unless any and all inaccuracies in such representations and warranties of the Parent Parties, in the aggregate, would or would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the ability of the Parent Parties to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement;

•         each of the Parent Parties must have performed in all material respects its obligations under the Merger Agreement required to be performed by it at or prior to the Closing;

•         Atkins must have received a certificate executed and delivered by an authorized officer of the Parent Parties confirming that the conditions set forth in the immediately preceding bullet points have been satisfied;

•         the amount of Available Cash as of immediately prior to Closing must be equal to or greater than the Necessary Cash;

•         the aggregate amount of the Parent Common Stockholder Redemptions must not exceed 15,000,000 shares; and

•         subject to any Parent Common Stockholder Redemption contemporaneous with the Closing, (i) the funds contained in the Trust Account available to Conyers Park must be released Conyers Park for payment of the Total Cash Value, the aggregate amount of Estimated Closing Indebtedness relating to Indebtedness for Borrowed Money, the Estimated Closing Atkins Transaction Expenses, the Escrow Amount and the Administrative Expense Amount, and (ii) there must be no actions, suits, proceedings, arbitrations or mediations pending or threatened by any Person (not including the Atkins and its Affiliates) with respect to or against the Trust Account that would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on Parent’s ability to perform its obligations under the Merger Agreement.

78

Conditions to the Obligations of the Parent Parties

The obligations of the Parent Parties to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement are subject to the satisfaction, or written waiver by the Parent Parties, at or prior to the Closing of the following conditions:

•         the representations and warranties of Atkins regarding Authorization, the absence of certain stockholders agreements and the Atkins Subsidiaries’ absence of ownership of any equity interest in Atkins must be true and correct in all material respects as of the Closing Date as if made at and as of such time (or, if given as of an earlier date, as of such earlier date);

•         the representations and warranties of Atkins regarding the Atkins Group Companies’ capitalization must be true and correct in all respects (except for de minimis inaccuracies) as of the Closing Date as if made at and as of such time (or, if given as of an earlier date, as of such earlier date);

•         the representations and warranties of Atkins regarding Organization and the absence of a Material Adverse Effect since February 25, 2017 must be true and correct in all respects as of the Closing Date as if made at and as of such time (or, if given as of an earlier date, as of such earlier date);

•         the other representations and warranties of Atkins, disregarding any qualifications contained therein relating to Material Adverse Effect or materiality, must be true and correct as of the Closing Date as if made at and as of such time (or, if given as of an earlier date, as of such earlier date), except that this condition will be satisfied unless any and all inaccuracies in such representations and warranties of the Atkins, in the aggregate, result in a Material Adverse Effect;

•         Atkins must have performed in all material respects its obligations under the Merger Agreement required to be performed by it at or prior to the Closing;

•         Conyers Park must have received a certificate executed and delivered by an authorized officer of the Atkins confirming that the conditions set forth in the immediately preceding bullet points have been satisfied;

•         the Parent Parties must have received a copy of the Written Consent, which must remain in full force and effect;

•         the aggregate amount of Parent Common Stockholder Redemptions must not exceed 15,000,000 shares; and

•         since the date of the Merger Agreement, a Material Adverse Effect must not have occurred.

Representations and Warranties

Under the Merger Agreement, the Atkins Group Companies made customary representations and warranties relating to: organization; authorization; capitalization; the Atkins Subsidiaries; consents and approvals; financial statements; absence of undisclosed liabilities; absence of certain changes; real estate; intellectual property; litigation; material contracts; taxes; environmental matters; licenses and permits; employee benefits; labor and employment matters; international trade and anti-corruption matters; certain fees; insurance policies; affiliate transactions; information supplied; customers and suppliers; compliance with laws; sufficiency of assets; and disclaimer of warranties.

Under the Merger Agreement, the Parent Parties made customary representations and warranties relating to: organization; authorization; capitalization; consents and approvals; financial statements; financial capability; absence of undisclosed liabilities; litigation; material contracts; taxes; compliance with laws; certain fees; organization of the Merger Subs; solvency; SEC reports, NASDAQ compliance and the Investment Company Act; information supplied; approvals of boards of directors and stockholders; Trust Account; affiliate transactions; and independent investigation.

79

Covenants

Covenants of Atkins

Atkins made certain covenants under the Merger Agreement, including, among other things, the following:

•         From the date of the Merger Agreement until the earlier of (x) the Effective Time or (y) the date on which the Merger Agreement is terminated, other than in connection with the transaction contemplated by the Merger Agreement, Atkins agreed that it will not, and will not authorize or (to the extent within its control) permit any Atkins Subsidiary or any of its or any Atkins Subsidiary’s Affiliates, directors, officers, employees, agents or representatives (including investment bankers, attorneys and accountants), in each case in such directors’, officers’, employees’, agents’ or representatives’ capacity in such role with the applicable Group Atkins, to, directly or indirectly, (i) initiate, solicit, or facilitate, or make any offers or proposals related to, an Acquisition Proposal, (ii) engage in any discussions or negotiations with respect to an Acquisition Proposal with, or provide any non-public information or data to, any Person that has made, or informs Atkins that it is considering making, an Acquisition Proposal, or (iii) enter into any agreement relating to an Acquisition Proposal. Atkins must give notice of any Acquisition Proposal to Conyers Park as soon as practicable following its awareness of such proposal.

•         From the date of the Merger Agreement through the Closing Date, Atkins will disclose any event, fact or circumstance that will cause the failure of any of the conditions described in the section entitled “— Conditions to Closing of the Business Combination” above to be satisfied, and if such failure cannot be cured within thirty (30) days of receipt of the disclosure by the Parent Parties or, in any event, within two (2) Business Days prior to the Closing, then the Parent Parties will be entitled to terminate the Merger Agreement.

Covenants of the Parent Parties

The Parent Parties made certain covenants under the Merger Agreement, including, among other things, the following:

•         Upon satisfaction or waiver of the conditions described above in the section entitled “— Conditions to Closing of the Business Combination” and provision of notice thereof to the Trustee, (a) in accordance with and pursuant to the Trust Agreement, at the Closing, Conyers Park (i) will cause the documents, opinions and notices required to be delivered to the Trustee pursuant to the Trust Agreement to be delivered, and (ii) will use reasonable best efforts to cause the Trustee to (A) pay as and when due all amounts payable to stockholders of Conyers Park holding shares of the Parent common stock sold in Parent’s initial public offering who must have previously validly elected to redeem their shares of Parent common stock pursuant to Parent’s Organizational Documents, and (B) immediately thereafter, pay all remaining amounts then available in the Trust Account in accordance with the Merger Agreement and the Trust Agreement, and (b) thereafter, the Trust Account will terminate, except as otherwise provided therein.

•         Conyers Park will, as promptly as practicable, establish a record date and hold a meeting of stockholders for the purpose of voting on the Transaction Proposals and will use its reasonable best efforts to obtain the approval of the Transaction Proposals. Conyers Park will, through its board of directors, recommend to its stockholders that they vote in favor of the Transaction Proposals, and will not change, withdraw, withhold, qualify or modify such recommendation.

•         From and after the Closing Date, except as otherwise required by applicable Law, each Parent Party will not, and will cause the Atkins Surviving Subsidiary and the Atkins Subsidiaries not to, without the prior written consent of the Stockholders’ Representative, make, cause or permit to be made any Tax election or adopt or change any method of accounting, in each case that has retroactive effect to any pre-Closing period of Atkins or any Atkins Subsidiary.

•         From the date of the Merger Agreement until the earlier of (x) the Effective Time or (y) the date on which the Merger Agreement is terminated, other than in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, each Parent Party agreed that it will not, and will not authorize or (to the extent within its control) permit any of its subsidiaries or any of its or its subsidiaries’ directors, officers,

80

employees, agents or representatives (including investment bankers, attorneys and accountants), in each case in such directors’, officers’, employees’, agents’ or representatives’ capacity in such role with the applicable Parent Party, to, directly or indirectly, (i) initiate, solicit, or facilitate, or make any offers or proposals related to, an initial Business Combination, (ii) enter into, engage in or continue any discussions or negotiations with respect to any initial Business Combination with, or provide any non-public information, data or access to employees to, any Person that has made, or that is considering making, a proposal with respect to an initial Business Combination, or (iii) enter into any agreement relating to an initial Business Combination. Each Parent Party must promptly notify Atkins of any submissions, proposals or offers made with respect to an initial Business Combination as soon as practicable following such Parent Party’s awareness thereof.

•         As promptly as practicable following the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement and the availability of Atkins’ financial statements for the 52-weeks ended August 27, 2016, the 35-weeks ended August 29, 2015, the 52-weeks ended December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013, and the 26-weeks ended February 25, 2017 and February 27, 2016, Conyers Park agreed to prepare and file with the SEC this proxy statement/prospectus in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and the Offer and provide its stockholders with the opportunity for up to 40,250,000 shares of Parent common stock to be redeemed in conjunction with a stockholder vote on the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, and this proxy statement/prospectus will be sent to the stockholders of Conyers Park relating to the Parent Common Stockholders Meeting in definitive form, all in accordance with and as required by Parent’s Organizational Documents, any related agreements with Parent, Parent’s Sponsor and its Affiliates, applicable Law and any applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and NASDAQ. As promptly as practicable following the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement, Simply Good Foods will prepare and file with the SEC the Registration Statement, in which this Proxy Statement will be included as a prospectus, pursuant to which the shares of Simply Good Foods common stock and Simply Good Foods Warrants (and the shares of Simply Good Foods common stock issuable upon the exercise of such Simply Good Foods Warrants) to be issued to the Equity Holders and the holders of Conyers Park common stock and Conyers Park Warrants pursuant to the Mergers will be registered for resale under the Securities Act.

•         Conyers Park and Simply Good Foods will make all necessary filings with respect to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement under the Securities Act, the Exchange Act and applicable “blue sky” laws and any rules and regulations thereunder.

•         Parent will not terminate or withdraw the Offer other than in connection with the valid termination of the Merger Agreement. Conyers Park will extend the Offer for any period required by any rule, regulation, interpretation or position of the SEC, NASDAQ or the respective staff thereof that is applicable to the Offer.

Covenants of Simply Good Foods

Simply Good Foods made certain covenants under the Merger Agreement, including, among other things, the following:

•         Simply Good Foods will, at its own expense, prepare or cause to be prepared and timely file or cause to be timely filed all Tax Returns of the Atkins Group Companies for all Tax periods (or portions thereof) ending on the Closing Date that have not yet been filed and are required to be filed after the Closing Date. Simply Good Foods will cause any amounts shown to be due on such Tax Returns to be timely remitted to the applicable Governmental Entity no later than the date on which such Taxes are due.

•         Simply Good Foods will cause the Atkins Group Companies to waive the carryback of any net operating loss generated in any Tax year ending on or before the Closing Date or any Tax year ending on or after the Closing Date that is attributable, in whole or in part, to the Transaction Deductions or to the remaining amortization deductions attributable to the step-up in basis to the Akins Group Companies’ intangible assets that occurred as a result of the acquisition of Atkins Nutritionals, Inc. on October 29, 2003 as provided in Section 172(b)(3) of the Code (and any analogous provision of state or local Tax Law).

81

•         To the extent that Atkins has paid estimated income Taxes for the Tax periods (or portions thereof) ending on the Closing Date and the amount of the estimated income Taxes which were paid prior to the Closing Date exceeds the amount of the income Tax liability with respect to such Pre-Closing Tax Period (taking into account any allowed Transaction Deductions for such year), Simply Good Foods will prepare or cause to be prepared IRS Form 4466 (Corporation Application for Quick Refund of Overpayment of Estimated Tax) with, if applicable, IRS Form 8302 (Electronic Deposit of Tax Refund of $1 Million or More) and any analogous application for a state or local refund of a material overpayment of estimated state or local income Taxes with respect to such Tax year. Any such refund application will be treated as an income Tax Return that is subject to analogous review, comment, dispute resolution and filing procedures to those set forth in the second bullet point in this section entitled “— Covenants of Simply Good Foods.” Within ten (10) Business Days of the receipt from the applicable Governmental Entity of a refund as a result of such a refund application, Simply Good Foods will pay an amount equal to such refund to the Stockholders’ Representative (on behalf of the Equity Holders), net of any Taxes and other expenses attributable to such refund, and without duplication of any amount paid (or to be paid) pursuant to the Tax Receivables Agreement or already taken into account in the determination of Net Working Capital or Indebtedness.

•         All transfer, documentary, sales, use, stamp, registration and other such Taxes and fees (including any penalties and interest) incurred in connection with the Merger Agreement will be borne 50% by Simply Good Foods, on the one hand, and 50% by the Equity Holders, on the other hand, and the Parties will cooperate in filing all necessary Tax Returns and other documentation with respect to all such transfer, documentary, sales, use, stamp, registration and other Taxes and fees.

•         Prior to the Closing, the board of directors of Simply Good Foods, or an appropriate committee of non-employee directors thereof, will adopt a resolution consistent with the interpretive guidance of the SEC so that the acquisition of Simply Good Foods common stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement by any officer or director of the Atkins Group Companies who is expected to become a “covered person” of Simply Good Foods for purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder will be an exempt transaction for purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

•         Simply Good Foods will use its reasonable best efforts to (i) cause the shares of Simply Good Foods common stock to be issued to the Equity Holders to be approved for listing on NASDAQ upon issuance, and (ii) make all necessary and appropriate filings with NASDAQ and undertake all other steps reasonably required prior to the Closing Date to effect such listing.

Mutual Covenants

The Parties made certain mutual covenants under the Merger Agreement, including, among other things, the following:

•         Each of the Parties will cooperate and use their commercially reasonable efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all action, and to do, or cause to be done, all things necessary, proper or advisable under applicable Laws to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement reasonably promptly after the date thereof, including obtaining all licenses, permits, consents, approvals, authorizations, qualifications and orders of Governmental Entities necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Each of the Parties will pay 50% of the applicable filing fees due under the HSR Act. In addition, the Parent Parties agreed to provide such assurances as to financial capability, resources and creditworthiness as may be reasonably requested by any third party whose consent or approval is sought in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.

•         At the Closing, Simply Good Foods and the Majority Stockholder will enter into an Investor Rights Agreement.

•         In connection with the entry into the Merger Agreement, Conyers Park will enter into a commitment letter to provide for debt financing consisting of senior secured term loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $300 million as well as a senior secured revolving facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $75 million, a portion of which will be available at closing.

82

•         From and after the date of the Merger Agreement, the Atkins Group Companies will not take any action to accelerate, ahead of the date on which the annual bonuses would be paid in the Ordinary Course for fiscal year 2017, the payment of any annual bonuses payable to any participants in accordance with the applicable bonus plans. If the Closing has not occurred as of the Bonus Payment Date, the Atkins Group Companies will be permitted to pay such annual bonuses in accordance with the terms of the applicable bonus plans or, if determined by the Board of Directors of Atkins, in amounts in excess of those provided for by the terms of the applicable bonus plans. If the Closing occurs prior to the Bonus Payment Date, the Parent Parties will cause the Atkins Group Companies to pay the annual bonuses on the Bonus Payment Date in accordance with the terms of the applicable bonus plans (which plans shall not be amended or replaced after the Closing).

Termination

The Merger Agreement may be terminated and the Business Combination abandoned at any time prior to the Closing, as follows:

•         in writing, by mutual consent of the Parties;

•         by the Parent Parties if the condition that no Material Adverse Effect shall have occurred, as set forth in the Merger Agreement, cannot be satisfied or if there has been a breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement made by the Atkins in the Merger Agreement, or any such representation and warranty has become untrue or inaccurate after the date of the Merger Agreement, in each case which breach, untruth or inaccuracy (i) would reasonably be expected to result in certain conditions to the obligations of the Parent Parties, as described in the section entitled “— Conditions to Closing of the Business Combination” above, not being satisfied as of the Closing Date, and (ii) will not have been cured within twenty (20) days after written notice from the Parent Parties of such Terminating Atkins Breach is received by Atkins, or which breach, untruth or inaccuracy, by its nature, cannot be cured prior to the Outside Date;

•         by Atkins if there has been a breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement made by any Parent Party in the Merger Agreement, or any such representation and warranty has become untrue or inaccurate after the date of the Merger Agreement, in each case which breach, untruth or inaccuracy (i) would reasonably be expected to result in certain conditions to the obligations of Atkins, as described in the section entitled “— Conditions to Closing of the Business Combination” above, not being satisfied as of the Closing Date, and (ii) will not have been cured within twenty (20) days after written notice from Atkins of such Terminating Parent Breach is received by the Parent Parties, or which breach, untruth or inaccuracy, by its nature, cannot be cured prior to the Outside Date;

•         by written notice by any Party if the Closing has not occurred on or prior to the Outside Date for any reason other than delay and/or nonperformance of the Party seeking such termination, in which case the non-terminating Party will be deemed to be in breach of the Merger Agreement;

•         by the Parent Parties within twenty (20) days of receipt by the Parent Parties of a supplement to the Atkins Group Companies’ disclosure schedules that discloses any event, fact or circumstance that is reasonably likely to cause the failure of certain conditions to the obligations of each Party and the Parent Parties, as described in the section entitled “— Conditions to Closing of the Business Combination” above, to be satisfied and such failure cannot be cured within thirty (30) days of receipt of such Supplement by the Parent Parties or, in any event, within two (2) Business Days prior to the Closing;

•         by Atkins if Conyers Park’s board of directors changes its recommendation in favor of the Business Combination; or

•         by Conyers Park or Atkins if the approval of the Transaction Proposals is not obtained at the Parent Common Stockholders Meeting (including any adjournments of such meeting).

83

Amendments

The Merger Agreement may be amended, modified or supplemented at any time only by written agreement of the Parties. However, certain sections as they related to the Debt Financing may not be modified, waived or terminated in any manner adverse to the lenders in any material respect without the prior written consent of such lenders.

Tax Considerations

The Parent Merger is intended to qualify as an exchange by Conyers Park common stockholders of their common stock for common stock of Simply Good Foods described in Section 351 of the Internal Revenue Code or as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368 of the Code. Assuming the Parent Merger so qualifies (i) neither Conyers Park nor the Conyers Park common stockholders will recognize gain or loss on the Business Combination, (ii) a Conyers Park common stockholder will have an aggregate tax basis in the Simply Good Foods common stock received in the Parent Merger equal to the tax basis of property surrendered in exchange for Simply Good Foods common stock, and (iii) the stockholder’s holding period with respect to Simply Good Foods common stock will include the holding period of the property exchanged for Simply Good Foods common stock.

You are strongly urged to consult with a tax advisor to determine the particular U.S. federal, state or local or foreign income or other tax consequences of the Business Combination to you. For a description of material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Business Combination, see the section entitled “— Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations to Conyers Park Common Stockholders and Warrant Holders.”

The Investor Rights Agreement with Atkins Holdings LLC

At the closing of the Business Combination, Simply Good Foods, Sponsor and Atkins Holdings LLC will enter into an Investor Rights Agreement, substantially in the form attached hereto as Annex E, providing for, among other things, subject to the terms thereof, customary registration rights, including demand and piggy-back rights subject to cut-back provisions, and information rights in favor of Atkins Holdings LLC. Simply Good Foods has agreed to use its commercially reasonable efforts to file a shelf registration statement to register Atkins Holdings LLC’s shares at any time that Simply Good Foods is eligible to do so. Pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement, Atkins Holdings LLC will agree not to sell, transfer, pledge or otherwise dispose of the shares of common stock in Simply Good Foods it receives in connection with the Business Combination for 180 days from the closing of the Business Combination, as well as to certain other lock-up provisions set forth therein.

In addition, pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement, for so long as Atkins Holdings LLC holds approximately 50% of its shares of common stock it holds on the closing of the merger, it will have the right to nominate one director to serve on the Board of Directors of Simply Good Foods as a Class III Director or, if it chooses not to do so or its nominated director resigns or is removed and is not replaced or nominated in accordance with the Investor Rights Agreement, to select one non-voting observer to participate in any meeting of the Board of Directors. Sponsor and its affiliates have agreed to vote their respective shares of common stock then beneficially owned in favor of the election or appointment of Atkins Holdings LLC’s director. Atkins Holdings LLC’s director will also serve on a standing committee of the Board of Directors chosen by Atkins Holdings LLC.

The Investor Rights Agreement with Conyers Park

At the closing of the Business Combination, Simply Good Foods and Sponsor will enter into an Investor Rights Agreement, substantially in the form attached hereto as Annex D, providing for, among other things, subject to the terms thereof, customary registration rights, including demand and piggy-back rights subject to cut-back provisions. Simply Good Foods has agreed to file a shelf registration statement to register Sponsor’s shares within 180 days of Closing. Pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement, Sponsor will agree not to sell, transfer, pledge or otherwise dispose of the shares of common stock in Simply Good Foods it receives in connection with the Business Combination for 180 days from the closing of the Business Combination, subject to certain exceptions.

In addition, pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement, for so long as Sponsor holds at least 50% of its shares of common stock it holds at Closing, it will have the right to nominate three directors to serve on the Board of Directors of Simply Good Foods, and for so long as Sponsor holds at least 25% of its shares of common stock it holds at Closing, it will have the right to nominate one director to serve on the Board of Directors of Simply Good Foods.

84

The Tax Receivable Agreement

At the closing of the Business Combination, Simply Good Foods will enter into the Tax Receivable Agreement with the Stockholders’ Representative (on behalf of the Selling Equityholders). The Tax Receivable Agreement will generally provide for the payment by Simply Good Foods to the Selling Equityholders for certain federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax benefits deemed realized (as further described below) in post-closing taxable periods by Simply Good Foods, the Company, Atkins and Atkins eligible subsidiaries (collectively, the “Tax Group”) from the use of up to $100 million of the following tax attributes: (i) net operating losses available to be carried forward as of the closing of the Business Combination; (ii) certain deductions generated by the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; and (iii) remaining depreciable tax basis from the 2003 acquisition of Atkins Nutritionals, Inc. In addition, Simply Good Foods will pay the Stockholders’ Representative (on behalf of the Selling Equityholders) for the use of 75% of up to $7.6 million of alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards (such alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards and the tax attributes described in clauses (i)-(iii) of the previous sentence, collectively, the “Tax Attributes”).

Under the Tax Receivable Agreement, the Tax Group is generally deemed to realize a tax benefit from the use of a Tax Attribute on a “with and without” basis, thereby generally treating the Tax Attribute as the last item used, except: (i) if in a given year a Tax Attribute would have been used but for Simply Good Foods or one of its subsidiaries having completed an acquisition of one or more business entities (e.g., a new acquisition provides tax attributes that offset income that otherwise would have been offset by a Tax Attribute), then the Tax Group will be deemed to realize the benefit it would have realized in the absence of the subsequent acquisition, until the aggregate tax benefits for that year equals $13.2 million (with any excess carried forward and paid in a year when the realized tax benefit is otherwise less than $13.2 million); and (ii) if the applicable corporate tax rate (and resulting realized tax benefit) is lower than it would have been but for a change of the taxable year after the closing date of the Business Combination (e.g., because the change in tax year enabled the Tax Group to benefit sooner from a legislative rate reduction), then the realized tax benefit will be calculated using the original higher rate (solely for U.S. federal tax purposes) for twelve months following the change of taxable year. Generally, Simply Good Foods will pay the Stockholders’ Representative for the deemed realized tax benefit for each taxable year, except that the amount payable will be adjusted if the realized tax benefit for prior taxable years is subsequently re-determined to be lower or higher than originally calculated (e.g., due to an audit that invalidates a deduction). In addition, any amount otherwise payable under the Tax Receivable Agreement will be reduced by the amount of any pre-closing income taxes of Atkins borne by Simply Good Foods (and any tax deductions arising from such income tax are generally treated as additional Tax Attributes). The Stockholders’ Representative is not required to repay any amounts previously paid under the Tax Receivable Agreement.

As a result of the foregoing, in certain circumstances (i) Simply Good Foods could be required to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement that are greater than or less than the actual tax savings that the Tax Group realizes in respect of the Tax Attributes and (ii) it is possible that Simply Good Foods may be required to make payments years in advance of the actual realization of tax benefits in respect of the Tax Attributes. In these situations, Simply Good Foods’ obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement could have an adverse impact on Simply Good Foods’ liquidity and could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing certain mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes of control. There can be no assurance that Simply Good Foods will be able to finance its obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement in a manner that does not adversely affect its working capital and growth requirements.

Debt Financing

Atkins Nutritionals, Inc., Atkins Nutritionals Holdings, Inc., Atkins Nutritionals Holdings II, Inc. and Atkins (collectively, the “Borrower”) will enter into a new senior secured credit facility (the “New Credit Facility”) with Barclays Bank PLC and Goldman Sachs Bank USA, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Bookrunners and certain other lenders, consisting of a $200 million term loan facility (the “New Term Loan Facility”) and a $75 million revolving loan facility (the “New Revolving Facility”), the proceeds of which are expected to be available at the Closing. The New Revolving Facility includes borrowing capacity available for letters of credit up to $30 million and for “swingline” loan borrowings up to $25 million. Any issuance of letters of credit or making of a swingline loan will reduce the amount available under the New Revolving Facility. The New Term Loan Facility will mature seven years after the closing date of the New Credit Facility and the New Revolving Facility will mature five years after the closing date of the New Credit Facility.

85

The New Credit Facility will provide the Borrower with the option to raise incremental credit facilities (including an incremental facility that will provide the Borrower with the option to increase the amount available under the New Credit Facility or additional term loan facilities or revolving facilities by an aggregate amount of up to the greater of (x) $70,000,000 and (y) an amount equal to 100% of pro forma consolidated EBITDA, plus additional amounts subject to compliance with certain financial leverage ratios) and extend the maturity date of the New Term Loan Facility and the New Revolving Facility, subject to certain limitations.

The obligations under the New Credit Facility will be guaranteed by Conyers Park, Intermediateco and the Borrower’s wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries other than certain excluded subsidiaries, including, but not limited to, immaterial subsidiaries, non-profit subsidiaries, and any other subsidiary with respect to which the burden or cost of providing a guarantee is excessive in view of the benefits to be obtained by the lenders therefrom.

The New Term Loan Facility will require the Borrower to make certain mandatory prepayments, with (i) 100% of net cash proceeds of all non-ordinary course asset sales or other dispositions of property, subject to the ability to reinvest such proceeds and certain other exceptions, and subject to step downs if certain leverage ratios are met and (ii) 100% of the net cash proceeds of any debt incurrence, other than debt permitted under the term loan agreement (other than debt incurred to refinance the New Term Loan Facility). The Borrower will also be required to make scheduled amortization payments equal to 1.0% of the New Term Loan Facility commencing after the second full fiscal quarter after the closing date of the New Credit Facility (subject to reductions by optional and mandatory prepayments of the loans). The Borrower may prepay the New Credit Facility at any time without premium or penalty, subject to payment of customary breakage costs and a customary “soft call.”

Certain covenants and events of default

The New Credit Facility contains financial covenants requiring the Borrower, if as of the last day of any fiscal quarter, borrowings and other extensions of credit in excess of 30% of the aggregate amount of the revolving commitments are then outstanding (other than letters of credit that have been cash collateralized and letters of credit in an amount not to exceed $15,000,000 and certain other items), to comply with a ratio of (x) the aggregate principal amount of consolidated net indebtedness of the Borrower outstanding to (y) trailing four quarter consolidated EBITDA (as defined under the New Credit Facility) of less than or equal to 6.25 to 1.00.The New Credit Facility will contain a number of traditional negative covenants. Such covenants, among other things, limit or restrict, the Borrower’s ability to:

•         incur additional indebtedness and make guarantees;

•         incur liens on assets;

•         engage in mergers or consolidations or fundamental changes;

•         sell assets;

•         pay dividends and distributions or repurchase capital stock;

•         make investments, loans and advances, including acquisitions;

•         amend material agreements governing certain of the Borrower’s organizational documents;

•         enter into certain agreements that would restrict the ability of the Borrower and its subsidiaries to pay dividends;

•         repay certain junior indebtedness; and

•         engage in certain transactions with affiliates.

The aforementioned restrictions are subject to certain exceptions including (i) the ability to incur additional indebtedness, liens, investments, dividends and distributions, and prepayments of junior indebtedness subject, in each case, to compliance with certain financial metrics and certain other conditions, (ii) the ability to upstream payments in connection with the Tax Receivable Agreement and (iii) a number of other traditional exceptions that grant the Borrower continued flexibility to operate and develop its business.

The New Credit Facility will also contain certain customary representations and warranties, affirmative covenants and events of default. If an event of default occurs, the lenders under the New Credit Facility will be entitled to take various actions, including the acceleration of amounts due under the New Credit Facility and all actions permitted to be taken by a secured creditor.

86

Background of the Business Combination

The terms of the Merger Agreement are the result of negotiations between Conyers Park and the Selling Equityholders and their respective representatives. The following is a brief description of the background of these negotiations.

Conyers Park is a blank check company formed under the laws of the State of Delaware and was incorporated in Delaware on April 20, 2016. The Company was formed for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses with the intention of focusing its search for a target business in the consumer sector.

On July 20, 2016, Conyers Park consummated its initial public offering of 40,250,000 units, including the full exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option of 2,750,000 units (collectively, the “Units”). Each Unit consists of one share of Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value per share (“Class A Common Stock”), and one-third of one warrant (“Public Warrant”), to purchase one share of Class A Common Stock. Each whole Public Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of Class A Common Stock at an exercise price of $11.50 per share.

The Units were sold at an offering price of $10.00 per Unit, generating gross proceeds of $402,500,000 (before underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses). Simultaneously with the consummation of our initial public offering and the sale of the Units, we consummated a private placement of 6,700,000 warrants (“Placement Warrants”) at a price of $1.50 per Placement Warrant, issued to our Sponsor, generating total proceeds of $10,050,000.

Approximately $402.5 million of the net proceeds from the initial public offering (including the over-allotment) and the private placements with our Sponsor were deposited in a trust account established for the benefit of our public stockholders.

Prior to the consummation of its initial public offering, neither Conyers Park, nor anyone on its behalf, contacted any prospective target business or had any substantive discussions, formal or otherwise, with respect to such a transaction with Conyers Park.

After the initial public offering, Conyers Park initiated contact with more than 20 potential targets, including privately held assets and assets or divisions owned by publicly traded companies, with revenues ranging from approximately $250 million to $3.5 billion, and/or their advisors. Of those potential targets, Conyers Park conducted additional due diligence with respect to approximately ten.

On August 5, 2016, Jim Kilts, the Executive Chairman of Conyers Park, contacted the Chief Executive Officer of Atkins, Joseph Scalzo, and had a call with him that same day. During the week of August 8, 2016, Brian Ratzan, the Chief Financial Officer and a Director of Conyers Park had a follow up call with Mr. Scalzo to discuss a proposal. Conyers Park submitted a non-binding bid of $750 million based on its own estimate of company EBITDA of $75 million. Conyers Park arrived at its own estimate of EBITDA using publicly available U.S. Multi-Outlet Retail Sales data and estimated EBITDA margins of between 15% and 20%, and used EBITDA as a reflection of the ongoing earnings of the business. Mr. Ratzan then began a dialog with Mr. Scalzo and Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. who was acting as a financial advisor to Atkins. On August 15, 2016, Conyers Park executed a confidentiality agreement with Atkins. Deutsche Bank agreed that if a transaction were to be consummated with Atkins, Deutsche Bank would waive its deferred underwriting fee that it was conditionally entitled to from the initial public offering of Conyers Park.

On September 9, 2016, the management team of Atkins (Mr. Scalzo, Shaun Mara, Chief Financial Officer of Atkins, Hanno Holm, Chief Operations Officer of Atkins, and Robert Gandert, Chief Customer/Business Development Officer of Atkins) met with the management team of Conyers Park (Mr. Kilts, Mr. Ratzan and David West, Chief Executive Officer of Conyers Park) in Greenwich, Connecticut.

On October 4, 2016, Conyers Park held an in-person board meeting to, among other things, discuss the potential acquisition of Atkins and the over 20 other opportunities being considered. Of those opportunities, five were in active, early-stage discussions, including three privately owned branded food assets (including Atkins), one privately owned manufacturer of household and personal care products, and assets owned by one large-cap publicly traded food company.

87

On October 30, 2016, Mr. Ratzan met with Deutsche Bank to discuss the improvement in recent financial performance of Atkins, the potential tax benefits of the transaction, and the potential acquisition by Atkins of Wellness Foods.

On November 2, 2016, Mr. Kilts, Mr. West and Mr. Ratzan had a telephonic discussion with Mr. Scalzo, Mr. Mara, Mr. Gandert and Scott Parker, Chief Marketing Officer of Atkins, for an update on Atkins’ operating performance.

On November 10, 2016, at the end of an audit committee meeting, Mr. Kilts, Mr. West and Mr. Ratzan gave an update to the committee on the five active discussions regarding potential target businesses, including their view of each of the businesses, valuation considerations, and likelihood of completing a transaction.

On December 8, 2016, representatives of Atkins’ majority shareholder (Neal Aronson, Founder and Managing Partner of Roark Capital Group, Ezra Field, Senior Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Roark Capital Group, and Michael Thompson, Principal of Roark Capital Group) met with Mr. Kilts, Mr. West and Mr. Ratzan at which meeting Conyers Park proposed a $700 million purchase price plus a tax sharing arrangement that would be negotiated at a later date. This offer was ultimately rejected by the representatives of Atkins’ majority shareholder, who felt that the valuation was inadequate.

While the meetings regarding an acquisition of Atkins by Conyers Park were ongoing, Conyers Park was continuing its diligence on another potential target in the foods industry and having discussions with its management team. This other potential transaction had been identified as active at the October 4, 2016 Conyers Park board meeting.

In late December, Conyers Park increased its offer for Atkins by $9 million based on the continued strong performance of the business. In addition to that increase, Conyers Park agreed to pay another $21 million which incorporated the purchase price and fees and expenses of the Wellness Foods acquisition paid by Atkins in December of 2016. The offer reflected that a portion of the purchase price can be satisfied with a rollover by the pre-Closing Atkins stockholders of $102.5 million into the stock of Conyers Park. Conyers Park believed a rollover by the pre-Closing Atkins stockholders would reduce the required leverage of the transaction and best position the company for future growth. On December 31, 2016, a purchase price of $730 million for Atkins was tentatively agreed on by the parties. This purchase price, including the dilution resulting from the conversion of the Founder Shares, represented a transaction multiple that was in line with publicly traded peers of Atkins and precedent transactions.

Commencing on January 9, 2017 Conyers Park and Atkins negotiated a letter of intent for the proposed transaction. On January 18, 2017, a Conyers Park board meeting was held to approve the execution of the letter of intent. On January 19, 2017, the letter of intent was executed with a thirty day exclusivity provision at which point Conyers Park ceased discussions with other potential targets.

On January 20, 2017, Conyers Park commenced confirmatory business due diligence and third party legal, accounting, tax, insurance, benefits and environmental due diligence.

On February 1st and 2nd of 2017, Mr. West and Mr. Ratzan met with management of Atkins (Mr. Scalzo, Mr. Mara, Mr. Parker, Mr. Gandert, Mr. Holm and Annita Menogan, General Counsel and Secretary of Atkins) in Denver, Colorado to discuss the business and financial performance of Atkins and to conduct further due diligence.

On February 12, 2016, King & Spalding LLP, counsel to Atkins’ majority shareholder and Atkins, distributed a draft of the Merger Agreement and other agreements for the potential business combination to Conyers Park and its attorneys, Kirkland & Ellis LLP.

On February 15, 2017, the board members of Conyers Park met with members of management of Atkins, Mr. Scalzo and Mr. Mara. Mr. Scalzo and Mr. Mara presented an overview of the business and financial performance of Atkins, including U.S. Multi-Outlet Retail Sales data, sales by customer, historical income statements, and cash flow characteristics.

On March 1, 2017, Kirkland & Ellis LLP sent their first set of comments to the Merger Agreement to King & Spalding LLP. The revised draft generally addressed risk allocation and economic points related to the purchase price, and also included changes to representations and warranties, covenants and closing conditions.

On March 7, 2017, Mr. Kilts, Mr. West and Mr. Ratzan met in Naples, Florida with Mr. Scalzo and Mr. Parker to further conduct diligence on marketing and brand positioning.

88

Throughout March, Conyers Park and Atkins’ majority shareholder exchanged drafts of the Merger Agreement and drafts of the ancillary documents, including the Tax Receivable Agreement and the Investor Rights Agreement in favor of Atkins Holdings LLC. The various drafts exchanged reflected divergent views on, among other things, registration rights, governance rights, risk allocation and purchase price-related issues. For a description of the Tax Receivable Agreement, see the section entitled “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — The Tax Receivable Agreement.” For a description of the Investor Rights Agreement between Simply Good Foods, Sponsor and Atkins Holdings LLC, please see “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — The Investor Rights Agreement with Atkins Holdings LLC.”

On March 29, 2017, Conyers Park held a board meeting to discuss the status of the transaction and approach to potential sources of funding, including the possibility of raising incremental equity. Based on factors cited in “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — The Company’s Board of Directors’ Reasons for the Approval of the Business Combination.”, the board then directed Conyers Park management to continue negotiating the terms of the Merger Agreement.

On April 2, 2017, principals from Atkins’ majority shareholder, including Mr. Field and Stephen Aronson, Managing Director and General Counsel of Roark Capital Group, and Mr. West and Mr. Ratzan held a conference call to resolve remaining business issues, which included the mechanics of the Tax Receivable Agreement, closing working capital, and the Investor Rights Agreement, among others. The remaining open issues in the Merger Agreement at this time included the treatment of certain receivables and bonus payments, provisions related to the financing and the Company’s capital structure as impacted by the financing and contemplated private placement equity investment.

On April 3, 2017, the board of Conyers Park met, reviewed the Merger Agreement and ancillary documents, and unanimously adopted resolutions (i) determining that it is in the best interests of Conyers Park and its stockholders for Conyers Park to enter into the Merger Agreement, (ii) adopting the Merger Agreement and approving Conyers Park’s execution, delivery and performance of the same and the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement including the Common Stock Private Placement, the Debt Financing and entry into the ancillary documents, and (iii) approving the filing of the proxy statement with the Securities Exchange Commission, subject, in each case, to changes to the Business Combination and documentation acceptable to the officers of Conyers Park.

On April 4, 2017, the principals of Conyers Park, Mr. West and Mr. Ratzan, and the principals of Atkins’ majority shareholder, including Mr. Field and Mr. Stephen Aronson, negotiated the nomination rights contemplated under the Investor Rights Agreement, with Kirkland & Ellis LLP sending to King & Spalding LLP a revised draft reflecting such terms. Kirkland & Ellis LLP also sent a revised draft of the Merger Agreement, which incorporated proposals on the treatment of certain receivables and bonus payments, financing and the Company’s capital structure as impacted by the financing and contemplated private placement equity investment.

On April 5, 2017, the parties came to a general agreement on the size of the private placement equity investment Conyers Park was contemplating and reached out to certain institutional investors. At this time, Conyers Park was also negotiating debt commitment documentation for indebtedness of up to $300 million together with a revolving credit facility of between $50 to $75 million.

On April 7, 2017, certain institutional investors indicated an interest to purchase Class A common stock for an aggregate amount of $100 million at $10 per share.

On April 9 and 10, 2017, Conyers Park executed debt financing commitment documentation, as well as subscription agreements for purchases of $100 million in aggregate amount of Class A common stock at $10 per share which would upon Closing become shares of common stock of The Simply Good Foods Company.

On April 10, 2017, the parties executed the Merger Agreement.

On April 11, 2017, a press release was issued announcing the business combination. Shortly thereafter Conyers Park filed a current report on Form 8-K attaching the press release and investor presentation to be used later that day.

On June 2, 2017, the board of Conyers Park met to discuss the status of the transaction and unanimously adopted resolutions (i) reaffirming its actions taken on April 3, 2017, including ratifying the Merger Agreement and

89

the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby including the Common Stock Private Placement and the the Debt Financing, (ii) recommending that  the Merger Agreement be submitted to Conyers Park’s stockholders for approval, and (iii) delegating the decision on the record date, date and time for such meeting to a committee of the board which was established for such purpose whose members are David J. West and Brian K. Ratzan.  The board, with Messrs. Kilts, Ratzan, and West recusing themselves due to their ownership interests in Sponsor, also approved the entry by Simply Good Foods into an investor rights agreement, substantially in the form attached hereto as Annex D with Sponsor.

The Company’s Board of Directors’ Reasons for the Approval of the Business Combination

On April 3, 2017, Conyers Park’s board of directors met and unanimously (i) approved the Purchase Agreement and the transaction contemplated thereby, (ii) determined that the Business Combination is in the best interest of Conyers Park and its stockholders, (iii) directed the Purchase Agreement be submitted to its stockholders for approval and adoption, and (iv) recommended that our stockholders approve and adopt the Purchase Agreement.

Before reaching its decision, Conyers Park’s board of directors reviewed the results of its management’s due diligence, which included:

•         research on comparable companies including Amplify Snack Brands, Inc., B&G Foods, Inc., Flowers Foods, Inc., Hostess Brands, Inc., J&J Snack Foods Corp., Lancaster Colony Corporation, McCormick & Company, Inc., Pinnacle Foods Inc., Post Holdings, Inc., Snyder’s-Lance, Inc., and The J. M. Smucker Company, and over 30 precedent transactions involving branded food acquisitions from the past 10 years, ranging in transaction size from approximately $90 million to $7 billion in enterprise value. Conyers Park’s board of directors compared the EBITDA multiple derived from the purchase price for Atkins (including the dilution resulting from the conversion of the Founder shares) to the average EBITDA multiple of the aforementioned publicly traded comparable companies, as well as to the average EBITDA multiple of the aforementioned precedent transactions, and found that Atkins’ transaction multiple was in-line with both;

•         extensive meetings and calls with Atkins’ management team regarding operations and projections;

•         research on the nutritional snacking industry, including historical growth trends, market share information and market size projections;

•         review of Atkins’ material contracts, environmental matters, intellectual property matters, labor matters, and financial, tax, legal, environmental and accounting diligence;

•         financial and valuation analysis including financial projections provided by Atkins, which indicated Net Sales of $402 million and $428 million, Gross Profit of $188 million and $201 million and Adjusted EBITDA of $72 million and $78 million, for the fiscal years ending August 31, 2017 and 2018, respectively, an implied trading multiple (after accounting for the dilution from the Founder Shares and fees and expenses related to the transaction resulting in an enterprise value of $856 million at the original issue price of $10.00 per share) of 11.6x estimated EBITDA for the 12-months ended December 31, 2017 of $74 million, compared to a peer set median trading multiple of 13.7x 2017 estimated EBITDA, and an implied trading multiple (after accounting for the dilution from the Founder Shares and fees and expenses related to the transaction resulting in an enterprise value of $856 million at the original issue price of $10.00 per share) of 11.8x estimated EBITDA less capital expenditure for the 12-months ended December 31, 2017 of $73 million, compared to a peer set median trading multiple of 16.4x 2017 estimated EBITDA less capital expenditure; and

•         reports relating to Quality of Earnings, tax, legal and cost diligence prepared by external advisors of KPMG LLP, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Mercer Inc., and Marsh USA Inc.

The Company’s board of directors considered a wide variety of factors in connection with its evaluation of the Business Combination. In light of the complexity of those factors, the Company’s board of directors, as a whole, did not consider it practicable to, nor did it attempt to, quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific factors it took into account in reaching its decision.

90

In the prospectus for Conyers Park’s IPO, Conyers Park identified the following general criteria and guidelines that it believed would be important in evaluating prospective target businesses. Conyers Park indicated its intention to acquire companies that it believes:

•         have market and/or cost leadership positions in their respective consumer niches and would benefit from Conyers Park’s extensive networks and insights within the consumer sector;

•         provide enduring products or services, with the potential for revenue, market share and/or distribution improvements;

•         are fundamentally sound companies that are not operating at their full potential but offer compelling value;

•         offer the opportunity for Conyers Park’s management team to partner with established management teams or business owners to achieve long-term strategic and operational excellence;

•         exhibit unrecognized value or other characteristics, desirable returns on capital, and a need for capital to achieve the Company’s growth strategy, that Conyers Park believes have been misevaluated by the marketplace based on its analysis and due diligence review; and

•         will offer an attractive risk-adjusted return for Conyers Park’s shareholders.

In considering the Business Combination, Conyers Park’s board of directors concluded that Atkins met all of the above criteria. In particular, the board considered the following positive factors, although not weighted or in any order of significance:

•         Powerful Brand with Strong Competitive Position. Atkins is a brand with strong consumer equity, as demonstrated by its 85% aided brand awareness based on a January 2016 study conducted by Atkins. Atkins is a player of meaningful scale in both nutrition bars and RTD shakes and is a leader in the fast growing nutritional snacking space.

•         Alignment with Consumer Mega Trends. The Atkins brand is well positioned at the confluence of snacking and better-for-you nutrition. Health concerns continue to grow, driven by obesity and diabetes rates reaching 38% and 13% of U.S. adults, respectively. Snacking benefits from the tailwind trends of convenience, meal replacement, health and wellness, as well as “clean eating.” For many consumers, the Atkins brand stands for “low carb,” “low sugar” and “protein rich” nutrition. With 73% of consumers claiming to be lowering their carbohydrate intake, Atkins is well aligned with consumer mega trends.

•         Proven Track Record of Growth. Atkins has demonstrated eight consecutive years of U.S. Multi-Outlet Retail Sales growth of its snacking products, with a 16% U.S. Multi-Outlet Retail Sales CAGR from December 2008 through the fiscal year ended August 2016. For the fiscal year ended August 2016, Atkins’ snacking products generated $443 million in U.S. Multi-Outlet Retail Sales, representing growth of 6.6% from the fiscal year ended August 2015. Atkins has continued to demonstrate growth in fiscal year 2017: for the first half of fiscal year 2017 (ended February), Atkins’ snacking products generated $215 million in U.S. Multi-Outlet Retail Sales, representing growth of 6.9% from the first half of fiscal year 2016 (ended February). Atkins’ management believes the brand has the opportunity to expand its target marketing audience by up to four times and thereby sustain a strong organic growth trajectory. Conyers Park’s board of directors reviewed data from IRI, Nielsen FDMx and Retail Link relating to U.S. Multi-Outlet Retail Sales for the period from 2008 to 2016.

•         Asset-Light Model Characterized by Strong Cash Flow Generation. Atkins benefits from strong cash flow generation, with strong and consistent EBITDA margins, minimal annual capital expenditure needs of approximately $1 million and modest working capital requirements.

•         Experienced and Proven Management Team with Premier Sponsorship. Central to the post-combination company’s platform is its leadership team, combining Conyers Park principals’ extensive experience building and revitalizing brands with Atkins’ private and public company experience across multiple branded consumer products, food and nutrition categories. Selling Equityholders will own 10,250,000 shares in the post-combination company, ensuring continuity and alignment of interest.

91

•         Opportunities for Platform Growth Through M&A. Atkins is a scalable M&A platform, due to the combination of the brand’s leadership in nutritional snacking, its management’s deep expertise in brand building, merchandising and product development, and Atkins’ strong customer relationships with key food/drug/mass players. The food industry and snacking industry in particular are highly fragmented and offer attractive opportunities for consolidation. Atkins is well positioned to drive consolidation across the nutritional snacking space and the broader food sector, via both bolt-on acquisitions and Reverse Morris Trust partnerships with large strategic players.

Conyers Park’s board of directors also considered a variety of uncertainties and risks and other potentially negative factors concerning the Business Combination, including, but not limited to, the following:

•         Financial History of Atkins. The board was aware that in the early 2000s, in the midst of the surge of low carb diets, the strategy pursued by Atkins’ management at that time was to proliferate the brand into numerous food categories. Atkins launched over 1,100 SKUs in categories such as bread, macaroni and cheese, ice cream, barbeque sauce, vitamin pills, and supplements — categories well beyond Atkins’ core snacking business. As the surge in low carb diets faded, those new products did not sell well and Atkins filed for bankruptcy in 2005. This financial history was discussed and considered by the board; however, the board viewed the current business as financially stable given its focus on snacking and its eight-year track record of steady growth.

•         Benefits Not Achieved. The risk that the potential benefits of the Business Combination may not be fully achieved, or may not be achieved within the expected timeframe.

•         Liquidation of the Company. The risks and costs to Conyers Park if the Business Combination is not completed, including the risk of diverting management focus and resources from other businesses combination opportunities, which could result in Conyers Park being unable to effect a business combination by July 20, 2018 and force Conyers Park to liquidate and the warrants to expire worthless.

•         Exclusivity. The fact that the Merger Agreement includes an exclusivity provision that prohibits the Company from soliciting other initial business combination proposals, which restricts the Company’s ability to consider other potential initial business combinations until the earlier of the termination of the Merger Agreement or the consummation of the Business Combination between the Company and Atkins.

•         Stockholder Vote. The risk that the Company’s stockholders may fail to provide the respective votes necessary to effect the Business Combination.

•         Closing Conditions. The fact that completion of the Business Combination is conditioned on the satisfaction of certain closing conditions that are not within the Company’s control.

•         Litigation. The possibility of litigation challenging the Business Combination or that an adverse judgment granting permanent injunctive relief could indefinitely enjoin consummation of the Business Combination.

•         Fees and Expenses. The fees and expenses associated with completing the Business Combination.

•         Other Risks. Various other risks associated with the Business Combination, the business of the Company and the business of Atkins described under “Risk Factors” beginning on page 29 of this document.

In addition to considering the factors described above, the board also considered that:

•         Interests of Certain Persons. Some officers and directors of the Company may have interests in the Business Combination as individuals that are in addition to, and that may be different from, the interests of the Company’s stockholders (see “— Interests of Certain Persons in the Business Combination” below). Conyers Park’s independent directors reviewed and considered these interests during the negotiation of the Business Combination and in evaluating and unanimously approving, as members of the board, the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated therein, including the Business Combination.

The Conyers Park board of directors concluded that the potential benefits that it expected the Company and its stockholders to achieve as a result of the Business Combination outweighed the potentially negative factors associated with the Business Combination. Accordingly, the Conyers Park board of directors unanimously

92

determined that the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Business Combination, were advisable, fair to, and in the best interests of, the Company and its stockholders.

Interests of Certain Persons in the Business Combination

In considering the recommendation of Conyers Park’s board of directors to vote in favor of the Business Combination, stockholders should be aware that aside from their interests as stockholders, Sponsor and certain members of Conyers Park’s board of directors and executive officers have interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to, those of other stockholders generally. Conyers Park’s board of directors was aware of and considered these interests, among other matters, in evaluating and negotiating the Business Combination, and in recommending to stockholders that they approve the Business Combination. Stockholders should take these interests into account in deciding whether to approve the Business Combination. These interests include, among other things:

•         the continued right of Sponsor to hold Simply Good Foods common stock;

•         the fact that Sponsor paid an aggregate of $10,050,000 for its private placement warrants at the time of the Company’s IPO and such securities will expire worthless if a business combination is not consummated by July 20, 2018;

•         the fact that Sponsor has agreed not to redeem any of the Founder Shares in connection with a stockholder vote to approve a proposed initial business combination;

•         the fact that Sponsor paid an aggregate of $25,000 for its Founder Shares and such securities will have a significantly higher value at the time of the Business Combination;

•         if the Trust Account is liquidated, including in the event Conyers Park is unable to complete an initial business combination within the required time period, Sponsor has agreed to indemnify Conyers Park to ensure that the proceeds in the Trust Account are not reduced below $10.00 per public share, or such lesser per public share amount as is in the Trust Account on the liquidation date, by the claims of prospective target businesses with which Conyers Park has entered into an acquisition agreement or claims of any third party for services rendered or products sold to Conyers Park, but only if such a vendor or target business has not executed a waiver of any and all rights to seek access to the Trust Account;

•         the continuation of all seven of Conyers Park’s existing directors as a director of the post-combination company; and

•         the continued indemnification of Conyers Park’s existing directors and officers and the continuation of Conyers Park’s directors’ and officers’ liability insurance after the Business Combination.

Potential Purchases of Public Shares

In connection with the stockholder vote to approve the proposed Business Combination, Sponsor, directors, officers, or advisors or their respective affiliates may privately negotiate transactions to purchase shares from stockholders who would have otherwise elected to have their shares redeemed in conjunction with a proxy solicitation pursuant to the proxy rules for a per-share pro rata portion of the Trust Account. None of Conyers Park’s directors, officers or advisors or their respective affiliates will make any such purchases when they are in possession of any material non-public information not disclosed to the seller or during a restricted period under Regulation M under the Exchange Act. Such a purchase would include a contractual acknowledgement that such stockholder, although still the record holder of Conyers Park’s shares is no longer the beneficial owner thereof and therefore agrees not to exercise its redemption rights, and would include a contractual provision that directs such stockholder to vote such shares in a manner directed by the purchaser. In the event that Sponsor, directors, officers or advisors or their affiliates purchase shares in privately negotiated transactions from public stockholders who have already elected to exercise their redemption rights, such selling stockholders would be required to revoke their prior elections to redeem their shares. Any such privately negotiated purchases may be effected at purchase prices that are in excess of the per-share pro rata portion of the Trust Account.

93

The purpose of such purchases would be to increase the likelihood of obtaining stockholder approval of the Business Combination or, where the purchases are made by Sponsor, directors, officers or advisors or their respective affiliates, to satisfy a closing condition in an agreement related to the Business Combination.

Total Company Shares to be Issued in the Business Combination

It is anticipated that, upon completion of the Business Combination, the Company’s public stockholders (other than investors in the Common Stock Private Placement) will retain an ownership interest of approximately 57% in Simply Good Foods, the Common Stock Private Placement investors will own approximately 14% of the outstanding common stock of Simply Good Foods (such that public stockholders, including Common Stock Private Placement investors, will own approximately 71% of the post-combination company), Sponsor will retain an ownership interest of approximately 14% in the post-combination company and the Selling Equityholders will own approximately 13% of the outstanding common stock of the post-combination company. This ownership interest assumes that no shares are elected to be redeemed and does not take into account warrants to purchase common stock of Simply Good Foods that may remain outstanding following the Business Combination.

Sources and Uses for the Business Combination

The following table summarizes the sources and uses for funding the Business Combination.

Sources of Funds					Uses
(in millions)
Existing Cash in Trust Account		$	402.5		Cash Consideration to Selling Equityholders		$	627.6
Common Stock Private Placement			100.0		Selling Equityholders’ Retained Equity Value			102.5
Selling Equityholders’ Retained Equity Value			102.5		Conyers Park Estimated Transaction Costs			25.0
Committed Debt Financing			150.1
Total Sources		$	755.1		Total Uses		$	755.1

Board of Directors of the Company Following the Business Combination

Upon consummation of the Business Combination, we anticipate that the board of directors of Simply Good Foods will consist of nine directors. See the section entitled “Management and Board of Directors After the Business Combination” for additional information.

Certificate of Incorporation; Bylaws

Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, upon the closing of the Business Combination, our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws, as applicable, will be amended and restated promptly to:

•         classify our board of directors into three separate classes, with each class having a three year term;

•         adopt Delaware as the exclusive forum for certain stockholder litigation;

•         amend the stockholder vote required to remove any or all directors;

•         elect not to be governed by Section 203 of the DGCL and, instead, include a provision in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation that is substantially similar to Section 203 of the DGCL, but carves out Sponsor, its successors, certain affiliates and transferees from the definition of “interested stockholder,” and to make certain related changes;

•         change the stockholder vote required to amend the post-combination company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws;

•         amend the charter to authorize additional shares of capital stock;

•         revise our waiver regarding corporate opportunities; and

94

•         make certain other changes that our board of directors deems appropriate for a public operating company.

Name; Headquarters

The name of the post-combination company after the Business Combination will be The Simply Good Foods Company and our headquarters will be located at 1050 17th Street, Suite 1500, Denver, CO 80265.

Redemption Rights

Pursuant to Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, holders of public shares may elect to have their shares redeemed for cash at the applicable redemption price per share calculated in accordance with Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation. As of March 31, 2017, based on funds in the Trust Account of approximately $403.1 million, $402.5 million of which Conyers Park intends to use for the purposes of consummating a business combination, this would have amounted to approximately $10.00 per share, excluding the impact of up to $1,000,000 of interest income available to us for working capital requirements. If a holder exercises its redemption rights, then such holder will be exchanging its shares of Conyers Park’s common stock for cash and will no longer own shares of the Company. Such a holder will be entitled to receive cash for its public shares only if it properly demands redemption and delivers its shares (either physically or electronically) to Conyers Park’s transfer agent prior to the special meeting of stockholders. See the section entitled “Special Meeting in Lieu of 2017 Annual Meeting of Company Stockholders — Redemption Rights” for the procedures to be followed if you wish to redeem your shares for cash.

Appraisal Rights

There are no appraisal rights available to our stockholders in connection with the Business Combination.

Accounting Treatment

The Business Combination will be accounted for using the acquisition method under the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification 805 “Business Combinations” with Conyers Park being considered the accounting acquirer and Atkins being considered the acquiree.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations to Conyers Park Common Stockholders and Warrant Holders

In the opinion of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, United States tax counsel to Conyers Park, based on, and subject to, customary assumptions, qualifications and limitations as well as representations of Conyers Park and Simply Good Foods, the material U.S. federal income tax considerations for beneficial owners of our Conyers Park common stock and Conyers Park warrants of (i) electing to have their Conyers Park common stock redeemed for cash if the acquisition is completed, (ii) the Business Combination, and (iii) the ownership and disposition of Simply Good Foods common stock and Simply Good Foods warrants are set forth below. This summary is based upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which we refer to as the “Code,” the regulations promulgated by the U.S. Treasury Department, current administrative interpretations and practices of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, which we refer to as the “IRS,” and judicial decisions, all as currently in effect and all of which are subject to differing interpretations or to change, possibly with retroactive effect. No assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a court would not sustain a position contrary to any of the tax considerations described below. This summary does not discuss all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to particular investors in light of their particular circumstances, such as investors subject to special tax rules (e.g., financial institutions, insurance companies, mutual funds, pension plans, S corporations, broker-dealers, traders in securities that elect mark-to-market treatment, regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts, trusts and estates, partnerships and their partners, and tax-exempt organizations (including private foundations)) and investors that hold Conyers Park common stock or warrants or Simply Good Foods common stock or warrants as part of a “straddle,” “hedge,” “conversion,” “synthetic security,” “constructive ownership transaction,” “constructive sale” or other integrated transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes, investors subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the Code, U.S. Holders (as defined below) that have a functional currency other than the United States dollar, U.S. expatriates, investors subject to the U.S. “inversion” rules, and Non-U.S. Holders (as defined below, and except as otherwise discussed below), all of whom may be subject to tax rules that differ materially

95

from those summarized below. In addition, this summary does not discuss any state, local, or non-United States tax considerations, any non-income tax (such as gift or estate tax) considerations, alternative minimum tax or the Medicare tax. In addition, this summary does not address any tax consequences to investors that directly or indirectly hold equity interests in Atkins prior to the Business Combination, including holders of Conyers Park common stock or warrants that also hold, directly or indirectly, equity interests in Atkins. In addition, this summary is limited to investors that hold Conyers Park common or warrants or Simply Good Foods common stock or warrants as “capital assets” (generally, property held for investment) under the Code.

If a partnership (including an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds Conyers Park common stock or warrants or Simply Good Foods common stock or warrants, the tax treatment of a partner in such partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner, the activities of the partnership and the partner and certain determinations made at the partner level. If you are a partner of a partnership holding Conyers Park common stock or warrants or Simply Good Foods common stock or warrants, you are urged to consult your tax advisor regarding the tax consequences of a redemption.

Because each share of Conyers Park common stock and a warrant that compose a unit, as well as each share of Simply Good Foods common stock and a warrant that compose a unit, are separable at the option of the holder, as well as the option of Conyers Park or Simply Good Foods, as the case may be, and because each such share and warrant so separated is listed and tradable on NASDAQ, each such share and warrant should be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as separate instruments and the unit itself should not be treated as an integrated instrument. No assurance can be given, however, that the IRS would not assert, or that a court would not sustain a contrary position, including that each unit should be treated as an integrated instrument; there are certain authorities that suggest this contrary position is the proper treatment of certain instruments similarly issued as a unit, although these authorities generally involve instruments that are not separable, or where the holder is economically compelled not to separate the unit. If the units were each treated as an integrated instrument comprising a share of Conyers Park common stock and a warrant, or a share of Simply Good Foods common stock and a warrant, as the case may be, each unit would likely be treated as stock for U.S. federal income tax purposes, in which case the tax consequences described herein to a beneficial owner of a unit who does not also separately hold any warrants generally would correspond to the tax consequences described below to a beneficial owner of common stock, and the portions of the discussion describing the tax consequences in respect of a warrant would not apply. The remainder of this discussion assumes that each such share and warrant that compose a unit is treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a separate instrument and the unit itself is not treated as an integrated instrument. You are urged to consult your tax advisor concerning the U.S. federal, state, local and any foreign tax consequences of an investment in a unit (including alternative characterizations of a unit).

U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations to U.S. Holders

For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of Conyers Park common stock or warrants, or Simply Good Foods common stock or warrants, as the case may be, that is:

•         an individual who is a United States citizen or resident of the United States;

•         a corporation (including an entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia;

•         an estate the income of which is includible in gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes regardless of its source; or

•         a trust (A) the administration of which is subject to the primary supervision of a United States court and which has one or more United States persons (within the meaning of the Code) who have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (B) that has in effect a valid election under applicable Treasury regulations to be treated as a United States person.

Tax Consequences for U.S. Holders Exercising Redemption Rights

This section is addressed to U.S. Holders of Conyers Park common stock that elect to have their Conyers Park common stock redeemed for cash as described in the section entitled “Special Meeting in Lieu of 2017 Annual Meeting of Company Stockholders — Redemption Rights.”

96

Redemption of Conyers Park Common Stock

In the event that a U.S. Holder’s Conyers Park common stock is redeemed pursuant to the redemption provisions described in the section entitled “Special Meeting in Lieu of 2017 Annual Meeting of Company Stockholders — Redemption Rights,” the treatment of the transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes will depend on whether the redemption qualifies as sale of the Conyers Park common stock under Section 302 of the Code. Generally, whether the redemption qualifies for sale treatment will depend largely on the total number of shares of our stock treated as held by the U.S. Holder (including any stock constructively owned by the U.S. Holder as a result of owning warrants or as a result of the Business Combination) relative to all of our shares treated as held by the U.S. Holder both before and after the redemption. The redemption of Conyers Park common stock generally will be treated as a sale of the Conyers Park common stock (rather than as a distribution) if the redemption (i) is “substantially disproportionate” with respect to the U.S. Holder, (ii) results in a “complete termination” of the U.S. Holder’s interest in us or (iii) is “not essentially equivalent to a dividend” with respect to the U.S. Holder.

In determining whether any of the foregoing tests are satisfied, a U.S. Holder generally takes into account not only stock actually owned by the U.S. Holder, but also shares of our stock that are constructively owned by it. A U.S. Holder may constructively own, in addition to stock owned directly, stock owned by certain related individuals and entities in which the U.S. Holder has an interest or that have an interest in such U.S. Holder, as well as any stock the U.S. Holder has a right to acquire by exercise of an option, which would generally include Conyers Park common stock which could be acquired pursuant to the exercise of the warrants (and, after the completion of the Business Combination, Simply Good Foods common stock which could be acquired by exercise of the warrants). In order to meet the substantially disproportionate test, the percentage of our outstanding voting stock actually and constructively owned by the U.S. Holder immediately following the redemption of Conyers Park common stock must, among other requirements, be less than 80% of the Conyers Park common stock actually and constructively owned by the U.S. Holder immediately before the redemption. There will be a complete termination of a U.S. Holder’s interest if either (i) all of the shares of our stock actually and constructively owned by the U.S. Holder are redeemed or (ii) all of the shares of our stock actually owned by the U.S. Holder are redeemed and the U.S. Holder is eligible to waive, and effectively waives in accordance with specific rules, the attribution of stock owned by certain family members and the U.S. Holder does not constructively own any other stock and certain other requirements are met. The redemption of the Conyers Park common stock will not be essentially equivalent to a dividend if a U.S. Holder’s conversion results in a “meaningful reduction” of the U.S. Holder’s proportionate interest in us. Whether the redemption will result in a meaningful reduction in a U.S. Holder’s proportionate interest in us will depend on the particular facts and circumstances. The IRS has indicated in a published ruling that even a small reduction in the proportionate interest of a small minority stockholder in a publicly held corporation who exercises no control over corporate affairs may constitute such a “meaningful reduction.”

If none of the foregoing tests are satisfied, then the redemption will be treated as a distribution and the tax effects will be as described below under “— Taxation of Distributions.”

U.S. Holders who actually or constructively own five percent (or, if Conyers Park common stock is not then publicly traded, one percent) or more of Conyers Park common stock (by vote or value) may be subject to special reporting requirements with respect to a redemption of Conyers Park common stock. We expect that the Conyers Park common stock will be publicly traded for this purpose. Such U.S. Holders should consult with their tax advisors with respect to their reporting requirements.

U.S. Holders of our Conyers Park common stock considering exercising their redemption rights are urged to consult their tax advisors to determine whether the redemption of their Conyers Park common stock would be treated as a sale or as a distribution under the Code.

Gain or Loss on Sale, Taxable Exchange, or Other Taxable Disposition of Conyers Park Common Stock

If the redemption qualifies as a sale of Conyers Park common stock, a U.S. Holder must treat any gain or loss recognized upon a sale, taxable exchange or other taxable disposition of our Conyers Park common stock as capital gain or loss. Any such capital gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the Conyers Park common stock so disposed of exceeds one year. Generally, a U.S. Holder will recognize gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between (i) the sum of cash and the fair market value of any property received in such disposition (or, if the Conyers Park common stock is held as part of a unit at the time of the disposition, the portion of the amount realized on such disposition that is allocated to the Conyers Park

97

common stock based upon the then fair market values of the Conyers Park common stock and the warrant included in the unit) and (ii) the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in its Conyers Park common stock so disposed of. A U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in its Conyers Park common stock generally will equal the U.S. Holder’s acquisition cost of the Conyers Park common stock (which, if the Conyers Park common stock was acquired as part of a unit, is the portion of the purchase price of the unit allocated to the share of Conyers Park common stock or, if the Conyers Park common stock was received upon exercise of a warrant the initial basis of the Conyers Park common stock upon exercise of the warrant (which will generally be as described below in “— Tax Consequences of Ownership and Disposition of Simply Good Foods Common Stock and Warrants Exercisable for Shares of Simply Good Foods Common Stock — Exercise or Lapse of a Warrant”)) less any prior distributions treated as a return of capital. Long-term capital gain realized by a non-corporate U.S. Holder generally will be taxable at a reduced rate. The deduction of capital losses is subject to limitations.

Taxation of Distributions

If the redemption does not qualify as a sale of Conyers Park common stock, the U.S. Holder will be treated as receiving a distribution. In general, any distributions to U.S. Holders generally will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent paid from our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits will constitute a return of capital that will be applied against and reduce (but not below zero) the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Conyers Park common stock. Any remaining excess will be treated as gain realized on the sale or other disposition of the Conyers Park common stock and will be treated as described above under “— Gain or Loss on Sale, Taxable Exchange, or Other Taxable Disposition of Conyers Park Common Stock.” Dividends we pay to a U.S. Holder that is a taxable corporation generally will qualify for the dividends received deduction if the requisite holding period is satisfied. With certain exceptions, and provided certain holding period requirements are met, dividends we pay to a non-corporate U.S. Holder generally will constitute “qualified dividends” that will be taxable at a reduced rate.

WE URGE HOLDERS OF CONYERS PARK COMMON STOCK CONTEMPLATING EXERCISE OF THEIR REDEMPTION RIGHTS TO CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS CONCERNING THE U.S. FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND FOREIGN INCOME AND OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES THEREOF.

Tax Consequences of the Parent Merger

The exchange by U.S. Holders of Conyers Park common stock for common stock of Simply Good Foods pursuant to the Parent Merger, in combination with the exchange by the Sellers of their common stock in Atkins pursuant to the Business Combination, will constitute a tax-deferred transaction pursuant to Section 351 of the Code, and as a result, no gain or loss will be recognized by the U.S. Holders of Conyers Park common stock who exchange Conyers Park common stock solely for Simply Good Foods common stock. Accordingly, the adjusted tax basis of the shares of Simply Good Foods common stock received by such a U.S. Holder of Conyers Park common stock in the Parent Merger will be the same as the adjusted tax basis of the Conyers Park common stock surrendered in exchange therefor. In addition, the holding period of the shares of Simply Good Foods common stock received in the Parent Merger by such a U.S. Holder of shares of Conyers Park common stock will include the period during which such shares of Conyers Park common stock were held on the date of the Parent Merger. Every “significant transferor,” pursuant to the exchange must include a statement on or with such transferor’s income tax return for the taxable year of the exchange. For this purpose, a significant transferor is generally a person that transferred property to a corporation and received stock of the transferee corporation if, immediately after the exchange, such person — (i) owned at least five percent (by vote or value) of the total outstanding stock of the transferee corporation if the stock owned by such person is publicly traded, or (ii) owned at least one percent (by vote or value) of the total outstanding stock of the transferee corporation if the stock owned by such person is not publicly traded. We expect that the Simply Good Foods common stock will be publicly traded for this purpose.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, there is a risk that the outstanding Conyers Park warrants, which are currently exercisable for one share of Conyers Park common stock and will be exercisable for one share of Simply Good Foods common stock following the Parent Merger, will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as having been “exchanged” by the holders of such warrants for “new warrants.” Because the terms of the warrants are not otherwise being changed pursuant to the Parent Merger and because the terms of the warrants, when originally

98

issued, contemplated, among other things, the warrants becoming exercisable into shares of another corporation under circumstances similar to the Parent Merger, then the warrants becoming exercisable into shares of Simply Good Foods common stock should not be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as giving rise to an exchange of the warrants for new warrants. Although Conyers Park and Simply Good Foods intend to take this position, no assurance can be given, however, that the IRS would not assert, or that a court would not sustain a contrary position, and if the warrants were to be treated as having been exchanged for new warrants and such exchange were governed only by Section 351 of the Code and not by Section 368 of the Code, a U.S. Holder of Conyers common stock holding such warrants would be required to recognize gain, but not loss, as a result of the exchange equal to the lesser of (i) such stockholder’s “realized gain” from the exchange (generally the excess of the sum of the fair market value of the Simply Good Foods common stock received and new warrants treated as having been received over such stockholder’s aggregate tax basis in the Conyers Park common stock exchanged and warrants treated as having been exchanged), or (ii) the fair market value of the new warrants treated as having been received. Any such gain would generally be long-term capital gain if the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the Simply Good Foods common stock and warrants was more than one year at the time of the Parent Merger. In that case, the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the new warrants treated as having been received in the exchange would be equal to the fair market value of such warrants at the time of the Parent Merger. However, if the deemed exchange also qualifies as part of a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368 of the Code, a U.S. Holder of Conyers Park warrants will not recognize any gain or loss on any such deemed exchange of warrants and such U.S. Holder’s basis in the new warrants deemed received will be equal to the U.S. Holder’s basis in its warrants deemed exchanged. However, the requirements for qualification of the Parent Merger as a tax-deferred “reorganization” under Section 368 of the Code are more stringent in certain respects than the requirements for qualification as a tax-deferred transaction under Section 351 of the Code and there can be no assurance that the transaction will also qualify under Section 368.

Tax Consequences of Ownership and Disposition of Simply Good Foods Common Stock and Warrants Exercisable for Shares of Simply Good Foods Common Stock

Dividends and Other Distributions on Simply Good Foods Common Stock

Distributions on Simply Good Foods common stock will generally be subject to the rules described above under “— Tax Consequences for U.S. Holders Exercising Redemption Rights — Taxation of Distributions.”

Dispositions of Simply Good Foods Common Stock or Warrants

The sale, exchange or other disposition of Simply Good Foods common stock or warrants will generally be subject to the rules described above in “— Tax Consequences for U.S. Holders Exercising Redemption Rights — Gain or Loss on Sale, Taxable Exchange, or Other Taxable Disposition of Conyers Park Common Stock.”

Exercise or Lapse of a Warrant

Except as discussed below with respect to the cashless exercise of a warrant, a U.S. Holder generally will not recognize taxable gain or loss on the acquisition of common stock upon exercise of a warrant for cash. The U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the share of Simply Good Foods common stock received upon exercise of the warrant generally will be an amount equal to the sum of the U.S. Holder’s initial investment in the warrant (i.e., the portion of the U.S. Holder’s purchase price for units that is allocated to the warrant) and the exercise price. The U.S. Holder’s holding period for the Simply Good Foods common stock received upon exercise of the warrants will begin on the date following the date of exercise (or possibly the date of exercise) of the warrants and will not include the period during which the U.S. Holder held the warrants. If a warrant is allowed to lapse unexercised, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize a capital loss equal to such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the warrant. Such loss will be long-term if the warrant has been held for more than one year.

The tax consequences of a cashless exercise of a warrant are not clear under current tax law. A cashless exercise may be tax-deferred, either because the exercise is not a gain realization event or because the exercise is treated as a recapitalization for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In either tax-deferred situation, a U.S. Holder’s basis in the Simply Good Foods common stock received would equal the U.S. Holder’s basis in the warrant. If the cashless exercise were treated as not being a gain realization event, a U.S. Holder’s holding period in the Simply Good Foods common stock would be treated as commencing on the date following the date of exercise (or possibly the date of exercise) of the warrant. If the cashless exercise were treated as a recapitalization, the holding period of the Simply Good Foods common stock would include the holding period of the warrant.

99

It is also possible that a cashless exercise could be treated in part as a taxable exchange in which gain or loss would be recognized. In such event, a U.S. Holder could be deemed to have surrendered warrants equal to the number of shares of Simply Good Foods common stock having a value equal to the exercise price for the total number of warrants to be exercised. The U.S. Holder would recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of the Simply Good Foods common stock represented by the warrants deemed surrendered and the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the warrants deemed surrendered. In this case, a U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the Simply Good Foods common stock received would equal the sum of the fair market value of the Simply Good Foods common stock represented by the warrants deemed surrendered and the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the warrants exercised. A U.S. Holder’s holding period for the Simply Good Foods common stock would commence on the date following the date of exercise (or possibly the date of exercise) of the warrant.

Due to the absence of authority on the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a cashless exercise, there can be no assurance which, if any, of the alternative tax consequences and holding periods described above would be adopted by the IRS or a court of law. Accordingly, U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the tax consequences of a cashless exercise.

Adjustment to Exercise Price

Under Section 305 of the Code, if certain adjustments are made (or not made) to the number of shares to be issued upon the exercise of a warrant or to the warrant’s exercise price, a U.S. Holder may be deemed to have received a constructive distribution with respect to the warrant, which could result in adverse consequences for the U.S. Holder, including the inclusion of dividend income. These rules governing constructive distributions are complex and U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors on the tax consequences any such constructive distribution.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations to Non-U.S. Holders

For purposes of this discussion, a “Non-U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of Conyers Park common stock, or warrant, or Simply Good Foods common stock or warrant, as the case may be, in each case that is not a U.S. Holder.

Tax Consequences for Non-U.S. Holders Exercising Redemption Rights

This section is addressed to Non-U.S. Holders of Conyers Park common stock that elect to have their Conyers Park common stock redeemed for cash as described in the section entitled “Special Meeting in Lieu of 2017 Annual Meeting of Company Stockholders — Redemption Rights.”

Redemption of Conyers Park Common Stock

The characterization for United States federal income tax purposes of the redemption of a Non-U.S. Holder’s Conyers Park common stock pursuant to the redemption provisions described in the sections entitled “Special Meeting in Lieu of 2017 Annual Meeting of Company Stockholders — Redemption Rights” generally will correspond to the U.S. federal income tax characterization of such a redemption of a U.S. Holder’s Conyers Park common stock, as described under “— U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations to U.S. Holders — Tax Consequences for U.S. Holders Exercising Redemption Rights.”

Non-U.S. Holders of Conyers Park common stock considering exercising their redemption rights should consult their tax advisors as to whether the redemption of their Conyers Park common stock will be treated as a sale or as a distribution under the Code.

Gain on Sale, Taxable Exchange or Other Taxable Disposition of Conyers Park Common Stock

Subject to the discussion below under “— FATCA,” if the redemption qualifies as a sale of Conyers Park common stock, a Non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to United States federal income or withholding tax in respect of gain recognized on a sale of its Conyers Park common stock, unless:

100

•         the gain is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business by the Non-U.S. Holder within the United States (and, under certain income tax treaties, is attributable to a United States permanent establishment or fixed base maintained by the Non-U.S. Holder), in which case the Non-U.S. Holder will generally be subject to the same treatment as a U.S. Holder with respect to the redemption, and a corporate Non-U.S. Holder may be subject to the branch profits tax at a 30% rate (or lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty);

•         the Non-U.S. Holder is an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year in which the redemption takes place and certain other conditions are met, in which case the Non-U.S. Holder will be subject to a 30% tax on the individual’s net capital gain for the year; or

•         we are or have been a “U.S. real property holding corporation” for United States federal income tax purposes at any time during the shorter of the five-year period ending on the date of disposition or the period that the Non-U.S. Holder held the Conyers Park common stock, and, in the case where shares of Conyers Park common stock are regularly traded on an established securities market, the Non-U.S. Holder has owned, directly or constructively, more than 5% of Conyers Park common stock at any time within the shorter of the five-year period preceding the disposition or such Non-U.S. Holder’s holding period for the shares of Conyers Park common stock.

With respect to the third bullet point above (if applicable to a particular Non-U.S. Holder), gain recognized by such holder on the sale, exchange or other disposition of Conyers common stock will be subject to tax at generally applicable U.S. federal income tax rates. In addition, a purchaser of Conyers common stock from such Non-U.S. Holder would be required to withhold U.S. federal income tax at a rate of 15% of the amount realized upon such disposition. There can be no assurance that Conyers Park common stock will be treated as regularly traded on an established securities market. Conyers Park does not believe that it has been or will be a “United States real property holding corporation” for U.S. federal income tax purposes but there can no assurance in this regard.

Taxation of Distributions

If the redemption does not qualify as a sale of Conyers Park common stock, the Non-U.S. Holder will be treated as receiving a distribution. Subject to the discussion below under “— FATCA,” in general, any distributions we make to a Non-U.S. Holder on shares of Conyers Park common stock, to the extent paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under United States federal income tax principles), will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes and, provided such dividends are not effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a trade or business within the United States, the applicable withholding agent will be required to withhold tax from the gross amount of the dividend at a rate of 30%, unless such Non-U.S. Holder is eligible for a reduced rate of withholding tax under an applicable income tax treaty and provides proper certification of its eligibility for such reduced rate. Any distribution not constituting a dividend will be treated first as reducing (but not below zero) the Non-U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in its shares of Conyers Park common stock (and, subject to the discussion below under “— FATCA,” and the third bullet point above under “— Tax Consequences for Non-U.S. Holders Exercising Redemption Rights — Gain on Sale, Taxable Exchange or Other Taxable Disposition of Conyers Park Common Stock,” to the extent such distribution does not exceed the adjusted tax basis such amount will generally not be subject to withholding) and, to the extent such distribution exceeds the Non-U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis, as gain realized from the sale or other disposition of Conyers Park common stock, which will be treated as described above under “— Tax Consequences for Non-U.S. Holders Exercising Redemption Rights — Gain on Sale, Taxable Exchange or Other Taxable Disposition of Conyers Park Common Stock.” Dividends we pay to a Non-U.S. Holder that are effectively connected with such Non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a trade or business within the United States generally will not be subject to United States withholding tax, provided such Non-U.S. Holder complies with certain certification and disclosure requirements. Instead, such dividends generally will be subject to United States federal income tax, net of certain deductions, at the same graduated individual or corporate rates applicable to U.S. Holders (subject to an exemption or reduction in such tax as may be provided by an applicable income tax treaty). If the Non-U.S. Holder is a corporation, dividends that are effectively connected income may also be subject to a “branch profits tax” at a rate of 30% (or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty).

101

Tax Consequences of the Parent Merger

The characterization for United States federal income tax purposes of an exchange of a Non-U.S. Holder’s Conyers Park common stock solely for Simply Good Foods common stock as a result of the Parent Merger in connection with the Business Combination generally will correspond to the U.S. federal income tax characterization of such an exchange of a U.S. Holder’s Conyers Park common stock for Simply Good Foods common stock. Any such Non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the exchange unless the exchange is treated as a taxable exchange and the Non-U.S. Holder falls within any of the circumstances described in the bullets above under “— Gain on Sale, Taxable Exchange or Other Taxable Disposition of Conyers Park Common Stock.”

Tax Consequences of Ownership and Disposition of Simply Good Foods Common Stock and Warrants Exercisable for Shares of Simply Good Foods Common Stock

Dividends and Other Distributions on Simply Good Foods Common Stock

In general, any distributions made to a Non-U.S. Holder on Simply Good Foods common stock (and any constructive distributions a Non-U.S. Holder may be deemed to receive, as described above under “— U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations to U.S. Holders — Tax Consequences of Ownership and Disposition of Simply Good Foods Common Stock and Warrants Exercisable for Shares of Simply Good Foods Common Stock — Adjustment to Exercise Price”) will generally be subject to the rules described above under “— Tax Consequences for Non-U.S. Holders Exercising Redemption Rights — Taxation of Distributions.”

In addition, Section 871(m) of the Code imposes withholding tax at a rate of 30% (or lower treaty rate) on certain “dividend equivalent” payments made or deemed made to non-U.S. persons in respect of financial instruments that reference U.S. stocks. Under final Treasury regulations issued pursuant to Section 871(m), these rules generally do not apply to a payment to the extent that the payment is already treated as a deemed dividend to you as described above under “— U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations to U.S. Holders — Tax Consequences of Ownership and Disposition of Simply Good Foods Common Stock and Warrants Exercisable for Shares of Simply Good Foods Common Stock — Adjustment to Exercise Price.” However, because the Section 871(m) rules are complex, it is possible that they will apply in certain circumstances in which the deemed dividend rules above do not apply, in which case the Section 871(m) rules might require withholding. You should consult your tax advisor regarding the potential application of the Section 871(m) rules to your ownership of the warrants.

Exercise or Lapse of a Warrant

The U.S. federal income tax characterization of a Non-U.S. Holder’s exercise or lapse of a warrant generally will correspond to the U.S. federal income tax characterization of the exercise or lapse of a warrant by a U.S. Holder, as described under “— U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations to U.S. Holders — Tax Consequences of Ownership and Disposition of Simply Good Foods Common Stock and Warrants Exercisable for Shares of Simply Good Foods Common Stock — Exercise or Lapse of a Warrant” above. However, capital losses recognized by a Non-U.S. Holder on lapse of a warrant will generally be taken into account for U.S. income tax purposes only for purposes of calculating net capital gain described in the second bullet above in “— Tax Consequences for Non-U.S. Holders Exercising Redemption Rights — Gain on Sale, Taxable Exchange or Other Taxable Disposition of Conyers Park Common Stock.”

Disposition of Simply Good Foods Common Stock or Warrants

The sale, exchange or other disposition of Simply Good Foods common stock or warrants will generally be subject to the rules described above in “— Tax Consequences for Non-U.S. Holders Exercising Redemption Rights — Gain on Sale, Taxable Exchange or Other Taxable Disposition of Conyers Park Common Stock.”

FATCA

A 30% withholding tax applies with respect to certain payments on and, after December 31, 2018, gross proceeds from a sale or disposition of, Conyers Park common stock, Conyers Park warrants, Simply Good Foods

102

common stock, and Simply Good Foods warrants (including dividends and any constructive distributions treated as a dividend as described above under “— U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations to U.S. Holders — Tax Consequences of Ownership and Disposition of Simply Good Foods Common Stock and Warrants Exercisable for Shares of Simply Good Foods Common Stock — Adjustment to Exercise Price”), in each case, if paid to a foreign financial institution or a non-financial foreign entity (including, in some cases, when such foreign financial institution or entity is acting as an intermediary), unless (i) in the case of a foreign financial institution, such institution enters into an agreement with the U.S. government to withhold on certain payments, and to collect and provide to the U.S. tax authorities substantial information regarding U.S. account holders of such institution (which includes certain equity and debt holders of such institution, as well as certain account holders that are foreign entities with U.S. owners), (ii) in the case of a non-financial foreign entity, such entity certifies that it does not have any substantial U.S. owners or provides the withholding agent with a certification identifying the direct and indirect substantial U.S. owners of the entity, or (iii) the foreign financial institution or non-financial foreign entity otherwise qualifies for an exemption from these rules. Under certain circumstances, a holder might be eligible for refunds or credits of such taxes. An intergovernmental agreement between the United States and an applicable foreign country or future Treasury Regulations may modify these requirements. U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders are encouraged to consult their tax advisors regarding the possible implications of such withholding tax.

Regulatory Matters

At any time before or after consummation of the Business Combination, notwithstanding the early termination of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the “HSR Act” or “HSR”), the applicable competition authorities could take such action under applicable antitrust laws as each deems necessary or desirable in the public interest, including seeking to enjoin the consummation of the Business Combination. Private parties may also seek to take legal action under the antitrust laws under certain circumstances. Conyers Park cannot assure you that the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, any state attorney general, or any other government authority will not attempt to challenge the Business Combination on antitrust grounds, and, if such a challenge is made, Conyers Park cannot assure you as to its result. The Company and Atkins will file required forms under the HSR Act with the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and the U.S. Federal Trade Commission. Neither the Company nor Atkins is aware of any material regulatory approvals or actions that are required for completion of the Business Combination other than the HSR approval. It is presently contemplated that if any such additional regulatory approvals or actions are required, those approvals or actions will be sought. There can be no assurance, however, that any additional approvals or actions will be obtained.

Vote Required for Approval

The Business Combination is conditioned on the approval of the Business Combination Proposal at the special meeting. The Adjournment Proposal is not conditioned on the approval of any other proposal set forth in this proxy statement/prospectus.

This Business Combination Proposal (and consequently, the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Business Combination) will be approved and adopted only if the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of Conyers Park’s common stock vote “FOR” the Business Combination Proposal. Failure to vote by proxy or to vote in person at the special meeting or an abstention from voting will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Business Combination Proposal.

As of the record date, Sponsor, directors and officers have agreed to vote any shares of common stock owned by them in favor of the Business Combination. As of the date hereof, Sponsor, directors and officers have not purchased any public shares.

Recommendation of the Board of Directors

CONYERS PARK’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT ITS STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE BUSINESS COMBINATION PROPOSAL.

103

PROPOSAL NO. 2 — THE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL

Overview

The Adjournment Proposal, if adopted, will allow Conyers Park’s board of directors to adjourn the special meeting to a later date or dates to permit further solicitation of proxies. The Adjournment Proposal will only be presented to Conyers Park’s stockholders in the event that there are insufficient votes for, or otherwise in connection with, the approval of the Business Combination Proposal, but no other proposal if the Business Combination Proposal is approved. In no event will Conyers Park’s board of directors adjourn the special meeting or consummate the Business Combination beyond     .

Consequences if the Adjournment Proposal is Not Approved

If the Adjournment Proposal is not approved by Conyers Park’s stockholders, Conyers Park’s board of directors may not be able to adjourn the special meeting to a later date in the event that there are insufficient votes for, or otherwise in connection with, the approval of the Business Combination Proposal or any other proposal.

Vote Required for Approval

The approval of the Adjournment Proposal requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Conyers Park’s common stock represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote thereon at the special meeting. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” this proposal.

Recommendation of the Board of Directors

CONYERS PARK’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT ITS STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL.

104

INFORMATION ABOUT PARENT

General

Conyers Park is a blank check company incorporated as a Delaware corporation on April 20, 2016 and formed for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses, which is referred to herein as the initial Business Combination.

Objective and Business Opportunity

While Conyers Park may pursue an acquisition opportunity in any industry or sector, it is focused on the consumer sector and consumer-related businesses, which complements its management team’s expertise and which will benefit from its operational value add. Conyers Park believes that the experience and capabilities of its management team will make it an attractive partner to potential target businesses, enhance its ability to complete a successful business combination, and bring value to the business post-business combination. Not only does Conyers Park’s management team bring a combination of operating, investing, financial and transaction experience, but also has worked closely together in the past at multiple consumer companies, creating value for shareholders.

Conyers Park’s acquisition and value creating strategy is to identify, acquire and build a company in the consumer sector that complements the experience of its management team and can benefit from its operational expertise. After the initial Business Combination, Conyers Park envisions its strategy may include additional mergers and acquisitions with a focus on generating attractive risk adjusted returns for its stockholders. Conyers Park will leverage its management team’s network of potential proprietary and public transaction sources where it believes a combination of its relationships, knowledge and experience in the consumer sector could effect a positive transformation or augmentation of existing businesses to improve their overall value.

Conyers Park believes that companies operating in the consumer sector have characteristics which make them attractive investments. Many companies in the consumer industry generate high margins and strong free cash flow, maintain operational stability throughout economic cycles, and serve as good platforms for future acquisitions. Furthermore, these companies can create significant value by introducing new products and/or services to the marketplace, growing distribution, and building brands that resonate in households worldwide. Conyers Park’s management team has executed on these growth strategies throughout their careers.

Recently, many large consumer companies have announced plans to cut costs and divest non-core brands, which is expected to result in the sale of assets. All members of Conyers Park’s management team have had extensive experience undertaking mergers and acquisitions and overseeing business integration and synergy realization. Conyers Park believes that its management team of consumer industry veterans is uniquely capable of identifying attractive businesses, executing acquisitions, and adding value post deal completion.

Conyers Park’s management team is led by James M. Kilts, its Executive Chairman, and David J. West, its Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Kilts’ and Mr. West’s careers have centered on identifying and implementing value creation initiatives within the consumer industry. They have collectively created approximately $50 billion in shareholder value throughout their combined 70+ year careers in the consumer industry by relying on what Conyers Park believes to be tried-and-true management strategies: cost management and productivity enhancement, and reinvesting the savings behind product innovation, marketing, and brand building.

Sponsor is an affiliate of Centerview Capital. Founded in 2006, Centerview Capital sponsors multiple investment funds, including consumer (also known as Centerview Capital Consumer) and technology funds. Centerview Capital’s management team, including James M. Kilts, David J. West and Brian K. Ratzan, are all partners at Centerview Capital Consumer. Mr. Ratzan, Conyers Park’s Chief Financial Officer, brings over 20 years of private equity investing experience. The deep operating experience of Mr. Kilts and Mr. West complement Mr. Ratzan’s financial and transactional expertise to create a team capable of identifying attractive investments and executing deals in the consumer sector. Centerview Capital Consumer has made investments across the consumer industry spectrum, including the food and beverage, household/personal care, and consumer services sectors. Centerview Capital Consumer has a track record of identifying high-quality assets, businesses and management

105

teams. Centerview Capital is associated with Centerview Partners. Certain partners of Centerview Partners are partners (either directly or indirectly) in the ultimate general partner and the manager of Centerview Capital Consumer’s investment funds, and serve on Centerview Capital Consumer’s investment committee. Centerview Partners is a leading independent investment banking and advisory firm which provides advice on mergers and acquisitions, financial restructurings, valuation, and capital structure to companies, institutions and governments. Since the founding of Centerview Partners in 2006, the firm has advised on over $1 trillion of transactions. Centerview Partners’ clients include over 20% of the 50 largest companies in the world by market capitalization, including many of the world’s most influential consumer companies, which Conyers Park believes further broadens its reach and network of deal contacts.

Conyers Park’s management team’s proprietary deal sourcing network, ranging from industry executives, private owners, private equity funds, and investment bankers, in addition to the extensive global industry and geographical reach of Centerview Capital Consumer and Centerview Partners, enables Conyers Park to pursue a broad range of opportunities across the entire consumer sector. Conyers Park’s management believes that its ability to identify and implement operational value creation initiatives will remain central to its differentiated acquisition strategy. Additionally, Conyers Park’s network and current affiliations allow us to lean heavily on an existing infrastructure of resources that will assist in due diligence and ultimately structuring an acquisition.

With respect to the foregoing examples, past performance by Conyers Park’s management team or Centerview Capital Consumer is not a guarantee either (i) of success with respect to any business combination Conyers Park may consummate or (ii) that Conyers Park will be able to identify a suitable candidate for its initial business combination. You should not rely on the historical record of Conyers Park’s management’s or Centerview Capital Consumer’s performance as indicative of our future performance. None of Conyers Park’s officers or directors have had experience with blank check companies or special purpose acquisition corporations in the past.

Significant Activities Since Inception

On July 20, 2016, Conyers Park consummated its initial public offering of 40,250,000 units (“Public Units”), including the full exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option of 2,750,000 units (the “Over-Allotment Units”; collectively with the Public Units, the “Units”). Each Unit consists of one share of Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value per share (“Class A Common Stock”), and one-third of one warrant (“Public Warrant”), to purchase one share of Class A Common Stock. Each whole Public Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of Class A Common Stock at an exercise price of $11.50 per share. The Units were sold at an offering price of $10.00 per Unit, generating gross proceeds of $402,500,000 (before underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses). Simultaneously with the consummation of Conyers Park’s initial public offering and the sale of the Units, the Company consummated the private placement (“Private Placement”) of 6,700,000 warrants (“Placement Warrants”) at a price of $1.50 per Placement Warrant, issued to its Sponsor, generating total proceeds of $10,050,000.

Approximately $402.5 million of the net proceeds from the IPO (including the over-allotment) and the private placements with Sponsor were deposited in the Trust Account established for the benefit of its public stockholders.

Conyers Park’s units began trading on July 20, 2016 on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “CPAA.U.” Commencing on September 2, 2016, the securities comprising the units began separate trading. The units, common stock, and warrants are trading on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbols “CPAA.U,” “CPAA” and “CPAA.W,” respectively.

Initial Business Combination

NASDAQ rules require that an initial business combination must be with one or more target businesses that together have a fair market value equal to at least 80% of the balance in Conyers Park’s Trust Account (less any deferred underwriting commissions and taxes payable on interest earned) at the time of signing a definitive agreement in connection with an initial business combination. If Conyers Park’s board of directors is not able to independently determine the fair market value of Atkins, Conyers Park will obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm that is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, which Conyers Park refers to as “FINRA,” with respect to the satisfaction of such criteria.

106

Redemption Rights for Holders of Public Shares

Conyers Park is providing its public stockholders with the opportunity to redeem their public shares for cash equal to a pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account, including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to it to pay up to $1,000,000 of the Company’s working capital requirements as well as to pay the Company’s franchise and income taxes, divided by the number of then outstanding public shares, upon the consummation of the Business Combination, subject to the limitations described herein. As of December 31, 2016, the amount in the Trust Account, net of taxes payable and any interest that Conyers Park may withdraw for working capital purposes, is approximately $10.01 per public share. Sponsor, officers and directors have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to the Founder Shares and any public shares they may hold in connection with the consummation of the Business Combination. The Founder Shares will be excluded from the pro rata calculation used to determine the per-share redemption price.

Submission of Conyers Park’s Initial Business Combination to a Stockholder Vote

The special meeting of Conyers Park’s stockholders to which this proxy statement/prospectus relates is to solicit your approval of the Business Combination. Unlike many other blank check companies, Conyers Park’s public stockholders are not required to vote against the Business Combination in order to exercise their redemption rights. If the Business Combination is not completed, then public stockholders electing to exercise their redemption rights will not be entitled to receive such payments. Sponsor, directors and officers have agreed to vote any shares of common stock owned by them in favor of the Business Combination.

Limitation on Redemption Rights

Notwithstanding the foregoing, Conyers Park’s current amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that a public stockholder, together with any affiliate of such stockholder or any other person with whom such stockholder is acting in concert or as a “group” (as defined under Section 13 of the Exchange Act), will be restricted from seeking redemptions with respect to more than an aggregate of 10% of the shares of common stock included in the units sold in Conyers Park’s IPO.

Employees

Conyers Park currently has two executive officers. Members of its management team are not obligated to devote any specific number of hours to its matters but they intend to devote as much of their time as they deem necessary to Conyers Park’s affairs until Conyers Park has completed an initial business combination. Conyers Park presently expects its executive officers to devote such amount of time as they reasonably believe is necessary to its business. Conyers Park does not intend to have any full time employees prior to the closing of an initial business combination.

Management

Directors and Executive Officers

The directors and executive officers of the Company are as follows as of May 26, 2017:

Name		Age		Position
James M. Kilts(c)		68		Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors
David J. West(c)		54		Chief Executive Officer and Director
Brian K. Ratzan(c)		46		Chief Financial Officer and Director
Clayton C. Daley, Jr(a)(d)		64		Director
Nomi P. Ghez(b)(d)		70		Director
James E. Healey(a)(d)(e)		75		Director
Robert G. Montgomery(b)(e)		63		Director

____________

(a)      Class I director (to serve until the first annual meeting of stockholders)

(b)      Class II director (to serve until the second annual meeting of stockholders)

(c)      Class III director (to serve until the third annual meeting of stockholders)

(d)      Member of Audit Committee

(e)      Member of Compensation Committee

107

James M. Kilts, Conyers Park’s Executive Chairman since inception, is a renowned leader in the consumer industry, with over 40 years of experience leading a range of companies and iconic brands. Mr. Kilts is the Founding Partner of Centerview Capital Consumer, founded in 2006. Previously, Mr. Kilts served as Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of Gillette from 2001 until it merged with The Procter & Gamble Company in 2005; at that time he became Vice Chairman of the Board of The Procter & Gamble Company. Before Mr. Kilts joined Gillette, the company’s sales had been flat for 4 years, and it had missed earnings estimates for 14 consecutive quarters. Mr. Kilts took steps to rebuild the management team, cut costs and reinvest the savings in innovation and marketing. During his tenure as Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Kilts oversaw the creation of approximately $30 billion in equity value for Gillette’s public shareholders. Gillette’s share price appreciated 110% during Mr. Kilts’ tenure, while the S&P 500 declined 3% over the same time period. Under Mr. Kilts’ leadership, Gillette rejoined the top ranks of consumer products companies as sales increased an average of 9% each year. The Harvard Business Review cited Mr. Kilts’ leadership as the driving force behind Gillette’s turnaround. Prior to Gillette, Mr. Kilts served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Nabisco from 1998 until its acquisition by The Philip Morris Companies in 2000. Before joining Nabisco, Mr. Kilts was an Executive Vice President of The Philip Morris Companies from 1994 to 1997 and headed the Worldwide Food group. In that role, Mr. Kilts was responsible for integrating Kraft and General Foods and for shaping the group’s domestic and international strategy. Mr. Kilts had previously served as President of Kraft USA and Oscar Mayer. He also had been Senior Vice President of Strategy and Development, President of Kraft Limited in Canada, and Senior Vice President of Kraft International. Mr. Kilts began his career with General Foods Corporation in 1970. Owing to Mr. Kilts’ successes across the consumer industry, numerous companies seek his business expertise and advice. Mr. Kilts is currently a member of the Board of Directors of MetLife, Inc., where he has served since 2005, Pfizer, Inc., where he has served since 2007, Unifi Inc., where he has served since April 2016, and Nielsen Holdings N.V. Mr. Kilts served as Chairman of the Board of Nielsen Holdings N.V. from January 2011 to January 2014, and Chairman of the Supervisory Board of the Nielsen Company B.V. from 2009 to January 2014. Mr. Kilts is also a member of the Board of Overseers of Weill Cornell Medicine. Previously, Mr. Kilts was a member of the Board of Directors of Big Heart Pet Brands from March 2011 to March 2015 (during which time he served as Chairman), MeadWestvaco from 2006 to April 2014, The New York Times Company from 2005 to 2008, May Department Stores from 1998 to 2005, Whirlpool Corporation from 1999 to 2005, Chairman of the Board of the Grocery Manufacturers Association from 2003 to 2005, and Delta Airlines from 2002 to 2004. Mr. Kilts is also a former member of Citigroup’s International Advisory Board. Mr. Kilts received a bachelor’s degree in History from Knox College, Galesburg, Illinois and earned an MBA degree from the University of Chicago. Conyers Park believes that Mr. Kilts’ deep consumer industry background, coupled with broad operational and transactional experience, make him well qualified to serve as a Director.

David J. West, Conyers Park’s Chief Executive Officer and a Director since inception, is an established leader in the consumer industry, with nearly 30 years of experience leading a range of companies and well-known brands. Mr. West became a partner of Centerview Capital Consumer in May 2016. Prior to joining Centerview Capital Consumer, Mr. West served as Chief Executive Officer and President of Big Heart Pet Brands (formerly known as Del Monte Foods) from August 2011 to March 2015, at that time one of the world’s largest pure-play pet food and treats company whose brands included Meow Mix®, Kibbles ‘n Bits®, Milk-Bone®, and others. Mr. West helped reposition the business to increase focus on growth and innovation, launched new products such as Milk-Bone Brushing Chews®, enhanced specialty pet distribution channels through the acquisition of Natural Balance Pet Foods, and developed a marketing culture to effectively promote products. Mr. West worked closely with Mr. Kilts during this time period, as Mr. Kilts was Chairman of the Board of Big Heart Pet Brands. In February 2014, Mr. West oversaw the sale of Del Monte Foods’ Consumer Products business and changed the company’s name to Big Heart Pet Brands, reflecting its singular focus on pet food and snacks. During his tenure as Chief Executive Officer, Mr. West oversaw the creation of approximately $2 billion of equity value for investors. Big Heart Pet Brands was sold to The J. M. Smucker Company in March 2015, at which time Mr. West served The J. M. Smucker Company as President, Big Heart Pet Food and Snacks until March 2016 and as a Senior Advisor until April 2016. Prior to joining Del Monte Foods, Mr. West served as the Chief Executive Officer, President and a director of Hershey from 2007 to May 2011. Under Mr. West’s leadership, Hershey enjoyed strong profits, net sales growth and shareholder returns, and was recognized as one of the World’s 100 Most Innovative Companies by Forbes Magazine in 2011. During Mr. West’s tenure as Chief Executive Officer, Hershey increased its investment in domestic and international operations, improved the effectiveness of its supply chain and business model, and accelerated its advertising, brand building and distribution programs. During Mr. West’s tenure as Chief Executive Officer, public shareholders of Hershey experienced more than $5 billion of equity value creation. Hershey’s share price appreciated 68% during this time period, while the S&P 500 grew 0%. Prior to his Chief Executive Officer role, Mr. West held various leadership positions at Hershey including

108

Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Customer Officer, and Senior Vice President of Strategy and Business Development. Prior to joining Hershey in 2001, Mr. West spent 14 years with the Nabisco Biscuit and Snacks group, where he held a range of senior positions including Senior Vice President, Finance, and Vice President, Corporate Strategy and Business Planning, a role in which he helped shape and execute Nabisco’s strategy, culminating in the acquisition of Nabisco Holdings Corp. by The Philip Morris Companies in 2000. At Nabisco, Mr. West worked closely with Mr. Kilts during Mr. Kilts’ tenure as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. West was a member of the board of directors of Hershey from 2007 to 2011, Del Monte Foods from 2011 to 2014, Big Heart Pet Brands from 2014 to 2015 and The J. M. Smucker Company from 2015 to 2016. Mr. West received a bachelor of science degree, cum laude, in Business Administration from Bucknell University in Lewisburg, Pennsylvania. Conyers Park believes that Mr. West’s deep consumer industry background, coupled with broad operational and transactional experience, make him well qualified to serve as a Director.

Brian K. Ratzan, Conyers Park’s Chief Financial Officer and a Director since inception, has been a Partner of Centerview Capital Consumer since April 2014. Mr. Ratzan has over 20 years of private equity investing experience. Prior to joining Centerview Capital Consumer, Mr. Ratzan was Partner and Head of U.S. Private Equity at Pamplona Capital Management from January 2012 to February 2014. Prior to joining Pamplona, Mr. Ratzan was Managing Director and Head of Consumer at Vestar Capital Partners, which he joined in 1998. Mr. Ratzan also previously worked at ‘21’ International Holdings, a private investment firm, and in the Investment Banking Group at Donaldson, Lufkin and Jenrette. Mr. Ratzan previously served on the boards of consumer companies including Del Monte Foods, The Sun Products Corporation (formerly known as Huish Detergents, Inc.), and Birds Eye Foods, Inc. Mr. Ratzan holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from the University of Michigan, where he was a member of Phi Beta Kappa, and an MBA degree from Harvard Business School. Conyers Park believes that Mr. Ratzan’s extensive investment management and transactional experience make him well qualified to serve as a Director.

Clayton C. Daley, Jr. has been a director of Conyers Park since July 2016 and spent his entire professional career with The Procter & Gamble Company (NYSE:PG), a global consumer packaged goods company, joining the company in 1974. There, Mr. Daley held a number of key accounting and finance positions including Chief Financial Officer and Vice Chairman of Procter & Gamble; Comptroller, U.S. Operations of Procter & Gamble USA; Vice President and Comptroller of Procter & Gamble International; and Vice President and Treasurer of Procter & Gamble. Mr. Daley retired from Procter & Gamble in 2009. Mr. Daley also served as Senior Advisor to TPG Capital until October 2012. Mr. Daley has been a director of SunEdison, Inc.(OTC:SUNEQ), a solar power company, since 2014 and served as a director and was Chair of the Audit Committee and a member of the Compensation and Option Committee of Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. (NYSE:HOT), a hotel and leisure company, from 2008 to 2016. He holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from Davidson College and an MBA from Ohio State University. Conyers Park believes that Mr. Daley’s consumer and food industry background, coupled with broad operational experience, make him well qualified to serve as a Director.

Nomi P. Ghez has over 30 years of experience working with consumer companies. Ms. Ghez was affiliated with Goldman Sachs from 1982 to 2003, most recently acting as a senior banker within the consumer sector of Goldman Sachs’ Mergers and Strategic Advisory Division, as well as a Partner and Managing Director. From 1982 to 2000, Ms. Ghez was Goldman Sachs’ food analyst in Investment Research, covering major U.S. and global food and consumer companies. Since 2003, Ms. Ghez has been a co-founding partner of Circle Financial Group, LLC, an integrated private wealth management group of nine professional women. In 2004, Ms. Ghez was a Portfolio Manager, Consumer Sector for Perry Capital LLC, a hedge fund. Ms. Ghez has served on the Board of Directors of Lipman Family Farms, a private fresh tomato company, since 2008 and on its Governance and Audit Committee since 2013, and was a Director of Maidenform Brands, Inc. (NYSE:MFB) from 2011 until its sale to HanesBrands (NYSE:HBI) in 2013, serving on its Audit Committee from 2012 to 2013. Ms. Ghez received a B.A. and M.A. from Tel Aviv University and a Ph.D. from New York University. Conyers Park believes that Ms. Ghez’s consumer analyst background, coupled with extensive financial and investment experience, make her well qualified to serve as a Director.

James E. Healey has 40 years of experience in the consumer products industry as a member of senior management, as well as in public accounting. From 1997 to 2000, Mr. Healey was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Nabisco Holdings Corp (NYSE:NA) and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Nabisco Group Holdings (NYSE:NGH) until their respective sales to Kraft Foods, Inc. and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, Inc. Prior to this, from 1973 to 1997, Mr. Healey held increasingly senior positions with Best Foods, Inc.,

109

now part of Unilever, culminating in his service as Comptroller and Chief Accounting Officer from 1987 to 1994 and as Vice President-Treasurer from 1994 to 1997. Mr. Healey began his career in 1968 as an audit manager in public company practice for KPMG. Since 2001, Mr. Healey has provided consulting services to both public and non-public companies in the areas of investor relations, cost reduction programs and outsourcing of internal audit functions, among others. From 2005 to 2011, Mr. Healey served as a Director, as well as on the Audit Committee and Human Resources Committee, of Sappi Ltd, a then-US-listed paper and pulp producer headquartered in South Africa. From 1990 to 2006, Mr. Healey served on the Board of Directors as Chairman of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Executive and Audit Committee of Interchange Financial Services Corp., until its sale to TD Banknorth in 2006. From 1991 to 1994, Mr. Healey served on the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, responsible to the Financial Accounting Standards Board for the creation of accounting standards. Mr. Healey holds a bachelor’s degree in public accounting from Pace University. Conyers Park believes that Mr. Healey’s consumer industry background, coupled with broad operational experience and public accounting experience, make him well qualified to serve as a Director.

Robert G. Montgomery has been a director of Conyers Park since July 2016. Mr. Montgomery has 40 years of experience in the consumer package goods industry, including sales, marketing, research and development positions on both an operational and executive level. From 2003 until 2010, Mr. Montgomery was successively a Senior Vice President, Sales, a Senior Vice President, Sales, Marketing & R&D and an Executive Vice President at Birds Eye Foods, Inc., a privately held frozen foods company. From 1998 to 2003, Mr. Montgomery served as Vice President of Sales in different divisions of HJ Heinz Company, a global food producer. Prior to this, from 1982 to 1998, Mr. Montgomery worked at McCain Food, Inc., as Vice President of Sales-Retail. Mr. Montgomery has held positions at Family Brands, Inc as Vice President of Sales, ConAgra Frozen Food Company as Area Vice President, Sara Lee Corporation as National Sales Planning Manager and Division Sales Manager and Del Monte Corporation as Senior Account Representative. In 2010, Mr. Montgomery founded and since has been a principal of Montgomery Consulting Solutions, a consulting firm specializing in sales, marketing and business strategies in the consumer packaged goods industry. In 2010, Mr. Montgomery also co-founded and since has been a principal of Jurs Montgomery Brokerage, LLC, a firm specializing in life insurance, long term care, disability and annuities. In 2016, Mr. Montgomery joined the board of directors of Wyman’s of Maine, a producer of frozen fruit. Mr. Montgomery holds a bachelor’s degree in management from Seton Hall University. Conyers Park believes that Mr. Montgomery’s consumer and food industry background, coupled with broad operational experience, make him well qualified to serve as a Director.

Stockholder Communications

Conyers Park’s board of directors has established a process for stockholders to send communications to the Company’s board of directors. Stockholders may communicate with the board of directors generally or a specific director at any time by writing to the Company’s Secretary, Conyers Park Acquisition Corp. c/o Conyers Park Sponsor LLC, 1 Greenwich Office Park, 2nd Floor, Greenwich, CT 06831. Conyers Park reviews all messages received, and forwards any message that reasonably appears to be a communication from a stockholder about a matter of stockholder interest that is intended for communication to the Company’s board of directors. Communications are sent as soon as practicable to the director to whom they are addressed, or if addressed to Conyers Park’s board of directors generally, to the Chairman of the Company’s board of directors. Because other appropriate avenues of communication exist for matters that are not of stockholder interest, such as general business complaints or employee grievances, communications that do not relate to matters of stockholder interest are not forwarded to Conyers Park’s board of directors.

Director Independence

NASDAQ listing standards require that a majority of Conyers Park’s board of directors be independent. An “independent director” is defined generally as a person other than an officer or employee of the company or its subsidiaries or any other individual having a relationship which in the opinion of Conyers Park’s board of directors, would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

Conyers Park’s currently has four “independent directors” as defined in the NASDAQ listing standards and applicable SEC rules, Mr. Daley, Mrs. Ghez, Mr. Healey and Mr. Montgomery.

110

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

Conyers Park’s board of directors recognizes that the leadership structure and combination or separation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman roles is driven by the needs of the Company at any point in time. As a result, no policy exists requiring combination or separation of leadership roles and our governing documents do not mandate a particular structure. This has allowed Conyers Park’s board of directors the flexibility to establish the most appropriate structure for the Company at any given time.

Conyers Park’s board of directors is actively involved in overseeing the Company’s risk management processes. Conyers Park’s board of directors focuses on the Company’s general risk management strategy and ensures that appropriate risk mitigation strategies are implemented by management. Further, operational and strategic presentations by management to Conyers Park’s board of directors include consideration of the challenges and risks of Conyers Park’s businesses, and Conyers Park’s board of directors and management actively engage in discussion on these topics. In addition, each of Conyers Park’s board of directors’ committees considers risk within its area of responsibility. For example, Conyers Park’s Audit Committee provides oversight to legal and compliance matters and assesses the adequacy of Conyers Park’s risk-related internal controls. Conyers Park’s Compensation Committee considers risk and structures the Company’s executive compensation programs, if any, to provide incentives to reward appropriately executives for growth without undue risk taking.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of Conyers Park’s executive officers currently serves, and in the past year has not served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on Conyers Park’s board of directors.

Number and Terms of Office of Officers and Directors

Conyers Park’s board of directors is divided into three classes with only one class of directors being elected in each year and each class (except for those directors appointed prior to its first annual meeting of stockholders) serving a three-year term. The term of office of the first class of directors, consisting of Messrs. Daley and Healey, will expire at Conyers Park’s first annual meeting of stockholders. The term of office of the second class of directors, consisting of Ms. Ghez and Mr. Montgomery, will expire at the second annual meeting of stockholders. The term of office of the third class of directors, consisting of Messrs. Kilts, West and Ratzan, will expire at the third annual meeting of stockholders. Conyers Park does not currently intend to hold an annual meeting of stockholders until after it consummates its initial Business Combination (unless it do not consummate its initial Business Combination prior to December 31, 2017, in which case NASDAQ rules require that Conyers Park hold an annual meeting prior to December 31, 2017).

Conyers Park’s officers are elected by the board of directors and serve at the discretion of the board of directors, rather than for specific terms of office. Conyers Park’s board of directors is authorized to appoint persons to the offices set forth in Conyers Park’s bylaws as it deems appropriate. Conyers Park’s bylaws provide that its officers may consist of a Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, Vice Presidents, Secretary, Assistant Secretaries, Treasurer and such other offices as may be determined by the board of directors.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Conyers Park’s board of directors has two standing committees: an Audit Committee and a Compensation Committee.

Audit Committee

Conyers Park has established and will maintain an Audit Committee of its board of directors. Mr. Daley, Mr. Healey and Ms. Ghez serve as members of Conyers Park’s Audit Committee. Mr. Daley serves as chairman of the Audit Committee. The rules of NASDAQ and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act require that the audit committee of a listed company be comprised solely of independent directors. Messrs. Daley and Healey and Ms. Ghez are all independent. Each member of Conyers Park’s Audit Committee is financially literate and Conyers Park’s board of directors has determined that Ms. Ghez qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in applicable SEC rules.

111

Responsibilities of Conyers Park’s Audit Committee include:

•         the appointment, compensation, retention, replacement, and oversight of the work of the independent auditors and any other independent registered public accounting firm engaged by Conyers Park;

•         pre-approving all audit and non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditors or any other registered public accounting firm engaged by Conyers Park, and establishing pre-approval policies and procedures;

•         reviewing and discussing with the independent auditors all relationships the auditors have with Conyers Park in order to evaluate their continued independence;

•         setting clear hiring policies for employees or former employees of the independent auditors;

•         setting clear policies for audit partner rotation in compliance with applicable laws and regulations;

•         obtaining and reviewing a report, at least annually, from the independent auditors describing (i) the independent auditor’s internal quality-control procedures and (ii) any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality-control review, or peer review, of the audit firm, or by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities, within, the preceding five years respecting one or more independent audits carried out by the firm and any steps taken to deal with such issues;

•         reviewing and approving any related party transaction required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC prior to Conyers Park entering into such transaction; and

•         reviewing with management, the independent auditors, and Conyers Park’s legal advisors, as appropriate, any legal, regulatory or compliance matters, including any correspondence with regulators or government agencies and any employee complaints or published reports that raise material issues regarding Conyers Park’s financial statements or accounting policies and any significant changes in accounting standards or rules promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the SEC or other regulatory authorities.

Conyers Park’s Audit Committee charter was filed as an exhibit to Conyers Park’s Form S-1 filed with the SEC on June 6, 2016. A copy of Conyers Park’s Audit Committee charter is available, free of charge, from the Company by writing to the Company’s Secretary, Conyers Park Acquisition Corp. c/o Conyers Park Sponsor LLC, 1 Greenwich Office Park, 2nd Floor, Greenwich, CT 06831.

Compensation Committee

The members of Conyers Park’s compensation committee are Messrs. Daley, Healey and Ms. Ghez. Mr. Daley serves as Chairman of the compensation committee. We have adopted a compensation committee charter, which details the principal functions of the compensation committee, including:

•         reviewing and approving on an annual basis the corporate goals and objectives relevant to Conyers Park’s Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, evaluating Conyers Park’s Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of such goals and objectives and determining and approving the remuneration (if any) of Conyers Park’s Chief Executive Officer based on such evaluation;

•         reviewing and approving on an annual basis the compensation of all of Conyers Park’s other officers;

•         reviewing on an annual basis Conyers Park’s executive compensation policies and plans;

•         implementing and administering Conyers Park’s incentive compensation equity-based remuneration plans;

•         assisting management in complying with Conyers Park’s proxy statement/prospectus and annual report disclosure requirements;

•         approving all special perquisites, special cash payments and other special compensation and benefit arrangements for Conyers Park’s officers and employees;

112

•         if required, producing a report on executive compensation to be included in Conyers Park’s annual proxy statement/prospectus; and

•         reviewing, evaluating and recommending changes, if appropriate, to the remuneration for directors.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, as indicated above, other than the $10,000 per month administrative fee payable to an affiliate of Sponsor and reimbursement of expenses, no other compensation of any kind, including finders, consulting or other similar fees, will be paid to any of Conyers Park’s officers, directors or any of their respective affiliates, prior to, or for any services they render in order to effectuate, the consummation of a business combination. Accordingly, it is likely that prior to the consummation of an initial business combination, the compensation committee will only be responsible for the review and recommendation of any compensation arrangements to be entered into in connection with such initial business combination.

The charter also provides that the compensation committee may, in its sole discretion, retain or obtain the advice of a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser and will be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of any such adviser. However, before engaging or receiving advice from a compensation consultant, external legal counsel or any other adviser, the compensation committee will consider the independence of each such adviser, including the factors required by NASDAQ and the SEC.

Director Nominations

Conyers Park does not have a standing nominating committee, though it intends to form a corporate governance and nominating committee as and when required to do so by law or NASDAQ rules. In accordance with Rule 5605(e)(2) of the NASDAQ rules, a majority of the independent directors may recommend a director nominee for selection by the board of directors. The board of directors believes that the independent directors can satisfactorily carry out the responsibility of properly selecting or approving director nominees without the formation of a standing nominating committee. The directors who shall participate in the consideration and recommendation of director nominees are Messrs. Daley, Healey and Montgomery and Ms. Ghez. In accordance with Rule 5605(e)(1)(A) of the NASDAQ rules, all such directors are independent. As there is no standing nominating committee, Conyers Park does not have a nominating committee charter in place.

The board of directors will also consider director candidates recommended for nomination by Conyers Park’s stockholders during such times as they are seeking proposed nominees to stand for election at the next annual meeting of stockholders (or, if applicable, a special meeting of stockholders). Conyers Park’s stockholders that wish to nominate a director for election to the Board should follow the procedures set forth in Conyers Park’s bylaws.

Conyers Park has not formally established any specific, minimum qualifications that must be met or skills that are necessary for directors to possess. In general, in identifying and evaluating nominees for director, the board of directors considers educational background, diversity of professional experience, knowledge of Conyers Park’s business, integrity, professional reputation, independence, wisdom, and the ability to represent the best interests of Conyers Park’s stockholders.

Code of Ethics

Conyers Park has adopted a code of ethics applicable to its directors, officers and employees. Conyers Park has previously filed a copy of our form of code of ethics as an exhibit to its Form S-1 filed on June 20, 2016. You can review these documents by accessing Conyers Park’s public filings at the SEC’s web site at www.sec.gov. In addition, a copy of the code of ethics will be provided without charge upon request. Conyers Park intends to disclose any amendments to or waivers of certain provisions of its code of ethics in a Current Report on Form 8-K.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities Act of 1934, the Company’s directors and executive officers, and any persons holding 10% or more of its common stock, are required to report their beneficial ownership and any changes therein to the SEC and the Company. Specific due dates for those reports have been established, and the Company is required to report herein any failure to file such reports by those due dates.

Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and Forms 4 furnished to the Company during the most recent fiscal year, and Forms 5 with respect to its most recent fiscal year, Conyers Park believes that all such forms required to

113

be filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act were timely filed, as necessary, by the officers, directors, and security holders required to file the same during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

Conflicts of Interest

Each of Conyers Park’s officers and directors presently has, and any of them in the future may have additional, fiduciary or contractual obligations to another entity pursuant to which such officer or director is required to present a business combination opportunity to such entity. Accordingly, if any of the above executive officers becomes aware of a business combination opportunity which is suitable for an entity to which he or she has then-current fiduciary or contractual obligations, he or she will honor his or her fiduciary or contractual obligations to present such business combination opportunity to such entity, and only present it to Conyers Park if such entity rejects the opportunity. Conyers Park does not believe, however, that the fiduciary duties or contractual obligations of its officers and directors will materially affect its ability to complete an initial business combination. Conyers Park’s certificate of incorporation provides that the Company renounce its interest in any corporate opportunity offered to any director unless such opportunity is expressly offered to such person solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer of Conyers Park and such opportunity is one which Conyers Park is legally and contractually permitted to undertake and would otherwise be reasonable for Conyers Park to pursue.

Conyers Park’s officers and directors have agreed not to participate in the formation of, or become an officer or director of, any other blank check company until Conyers Park has entered into a definitive agreement regarding its initial business combination or Conyers Park has failed to complete its initial business combination within the required timeframe. Potential investors should also be aware of the following other potential conflicts of interest:

•         None of Conyers Park’s officers or directors is required to commit his or her full time to Conyers Park’s affairs and, accordingly, may have conflicts of interest in allocating his or her time among various business activities.

•         In the course of their other business activities, Conyers Park’s officers and directors may become aware of investment and business opportunities which may be appropriate for presentation to Conyers Park as well as the other entities with which they are affiliated. Conyers Park’s management may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented.

•         Conyers Park’s officers and directors may have a conflict of interest with respect to evaluating a particular business combination if the retention or resignation of any such officers and directors was included by a target business as a condition to any agreement with respect to an initial business combination.

Conyers Park cannot assure you that any of the above-mentioned conflicts will be resolved in its favor.

In general, officers and directors of a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware are required to present business opportunities to a corporation if:

•         the corporation could financially undertake the opportunity;

•         the opportunity is within the corporation’s line of business; and

•         it would not be fair to the corporation and its stockholders for the opportunity not to be brought to the attention of the corporation.

Accordingly, as a result of multiple business affiliations, Conyers Park’s officers and directors may have similar legal obligations relating to presenting business opportunities meeting the above-listed criteria to multiple entities. Furthermore, Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the doctrine of corporate opportunity does not apply with respect to any of Conyers Park’s officers or directors in circumstances where the application of the doctrine would conflict with any fiduciary duties or contractual obligations they may have.

In addition, all of Conyers Park’s executive officers have fiduciary and contractual duties to Centerview Capital Consumer and to certain companies in which Centerview Capital Consumer has invested.

114

Accordingly, if any of the above executive officers or directors becomes aware of a business combination opportunity which is suitable for any of the above entities to which he or she has then current fiduciary or contractual obligations, he or she will honor his or her fiduciary or contractual obligations to present such business combination opportunity to such entity, and only present it to Conyers Park if such entity rejects the opportunity. Conyers Park does not believe, however, that any of the foregoing fiduciary duties or contractual obligations will materially affect its ability to complete an initial business combination. Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that it renounce its interest in any corporate opportunity offered to any director unless such opportunity is expressly offered to such person solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer of Conyers Park and such opportunity is one Conyers Park is legally and contractually permitted to undertake and would otherwise be reasonable for Conyers Park to pursue.

Conyers Park is not prohibited from pursuing an initial business combination with a company that is affiliated with its Sponsor, officers or directors. In the event Conyers Park seeks to complete an initial business combination with such a company, Conyers Park, or a committee of independent directors, would obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm which is a member of FINRA that such an initial business combination is fair to Conyers Park from a financial point of view.

In the event that Conyers Park submits an initial business combination to its public stockholders for a vote, Sponsor has agreed to vote its Founder Shares and any public shares purchased during or after the offering in favor of an initial business combination and Conyers Park’s officers and directors have also agreed to vote any public shares purchased during or after the offering in favor of an initial business combination.

Limitation on Liability and Indemnification of Officers and Directors

Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that its officers and directors are indemnified by Conyers Park to the fullest extent authorized by Delaware law, as it now exists or may in the future be amended. In addition, Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that Conyers Park’s directors will not be personally liable for monetary damages to it for breaches of their fiduciary duty as directors, except to the extent such exemption from liability or limitation thereof is not permitted by the DGCL.

Conyers Park has entered into agreements with its officers and directors to provide contractual indemnification in addition to the indemnification provided for in its amended and restated certificate of incorporation. Conyers Park’s bylaws also permit it to maintain insurance on behalf of any officer, director or employee for any liability arising out of his or her actions, regardless of whether Delaware law would permit such indemnification. Conyers Park has purchased a policy of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance that insures Conyers Park’s officers and directors against the cost of defense, settlement or payment of a judgment in some circumstances and insures Conyers Park against its obligations to indemnify its officers and directors.

These provisions may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against Conyers Park’s directors for breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions also may have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against officers and directors, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise benefit Conyers Park and its stockholders. Furthermore, a stockholder’s investment may be adversely affected to the extent Conyers Park pays the costs of settlement and damage awards against officers and directors pursuant to these indemnification provisions.

Conyers Park believes that these provisions, the insurance and the indemnity agreements are necessary to attract and retain talented and experienced officers and directors.

Executive Compensation

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

None of Conyers Park’s officers or directors has received any cash compensation for services rendered to it. Commencing on July 14, 2016, Conyers Park has paid an affiliate of its Sponsor a total of $10,000 per month for office space, utilities and secretarial support. No compensation of any kind, including finder’s and consulting fees, will be paid to its Sponsor, officers and directors, or any of their respective affiliates, for services rendered prior to or in connection with the completion of the Business Combination. However, these individuals will be reimbursed for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with activities on Conyers Park’s behalf such as identifying

115

potential target businesses and performing due diligence on suitable business combinations. Conyers Park’s audit committee reviews on a quarterly basis all payments that were made to its Sponsor, officers or directors, or their affiliates.

After the completion of the Business Combination, directors or members of Conyers Park’s management team who remain with us may be paid consulting, management or other fees from the combined company. For more information on post-combination company executive compensation, see the section entitled “Management and Board of Directors After the Business Combination — Post-Combination Company Executive Compensation.”

Compensation Committee Report

Conyers Park’s Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K. Based on that review and discussion, the Company’s board of directors has recommended that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement/prospectus.

		Respectfully submitted,
		James E. Healey Robert H. Montgomery

Audit Committee Report

Conyers Park’s Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed its audited financial statements with management of the Company, and has discussed with its independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, which Conyers Park refers to as “PCAOB,” Audit Standard No. 1301, “Communications with Audit Committees,” referred to as PCAOB Audit Standard No. 1301. Additionally, Conyers Park’s Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from its independent registered public accounting firm, as required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB, and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence. Based upon such review and discussion, Conyers Park’s Audit Committee recommended to its board of directors that the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 be included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the last fiscal year for filing with the SEC.

		Submitted by:
		Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
		Clayton C. Daley, Jr. Nomi P. Ghez James E. Healey

Fees and Services

WithumSmith+Brown, PC (“Withum”) has audited Conyers Park’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. The following is a summary of fees paid or to be paid to Withum for services rendered in fiscal year 2016.

Audit Fees. Audit fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of Conyers Park’s year-end financial statements and services that are normally provided by Withum in connection with regulatory filings. The fees billed by Withum for professional services rendered for the audit of Conyers Park’s annual financial statements, review of the financial information included in Conyers Park’s Forms 10-Q for the respective periods, the registration statement, the Form 8-K filed in connection with the closing of Conyers Park’s IPO and other required filings with the SEC for the period from April 20, 2016 (inception) through December 31, 2016 totaled $65,000. The above amounts include interim procedures and audit fees, as well as attendance at Audit Committee meetings.

Audit-Related Fees. Audit-related services consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of Conyers Park’s financial statements and are not

116

reported under “— Audit Fees.” These services include attest services that are not required by statute or regulation and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards. During the year ended December 31, 2016, Conyers Park did not pay Withum for consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.

Tax Fees. Conyers Park did not pay Withum for tax planning and tax advice during the year ended December 31, 2016.

All Other Fees. Conyers Park did not pay Withum for other services during the year ended December 31, 2016.

Our Audit Committee has determined that the services provided by Withum are compatible with maintaining the independence of Withum as our independent registered public accounting firm.

Pre-Approval Policy

Conyers Park’s Audit Committee has approved all of the foregoing services. Conyers Park’s Audit Committee will pre-approve all future auditing services and permitted non-audit services to be performed for it by its auditors, including the fees and terms thereof (subject to the de minimis exceptions for non-audit services described in the Exchange Act which are approved by our Audit Committee prior to the completion of the audit).

117

SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF THE COMPANY

The following tables summarize the relevant financial data for our business and should be read in conjunction with “The Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our audited and unaudited interim financial statements, and the notes and schedules related thereto, which are included in this proxy statement/prospectus. Upon consummation of the Business Combination, Simply Good Foods intends to change its fiscal year end to the last Saturday in August.

(in thousands, except per share data)		Three Months Ended March 31, 2017				Year Ended December 31, 2016(1)
		(unaudited)				(audited)
Statement of Operations:
Revenue		$	—			$	—
General and administrative expenses		$	442,492			$	487,090
Loss from operations		$	(442,492	)		$	(487,090	)
Interest income		$	352,070			$	294,587
Net loss		$	(90,422	)		$	(192,503	)
Per Share Data:
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic and diluted			11,844,120				11,201,093
Net loss per common share – basic and diluted		$	(0.01	)		$	(0.02	)

____________

(1)      Represents period of inception (April 20, 2016) to December 31, 2016.

		As of March 31, 2017			As of December 31, 2016
		(unaudited)			(audited)
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
Working capital(2)		$	535,240		$	977,732
Total assets(3)		$	404,131,512		$	404,085,147
Total liabilities		$	14,537,115		$	14,400,328
Class A common stock subject to possible redemption; 38,459,439 and 38,468,481 (at a redemption of $10.00 per share) as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively		$	384,594,387		$	384,684,810
Total stockholders’ equity(4)		$	5,000,010		$	5,000,009

As of March 31, 2017, the total assets amount includes approximately $403,146,657 being held in the Trust Account, $402,500,000 of which Conyers Park intends to use for the purposes of consummating a business combination within the time period described in this proxy statement/prospectus, with $14,087,500 in deferred underwriting commissions to the underwriters of Conyers Park’s IPO, in connection with the Business Combination and the remaining $646,657 being available to Conyers Park for general working capital purposes. If a business combination is not so consummated, Conyers Park will be dissolved and the proceeds held in the Trust Account will be distributed solely to Conyers Park’s public stockholders.

____________

(2)      Includes $701,522 in cash held outside of the Trust Account, plus $283,333 of other current assets, less $449,615 of current liabilities as of March 31, 2017. Includes $954,102 in cash held outside of the Trust Account, plus $336,458 of other current assets, less $312,828 of current liabilities as of December 31, 2016.

(3)      Includes $403,146,557 held in the Trust Account, plus $701,522 in cash held outside the Trust Account, plus $283,333 of other current assets as of March 31, 2017. Includes $402,794,587 held in Trust Account, plus $954,102 in cash held outside of the Trust Account, plus $336,458 of other current assets as of December 31, 2016.

(4)      Excludes 38,459,439 and 38,468,481 shares of Class A common stock subject to possible redemption (at a redemption value of $10.00 per share) as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

118

THE COMPANY’S MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of Conyers Park’s financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the audited and unaudited interim financial statements and the notes thereto contained elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus. Certain information contained in the discussion and analysis set forth below includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this proxy statement/prospectus including, without limitation, statements under “The Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” regarding the Company’s financial position, business strategy and the plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. When used in this proxy statement/prospectus, words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend” and similar expressions, as they relate to Conyers Park or the Company’s management, identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs of management, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, the Company’s management. Actual results could differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors detailed in our filings with the SEC.

Overview

Conyers Park is a newly organized blank check company incorporated as a Delaware corporation on April 20, 2016 and formed for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses. Conyers Park intends to effectuate its initial business combination using cash from the proceeds of its initial public offering and the private placement of warrants that occurred simultaneously with the consummation of the initial public offering, its capital stock, debt or a combination of cash, stock and debt.

The issuance of additional shares of its stock in a business combination:

•         may significantly dilute the equity interest of investors in Conyers Park’s initial public offering, which dilution would increase if the anti-dilution provisions in the Class B common stock resulted in the issuance of shares of Class A common stock on a greater than one-to-one basis upon conversion of the Class B common stock;

•         may subordinate the rights of holders of the Company’s common stock if preferred stock is issued with rights senior to those afforded to the Company’s common stock;

•         could cause a change in control if a substantial number of shares of the Company’s common stock is issued, which may affect, among other things, the Company’s ability to use its net operating loss carry forwards, if any, and could result in the resignation or removal of its present officers and directors;

•         may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of the Company by diluting the stock ownership or voting rights of a person seeking to obtain control of the Company; and

•         may adversely affect prevailing market prices for the Company’s Class A common stock and/or warrants.

Similarly, if the Company issues debt securities, it could result in:

•         default and foreclosure on the Company’s assets if its operating revenues after an initial business combination are insufficient to repay its debt obligations;

•         acceleration of its obligations to repay the indebtedness even if the Company makes all principal and interest payments when due if the Company breach certain covenants that require the maintenance of certain financial ratios or reserves without a waiver or renegotiation of that covenant;

•         the Company’s immediate payment of all principal and accrued interest, if any, if the debt security is payable on demand;

•         the Company’s inability to obtain necessary additional financing if the debt security contains covenants restricting its ability to obtain such financing while the debt security is outstanding;

119

•         the Company’s inability to pay dividends on its common stock;

•         using a substantial portion of the Company’s cash flow to pay principal and interest on its debt, which will reduce the funds available for dividends on the Company’s common stock if declared, its ability to pay expenses, make capital expenditures and acquisitions, and fund other general corporate purposes;

•         limitations on the Company’s flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in its business and in the industry in which the Company operates;

•         increased vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic, industry and competitive conditions and adverse changes in government regulation;

•         limitations on our ability to borrow additional amounts for expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements, and execution of our strategy; and

•         other purposes and other disadvantages compared to our competitors who have less debt.

As indicated in the accompanying financial statements, at December 31, 2016 and March 31, 2017, the Company had $954,102 and $701,522, respectively, in cash and cash equivalents. The Company expects to continue to incur significant costs in the pursuit of its acquisition plans. The Company cannot assure you that its plans to complete its initial business combination will be successful.

Results of Operations

For the period from April 20, 2016 (inception) to December 31, 2016, the Company had a net loss of $192,503. For the three month period ended March 31, 2017, the Company had a net loss of $90,422. The Company’s entire activity from April 20, 2016 through March 31, 2017, consisted of formation and preparation for its initial public offering and since its initial public offering, the search for a target business with which to consummate an initial business combination, and as such, the Company had no operations and no significant operating expenses. Subsequent to the closing of its initial public offering on July 20, 2016, the Company’s normal operating costs included costs associated with its search for the business combination, costs associated with its governance and public reporting, state franchise taxes and charges of $10,000 per month from its Sponsor for administrative services.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Until the consummation of the Company’s initial public offering, its only sources of liquidity was an initial purchase of Founder Shares for $25,000 by the Company’s Sponsor, and a total of $225,000 (out of $300,000 that was available) loaned by the Company’s Sponsor. This Note was non-interest bearing and was paid in full on July 20, 2016 in connection with closing of its initial public offering.

On July 20, 2016, the Company consummated its initial public offering in which it sold 40,250,000 Units at a price of $10.00 per Unit (including the full exercise of the underwriter’s overallotment option) generating gross proceeds of $402,500,000 before underwriting discounts and expenses. The Company’s Sponsor purchased an aggregate of 6,700,000 warrants at a price of $1.50 per warrant in a private placement that occurred simultaneously with the Company’s initial public offering. In connection with the Company’s initial public offering, it incurred offering costs of $22,697,678 (including an underwriting discount of $8,050,000 and a Deferred Discount of $14,087,500). Other incurred offering costs consisted principally of formation and preparation fees related to its initial public offering. A total of $402,500,000 of the net proceeds from the Company’s initial public offering and the Private Placement were deposited in the Trust Account established for the benefit of its public stockholders.

Prior to the completion of an initial business combination, the Company has available to it the $701,522 of cash and cash equivalents on its balance sheet as of March 31, 2017. The Company will use these funds to identify and evaluate target businesses, perform business due diligence on prospective target businesses, travel to and from the offices, plants or similar locations of prospective target businesses or their representatives or owners, review corporate documents and material agreements of prospective target businesses, and structure, negotiate and complete a business combination. The Company is also entitled to up to $1,000,000 in interest from the Trust Account to be used for working capital purposes. The amount of interest available to the Company from the Trust Account may be less than $1,000,000 as a result of the current interest rate environment. As of March 31, 2017, the interest income in the Trust Account is $646,657.

120

In order to fund working capital deficiencies or finance transaction costs in connection with an intended initial business combination, Sponsor or an affiliate of Sponsor or certain of the Company’s officers and directors may, but are not obligated to, loan the Company funds as may be required. If the Company completes an initial business combination, it would repay such loaned amounts. In the event that an initial business combination does not close, the Company may use a portion of the working capital held outside the Trust Account to repay such loaned amounts but no proceeds from the Trust Account would be used for such repayment. Up to $1,500,000 of such loans may be convertible into warrants, at a price of $1.50 per warrant at the option of the lender. The warrants would be identical to the private placement warrants, including as to exercise price, exercisability and exercise period. The terms of such loans by the Company’s officers and directors, if any, have not been determined and no written agreements exist with respect to such loans. The Company does not expect to seek loans from parties other than Sponsor or an affiliate of Sponsor as it does not believe third parties will be willing to loan such funds and provide a waiver against any and all rights to seek access to funds in the Trust Account.

The Company expects that it has sufficient resources subsequent to its initial public offering to fund its operations through July 20, 2018. The Company does not believe it will need to raise additional funds in order to meet the expenditures required for operating its business. However, if its estimates of the costs of identifying a target business, undertaking in-depth due diligence and negotiating an initial business combination are less than the actual amount necessary to do so, the Company may have insufficient funds available to operate its business prior to an initial business combination. Moreover, the Company may need to obtain additional financing either to complete an initial business combination or because it becomes obligated to redeem a significant number of its public shares upon completion of an initial business combination, in which case it may issue additional securities or incur debt in connection with such business combination, which may include a specified future issuance. Subject to compliance with applicable securities laws, the Company would only complete such financing simultaneously with the completion of an initial business combination. If the Company is unable to complete an initial business combination because it does not have sufficient funds available to it, the Company will be forced to cease operations and liquidate the Trust Account. In addition, following an initial business combination, if cash on hand is insufficient, the Company may need to obtain additional financing in order to meet its obligations.

The Company has not entered into any off-balance sheet financing arrangements, established any special purpose entities, guaranteed any debt or commitments of other entities, or entered into any non-financial assets.

Contractual Obligations

At March 31, 2017, the Company did not have any long-term debt, capital lease obligations, operating lease obligations or long-term liabilities. On July 14, 2016, in connection with its initial public offering, the Company entered into an Administrative Services Agreement with its Sponsor, pursuant to which the Company pays a total of $10,000 per month for office space, utilities and administrative support. Upon completion of the initial business combination or the Company’s liquidation, the Company will cease paying these monthly fees.

The underwriters are entitled to underwriting commissions of 5.5%, of which 2.0% ($8,050,000) was paid at the closing of the Company’s initial public offering, and 3.5% ($14,087,500) has been deferred. The deferred underwriting commissions will become payable to the underwriters from the amounts held in the trust account solely in the event that the Company completes an initial business combination, subject to the terms of the underwriting agreement. The underwriters are not entitled to any interest accrued on the deferred underwriting commissions.

Critical Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and income and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. The Company has identified the following as its critical accounting policies:

121

Emerging Growth Company

Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such an election to opt out is irrevocable. Conyers Park has elected not to opt out of such extended transition period which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, Conyers Park, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard.

This may make comparison of Conyers Park’s financial statements with another public company, which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period, difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.

Net Loss Per Common Share

Net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus, to the extent dilutive, the incremental number of shares of common stock to settle warrants, as calculated using the treasury stock method. At March 31, 2017, the Company had outstanding warrants to purchase 20,116,667 shares of common stock. For the period presented, these shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share of common stock because their inclusion would have been antidilutive. As a result, diluted loss per common share is the same as basic loss per common share for the period.

Off-Balance Sheet Financing Arrangements

The Company has no obligations, assets or liabilities which would be considered off-balance sheet arrangements. The Company does not participate in transactions that create relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, often referred to as variable interest entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements.

Financial Instruments

The fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities, which qualify as financial instruments under FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” approximates the carrying amounts represented in the balance sheet.

Offering Costs

The Company complies with the requirements of FASB ASC 340-10-S99-1 and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 5A — “Expenses of Offering.” Offering costs were $22,697,678 (including $22,137,500 in underwriters’ fees), consisting principally of costs incurred in connection with formation and preparation for its initial public offering. These costs, together with the underwriters’ discount were charged to additional paid-in capital upon closing of its initial public offering on July 20, 2016.

Income Taxes

The Company follows the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes under FASB ASC 740, “Income Taxes.” Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that included the enactment date. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

122

FASB ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. There were no unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 2017. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. No amounts were accrued for the payment of interest and penalties at March 31, 2017. The Company is currently not aware of any issues under review that could result in significant payments, accruals or material deviation from its position. The Company is subject to income tax examinations by major taxing authorities since inception.

At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had no material deferred tax assets.

Redeemable Common Stock

All of the 40,250,000 Class A Common Stock sold as parts of the Units in the Company’s initial public offering contain a redemption feature which allows for the redemption of Class A Common Stock under its Liquidation or Tender Offer/Stockholder Approval provisions. In accordance with FASB ASC 480, redemption provisions not solely within the Company’s control require the security to be classified outside of permanent equity. Ordinary liquidation events, which involve the redemption and liquidation of all of the entity’s equity instruments, are excluded from the provisions of FASB ASC 480. Although the Company has not specified a maximum redemption threshold, its amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that in no event will it redeem its public shares in an amount that would cause its net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001.

The Company will recognize changes in redemption value immediately as they occur and will adjust the carrying value of the security to equal the redemption value at the end of each reporting period. Increases or decreases in the carrying amount of redeemable Class A Common Stock shall be affected by charges against additional paid-in capital.

Accordingly, at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, 38,459,439 and 38,468,481, respectively, of the 40,250,000 shares of Class A Common Stock included in the Units were classified outside of permanent equity at its redemption value.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Company’s management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on its financial statements.

123

INFORMATION ABOUT ATKINS

References in this section to “Atkins,” generally refer to NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Overview

Atkins is a growing developer, marketer and seller of branded nutritional foods and snacking products. Its highly-focused product portfolio consists primarily of nutrition bars, ready-to-drink (“RTD”) shakes, snacks and confectionery products marketed under the Atkins®, SimplyProtein®, Atkins Harvest Trail, Atkins Endulge® and Atkins Lift brand names. Over the past 45 years, Atkins has become an iconic American brand that for many consumers stands for “low carb,” “low sugar” and “protein rich” nutrition. For the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, its net sales were $427.9 million, net income was $10.0 million and Adjusted EBITDA (as defined below in the section entitled “— Summary Historical Financial Information of Atkins”) was $64.2 million. When adjusting the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 for the impact of the licensing of its frozen meals business effective September 1, 2016, Atkins’ Pro Forma Adjusted Net Sales were $371.0 million and Atkins’ Pro Forma Adjusted EBITDA was $64.2 million (as defined below in the section entitled “Summary Historical Financial Information of Atkins”).

Atkins is a leading brand in nutritional snacking with a broad and growing consumer base. In its core snacking business, Atkins strives to offer a complete line of nutrition bars, RTD shakes and confections that satisfy hunger while providing consumers with a convenient, “better-for-you” snacking alternative. Atkins sales, marketing and R&D capabilities enable it to distribute products into a national customer base across the mass merchandiser, grocery and drug channels. We believe that Atkins’ broad brand recognition, depth of management talent and strong cash generation position it to continue to innovate in the Atkins brand and acquire other brands, and thereby become an industry leading snacking platform. To that end, in December 2016, Atkins completed the acquisition of Wellness Foods, Inc., a Canada-based developer, marketer and seller of the SimplyProtein® brand that is focused on protein-rich and low-sugar products, which Atkins’ management believes has significant opportunity for expansion in the U.S. In addition to snacking products, Atkins has entered into a license arrangement for frozen meals sold in the U.S. by Bellisio Foods, Inc. which reduces Atkins’ GAAP net sales as they no longer ship direct to customers.

Snacking occasions are on the rise as consumers crave convenient, healthy and delicious foods, snacks and meal replacements for their on-the-go lifestyles. Atkins’ emphasis on nutrition bars and RTD shakes positions it to capitalize on consumers’ busy schedules. We believe a number of existing and emerging consumer trends within the U.S. food and beverage industry — including increased consumption of smaller, more frequent meals throughout the day, consumers’ strong preference for convenient, “better-for-you” snacks, consumers’ greater focus on health and wellness, and consumers’ moves toward controlling carbohydrate and sugar consumption — will continue to both drive the growth of the nutritional snacking category and increase the demand for Atkins’ product offerings.

Atkins believes that Conyers Park’s principals bring deep and seasoned industry expertise in branded food, nutrition and snacking, as well as strong public company capabilities and experience with executing growth strategies and integrating M&A. As a result, Atkins believes the combination with Conyers Park positions it to take advantage of existing and emerging trends within the $60 billion U.S. snacking category as well as within the $447 billion broader U.S. food sector. Going forward, as the post-combination company executes its growth strategy, we believe we will continue to grow revenue and leverage our platform and efficient, asset-light infrastructure, generating continued earnings growth and strong free cash flow, which will create additional equity value for our stockholders.

As a result of strong brand recognition, a loyal consumer following and differentiated operating capabilities, Atkins has delivered strong financial performance. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. (GAAP), on a GAAP reported basis and on an adjusted pro forma basis, which is reflective of how management will evaluate results given the execution of the frozen meals license agreement, results were as follows:

•         For the 53-week period ended August 29, 2015 compared to the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016:

•         Net sales grew from $419.1 million to $427.9 million, representing a growth rate of 2.1% with Net sales excluding the change in frozen meals growing from $354.1 million to $367.0 million, representing a growth rate of 3.6%

•         Net income grew from $9.1 million to $10.0 million, representing a growth rate of 9.9%

124

•         Adjusted EBITDA grew from $59.4 million to $64.2 million, representing a growth rate of 8.2%

•         Adjusted EBITDA margin expanded from 14.2% to 14.9%, representing a margin expansion of 70 basis points

•         For the 26-week period ended February 27, 2016 compared to the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017:

•         Net sales decreased from $219.8 million to $202.1 million, representing a decrease of 8.1%

•         Net income grew from $8.1 million to $10.3 million, representing a growth rate of 27.2%

•         Atkins’ Pro Forma Adjusted Net Sales grew from $190.8 million to $202.1 million, representing a growth rate of 5.9%

•         Atkins’ Pro Forma Adjusted EBITDA grew from $35.2 million to $40.4 million, representing a growth rate of 14.8%

•         Atkins’ Pro Forma Adjusted EBITDA margin expanded from 18.4% to 20.0%, representing a margin expansion of 160 basis points.

For reconciliation of Atkins’ Pro Forma to GAAP financials, please refer to “Summary Historical Financial Information of Atkins.”

Atkins’ Strengths

Powerful brand with strong consumer awareness and loyalty. Atkins is a leading player in the fast growing nutritional snacking category, and one of the only brands with scale in both nutrition bars and RTD shakes. Its iconic brand has 85% aided brand awareness with U.S. consumers today, based on a study conducted by Atkins in January 2016. Atkins continues to add new consumers, as demonstrated by a 9% compound annual increase in its consumer base over the past five fiscal years. Its highly-focused snacking portfolio provides it with a unique position within retailers’ nutrition and wellness aisles, resulting in meaningful shelf space. Atkins’ ability to appeal to both weight management program consumers and consumers focused on everyday nutritious eating makes it a highly attractive and strategic brand for a diverse set of retailers across various distribution channels.

Aligned with consumer mega trends. Increasing global concern about growing rates of obesity and weight-related diseases and other health issues has resulted in increased scientific, media and consumer focus on nutrition. Over 100 independent, peer reviewed, clinical studies show the benefits of controlling carbohydrates. Atkins’ management believes that this focus is prompting consumers to rebalance their nutritional breakdown away from carbohydrates. In fact, 73% of consumers are seeking to lower their carbohydrate intake according to Health Focus International. For many consumers, the Atkins brand stands for “low carb,” “low sugar” and “protein rich” nutrition, attributes which are well aligned with consumer mega trends. In addition, consumers’ eating habits are gradually shifting towards increased convenience, snacking and meal replacement. Atkins’ portfolio of convenient and nutritious products as well as its ongoing effort to meet consumer demands for “cleaner labels,” which Atkins defines as products made with fewer, simpler and more recognizable ingredients, are strategically aligned with these trends.

Scalable snacking and food platform. With the highly-recognized Atkins brand as an anchor, Atkins has been able to grow its product offerings through new brand extensions such as Atkins Harvest Trail and Atkins Lift and via acquisitions such as its December 2016 acquisition of Wellness Foods, Inc., a Canada-based developer, marketer and seller of the SimplyProtein® brand. Atkins’ in-house product development experience, combined with its outsourced manufacturing model, allow it to bring new products to market quickly. Atkins prides itself on knowing its consumers and mining insights that lead to new products and ideas. Atkins believes that it has the ability to leverage its strong relationships with its retail customers and distributors, brand building record, and merchandising expertise to help new products, brands and brand extensions gain distribution and consumer recognition, allowing Atkins to continue to successfully expand its snacking platform.

Asset-light business with strong cash generation. Atkins retains core in-house capabilities including sales and marketing, brand management, customer relationships, product development, and supply-chain know-how, while partnering with a diversified pool of contract manufacturers and distributors to execute manufacturing and distribution. Outsourcing these competencies allows Atkins to focus its efforts on innovation, marketing and sales to

125

strive to meet consumer demands. Atkins’ lean infrastructure allows for significant flexibility and speed-to-market and minimal capital investment, which translates into consistent and robust free cash flow generation over time, driven by strong gross margins, EBITDA margins and EBITDA less capital expenditure margins.

Experienced leadership team. Atkins’ experienced team of industry veterans has extensive experience across multiple branded consumer products, food and nutrition categories. For example, its Chief Executive Officer Joseph Scalzo has significant experience operating packaged foods businesses, having served in various leadership roles at Dean Foods, WhiteWave Foods, The Gillette Company, The Coca-Cola Company, and The Procter & Gamble Company. Conyers Park complements Atkins’ extensive experience with the significant industry expertise of James Kilts, the former Chief Executive Officer of The Gillette Company and Nabisco, and former President of Kraft USA and Oscar Mayer, and David West, the former Chief Executive Officer of Big Heart Pet Brands and The Hershey Company. The Atkins’ management team’s deep expertise and proven track record in managing brands and operating packaged food businesses is a key driver of Atkins’ success and positions the Conyers Park and Atkins combination as an attractive vehicle for future long-term growth within the snacking space and broader food category.

Atkins’ Strategies

Continue Atkins’ advocacy, education and activation for core program consumers. Consumers who purchase Atkins’ products have shown a strong affinity for the brand as evidenced by a relatively high level of servings per buyer, per year. Historically, Atkins’ core target consumer base has consisted of individuals participating in branded weight management programs. These consumers are Atkins’ most loyal, profitable and frequent purchasers. Atkins’ management believes that social media is a cost-effective way of continuing to attract and retain these core consumers. Atkins’ management expects that Atkins’ recently improved website and mobile application will continue to attract core consumers, including millennials, to its products. Atkins’ marketing also continues to use television and print behind its celebrity spokeswoman Alyssa Milano and its “Happy Weight” communication, which was created to encourage consumers to go to Atkins’ website and app to learn more about Atkins and weight management. In addition, Atkins’ management believes that its ongoing efforts to educate consumers about the benefits of a lower carbohydrate lifestyle will further reinforce the brand to core consumers who are focused on a programmatic approach to weight management.

Further develop marketing strategy to reach self-directed low carbohydrate consumers. Atkins will continue to make focused changes to its approach to consumer outreach. According to the IRI Study, over 50% of current Atkins consumers are self-directed eaters (not on a program diet) who buy and consume Atkins products, despite the fact that historically, Atkins’ marketing and advertising have not been targeted towards them. Based on a study it conducted in January 2016, Atkins believes that the addressable market for its products is expandable from approximately 8 million low carbohydrate, program weight management consumers to approximately 46 million consumers, including individuals focused on self-directed weight management and those who have adopted a low carbohydrate approach to eating unrelated to weight management. Atkins’ management expects that the brand’s redesigned marketing and advertising, such as its food-focused television advertising, will be effective at reaching the large addressable market of self-directed low carbohydrate consumers. Additionally, social media continues to be an important component of Atkins’ marketing tools and Atkins has an active and growing presence on key social channels such as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. During the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, Atkins had over 10 million new visitors to its website.

Innovate and expand the portfolio of product offerings to meet consumer demands for “cleaner labels,” higher protein products and new product forms. Atkins’ management expects that its ongoing efforts to meet consumer demands for “cleaner labels,” which it defines as products made with fewer, simpler and more recognizable ingredients, will be effective at reaching self-directed low carbohydrate consumers, who are focused on weight management as part of overall health, wellness and “clean eating.” Atkins’ management is committed to continually finding new and innovative formulations to reduce the number of product ingredients, as well as using “better for you” ingredients like nuts, fiber and whey protein in its existing products, while maintaining and improving taste and quality. In addition, Atkins will continue to enhance, strengthen and expand its product offerings with new and innovative flavors and forms, simple ingredients and packaging alternatives, all while maintaining a commitment to delivering products that meet Atkins’ nutritional profile and provide the convenience that consumers crave. Atkins’ in-house research and development laboratory allows it to develop new products internally and bring them to market quickly through its contract manufacturing network without diverging from high standards of taste, quality, safety and nutritional content. Additionally, Atkins is able to meet consumer demands through M&A,

126

such as its December 2016 acquisition of Wellness Foods, Inc., a Canada-based developer, marketer and seller of the SimplyProtein® brand that is focused on “cleaner label,” protein-rich, and low-sugar products, which Atkins’ management believes has significant opportunity for expansion in the U.S., particularly among self-directed low carbohydrate consumers.

Expand distribution in white space opportunities. In the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, over 80% of Atkins’ gross sales were through the mass retailer and grocery distribution channels. The Atkins management team believes there is opportunity for the brand to further penetrate other distribution channels such as convenience and club stores. Atkins’ management also believes that the development of the SimplyProtein® brand will allow Atkins to expand distribution into the natural and specialty channel. In addition, while shoppers have become heavy consumers of e-commerce purchases generally, only 2% of Atkins’ gross sales for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 were through its e-commerce channel. Atkins intends to leverage its brand recognition to further develop the distribution channels through which it reaches consumers, including through the expansion of the e-commerce channel.

Leverage platform to expand in attractive food and snacking categories. Atkins’ management believes the fragmented snacking category presents a substantial opportunity for consolidation and the opportunity to build, through disciplined acquisitions, a leading platform in the snacking space and broader food category. As a leader in nutritious snacking, both Conyers Park’s and Atkins’ managements believe Atkins has the unique capability to leverage its operating platform and customer relationships to expand beyond the Atkins brand. Atkins’ experienced management team has deep expertise in brand building to expand the business into additional brands and products in the snacking segment. Atkins is actively seeking to identify and evaluate new acquisition opportunities to complement the Atkins platform, and sees significant opportunity for growth and synergies in complementary adjacent snacking categories such as sports/active and adult nutritional snacks, salty snacks and protein snacks, as well as in the “better-for-you” eating space. In addition to building scale through bolt-on acquisitions, Conyers Park believes that Atkins remains an attractive Reverse Morris Trust partner for large strategic players.

Atkins’ Vision

Atkins’ vision is to improve global health by persistently and consistently becoming how a healthier world eats. To make this vision a reality, Atkins strives to embed its brand as a part of everyday life through advocacy, education, and innovation. For over 45 years, Atkins has become an iconic American brand that for many consumers stands for “low carb,” “low sugar” and “protein rich” nutrition. Atkins’ vision and mission, coupled with its belief that today’s consumer is looking for sustainable, healthy long-term habits, has inspired Atkins’ focus on nutritional snacking. Atkins believes that wellbeing is not just about weight loss or quick results, but also about a healthier approach to eating.

Atkins’ convenient snacking portfolio specializes in low-sugar, protein rich and higher fiber nutrition bars, RTD shakes and confections. Atkins currently markets its products under the Atkins®, SimplyProtein®, Atkins Harvest Trail, Atkins Endulge®, and Atkins Lift brand names. Atkins has significant brand recognition, with 85% aided brand awareness among U.S. consumers, based on a study conducted by Atkins in January 2016.

Atkins’ Approach to Healthy Living and Healthy Weight

Over 100 independent, peer reviewed, clinical studies support that eating the right foods can improve health, not only in terms of weight management, but also in terms of related chronic issues like diabetes and certain heart conditions. Atkins believes that it offers a balanced approach to nutrition that can result in better health.

Dr. Robert Atkins, a well-known cardiologist, discovered the beneficial effects on his patients of a low carbohydrate nutritional regimen and helped refine the understanding of human nutrition and its link to health. More people are recognizing that Atkins is the foundation of the new convention of eating right, and that the old convention of eating excess carbohydrates and sugar has actually contributed to global obesity. Dr. Atkins limited his patients’ intake of sugar and carbohydrates not only for the weight management benefits, but also because of the numerous other health benefits to his patients. While calorie control plays some role in wellness, studies show that it can be far more important to know what the body does with food and its components. Atkins believes that controlling the things that the human body turns into sugar is the single biggest factor in eating right. When there is too much sugar and too many carbohydrates (which the body also turns into sugar) in the bloodstream, the body stores them as fats. Many people do not know that starchy carbohydrates such as breads, pasta, cereal, rice and

127

potatoes are really just complex sugars. One quarter cup of raisins is equivalent to 9.3 teaspoons of sugar and 1 oz. of pretzels is equivalent to 6.6 teaspoons of sugar. Atkins believes that eating proteins and good fats and controlling carbohydrate consumption are the most important parts of eating right. The old conventional wisdom of fewer calories, no matter how many of them are sugars, is unhealthy because eating sugar can flood the body with too much of the wrong kind of fuel, whereas the Atkins approach aims to satisfy the body while creating greater energy, higher metabolism and less stored fat. The human body works better with the right fuel.

Atkins’ Products

Core Products

Atkins’ core products consist of nutrition bars, RTD shakes and confections.

Nutrition Bars. To keep its on-the-go consumers energized and fueled, Atkins’ nutrition bars offer a convenient and effective solution, providing consumers with protein, fiber and a delicious taste. Atkins offers three main types of nutrition bars: Atkins Harvest Trail Bars, Atkins Meal Bars and Atkins Snack Bars. Atkins Harvest Trail Bars contain 8 grams of protein and 9 to 10 grams of fiber, and are available in a variety of flavors, including blueberry vanilla and almond, dark chocolate sea salt caramel and vanilla fruit and nut. With 2 to 4 grams of net carbs, Atkins Meal Bars contain 13 to 17 grams of protein, and are available in 13 different flavors. With 2 to 7 grams of net carbs, Atkins Snacks contain 5 to 12 grams of protein. Atkins offers 14 varieties of Atkins Snack bars.

Atkins also offers Atkins Lift protein bars designed to fuel consumers’ active and busy lives. With 4 to 5 grams of net carbs, Atkins Lift protein bars contain 20 to 21 grams of protein and 16 grams of fiber. These protein bars, which come in a variety of flavors, including chocolate chip cookie dough and peanut butter chocolate chip, are gluten free.

To add to Atkins’ portfolio of nutrition bars and snacks, in December 2016 Atkins acquired Wellness Foods, Inc. a Canada-based company which owns the SimplyProtein® brand and offers a variety of protein-based snacks, including bars, chips and crunches.

RTD Shakes. Atkins’ rich and creamy RTD shakes contain 10 to 15 grams of protein, as well as other important vitamins and minerals. Available in a variety of flavors, including cookies and crème, café caramel and creamy chocolate, RTD shakes are made with high quality ingredients and are designed to provide energy balance through the day.

Atkins also offers RTD Atkins Lift protein drinks, which are flavored with natural ingredients and offered in berry, lemon and orange flavors. With 2 grams or less of net carbs, Atkins Lift protein drinks, which contain 20 grams of protein, are designed to serve as a refreshing fuel source.

Confections. Atkins believes its Atkins Endulge® line, which is designed to satisfy consumers’ sweet cravings and which Atkins calls its Treats, consists of delicious desserts without all of the added sugar. Atkins offers 13 different Treats, such as peanut butter cups and pecan caramel clusters, each with only 1 gram of sugar or less and low net carbs, providing consumers with the option to indulge.

Other Products

Through third-party partnerships, Atkins offers complementary Atkins branded products, including frozen meals, home delivery meals and meal kits.

Licensed Frozen Meals. Atkins signed a renewable seven-year license agreement with Bellisio Foods, Inc., or Bellisio, effective September 1, 2016, to license its frozen meals business. Bellisio manufactures, distributes, markets, promotes and sells Atkins frozen food products under the Atkins licensed mark. These products include Atkins branded frozen breakfasts, lunches and dinners, which can be found in grocery stores, wholesale clubs and other retailers in the United States. With a large selection of meal types, including burritos, pizzas, breakfast bowls and more, frozen meal options serve as what Atkins believes is a great way to learn the basics of protein rich, low-carbohydrate and low-sugar eating in a simple, convenient and delicious way. The scope of the license includes all frozen meals, snacks and desserts across all retail channels (excluding online), in the U.S., Canada and Mexico.

128

Recipes, Home Delivery and Meal Kits. Atkins offers over 1,600 protein rich, low-carbohydrate and low-sugar recipes designed to help consumers achieve and maintain a healthy lifestyle, while still enjoying delicious food. In addition to the recipes available on its website, Atkins has teamed with Chef’d LLC, or Chef’d, to deliver fresh low-carbohydrate and low-sugar ready-to-cook recipes and ingredients directly to consumers’ doors — taking the guesswork out of prepping, planning and shopping. Atkins also offers online one-week meal kits based around nutrition bars, RTD shakes and frozen meals, which are delivered directly to consumers’ doors.

Marketing, Advertising and Consumer Outreach

Atkins believes advocacy and education are key foundations of its approach to growth. By increasing consumer awareness about the benefits of adopting a low-carbohydrate approach to healthy eating, Atkins is able to capture a larger audience, and spread its message about the benefits of a low-carbohydrate approach to healthy living. Accordingly, Atkins has structured its marketing and advertising not only to promote its products, but also to educate consumers, including through community and school health education programs.

Target Demographics

Atkins has built a large consumer following, with its weight management consumer forming the core of a much larger group of consumers looking for a more nutritious lifestyle. These consumers are an important foundation for Atkins’ business. They are loyal, profitable and frequent purchasers of Atkins’ products. Beyond this group, Atkins management believes that there is significant opportunity to expand Atkins’ marketing, education and products to consumers who are not necessarily looking for a weight loss plan, but rather are focused more generally on long-term low-carbohydrate healthy living. Atkins refers to these consumers as self-directed low-carb consumers.

Atkins believes its brand is uniquely positioned to capture both branded program consumers and self-directed low-carb consumers, and as part of its growth initiatives, Atkins has directed its marketing and advertising efforts to capitalize on this significant incremental opportunity.

Branded Program Consumers. Atkins identifies branded program consumers as those consumers open to a weight-management program. These consumers are typically of the belief that Atkins’ nutritional approach is effective, that Atkins’ food products generally make them less hungry than other approaches, and that Atkins’ snacks are an effective way to facilitate weight management. Atkins’ primary message to these consumers is that its products and snacks enable weight management while still allowing consumers to maintain a sustainable and satisfying lifestyle. Atkins emphasizes to these consumers the emotional benefits of healthy living — increased energy, strength and self-esteem — and the simplicity and healthiness of its program.

Self-Directed Low-Carb Consumers. Atkins identifies self-directed low-carb consumers as those consumers not interested in a directed, programmatic approach to weight management, but who rather are interested in low-carbohydrate and low-sugar principles. These consumers are generally of the view that lowering carbohydrate and sugar intake is a better, healthier way to eat and should result in weight loss and maintenance. Atkins’ primary message to these consumers is that it offers delicious low-carbohydrate food options to provide better choices for snacking and meals. Atkins emphasizes appetite appeal and a more generalized theme of controlling carbohydrate and sugar consumption rather than weight management.

Education and Consumer Knowledge

Atkins believes the first step in expanding its consumer base and growing its business is educating consumers on the benefits of the Atkins approach to eating and teaching them how to make smarter food choices. In order to facilitate awareness of the health benefits of a low-carbohydrate, low-sugar and protein rich eating approach and spread knowledge of what Atkins believes are the dangers of a carbohydrate rich diet, Atkins has established a variety of marketing and advertising strategies to connect with consumers, including digital marketing and social media platforms, television advertising, celebrity endorsements and free online consumer tracking, management and facilitation tools. Atkins finds that the more consumers know about the science behind its approach to nutritious eating, the more likely they are to rebalance their nutrition away from carbohydrates.

129

Digital Marketing and Social Media

Atkins dedicates a sizeable portion of its marketing and advertising spend to digital marketing channels. Atkins maintains a registered domain at www.atkins.com, which serves as the primary source of information regarding Atkins’ products. In 2016, Atkins had approximately 10 million new visitors to its website, based on internal tracking. Atkins also uses its website as a platform for consumer testimonials and success stories, and as a means to communicate simple nutrition choices that it believes can deliver a healthy holistic lifestyle and sustainable weight management.

Atkins extensively uses social media platforms for online collaboration like iPhone and Android smartphone apps, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Snapchat. These platforms are fundamentally changing the way Atkins engages with its consumers and allows Atkins to directly reach desirable target demographics such as millennials. Here are a few examples of how Atkins uses social media to connect with its consumers and promote healthy lifestyles:

Facebook. Atkins maintains a Facebook page, which it uses to facilitate consumer services, distribute brand information and news, and publish videos and pictures promoting its brand. Atkins also conducts regular contests and giveaways. As of January 2017, Atkins had approximately 650,000 Facebook followers.

Instagram. Atkins maintains an Instagram account, @atkinsinsider, which it uses as motivational, inspirational and aspirational publishing, and as an authentic representation of low-carb lifestyles. Atkins frequently publishes consumer success stories, and conducts regular contests for its consumers. As of January 2017, Atkins had approximately 25,000 Instagram followers.

Twitter. Atkins maintains an active Twitter account, @atkinsinsider, which it uses to disseminate trending news and information, as well as to publish short format tips, tricks and hacks. Atkins also engages in celebrity chats, and conducts regular contests for its consumers. As of January 2017, Atkins had approximately 29,000 Twitter followers.

Celebrity Endorsements

Atkins utilizes celebrity partnerships to increase consumer awareness of its products and serve as real-life motivational and inspirational success stories. In 2015, Atkins partnered with Alyssa Milano, co-host of “Project Runway All Stars,” to serve as its official celebrity spokesperson. Atkins also partners with other celebrities, such as Kim Kardashian, who publicly attribute their weight loss to Atkins’ products and programs. By actively supporting Atkins’ products and nutritional approach, these celebrities serve as a valuable resource contemporizing the Atkins brand, educating consumers, encouraging them to learn more about Atkins, and building brand awareness.

Television Advertising

In addition to digital marketing and social media, Atkins also engages in traditional advertising through television. Atkins specifically uses television as a means to encourage more consumers to learn about Atkins, share success stories and increase consumer awareness regarding the benefits of low-carbohydrate and low-sugar eating approaches. In the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, approximately 25% of Atkins’ U.S. selling and marketing expenses were spent on television advertising.

Atkins’ Tools

Atkins maintains a dynamic arsenal of educational, nutritional and weight management tools, including a mobile app and tracker, carb counter, meal plans and shopping lists. Atkins also maintains discussion boards and groups on its website and social media platforms to keep its consumers inspired, motivated, connected and informed.

Mobile App. Atkins mobile app allows consumers to search, track and plan their meals on their mobile phone or tablet. The app includes a comprehensive food search, which helps consumers find nutritional information for grocery items, restaurant meals, and Atkins-friendly recipes and products. The recently upgraded meal tracker allows consumers to track net carbs consumed based on their specific program. The progress tracker allows consumers to record their weight, body measurements and exercise to track weight loss to date and proximity to their goal weight. In addition, the mobile app includes over 1,000 recipes, making it simple to find and prepare low-carbohydrate and low-sugar meals.

130

Carb Counter. On Atkins’ website, Atkins offers a user-friendly guide to count carbohydrates. The Carb Counter tracks hundreds of different foods to assist consumers in tracking their daily carb intake. Specifically, the Carb Counter focuses on net carbs that impact blood sugar.

Meal Plans & Shopping Lists. Whether looking to cook or preferring grab-and-go, Atkins offers meal plans that fit a plethora of lifestyles. These meal plans are easily downloaded from Atkins’ website. These meal plans outline what consumers should eat throughout the day, including snacks.

Discussion Boards and Groups. Atkins maintains discussion boards on its website so that its consumers can connect with Atkins professionals and other members of the Atkins community. The discussion boards allow consumers to engage with Atkins professionals to receive advice and encouragement. Groups, also available on the website, facilitate support and encouragement among consumers and allow them to connect with one another and share their interests and goals. There are over 100 groups that a consumer may join, such as “Vegetarians on Atkins,” “Atkins Newbies” and “Continuing to Lose Weight”. A consumer may even start his or her own group.

Product Innovation

A portion of Atkins’ sales is driven by new products, and as a result, Atkins believes innovation is, and will continue to be, an important component of its business. Atkins takes a deliberate approach to new product development, focusing on enhancing existing products, innovating flavor and form varieties and expanding into adjacent snacking products. Atkins’ innovation model is designed to respond to competitive demands, with a primary focus on enhancing the quality and flavor of its products while simplifying composition and reducing the number of ingredients to meet consumer demands for cleaner labels.

Atkins’ innovation strategy is based on its ongoing research into consumers’ healthy lifestyle and nutritional needs. Atkins prides itself on knowing its consumers and developing products that meet their needs. Atkins management believes that an important component of these nutritional needs is a focus on evolving current products and creating new products with cleaner and fewer ingredients. Accordingly, Atkins is committed to continually finding new and innovative formulations to reduce the number of ingredients in its products, as well as using “better-for-you” ingredients like nuts, fiber and whey protein in its products, while continually improving taste and quality.

Atkins maintains an in-house research and development team as well as market research and consumer insight capabilities. Through its research and development lab in Louisville, Colorado, Atkins controls the brand’s innovations and product formulations from the ground up. By developing new products, prototypes and adjacencies in-house, Atkins facilitates its core competencies in product innovation, and enhances its speed to market.

In addition, as part of its innovation process, Atkins collaborates with nationally recognized third-party flavor houses and product development firms for new product development and then conducts its own proprietary consumer research to identify and improve upon new product concepts. Atkins plans to continue to conduct extensive consumer research in order to develop successful new products including product flavor and concept testing, marketing and trend analyses and consumer prototype testing.

Intellectual Property

Atkins owns numerous domestic and international trademarks and other proprietary rights that are important to its business. Depending upon the jurisdiction, trademarks are valid as long as they are used in the regular course of trade and/or their registrations are properly maintained. Atkins believes the protection of its trademarks, copyrights, patents, domain names, trade dress, and trade secrets are important to its success. Atkins aggressively protects its intellectual property rights by relying on a combination of watch services and trademark, copyright, patent, trade dress and trade secret laws, and through the domain name dispute resolution system. Atkins domain name is www.atkins.com, which trafficked approximately 10 million new visitors in 2016 based on internal estimates.

Atkins also owns virtually all of the recipes and specifications to its products.

Competition

Atkins competes primarily with nutritional snacking brands in large retail environments. The nutritional snacking industry is competitive, and includes a number of diverse competitors.

131

Atkins’ identified competitors include, but are not limited to, CLIF Bar, KIND bars, Special K, Slimfast, Muscle Milk, Premier Nutrition, Quest Nutrition and thinkThin.

Atkins believes that the principal competitive factors in the nutritional snacking and weight management industries are:

•         ingredients;

•         taste;

•         low-carbohydrate, low-sugar, protein rich versus other nutritional approaches;

•         convenience;

•         brand awareness and loyalty among consumers;

•         media spending;

•         product variety and packaging; and

•         access to retailer shelf space.

Atkins believes that it currently competes effectively with respect to each of these factors.

Supply Chain

Atkins operates an asset-light business model. For the manufacture of its products, Atkins subcontracts with contract manufacturers, and as a result Atkins’ operations are highly flexible and require minimal capital expenditure. The supply chain for Atkins’ International Business also uses exclusively contract manufacturers, and is completely separate from the North American Supply Chain, which is described below.

Atkins’ products are shipped directly to one central warehouse, which is a leased warehouse managed by a third-party logistics provider who then distributes products to customer distribution centers. In addition, Atkins’ use of demand forecasting and vendor-managed inventory systems enable it to meet shipping demands, ensure timely delivery of orders and offer service levels to its customers.

Sourcing. The principal ingredients to manufacture Atkins’ products include soy, nuts, dairy, and cocoa. Atkins packaging supplies consist of flexible film, cartons, and corrugate. All of Atkins’ core ingredients are purchased according to rigorous standards to assure food quality and safety. These core ingredients are generally available in adequate quantities from suppliers. Atkins visits with major suppliers to source competitively priced, quality ingredients that meet its standards. Atkins manages actively the cost of some ingredients including milk protein concentrate, chocolate coatings, some nuts, soy crisps and liquid soy.

Manufacturing. Atkins relies on contract manufacturers to manufacture its products. The contract manufacturers schedule and purchase ingredient inventory independently, according to parameters set in their contracts. Outsourcing allows Atkins to operate an asset-light business model and focus its efforts on innovation, marketing and sales. Atkins’ contract manufacturers are regularly audited by third parties and are required to follow rigorous food safety guidelines. Atkins’ believes its contract manufacturers have the capacity to meet its current and near-term supply needs. Atkins has two contract manufacturers for its ready-to-drink shakes and numerous contract manufacturers for its nutrition bars. Atkins monitors capacity and performance of its manufacturing partners and will qualify alternate suppliers as needed. Atkins receives finished products from its contract manufacturers, which includes all packaging and ingredients used, as well as an agreed-upon tolling charge for each item produced. These finished products are then shipped directly to Atkins’ distribution center in Greenfield, Indiana.

Storage. Atkins has one leased distribution center in Greenfield, Indiana, referred to as the Distribution Center, where it stores all finished goods. The Distribution Center has approximately 211,000 square feet of floor space.

132

Distribution. Atkins’ logistics provider distributes the finished goods through regional truckloads, which first flow through regional terminals. At the terminals, Atkins’ orders are consolidated with other customer orders. The finished goods are then distributed to retailer distribution centers. The regular weekly shipments and consolidation have diminished Atkins’ costs. Atkins manages over 50% of outgoing volume by writing its own orders to retailer distribution centers and maintaining agreed Finished Goods inventory levels.

Retailers. Atkins has a wide variety of customers across the mass, food, club, drug and e-commerce channels. Besides Walmart Stores, Inc., Atkins’ largest customer representing approximately 41% of sales, no other customer represents more than 10% of sales.

E-Commerce. Atkins aims to ensure that its consumers may access its brand in the way that best suits their lifestyles by offering home delivery of Atkins’ snacking products and meal kits and Chef’d fresh meals. Atkins sells its products on Atkins.com as well as Amazon.com. Atkins’ meal kits are delivered directly to consumers’ homes and are convenient for those who are too busy to cook. Further, Atkins has a licensing agreement with Chef’d, pursuant to which Atkins has licensed its brand name and certain Atkins recipes to Chef’d. Currently utilizing 25 Atkins recipes, Chef’d delivers fresh ingredient recipes to consumers’ homes for fresh home preparation.

Food Safety and Quality. Food safety and quality is a top priority and Atkins dedicates substantial resources to ensure that consumers receive safe, high quality food products. Atkins’ products are manufactured in facilities that have programs and controls in place regarding consistent quality and food safety. Product attributes, such as taste, aroma, texture and appearance are regularly monitored. Good Manufacturing Practices, or GMP, and comprehensive Food Safety programs are designed to produce a safe, wholesome product. Atkins’ suppliers are required to have equally robust processes in place and confirm their compliance with product specifications with Letters of Guaranty and Certificates of Analysis for shipments of core ingredients to be used in Atkins’ products. Finally, random samples of finished goods are sent regularly to a third-party laboratory for testing.

International

Atkins products are sold in 65 countries globally, including the U.S. Atkins top international sales are in Australia/New Zealand, Canada and the United Kingdom. For the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, Atkins’ international net sales represented approximately 7% of Atkins’ total net sales. Atkins’ international supply chain is self-sufficient and run by a lean team solely focused on international operations. Similar to U.S. operations, international operations utilize contract manufacturers for products, and distributors for distributions and sales.

Seasonality

Atkins has experienced in the past, and expects to continue to experience, seasonal fluctuations in its retail sales as a result of consumer and customer spending patterns. Historically, the months of January to May result in the greatest retail sales due to renewed consumer focus on healthy living following New Year’s Day, as well as significant customer merchandising around that time. Atkins believes these consumer spending patterns are driven primarily by the predisposition of consumers to adjust their approach to nutrition at certain times of the year as well as the timing of Atkins’ advertising linked with key customer promotion windows.

Regulation and Compliance

Along with Atkins’ contract manufacturers, brokers, distributors and ingredients and packaging suppliers, Atkins is subject to laws and regulations in the United States by federal, state and local government authorities. In the United States, the federal agencies governing the manufacture, distribution and advertising of Atkins’ products include, among others, the FTC, the FDA, the United States Department of Agriculture, or USDA, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and similar state and local agencies. Under various statutes, these agencies, among other things, prescribe the requirements and establish the standards for quality and safety and regulate marketing and advertising to consumers. Certain of these agencies, in certain circumstances, must not only approve Atkins’ products, but also review the manufacturing processes and facilities used to produce these products before they can be marketed in the United States.

Atkins is subject to labor and employment laws, laws governing advertising, privacy laws, safety regulations and other laws, including consumer protection regulations that regulate retailers or govern the promotion and sale of merchandise. Atkins’ operations, and those of its contract manufacturers, distributors and suppliers, also are subject

133

to various laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and worker health and safety matters. Atkins operations are subject to these laws and regulations and Atkins continues to monitor their development and its compliance.

Employees

As of February, 25, 2017, Atkins had 141 employees. None of Atkins’ U.S. employees are represented by a labor union or are covered by a collective bargaining agreement, and Atkins believes that it has good relations with its employees.

Properties

Atkins’ corporate headquarters is located at 1050 17th Street, Suite 1500 Denver, CO 80265. Atkins leases the property for this corporate office, which occupies approximately 19,000 square feet. In addition, Atkins leases other office space and storage space including in Louisville, Colorado, and offices in foreign countries including the Netherlands and the United Kingdom to support key international operations. Atkins also leases the Distribution Center in Greenfield, Indiana, which has approximately 211,000 square feet of floor space.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, Atkins may be party to various claims and litigation proceedings. Atkins evaluates these claims and litigation proceedings to assess the likelihood of unfavorable outcomes and to estimate, if possible, the amount of potential losses. Based on these assessments and estimates, Atkins establishes reserves, as appropriate. These assessments and estimates are based on the information available to management at the time and involve a significant amount of management judgment. Actual outcomes or losses may differ materially from current assessments and estimates.

Atkins’ History

Dr. Robert Atkins was a cardiologist who discovered that by controlling carbohydrate consumption in his patients, he could improve their health and lower their weight. In 1972, Dr. Robert Atkins published a book, Dr. Atkins’ Diet Revolution, and became famous as a diet doctor. He also founded a company, Atkins Nutritionals, to make food products that were consistent with his approach to nutrition. In the 1980s and 1990s, Atkins was a doctor-founded diet brand. In 2003, Atkins was acquired from its founders by Parthenon and Goldman Sachs Capital Partners. In the early 2000s, in the midst of the low carb diet craze, the Atkins diet was the most popular diet in the U.S., with one in two adults claiming they were using Atkins for weight loss. The strategy pursued by management at that time was to proliferate the brand into numerous categories within the grocery store. Atkins launched over 1,100 SKUs in categories such as bread, macaroni and cheese, ice cream, barbeque sauce, vitamin pills, and supplements — categories well beyond Atkins’ core snacking business. As the low carb diet craze faded, those new products did not sell well and Atkins filed for bankruptcy in 2005. Atkins re-emerged from bankruptcy in 2006, and was subsequently acquired by North Castle Partners in 2007. Atkins repositioned the business based on two strategies: a focus on core, programmatic weight loss consumers, and a focus on healthy snacking. Roark Capital Group acquired Atkins in 2010. Atkins positioned the brand to consumers as a balanced approach to weight loss and upgraded the snacking products to improve taste and expand flavor variety. Supported by increased levels of marketing spending, those strategies resulted in the eight consecutive years of U.S. Multi-Outlet Retail Sales growth. In 2016, Atkins evolved its strategy to continue to target consumers focused on a programmatic approach to weight loss, while adding a new target consumer: self-directed low carbohydrate consumers, who prefer a self-directed, rather than programmatic, approach to nutrition. Over the past year, Atkins has purposefully and thoughtfully broadened its brand, positioning it toward a healthier approach to eating, while focusing on the core snacking business.

Management

The following table sets forth information regarding the executive officers of Atkins. We expect these executive officers will continue to serve as executive officers of the post-combination company following the Business Combination.

134

Name		Age		Position(s)
Joseph E. Scalzo		58		Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
Shaun P. Mara		52		Chief Administrative Officer, Chief Financial Officer
Annita M. Menogan		62		Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
C. Scott Parker		60		Chief Marketing Officer
Robert C. Gandert		50		Chief Customer/Business Development Officer
Hanno E. Holm		45		Vice President and Chief Operations Officer
Timothy A. Matthews		37		Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

Executive Officers

Joseph E. Scalzo has served as the Chief Executive Officer and President of Atkins, and as a member of its board of directors, since February 2013. Before joining Atkins, Mr. Scalzo served as a director of Earthbound Farm from 2010 to October 2013. From November 2005 to February 2011, Mr. Scalzo served as a senior executive in various roles at Dean Foods, including as President and Chief Operating Officer, as well as President and Chief Executive Officer of WhiteWave Foods, Inc. Prior to that, Mr. Scalzo held various executive roles at The Gillette Company and The Coca Cola Company. Mr. Scalzo also served as a director of HNI Corp. from 2003 to November 2009 and since March 2014 has been a director of Focus Brands. Mr. Scalzo began his career at Proctor & Gamble in 1985 and received a Bachelor of Science in Chemical Engineering from the University of Notre Dame.

Shaun P. Mara has served as the Chief Administrative Officer of Atkins since August 2014 overseeing Atkins’ finance, accounting, tax and I/T functions, and he assumed the role of Chief Financial Officer in January 2016, following the departure of the previous Chief Financial Officer, who reported directly to Mr. Mara. Prior to joining Atkins, Mr. Mara served as Chief Financial Officer of Roofing Supply Group LLC from August 2013 to July 2014. From December 2010 to March 2013, Mr. Mara served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Dean Foods Company. Prior to joining Dean Foods, Mr. Mara held various positions at the Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company, Gillette Company, Staples, Inc. and KPMG LLP. Mr. Mara received a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from Bentley University.

Annita M. Menogan has served as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Atkins since October 2015. Prior to joining Atkins, Ms. Menogan was Of Counsel at Fortis Law Partners LLC from July 2014 to October 2015, where she advised publicly-held companies on SEC, regulatory and general corporate matters. From June 2013 to July 2014, Ms. Menogan was self-employed engaged in advising and training executive lawyers on managing in-house legal functions. From January 2006 to June 2013, Ms. Menogan served as Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. Prior to joining Red Robin, Ms. Menogan served as Vice President, Secretary and Deputy General Counsel at Molson Coors Brewing Company from August 1999 to September 2005. Ms. Menogan was in private law practice from 1983 to 1999 in general corporate and securities law practice. Ms. Menogan received a Juris Doctorate from the University of Denver and a Bachelor of Fine Arts from the Academy of Art University in San Francisco, California.

C. Scott Parker has served as Chief Marketing Officer of Atkins since January 2011. Prior to joining Atkins, Mr. Parker served as Vice President of Marketing at Jenny Craig from November 2003 to January 2011. From August 1996 to July 2002, Mr. Parker served as Vice President of Marketing at Bath & Body Works (a Division of Limited Brands). Prior to Bath & Body Works, Mr. Parker held various positions at Consumer Products Innovation, LLC, Bank One, Dial Corp., Procter & Gamble and Frito-Lay. Mr. Parker received a Bachelor of Arts in Economics from Stanford University and an MBA from University of California, Los Angeles.

Robert C. Gandert has served as Chief Business Development and Customer Officer of Atkins since October 2015. Prior to assuming this role, Mr. Gandert served as Senior Vice President of Sales from January 2011 to October 2015 and Vice President of Sales from December 2007 to January 2011. Prior to joining Atkins, Mr. Gandert held various roles at Cytosport, EAS/Abbott Labs and Kraft Foods, Inc. Mr. Gandert received a Bachelor of Business Administration from the Robert O. Anderson School of Management at the University of New Mexico.

Hanno E. Holm has served as Vice President and Chief Operations Officer of Atkins since November 2013. Prior to joining Atkins, Mr. Holm served as Chief Operations Officer of Charterhouse Baking Group from January 2012 to November 2013. From 2008 to 2012, Mr. Holm served as Chief Executive Officer and President of Hero/

135

WhiteWave LLC. Before Hero/WhiteWave LLC, Mr. Holm served as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operations Officer of Hero Group Divisions from 2003 to 2007. Mr. Holm previously worked at PRTM, STM and Brookes and Gatehouse Ltd. Mr. Holm received a Master of Business Administration from Cranfield University in England and a Master in Manufacturing Engineering from the University of Cambridge.

Timothy A. Matthews has served as Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of Atkins since November 2016. Prior to joining Atkins, Mr. Matthews served as Corporate Controller of Gevo, Inc. from June 2014 to November 2016. From May 2011 to June 2014, Mr. Matthews served as Senior Manager of Global Accounting and Consolidations at Molson Coors Brewing Company. Mr. Matthews was manager of Technical Accounting at Intermap Technologies from 2010 to 2011, and practiced with PricewaterhouseCoopers from 2003 to 2010. Mr. Matthews received an MBA from University of Denver and a Bachelor of Business Administration from St. Norbert College and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Atkins Executive Compensation

Introduction

This section provides an overview of Atkins’ executive compensation program, including a narrative description of the material factors necessary to understand the information disclosed in the summary compensation table below. For fiscal 2016, Atkins’ named executive officers are:

•         Joseph Scalzo, who has served as Atkins’ President and Chief Executive Officer since February 11, 2013;

•         Shaun Mara, who has served as Atkins’ Chief Administrative Officer since August 1, 2014 and as Atkins’ Chief Financial Officer since January 1, 2016; and

•         Scott Parker, who has served as Atkins’ Chief Marketing Officer since January 10, 2011.

The objective of Atkins’ compensation program is to provide a total compensation package to each named executive officer that will enable Atkins to attract, motivate and retain outstanding individuals, reward named executive officers for performance and align the financial interests of each named executive officer with the interests of Atkins’ stockholders to encourage each named executive officer to contribute to Atkins’ long-term performance and success.

The compensation program for Atkins’ named executive officers currently consists of the following elements: base salary; performance-based cash incentive awards; equity-based incentive compensation; and severance and change of control benefits. Historically, Atkins’ board of directors has determined the compensation for Atkins’ named executive officers.

Employment Agreements

Atkins has entered into a written employment agreement with Mr. Scalzo, a written severance agreement with Mr. Mara and an employment letter with Mr. Parker. These agreements were negotiated on an arms-length basis and establish the key elements of compensation.

Mr. Scalzo’s Employment Agreement

Atkins entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Scalzo on February 11, 2013. The agreement provides for an initial term of five years, with automatic successive one year extensions after the end of the initial term, unless either party provides a non-renewal notice to the other party at least 90 days before the expiration of the initial term or the renewal term, as applicable. The agreement provides that for so long as Mr. Scalzo is employed by Atkins, he will be a member of Atkins’ board of directors.

The initial annual base salary set forth in the agreement is $600,000, with annual increases in an amount equal to the change in “consumer price index,” as defined in Mr. Scalzo’s employment agreement, for the prior year and such other salary increases as determined by Atkins’ board of directors. Mr. Scalzo’s base salary in the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 was $653,403.84. Mr. Scalzo is eligible for an annual cash incentive award, with the target amount equal to 75% of his base salary and the maximum amount equal to 150% of his base salary, and with the actual amount based upon the Company’s achievement of the annual budget, which is set annually by the board of directors.

136

The agreement provides that Mr. Scalzo is eligible to participate in the employee benefit plans, programs and policies maintained by Atkins from time to time; provided that in lieu of participating in Atkins’ medical, dental and vision benefit plans, he may elect to receive a monthly payment of $1,500. Pursuant to an amendment to Mr. Scalzo’s agreement approved by Atkins’ board of directors on August 12, 2013, Mr. Scalzo is entitled to a car allowance of $750 per month.

The agreement also provides Mr. Scalzo with severance benefits in the event Atkins terminate his employment without “cause” or Mr. Scalzo resigns for “good reason” (as such terms are defined in the agreement), subject to his compliance with the restrictive covenants set forth below and his timely execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims. For more information see “— Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

Pursuant to his agreement, Mr. Scalzo is subject to an employment term and 15-month post-employment non-compete covenant, an employment term and 24-month post-employment non-solicitation covenant and perpetual confidentiality and non-disparagement covenants.

Mr. Mara’s Severance Agreement

Atkins entered into a severance agreement with Mr. Mara on August 4, 2014. Mr. Mara’s employment is “at will,” and his severance agreement does not include a specific term. The initial annual base salary set forth in the agreement is $400,000. For the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, Mr. Mara’s salary was $450,000. Mr. Mara is eligible for an annual cash incentive award, with the target amount equal to 65% of his base salary and the actual amount based upon the achievement of performance goals established by Atkins’ board of directors from time to time.

Mr. Mara is eligible to participate in the employee benefit plans, programs and policies maintained by Atkins from time to time, and he is entitled to a car allowance of $750 per month. Mr. Mara also receives reimbursement of his commuting expenses incurred in connection with travel to Atkins’ corporate offices in Denver, Colorado.

The agreement also provides Mr. Mara with severance benefits in the event Atkins terminates his employment without “cause” or he resigns for “good reason” (as such terms are defined in the agreement), subject to his compliance with the restrictive covenants set forth below and his timely execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims. For more information see “— Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

Pursuant to his agreement, Mr. Mara is subject to an employment term and 12-month post-employment non-compete covenant, an employment term and 24-month post-employment non-solicitation covenant and perpetual confidentiality and non-disparagement covenants.

Mr. Parker’s Employment Letter

Atkins entered into an employment letter with Mr. Parker on December 22, 2010. Mr. Parker’s employment is “at will,” and his employment letter does not include a specific term. The initial base salary set forth in the agreement is $345,000. For the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, Mr. Parker’s salary was $421,182.72. Mr. Parker is eligible for an annual cash incentive award, with a target amount equal to 50% of his base salary and the actual amount based upon the achievement of performance goals established by Atkins’ board of directors from time to time. The agreement provides that Mr. Parker is eligible to participate in the employee benefit plans, programs and policies maintained by Atkins from time to time and for reimbursement of commuting expenses incurred in connection with travel to Atkins’ corporate offices in Denver, Colorado.

The agreement also provides Mr. Parker with severance benefits in the event Atkins terminates his employment without “cause” (which is undefined in the letter), subject to his timely execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims. For more information see “— Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

Base Salary

Atkins pays base salaries to attract, recruit and retain qualified employees. The base salaries for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 for Atkins’ named executive officers were determined by Atkins’ board of directors, which takes into account the initial base amount set forth in the executive’s employment agreement, severance agreement or employment letter, as applicable, and the scope of the executive’s responsibilities, individual

137

contributions, prior experience and sustained performance. The executives’ respective base salaries for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 are set forth in the table below.

Named Executive Officer		52-week period ended August 27, 2016 Base Salary
Mr. Scalzo		$	653,404
Mr. Mara		$	450,000
Mr. Parker		$	421,183

Performance-Based Cash Incentive Compensation

Atkins’ named executive officers are eligible to participate in its annual performance-based cash incentive plan. The annual percentage bonus targets for each named executive officer are set forth in his employment agreement, severance agreement or employment letter, as applicable.

All of the named executive officers participated in the annual performance-based cash incentive plan for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 (the “2016 Incentive Plan”). The 2016 Incentive Plan applicable to the named executive officers was based upon achievement of financial objectives of which 50% was tied to sales growth targets and 50% was tied to EBITDA, each as defined in the 2016 Incentive Plan. The sales growth target and the EBITDA target were 3% and $69.0 million, respectively, and actual sales growth and EBITDA achieved were 4% and $70.1 million, respectively. Based on Atkins’ overall achievement of the performance goals, Atkins’ named executive officers each earned 112.5% of his target performance based goal. Each named executive officer’s target incentive (expressed as a percentage of base salary and as a dollar amount), maximum incentive (if applicable), performance factors and weightings, level of achievement of the performance factors for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 and 2016 award amounts are set forth in the table below.

Name		Base Salary ($)		Target Incentive (as Percentage of Base Salary) (%)		Target Incentive ($)		Maximum Incentive ($)		Performance Factors and Weightings		Achievement (%)		2016 Award ($)
J. Scalzo		653,404		75		490,053		980,106		Sales Growth Targets, 50% EBITDA Targets, 50%		112.5		551,309
S. Mara		450,000		65		292,500		—		Sales Growth Targets, 50% EBITDA Targets, 50%		112.5		392,063
S. Parker		421,183		50		210,592		—		Sales Growth Targets, 50% EBITDA Targets, 50%		112.5		236,915

Equity Incentive Compensation

Atkins provides equity-based incentive compensation to its named executive officers because it links Atkins’ long-term results achieved for Atkins’ stockholders and the rewards provided to named executive officers, thereby ensuring that such named executive officers have a continuing stake in Atkins’ long-term success. Historically, Atkins has granted equity incentive awards to Atkins’ named executive officers in conjunction with the applicable named executive officer’s initial hire and Atkins typically does not grant additional equity incentive awards annually. Atkins’ named executive officers have been granted stock options under the NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. 2010 Stock Option Plan (the “2010 Option Plan”).

On February 2, 2016, Atkins granted each of Messrs. Scalzo, Mara and Parker options to purchase 2,734 shares of Atkins’ common stock pursuant to the 2010 Option Plan. The February 2, 2016 grants under the 2010 Option Plan vest on the earlier to occur of (1) a change of control (as defined in the applicable award agreement) and (2) December 31, 2018, in each case, subject to the executive’s continued employment with the Company through the applicable vesting date. In the case of a change of control, the number of options that will

138

vest is based on the number of months elapsed from January 1, 2016 to the date of the change of control, divided by 36. In addition, the option awards will vest in full if, at the time of the change of control, the board determines that Atkins is on track to achieve the budget that the board approved for the fiscal year in which the change of control occurs, subject to the executive’s continued employment through the effective date of the change of control. Also in the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, Atkins amended the vesting schedule of the unvested option awards held by Messrs. Scalzo and Mara to be consistent with the vesting scheduling of their options granted on February 2, 2016. In connection with the Business Combination and pursuant to the Merger Agreement, if the option holder elects to exercise such option holder’s outstanding vested options, the option holder will receive shares of our common stock with respect to any vested options so exercised immediately prior to the effective time of the Business Combination, and any vested options that are not so exercised, together with any options that are unvested, will be cancelled as of the effective time of the Business Combination.

Benefits and Perquisites

Atkins offer health and welfare benefits and life insurance to its named executive officers on the same basis that these benefits are offered to its other eligible employees. Atkins also offers a 401(k) plan to its eligible employees. Atkins’ named executive officers participate in its 401(k) on the same basis as its other eligible employees.

Atkins provides limited perquisites to our named executive officers, including a monthly car allowance of $750. For additional information, see “— Summary Compensation Table.”

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information regarding compensation earned by Atkins’ named executive officers during fiscal 2016.

Name and Principal Position		Year		Salary ($)		Bonus ($)(1)		Option Awards ($)(2)		All Other Compensation ($)(3)		Total ($)
Joseph Scalzo President and Chief Executive Officer		2016		653,404		551,309		715,761		21,262		1,941,736
Shaun Mara Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer		2016		450,000		392,063		715,761		131,851		1,689,675
Scott Parker Chief Marketing Officer		2016		421,183		236,915		715,761		149,360		1,523,219

____________

(1)      Represents amounts earned by the named executive officers under the 2016 Incentive Plan for fiscal 2016. See “— Atkins Executive Compensation — Performance-Based Cash Incentive Compensation.”

(2)      Aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, for grants in fiscal 2016. Information about the assumptions used to value these awards can be found in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included in this proxy statement/prospectus. See “— Atkins Executive Compensation — Equity Incentive Compensation” for more information about the awards granted in 52-Week Period Ended August 27, 2016.

(3)      Amounts in this column are detailed in the table below:

Name		401(k) Match ($)		Insurance ($)(a)		Car Allowance ($)		Commuting ($)(b)		Life Insurance ($)		Total All Other Compensation ($)
Joseph Scalzo		7,950		4,006		9,000		—		306		21,262
Shaun Mara		7,950		3,122		9,000		111,269		510		131,851
Scott Parker		7,950		4,547		9,000		127,557		306		149,360

____________

(a)      Consists of supplemental individual disability insurance premiums paid by Atkins.

(b)      Consists of reimbursement for commuting expenses, including tax gross-ups.

139

Outstanding Equity Awards at the end of the 52-Week Period Ended August 27, 2016

The following table sets forth information with respect to outstanding option awards for each of the named executive officers as of August 27, 2016. In connection with the Business Combination and pursuant to the Merger Agreement, if the option holder elects to exercise such option holder’s outstanding vested options, the option holder will receive shares of our common stock with respect to any vested options so exercised immediately prior to the effective time of the Business Combination, and any vested options that are not so exercised, together with any options that are unvested, will be cancelled as of the effective time of the Business Combination. See “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — The Merger Agreement — Merger Consideration.” We have not granted any stock awards to the named executive officers.

		Option Awards
Name		Grant Date		Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) exercisable		Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) unexercisable			Option exercise price ($)		Option expiration date
Joseph Scalzo		2/2/16		—		2,734	(a)		837.15		2/2/26
		2/11/13		3,257		9,771	(b)		514.83		2/11/26
Shaun Mara		2/2/16		—		2,734	(a)		837.15		2/2/26
		8/25/14		315		2,837	(b)		869.46		8/25/24
Scott Parker		2/2/16		—		2,734	(a)		837.15		2/2/26
		1/10/11		2,247		450	(c)		154.58		1/10/21

____________

(a)      Awards vest on the earlier to occur of (1) a change of control (as defined in the award agreement) and (2) December 31, 2018, in each case, subject to the executive’s continued employment with the Company through the applicable vesting date. In the case of a change of control, the number of options that will vest is based on the number of months elapsed from January 1, 2016 to the date of the change of control, divided by 36. In addition, the awards will vest in full if, at the time of a change of control, the board determines that the Company is on track to achieve the budget that the board approved for the fiscal year in which the change of control occurs, subject to the executive’s continued employment through the effective date of the change of control.

(b)      In fiscal 2016, the vesting schedule of the unexercisable awards was amended to provide that awards will vest on the earlier to occur of (1) a change of control (as defined in the award agreement) and (2) December 31, 2018, in each case, subject to the executive’s continued employment with the Company through the applicable vesting date. In the case of a change of control, the number of options that will vest is based on the number of months elapsed from January 1, 2016 on the date of the change of control, divided by 36. In addition, the awards will vest in full, if upon a change of control, the board determines that the Company is on track to achieve the budget that the board approved for the fiscal year in which the change of control occurs, subject to the executive’s continued employment through the effective date of the change of control.

(c)      Awards will vest in full upon a change of control (as defined in the award agreement) if Atkins Holdings LLC achieves a return on its investment in the Company in connection with the change of control of at least 3 times its aggregate invested capital in the Company, subject to Mr. Parker’s continued employment with the Company.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control

The employment arrangements with each of Atkins’ named executive officers provide for the payment of severance benefits upon certain termination of employment.

Severance Benefits Under the Employment Arrangements

Atkins has agreed to pay severance benefits in the event it terminates an executive’s employment without “cause” or an executive resigns for “good reason” (in each case, as defined in the applicable agreement). Atkins also provides severance benefits in the case of an executive’s termination of employment due to death or disability.

140

Mr. Scalzo

Mr. Scalzo’s employment agreement provides for severance benefits if Atkins terminates his employment without “cause” (as defined in the agreement) or if he resigns for “good reason” (as defined in the agreement). In the event of such termination or resignation, Mr. Scalzo is entitled to: (1) if Atkins is on target to meet at least 100% of its annual budget for the year in which the termination occurs, a pro-rated portion of his annual performance-based cash incentive award, paid on the same date that awards for such year are paid to other executives of Atkins, (2) the continuation of his base salary for 15 months following the termination of his employment, and (3) to the extent Mr. Scalzo achieved at least 100% of his target bonus for the year immediately preceding his termination year and, at the time of his termination, the company is on target to meet at least 100% of its annual budget for the year in which his termination occurs, an amount equal to his target bonus for the year in which his employment is terminated, subject, in each case, to his compliance with the restrictive covenants in the agreement (as described above) and his timely execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims.

If Mr. Scalzo is terminated as a result of a “permanent disability” (as defined in the agreement), he is entitled to: (1) a prorated portion of the annual performance-based cash incentive award earned for the year of termination (if any) calculated at the end of such year and paid on the same date that awards for such year are paid to other executives of the company; (2) any other amounts earned, accrued or owing but not yet paid; and (3) continued participation in employee welfare benefit plans which, by their terms, permit a former employee to participate. In the event of a termination due to his death, his estate is entitled to the payments set forth in (1) and (2) above, as well as any other benefits to which he would be entitled in accordance with the terms of the applicable plans and programs of the company.

If a “change of control” of the company (as defined in the 2010 Option Plan, discussed below) occurs, neither the company, nor its affiliates, nor any acquirer will have any obligation to make severance payments in connection with such change of control, unless Mr. Scalzo’s employment is terminated by the company without “cause” or he resigns for “good reason” (each as defined in the agreement) following such change of control.

Upon any termination of Mr. Scalzo’s employment, including a termination for “cause” or resignation other than for “good reason,” he is entitled to: (1) his base salary actually earned up to the date of termination and (2) any earned cash incentive award from the previous year not yet paid.

Mr. Mara

Mr. Mara’s severance agreement provides for severance benefits if the company terminates his employment without “cause” (as defined in the agreement) or if he resigns for “good reason” (as defined in the agreement). In the event of such termination or resignation, he is entitled to the continuation of his base salary for 12 months following his termination, subject to his compliance with the restrictive covenants in the agreement (as described above) and his timely execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims.

If Mr. Mara is terminated as a result of a “permanent disability” (as defined in the agreement), he is entitled to: (1) a prorated portion of the annual performance-based cash incentive award earned for the year of termination (if any) calculated at the end of such year and paid on the same date that awards for such year are paid to other executives of the company; (2) any other amounts earned, accrued or owing but not yet paid; and (3) continued participation in employee welfare benefit plans which, by their terms, permit a former employee to participate. In the event of a termination due to his death, his estate is entitled to the payments set forth in clauses (1) and (2) above, as well as any other benefits to which he would be entitled in accordance with the terms of the applicable plans and programs of the company.

If a “change of control” of the company occurs (which is undefined in the agreement), neither the company, nor its affiliates, nor any acquirer will have any obligation to make severance payments in connection with such change of control, unless Mr. Mara’s employment is terminated by the company without “cause” or he resigns for “good reason” (each as defined in the agreement) in connection with such change of control.

Upon any termination of Mr. Mara’s employment, including a termination for “cause” or resignation other than for “good reason,” he is entitled to: (1) his base salary actually earned up to the date of termination and (2) any earned cash incentive award from the previous year not yet paid.

141

Mr. Parker

Mr. Parker’s employment letter provides for severance benefits if Mr. Parker’s employment is terminated without “cause” (which is undefined in the letter). In such instance, Mr. Parker is entitled to continue receiving his base salary for 12 months following his termination, subject to his timely execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims.

Change of Control Benefits

Mr. Mara

Pursuant to Mr. Mara’s amended and restated option grant, dated February 2, 2016, upon a “change of control” (as defined in the option grant) that occurs prior to December 31, 2018, Mr. Mara is entitled to an “exit bonus” (as defined in the option grant) equal to the excess, if any, of $2 million over (i) the gross, pre-tax proceeds he receives with respect to his options (net of the exercise price for such options) and shares acquired through previously exercised options, in each case, in the change of control transaction, plus (ii) any other change of control bonuses or similar payments he receives that are contingent upon the change of control transaction. Mr. Mara’s entitlement to the exit bonus is subject to his continued employment with the company through the closing of the change of control transaction.

Mr. Parker

In 2013, Atkins entered into change in control bonus award agreements with Mr. Parker that provide for cash bonus payments payable upon a “change in control” (as defined in the agreement). The cash bonus payment payable under each agreement is determined by multiplying Mr. Parker’s “covered securities” (as defined in the respective agreements) by an amount designated in each agreement, and his entitlement to the cash bonus is subject to his compliance with the non-disclosure of trade secrets, confidentiality, and non-disparagement obligations and his timely execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims. The maximum potential payments to Mr. Parker under these agreements is approximately $915,000 in the aggregate.

2010 Stock Option Plan

In 2010, Atkins adopted the 2010 Option Plan in order to provide a means to attract, retain and motivate Atkins’ directors, employees and consultants upon whose judgment, initiative and efforts Atkins’ continued success, growth and development are dependent. The 2010 Option Plan provides that each award will expire no later than the tenth anniversary of the grant. Vesting of the options granted under the 2010 Option Plan is determined in accordance with the provisions of the applicable option certificate. The specific provisions of option certificates issued pursuant to the 2010 Option Plan, including those concerning vesting of options, may vary. In order to exercise any portion of the options, the holder must be an active director, employee or consultant at the time of exercise of the option, unless otherwise provided in the applicable option certificate. If the termination of a director, employee or consultant’s status as an active employee is due to his or her death, the person or persons to whom any portion of the options are transferred by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, as applicable, thereafter will be treated as the holder of the option. In no event will an employee be entitled to exercise the option after its original expiration date. All options, whether or not vested, will be forfeited if an employee’s employment is terminated for “cause” (as defined in the 2010 Option Plan), unless otherwise provided in the applicable option certificate.

In connection with the Business Combination, all outstanding vested and unvested options will be exercised or cancelled pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement. See “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — The Merger Agreement — Merger Consideration.” No additional awards will be made under the 2010 Option Plan.

142

Director Compensation

The table below sets forth information concerning the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 compensation of Atkins’ non-employee directors that served during any part of the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016. In addition to the amounts shown below, Atkins also reimbursed all directors for travel expenses and other out-of-pocket costs incurred in connection with their attendance at meetings.

Name		Fees earned or paid in cash ($)		Stock/option awards ($)		All other compensation ($)		Total ($)
Ezra Field		—		—		—		—
Richard Laube		100,000		—		—		100,000
David Lee		—		—		—		—
Steve Heyer		50,000		—		—		50,000
Steve Powell		50,000		—		—		50,000
Tom McNeely		50,000		—		—		50,000
Michael Thompson		—		—		—		—
Patti Larchet		100,000		—		—		100,000

143

SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF ATKINS

The following table sets forth selected historical financial information derived from Atkins’ (i) unaudited financial statements included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 and February 27, 2016 and (ii) audited financial statements for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, and the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014, December 28, 2013, and (iii) unaudited financial statements for the 52-week period ended December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011. You should read the following selected financial information in conjunction with the section entitled “Atkins’ Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Atkins’ financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus.

		26-week period ended								52-week period ended				35-week period ended				52-week period ended
(in thousands)		February 25, 2017				February 27, 2016				August 27, 2016				August 29, 2015				December 27, 2014				December 28, 2013				December 29, 2012				December 31, 2011
Operating data:
Net Sales		$	202,111			$	219,777			$	427,858			$	252,898			$	429,858			$	393,929			$	311,153			$	247,744
Cost of goods sold			106,826				126,489				248,464				151,978				249,832				221,120				161,739				128,013
Gross profit			95,285				93,288				179,394				100,920				180,026				172,809				149,414				119,731
Operating expenses:
Distribution			9,329				9,075				18,489				11,429				19,481				19,544				16,575				13,812
Selling			8,271				9,369				18,513				14,632				22,282				23,211				15,851				14,104
Marketing			19,236				19,464				37,751				30,515				33,548				31,951				28,122				21,231
General and administrative			21,699				21,865				46,961				29,028				41,000				40,008				35,156				28,847
Depreciation and amortization			4,927				5,247				10,179				7,267				11,195				11,304				11,166				10,356
Other expense			58				425				1,542				65				146				603				1,094				—
Total operating expenses			63,520				65,445				133,435				92,936				127,652				126,621				107,964				88,350
Income from operations			31,765				27,843				45,959				7,984				52,374				46,188				41,450				31,381
Other income (expense):
Change in warrant liabilities			(397	)			—				(722	)			1,689				143				(3,173	)			(8,392	)			(2,846	)
Interest expense			(13,629	)			(13,733	)			(27,195	)			(18,331	)			(27,823	)			(35,402	)			(21,573	)			(19,207	)
Loss on foreign currency transactions			(718	)			(401	)			(619	)			(1,045	)			(1,211	)			1,198				(534	)			(88	)
Other expense			199				116				118				55				96				297				171				454
Total other expense			(14,545	)			(14,018	)			(28,418	)			(17,632	)			(28,795	)			(37,080	)			(30,328	)			(21,687	)
(Loss) income before (benefit from) provision for income taxes			17,220				13,825				17,541				(9,648	)			23,579				9,108				11,122				9,694
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes			6,970				5,726				7,507				(4,334	)			9,623				5,859				14,234				5,680
Net (loss) income		$	10,250			$	8,099			$	10,034			$	(5,314	)		$	13,956			$	3,249			$	(3,112	)		$	4,014
(in thousands)
Balance sheet data (at end of period):
Total assets		$	396,238			$	382,363			$	389,512			$	366,953			$	385,215			$	367,033			$	337,917			$	325,116
Long term debt, less current maturities			330,437				331,786				321,638				331,565				330,758				330,234				252,197				200,372
Warrant liabilities			16,119				15,000				15,722				15,000				16,689				16,832				17,158				11,601
NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ stockholders’ equity (deficit)			(15,996	)			(32,047	)			(27,834	)			(41,322	)			(36,217	)			(53,911	)			11,570				69,049

144

ATKINS’ MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of Atkins’ audited and unaudited financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information presented in “Selected Historical Financial Information of Atkins” and Atkins’ consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus. In addition to historical information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements, such as statements regarding Atkins’ expectation for future performance, liquidity and capital resources, that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from Atkins expectations. Atkins’ actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause such differences include those identified below and those described in “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” “Risk Factors” and “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information.” Atkins assumes no obligation to update any of these forward-looking statements.

Effective August 29, 2015, Atkins changed its fiscal year end from the last Saturday in December to the last Saturday in August. Atkins’ fiscal year 2016 ended August 27, 2016, and was a 52-week period. Atkins fiscal period 2015 ended August 29, 2015, and was a 35-week period. Fiscal years 2014 and 2013 were each 52-week periods, and ended December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013, respectively. Atkins’ fiscal quarters are comprised of 13 weeks each, except for 53-week fiscal periods for the which the fourth quarter will be comprised of 14 weeks, and end on the 13th Saturday of each quarter (14th Saturday of the fourth quarter, when applicable). Fiscal year 2017 will be a 52-week period and will end August 26, 2017. Atkins’ fiscal quarters for fiscal 2017 will end on November 26, 2016, February 25, 2017, May 27, 2017 and August 26, 2017.

The information for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 and the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013 are derived from Atkins’ audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus. The information for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 and February 27, 2016 are derived from the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus. The information for the 53-week period ended August 29, 2015 and the 35-week period ended August 30, 2014 are derived from unaudited consolidated financial statements, which are not included in this proxy statement/prospectus. Because the 53-week period ended August 29, 2015 included an additional week of operation, Atkins’ net sales, expenses and other results of operations may be higher for that period.

Any reference to “Atkins” refers to NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Overview

Atkins is a developer, marketer and seller of branded nutritional foods and snacking products. Its highly-focused product portfolio consists primarily of nutrition bars, RTD shakes, snacks and confectionery products marketed under the Atkins®, SimplyProtein®, Atkins Harvest Trail, Atkins Endulge® and Atkins Lift brand names. Over the past 45 years, Atkins has become an iconic American brand that for many consumers stands for “low carb,” “low sugar” and “protein rich” nutrition. In its core snacking business, Atkins strives to offer a complete line of nutrition bars, RTD shakes and confections that satisfy hunger while providing consumers with a convenient, “better-for-you” snacking alternative. In addition to snacking products, Atkins has entered into a license arrangement for frozen meals sold in the U.S. by Bellisio Foods, Inc.

Atkins is a leading brand in nutritional snacking with a broad and growing consumer base. Atkins sales, marketing and R&D capabilities enable it to distribute products into a national customer base across the mass merchandiser, grocery and drug channels. Atkins believes that its broad brand recognition, depth of management talent and strong cash generation position it to continue to innovate in the Atkins brand and acquire other brands, and thereby become an industry leading snacking platform. To that end, in December 2016, Atkins completed the acquisition of Wellness Foods, Inc., a Canada-based developer, marketer and seller of the SimplyProtein® brand that is focused on protein-rich and low-sugar products, which Atkins’ management believes has significant opportunity for expansion in the U.S.

145

Matters Affecting Comparability

Atkins results of operations for the periods presented in this section were affected by the following:

Change in Fiscal Year

Effective August 29, 2015, Atkins changed its fiscal year end from the last Saturday in December to the last Saturday in August. The intent of the change was to better align the reporting of Atkins’ financial results with the consumer spending patterns on its business and the seasonality of the business. This change has also allowed Atkins to better synchronize its management processes and business cycles with its consumers.

Licensing of the Frozen Meals

On September 1, 2016, the agreement with Bellisio Foods to license Atkins’ frozen meals resulting in royalty income became effective. This income will be reported within net sales for the period beginning with the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 whereas the frozen sales and related profitability was included in net sales through operating income in all prior periods. For a further discussion of this agreement, see Note 16 — Subsequent Events to Atkins consolidated financial statements.

Atkins’ Reportable Segment

Atkins’ business is organized around one reportable segment based on its go-to-market strategies, the objectives of the business and how Atkins’ chief decision maker, its CEO, monitors operating performance and allocates resources.

Key Performance Indicators

In assessing the performance of its business, Atkins considers a number of key performance indicators used by management and typically used by its competitors, including the non-GAAP measures of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. Because not all companies use identical calculations, this presentation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.

Adjusted EBITDA. Atkins defines Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) before interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization with further adjustments to exclude the following items: stock-based compensation and warrant expense, transaction costs and IPO readiness, restructuring costs, management fees, transactional exchange impact and other one-time expenses. Atkins believes that the inclusion of these supplementary adjustments in presenting Adjusted EBITDA are appropriate to provide additional information to investors and reflects more accurately operating results of the on-going operations. Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to differences in calculation.

The table below provides a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA (Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization) to its most directly comparable GAAP measure, which is net income (loss), for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 (unaudited) and February 27, 2016 (unaudited), the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 (audited), the 53-week period ended August 29, 2015 (unaudited), the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 (audited) and August 30, 2014 (unaudited), and the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 (audited) and December 28, 2013 (audited). For a further discussion of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA and why we consider them useful, see footnotes 1 and 2 to “Summary Historical Financial Information of Atkins.”

146

		26-Week Period Ended						52/53-Week Period Ended						35-Week Period Ended								52-Week Period Ended
(in thousands)		February 25, 2017			February 27, 2016			August 27, 2016			August 29, 2015			August 29, 2015				August 30, 2014				December 27, 2014			December 28, 2013
Net income (loss)		$	10,250		$	8,099		$	10,034		$	9,076		$	(5,314	)		$	(4,503	)		$	13,956		$	3,249
Interest expense			13,629			13,733			27,195			27,760			18,331				18,408				27,823			35,402
Income tax expense (benefit)			6,970			5,726			7,507			6,205			(4,334	)			(2,554	)			9,623			5,859
Depreciation and amortization			4,927			5,247			10,179			10,967			7,267				7,495				11,195			11,304
EBITDA		$	35,776		$	32,805		$	54,915		$	54,008		$	15,950			$	18,846			$	62,597		$	55,814
Stock Based Comp/Warrants		$	1,460		$	1,052		$	2,826		$	1,029		$	(1,464	)		$	1,826			$	1,285		$	4,684
Transaction Fees/IPO Readiness			556			275			470			556			483				1,394				1,466			—
Restructuring Costs			57			424			1,542			197			65				15				146			603
Management Fees			981			638			1,670			1,647			854				781				1,574			1,421
Recall Receivable Reserve			—			—			1,922			—			—				—				—			—
Refinancing Closing Costs			—			—			—			—			—				—				—			2,668
Frozen Licensing Media			335			—			—			—			—				—				—			—
One-time legal costs			455			—			—			—			—				—				—			—
Other(1)			740			428			896			1,939			1,073				235				1,268			(1,172	)
Adjusted EBITDA		$	40,360		$	35,622		$	64,241		$	59,376		$	16,961			$	23,097			$	68,336		$	64,018

____________

(1)      Other items consist principally of exchange impact of foreign currency transactions as well as minor impacts of channel inventory returns.

Key Financial Definitions

Net sales. Net sales consists primarily of product sales to Atkins’ customers less cost of promotional activities, slotting fees and other sales credits and adjustments, including product returns. However, beginning in the first quarter of the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 in connection with the licensing of Atkins’ frozen business noted above, Atkins now includes licensing revenue from the frozen meals business in net sales.

Cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold consists primarily of the costs Atkins pays to its contract manufacturing partners to produce the products sold. These costs include the purchase of raw ingredients, packaging and a tolling charge for the contract manufacturer. Cost of products sold includes products provided at no charge as part of promotions and the non-food materials provided with customer orders.

Gross profit. Gross profit is net sales less cost of goods sold.

Operating expenses. Operating expenses consist primarily of selling, marketing and distribution expenses, general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization and other expenses. The following is a brief description of the components of Atkins’ operating expenses:

•         Selling, marketing and distribution. Selling and marketing expenses are comprised of advertising and marketing costs as well as broker commissions. Distribution is principally freight associated with shipping and handling of products from Atkins’ distribution center to the customer.

•         General and administrative. General and administrative expenses are comprised of expenses associated with corporate and administrative functions that support Atkins’ business, including fees for employee salaries, professional services, insurance and other general corporate expenses. We expect our general and administrative fees to increase as we incur additional legal, accounting, insurance and other expenses associated with being a public company.

•         Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization costs consist of costs associated with the depreciation of fixed assets and capitalized leasehold improvements and amortization of intangible assets.

•         Other expense. Other expense is principally one-time costs of restructuring consisting of severance and related expenses.

Income from operations. Operating income (loss) reflects gross profit less operating expenses.

147

Other income (expense). Other income (expense) consists of non-frozen meals licensing revenue and other amounts, change in warrant liabilities, interest expense and loss on foreign currency transactions.

Income tax expense (benefit). Income tax expense (benefit) includes current and deferred federal tax expenses, as well as state and local income taxes. See “— Critical Accounting Policies — Income taxes.”

Net income (loss). Net income (loss) consists of income from operations less income tax expense plus income tax (benefit).

Comparison of Results for the 26-Week Period Ended February 25, 2017 and February 27, 2016

The following table sets forth information comparing the components of net income for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 and February 27, 2016.

		26-Week Period Ended							26-Week Period Ended
		February 25, 2017							February 27, 2016
		(unaudited)							(unaudited)
(in thousands)						% of sales							% of sales
Net sales		$	202,111			100.0	%		$	219,777			100.0	%
Cost of goods sold			106,826			52.8	%			126,489			57.6	%
Gross profit		$	95,285			47.2	%		$	93,288			42.4	%
Operating expenses:
Selling, marketing and distribution		$	36,836			18.2	%		$	37,908			17.2	%
General and administrative			21,699			10.7	%			21,865			9.9	%
Depreciation and amortization			4,927			2.4	%			5,247			2.4	%
Other expense			58			0.0	%			425			0.2	%
Total operating expenses		$	63,520			31.4	%		$	65,445			29.8	%
Income from operations			31,765			15.7	%			27,843			12.7	%
Other income (expense):
Interest expense			(13,629	)		(6.7	)%			(13,733	)		(6.2	)%
Other expense			(916	)		(0.5	)%			(285	)		(0.1	)%
Income before income taxes			17,220			8.5	%			13,825			6.3	%
Taxes			6,970			3.4	%			5,726			2.6	%
Net income		$	10,250			5.1	%		$	8,099			3.7	%
Other financial data:
Adjusted EBITDA		$	40,360			20.0	%		$	35,622			16.2	%

Net sales. Net sales decreased $17.7 million, or 8%, for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 (unaudited) compared to the 26-week period ended February 27, 2016 (unaudited). The net sales change is impacted by a few items that affect comparability as Atkins began licensing its frozen meals as of September 1, 2016 and acquired Wellness Foods in December 2016. With the licensing of Atkins’ frozen meals, net sales decreased approximately $28.9 million with net sales in the 26-week period ended February 27, 2016 of $31.0 million replaced by the licensing revenue of approximately $2.1 million in the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017. Additionally, net sales increased $1.1 million in the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 from the Wellness Foods acquisition in December 2016. The combination of these two changes resulted in a decrease in net sales of $27.8 million for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 (unaudited) compared to the 26-week period ended February 27, 2016 (unaudited). Excluding this, net sales actually increased $10.1 million, or 5%, due to increases in Atkins’ snacking business. The $10.1 million increase in net sales on snacking products was primarily due to a volume increase of $11.2 million driven by an increase in consumer demand, partially offset by negative pricing and mix changes of $1.0 million.

148

Cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold decreased $19.7 million, or 16%, for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 (unaudited) compared to the 26-week period ended February 27, 2016 (unaudited). The decrease in cost of goods sold was principally due to the licensing of Atkins’ frozen meals and the elimination of approximately $24 million of cost of goods sold related to this in Atkins’ results in the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in cost of goods sold due to the increase in net sales from its snacking business totaling approximately $4 million and the acquisition of Wellness Foods to the portfolio, which added $0.6 million in cost of goods sold.

Gross profit. Gross profit increased $2.0 million, or 2%, for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 (unaudited) compared to the 26-week period ended February 27, 2016 (unaudited). The increase in gross profit was driven by increased sales of snacking products (approximately $5 million), the addition of Wellness Foods ($0.5 million), increased cost savings as well as positive product mix ($1.7 million) partially offset by net impact of approximately $5 million for the elimination of lower frozen meals gross profit partially offset by the unmatched licensing revenue from frozen meals licensing.

Operating expenses. Operating expenses decreased $1.9 million, or 3%, for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 (unaudited) compared to the 26-week period ended February 27, 2016 (unaudited) due to the following:

•         Selling, marketing and distribution. Selling, marketing and distribution expenses decreased $1.1 million, or 3%, for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 (unaudited) compared to the 26-week period ended February 27, 2016 (unaudited). The decrease in selling, marketing and distribution expenses was driven primarily by the elimination of expenses from Atkins’ frozen meals of approximately $3 million partially offset by costs growing proportionally with the increased net sales on the snacking business of approximately $2 million.

•         General and administrative. General and administrative expenses decreased $0.2 million for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 (unaudited) compared to the 26-week period ended February 27, 2016 (unaudited). The decrease in general and administrative expenses was driven primarily by the elimination of expenses from Atkins’ frozen meals of $1.3 million, partially offset by some one-time expenses related to transaction fees and a legal case totaling $0.8 million.

•         Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $0.3 million for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 (unaudited) compared to the 26-week period ended February 27, 2016 (unaudited). The decrease in depreciation and amortization expenses was driven primarily by the decrease in amortization of intangible assets.

•         Other expense. Other expenses decreased $0.4 million for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 (unaudited) compared to the 26-week period ended February 27, 2016 (unaudited). The decrease in other expenses was driven primarily by a restructuring charge in the 26-week period ended February 27, 2016 that was unmatched in the current period.

Interest expense. Interest expense decreased $0.1 million for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 (unaudited) compared to the 26-week period ended February 27, 2016 (unaudited).

Other income (expense). Other expense increased $0.7 million for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 (unaudited) compared to the 26-week period ended February 27, 2016 (unaudited) due to an increase in warrant liabilities of $0.4 million and an increase in currency transaction expense of $0.3 million.

Income tax expense (benefit). Income tax expense increased $1.2 million, or 22%, from the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 (unaudited) compared to the 26-week period ended February 27, 2016 (unaudited). The increase in the income tax expense was primarily driven by the increase in pretax income.

Net income. Net income increased $2.2 million, or 27%, for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 (unaudited) compared to the 26-week period ended February 27, 2016 (unaudited). The increase in net income was driven primarily by improved income from operations due to improved gross profit and lower operating expenses largely due to the elimination of expenses from Atkins frozen meals partially offset by increased income taxes.

149

Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA increased $4.7 million, or 13%, for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 (unaudited) compared to the 26-week period ended February 27, 2016 (unaudited). The increase in Adjusted EBITDA was driven primarily by improved income from operations due to improved gross profit and lower operating expenses largely due to the elimination of expenses from Atkins frozen meals. For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to its most directly comparable GAAP measure, see “— Key Performance Indicators — Adjusted EBITDA.”

Comparison of Results for the 52-Week Period Ended August 27, 2016 and the 53-Week Period Ended August 29, 2015

The following table sets forth information comparing the components of net income for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 and the 53-week period ended August 29, 2015.

		52-Week Period Ended							53-Week Period Ended
		August 27, 2016							August 29, 2015
		(audited)							(unaudited)
(in thousands)						% of sales							% of sales
Net sales		$	427,858			100.0	%		$	419,128			100.0	%
Cost of goods sold			248,464			58.1	%			246,059			58.7	%
Gross profit		$	179,394			41.9	%		$	173,069			41.3	%
Operating expenses:
Selling, marketing and distribution		$	74,753			17.5	%		$	73,793			17.6	%
General and administrative			46,961			11.0	%			44,375			10.6	%
Depreciation and amortization			10,179			2.4	%			10,967			2.6	%
Other expense			1,542			0.3	%			196			0.1	%
Total operating expenses		$	133,435			31.2	%		$	129,331			30.9	%
Income from operations			45,959			10.7	%			43,738			10.4	%
Other income (expense):
Interest expense			(27,195	)		(6.4	)%			(27,760	)		(6.6	)%
Other expense			(1,223	)		(0.3	)%			(697	)		(0.2	)%
Income (loss) before income taxes			17,541			4.1	%			15,281			3.6	%
Taxes			7,507			1.8	%			6,205			1.5	%
Net income (loss)		$	10,034			2.3	%		$	9,076			2.2	%
Other Financial Data (Unaudited):
Adjusted EBITDA		$	64,241			15.0	%		$	59,376			14.2	%

Net sales. Net sales increased $8.7 million, or 2%, for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 (audited) compared to the 53-week period ended August 29, 2015 (unaudited). The increase in net sales was driven primarily by growth in Atkins’ U.S. snacking products, which were up $12.5 million, partially offset by declines in frozen meals of $2.2 million and an unfavorable currency impact of $2.1 million. The increase in U.S. snacking products of $12.5 million was due to a volume increase of $7.7 million driven by an increase in demand positive price/mix of $7.7 million, partially offset by an increase in returns of $2.9 million. The pricing and mix increase can be primarily attributed to the annualized impact of Atkins’ price increase on U.S. snacking products in December 2014 of approximately $2.5 million as well as improved product mix largely due to the addition of the Atkins Lift line to the portfolio at a higher price point. The increase in returns was principally due to the one-time impact of an ingredient recall on some of Atkins’ products in June of 2016. Although Atkins recognized a loss for this of approximately $2 million, Atkins is actively pursuing collection of this from its supplier.

Cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold increased $2.4 million, or 1%, from the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 (audited) compared to the 53-week period ended August 29, 2015 (unaudited). The increase in cost

150

of goods sold was driven primarily by the net sales increase noted above totaling approximately $5 million partially offset by cost savings and improved product mix of approximately $3 million.

Gross profit. Gross profit increased $6.3 million, or 4%, from the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 (audited) compared to the 53-week period ended August 29, 2015 (unaudited). The increase in gross profit was driven primarily by the net sales increase noted above (approximately $4 million), the annualized impact of Atkins’ price increase from snacking products in December 2014 of approximately $2.5 million as well as favorable cost savings and product mix of approximately $3 million partially offset by the increase in returns and allowances of $3 million, principally due to the one-time cost of the recall, and product mix.

Operating expenses. Operating expenses increased $4.1 million, or 3%, from the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 (audited) compared to the 53-week period ended August 29, 2015 (unaudited) due to the following:

•         Selling, marketing and distribution. Selling, marketing and distribution expenses increased $1.0 million, or 1%, from the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 (audited) compared to the 53-week period ended August 29, 2015 (unaudited). The increase in selling, marketing and distribution expenses was driven primarily by costs growing proportionally with the increased net sales.

•         General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased $2.6 million, or 6%, from the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 (audited) compared to the 53-week period ended August 29, 2015 (unaudited). The increase in general and administrative expenses was driven primarily by increases in employee related costs of $1.3 million and in facility costs of $0.4 million as well as some one-time legal settlements of $0.6 million in 2016.

•         Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $0.8 million, or 7%, from the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 (audited) compared to the 53-week period ended August 29, 2015 (unaudited). The decrease in depreciation and amortization expenses was driven primarily by the decrease in amortization of intangible assets.

•         Other expense. Other expenses increased $1.3 million from the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 (audited) compared to the 53-week period ended August 29, 2015 (unaudited). The increase in other expenses was due to the one-time costs of restructuring activities largely due to the employee costs eliminated as part of the licensing of Atkins’ frozen meal products.

Interest expense. Interest expense decreased $0.6 million, or 2.0%, from the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 (audited) compared to the 53-week period ended August 29, 2015 (unaudited). The decrease in interest expense was driven primarily by reduced levels of debt.

Other income (expense). Other expense increased $0.5 million from the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 (audited) compared to the 53-week period ended August 29, 2015 (unaudited) due to an increase in warrant liabilities of $1.8 million partially offset by more favorable currency transaction expense of $1.3 million.

Income tax expense (benefit). Income tax expense increased $1.3 million, for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 (audited) compared to the 52-week period ended August 29, 2015 (unaudited). The increase in the income tax expense was primarily driven by the increase in pretax income of $2.3 million in the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, combined with a one-time tax benefit of $0.9 million and remaining net benefit of $0.4 million for all other items affecting income tax, both of which reduced tax expense in 52-week period ended August 29, 2015 only. The one-time tax benefit relates to a reduction in the federal income tax rate used to record income taxes from 35% to 34% during 52-week period ended August 29, 2015.

Net income. Net income increased $1.0 million, or 11%, from the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 (audited) compared to the 53-week period ended August 29, 2015 (unaudited). The increase in net income was driven primarily by improved income from operations largely due to improved gross profit partially offset by higher operating expenses and increased income taxes.

151

Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA increased $4.9 million, or 8%, from the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 (unaudited) compared to the 53-week period ended August 29, 2015 (unaudited). The increase was driven primarily by improved income from operations largely due to improved gross profit partially offset by higher operating expenses. Additionally, Adjusted EBITDA is improved by the exclusion of the loss from the ingredient recall and frozen meals restructuring charges that are one-time items in EBITDA. For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to its most directly comparable GAAP measure, see “— Key Performance Indicators — Adjusted EBITDA.”

Comparison of Results for the 35-Week Period Ended August 29, 2015 and August 30, 2014

The following table sets forth information comparing the components of net income for the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 and August 30, 2014.

		35-Week Period Ended
		August 29, 2015							August 30, 2014
		(audited)							(unaudited)
(in thousands)						% of sales							% of sales
Net sales		$	252,898			100.0	%		$	260,391			100.0	%
Cost of goods sold			151,978			60.1	%			155,634			59.8	%
Gross profit		$	100,920			39.9	%		$	104,757			40.2	%
Operating expenses:
Selling, marketing and distribution		$	56,576			22.4	%		$	57,933			22.2	%
General and administrative			29,028			11.4	%			26,992			10.4	%
Depreciation and amortization			7,267			2.9	%			7,495			2.9	%
Other expense			65			0.0	%			14			0.0	%
Total operating expenses		$	92,936			36.7	%		$	92,434			35.5	%
Income from operations			7,984			3.2	%			12,323			4.7	%
Other income (expense):
Interest expense			(18,331	)		(7.2	)%			(18,408	)		(7.1	)%
Other expense			699			0.3	%			(972	)		(0.4	)%
Income (loss) before income taxes			(9,648	)		(3.8	)%			(7,057	)		(2.7	)%
Taxes			(4,334	)		(1.7	)%			(2,554	)		(1.0	)%
Net income (loss)		$	(5,314	)		(2.1	)%		$	(4,503	)		(1.7	)%
Other financial data (Unaudited):
Adjusted EBITDA		$	16,961			6.6	%		$	23,097			8.8	%

Net sales. Net sales decreased $7.5 million, or 3%, for the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 (audited) compared to the 35-week period ended August 30, 2014 (unaudited). The decrease in net sales was driven primarily by decreases to U.S. snacking business of $7.9 million and an unfavorable currency impact of $3.5 million partially offset by an increase in frozen meals of $2.0 million and an increase in our international business in constant dollars of $1.9 million. The decrease in the U.S. snacking business was due to a volume decrease of $12.7 million partially offset by positive pricing and mix changes of $4.8 million. The volume decline was largely driven by a decline in retail inventory levels primarily due to our warehouse shutdown the last week in August 2015 to conduct a physical inventory in connection with the shift in year end from December to August in 35-week period ended August 29, 2015. This resulted in a delay in timing of shipment to customers and reduced retail inventory levels. The pricing and mix increase can be primarily attributed to the price increase from snacking products in December of 2014.

Cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold decreased $3.7 million, or 2%, for the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 (audited) compared to the 35-week period ended August 30, 2014 (unaudited). The decrease in cost of goods sold was driven primarily by the net sales decrease noted above.

152

Gross profit. Gross profit decreased $3.8 million, or 4%, for the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 (audited) compared to the 35-week period ended August 30, 2014 (unaudited). The decrease in gross profit was driven primarily by the net sales decrease noted above (approximately $2.5 million) and negative product price/mix of approximately $0.5 million.

Operating expenses. Operating expenses increased $0.5 million, or 1%, for the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 (audited) compared to the 35-week period ended August 30, 2014 (unaudited) due to the following:

•         Selling, marketing and distribution. Selling, marketing and distribution expenses decreased $1.4 million, or 2%, for the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 (audited) compared to the 35-week period ended August 30, 2014 (unaudited) as costs decreased proportionally with the reduced net sales.

•         General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased $2.0 million, or 8%, for the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 (audited) compared to the 35-week period ended August 30, 2014 (unaudited). The increase in general and administrative expenses was driven primarily by increases in employee related costs due to a one-time bonus payout for all employees in August 2015 as well as a smaller bonus payout in 2014.

•         Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $0.2 million, or 3%, for the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 (audited) compared to the 35-week period ended August 30, 2014 (unaudited).

Interest expense. Interest expense was relatively unchanged from the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 (audited) compared to the 35-week period ended August 30, 2014 (unaudited) as debt levels were relatively constant.

Other income (expense). Other income increased $1.7 million for the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 (audited) compared to the 35-week period ended August 30, 2014 (unaudited) due to a decrease in warrant liabilities of $2.6 million partially offset by unfavorable currency transaction expense of $0.8 million.

Income tax expense (benefit). Income tax benefit increased $1.8 million, for the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 (audited) compared to the 35-week period ended August 30, 2014 (unaudited). The increase in the income tax benefit was primarily driven by the increase in pretax loss $2.6 million; the increase in non-temporary differences $0.9 million; and a one-time tax benefit of $0.9 million. The one-time tax benefit relates to a reduction in the federal income tax rate used to record income taxes from 35% to 34% during the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015. These tax credits are offset by the change in tax expenses of valuation allowance $0.3 million; state income tax adjustment of $0.2 million and all other affecting income tax of $0.4 million.

Net income (loss). Net loss increased $0.8 million, or 18%, for the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 (audited) compared to the 35-week period ended August 30, 2014 (unaudited). The decrease in profitability was driven primarily by the decline in gross profit and increase in operating expenses partially offset by a decrease in other expense and an increase in income tax benefits.

Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA decreased $6.4 million, or 28%, for the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 (unaudited) compared to the 35-week period ended August 30, 2014 (unaudited). The decrease in Adjusted EBITDA was driven primarily by the decline in gross profit and increase in operating expenses. For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to its most directly comparable GAAP measure, see “— Key Performance Indicators — Adjusted EBITDA.”

153

Comparison of Results for the 52-Week Period Ended December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013

The following table sets forth information comparing the components of net income for the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013.

		52-Week Period Ended
		December 27, 2014							December 28, 2013
		(audited)
(in thousands)						% of sales							% of sales
Net sales		$	429,858			100.0	%		$	393,929			100.0	%
Cost of goods sold			249,832			58.1	%			221,120			56.1	%
Gross profit		$	180,026			41.9	%		$	172,809			43.9	%
Operating expenses:
Selling, marketing and distribution		$	75,311			17.5	%		$	74,706			18.9	%
General and administrative			41,000			9.6	%			40,008			10.1	%
Depreciation and amortization			11,195			2.6	%			11,304			2.9	%
Other expense			146			0.0	%			603			0.2	%
Total operating expenses		$	127,652			29.7	%		$	126,621			32.1	%
Income from operations			52,374			12.2	%			46,188			11.7	%
Other income (expense):
Interest expense			(27,823	)		(6.5	)%			(35,402	)		(9.0	)%
Other expense			(972	)		(0.2	)%			(1,678	)		(0.4	)%
Income before income taxes			23,579			5.5	%			9,108			2.3	%
Taxes			9,623			2.2	%			5,859			1.5	%
Net income		$	13,956			3.2	%		$	3,249			0.8	%
Other financial data (Unaudited):
Adjusted EBITDA		$	68,336			15.9	%		$	64,018			16.0	%

Net sales. Net sales increased $36 million, or 9%, for the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 (audited) compared to the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013 (audited). The increase in net sales was driven primarily by growth in the U.S. snacking business of $21.2 million, an increase in the frozen meals business of $12.3 million and growth in international of $2.4 million. The impact of currency between periods was negligible. The growth in the U.S. snacking business is volume growth of approximately $25.6 million, partially offset by pricing and mix changes of approximately $4.4 million. Volume growth was largely due to an increase in consumer demand, while the pricing and mix decrease can be primarily attributed to the expansion of products into certain lower price point products. The frozen meals increase can be attributed to the significant increase in consumers and retail distribution in the second year of launch.

Cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold increased $28.7 million, or 13%, for the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 (audited) compared to the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013 (audited). The increase in cost of goods sold was driven primarily by the net sales increase noted above (approximately $20 million) and negative product mix due to the increase in higher-cost frozen meals as a percentage of the portfolio.

154

Gross profit. Gross profit increased $7.2 million, or 4%, for the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 (audited) compared to the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013 (audited). The increase in gross profit was driven primarily by the net sales increase noted above (approximately $9 million) partially offset by negative product mix principally due to the increase in lower margin frozen meals.

Operating expenses. Operating expenses increased $1.0 million, or 1%, for the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 (audited) compared to the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013 (audited) due to the following:

•         Selling, marketing and distribution. Selling, marketing and distribution expenses increased $0.6 million, or 1%, for the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 (audited) compared to the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013 (audited). The increase in selling, marketing and distribution expense was driven primarily by increased selling and marketing costs principally behind the frozen meals expansion. As a percentage of net sales, the decline was driven by efficiency gains in distribution costs and sales commissions.

•         General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased $1.0 million, or 2%, for the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 (audited) compared to the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013 (audited). The increase is driven by an increase in employee and facility costs of $1.3 million largely due to the expansion into frozen meals. In addition, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 (audited) includes approximately $1.5 million in one-time costs for an external study to assess strategic options that was offset by approximately $2.7 million in one-time costs to refinance Atkins’ debt that was in the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013 (audited).

•         Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $0.1 million, or 1%, for the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 (audited) compared to the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013 (audited).

•         Other expense. Other expenses decreased $0.4 million for the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 (audited) compared to the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013 (audited).

Interest expense. Interest expense decreased $7.6 million, or 21%, for the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 (audited) compared to the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013 (audited). The decrease in interest expense was driven primarily by the write off of all remaining deferred financing fees in 2013 in connection with the refinancing.

Other income (expense). Other expense decreased $0.7 million for the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 (audited) compared to the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013 (audited) due to an decrease in warrant liabilities of $3.4 million partially offset by unfavorable currency transaction expense of $2.4 million.

Income tax expense (benefit). Income tax expense increased $3.8 million, for the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 (audited) compared to the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013 (audited). The increase in the income tax expense was primarily driven by the increase in pretax income $14.5 million and an increase in state income tax $0.4 million; offset by tax credits on non-temporary differences $1.2 million; and a valuation allowance $0.5 million.

Net income. Net income increased $10.7 million for the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 (audited) compared to the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013 (audited). The increase in net income was largely due to the increased gross profit and lower interest expense as a result of the debt refinancing partially offset by increased operating expenses and higher taxes.

Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA increased $5.3 million, or 8%, for the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 (unaudited) compared to the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013 (unaudited). The increase was driven by the increase in gross profit partially offset by increased operating expenses to support the new frozen meals. For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to its most directly comparable GAAP measure, see “— Key Performance Indicators — Adjusted EBITDA.”

155

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview. Atkins has historically funded its operations with cash flow from operations and, when needed, with borrowings under its credit facility. Atkins’ principal uses for liquidity have been debt service and working capital. Atkins believes its sources of liquidity and capital will be sufficient to finance its continued operations, growth strategy and additional expenses we expect to incur as a public company for at least the next twelve months.

In addition, following the consummation of the Business Combination, Atkins will be obligated to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement (the “TRA”). Although the actual timing and amount of any payments that may be made under the TRA will vary, Atkins expects that the payments that we will be required to make could be significant. Any payments made by us under the TRA will generally reduce the amount of overall cash flow that might have otherwise been available to Atkins and, to the extent that Atkins is unable to make payments under the TRA for any reason, the unpaid amounts generally will be deferred and will accrue interest until paid by Atkins. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions — Tax Receivable Agreement.”

The following table shows summary cash flows information for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 (unaudited) and February 27, 2016 (unaudited), the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 (audited), the 53-week period ended August 29, 2015 (unaudited), the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 (audited) and August 30, 2014 (unaudited) and the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 (audited) and December 28, 2013 (audited).

		26-Week Period Ended								52/53-Week Period Ended								35-Week Period Ended								52-Week Period Ended
(in thousands)		February 25, 2017				February 27, 2016				August 27, 2016				August 29, 2015				August 29, 2015				August 30, 2014				December 27, 2014				December 28, 2013
Net cash provided by operating activities		$	19,387			$	4,531			$	29,023			$	37,805			$	20,426			$	6,403			$	23,479			$	21,941
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities			(21,323	)			(312	)			(815	)			(1,685	)			(968	)			(159	)			(875	)			(1,229	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities			(3,477	)			(7,464	)			(6,735	)			(1,932	)			(2,165	)			(5,091	)			(4,857	)			(1,729	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents			(162	)			(278	)			(75	)			(179	)			(113	)			22				(249	)			(52	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		$	(5,575	)		$	(3,523	)		$	21,398			$	34,009			$	17,180			$	1,175			$	17,498			$	18,931

Comparison of Results for the 26-Week Period Ended February 25, 2017 (unaudited) and February 27, 2016 (unaudited)

Operating activities. Atkins’ net cash provided by operating activities was $19.4 million for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017; an increase of $14.9 million, compared to $4.5 million for the 26-week period ended February 27, 2016. This increase of $14.9 million was due primarily to a favorable change in operating assets and liabilities as well as a higher net income. The favorable change in operating assets and liabilities was largely driven by the elimination of the assets and liabilities associated with the frozen meals licensing agreement resulting in lower inventory and receivable balances. This was somewhat offset by an increase in other assets due to a receivable due from Atkins’ frozen meals license partner as well as greater accounts payable and accrued expenses due to timing of disbursements.

Investing activities. Atkins’ net cash used by investing activities was $21.3 million for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017, which was an increase of $21.0 million compared to the $0.3 million for the 26-week period ended February 27, 2016. The large increase was due to the purchase of Wellness Foods for approximately $21.0 million in December 2016.

Financing activities. Atkins’ net cash used by financing activities was $3.5 million for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017, a decrease of $4.0 million, or 53%, compared to $7.5 million for the 26-week period ended February 27, 2016. This decrease was due primarily to a reduction in principal payments on Atkins’ debt in the current period.

156

Comparison of Results for the 52-Week Period Ended August 27, 2016 (audited) and the 53-Week Period Ended August 29, 2015 (unaudited)

Operating activities. Atkins’ net cash provided by operating activities was $29.0 million for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 (audited) compared to $37.8 million for the 53-week period ended August 29, 2015 (unaudited). This decrease of $8.8 million was due primarily to an unfavorable change in operating assets and liabilities as well as a slightly lower net income. The unfavorable change in operating assets and liabilities was driven by an increase in receivables partially offset by a reduction of inventory. Both of these were due to timing of sales in the month of August 2015 in connection with Atkins’ change in fiscal year end.

Investing activities. Atkins’ net cash used by investing activities was $0.8 million for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 (audited) compared to $1.7 million for the 53-week period ended August 29, 2015 (unaudited). All uses related to capital expenditures for the business, which average approximately $1.0 million per year, principally for research and development equipment, IT and website investments.

Financing activities. Atkins’ net cash used by financing activities was $6.7 million for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 (audited) compared to $1.9 million for the 53-week period ended August 29, 2015 (unaudited). The change was driven by an increase in payments of debt in 2016.

Comparison of Results for the 35-Week Period Ended August 29, 2015 (audited) and August 30, 2014 (unaudited)

Operating activities. Atkins’ net cash provided by operating activities was $20.4 million for the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 (audited) compared to $6.4 million for the 35-week period ended August 30, 2014 (unaudited). This increase of $14.0 million was due primarily to a decrease in Atkins’ net loss as well as a favorable change in operating assets and liabilities. The favorable change in operating assets and liabilities was driven by lower accounts payable and accrued expenses due to timing of disbursements, as well as a decrease in receivables partially offset by a reduction of inventory. The changes in receivables and inventory were due to timing of sales in the month of August 2015 in connection with the change in fiscal year end.

Investing activities. Atkins’ net cash used by investing activities was $1.0 for the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 (audited) compared to $0.2 million for the 35-week period ended August 30, 2014 (unaudited). All uses related to capital expenditures for the business, which average approximately $1 million per year, principally for research and development equipment, IT and website investments.

Financing activities. Atkins’ net cash used by financing activities was $2.2 million for the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 (audited) compared to $5.1 million for the 35-week period ended August 30, 2014 (unaudited). The change was driven by a change in paydown of debt.

Comparison of Results for the 52-Week Period Ended December 27, 2014 (audited) and December 28, 2013 (audited)

Operating activities. Atkins’ net cash provided by operating activities was $23.5 million for the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 compared to $21.9 million in the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013. This $1.5 million increase was due primarily to higher net income partially offset by an unfavorable change in operating assets and liabilities and the one-time write off of extinguished deferred financing fees in 2013. The unfavorable change in operating assets and liabilities was driven by a reduction in accrued interest due to the refinancing and greater accounts payable and accrued expenses due to timing of disbursements, partially offset by lower growth in receivables due to timing of sales.

Investing activities. Atkins’ net cash used in investing activities was $0.9 million for the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 compared to $1.2 million in the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013. All uses here relate to capital expenditures for the business, which average approximately $1.0 million per year, principally for research and development equipment, IT and website investments.

Financing activities. Atkins’ net cash used in financing activities was $4.9 million for the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 compared to a $1.7 million use in the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013. This increase in uses was due primarily to the paydown of debt in the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 compared to the refinancing of the debt and partial distribution to shareholders in the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013.

157

Debt and credit facilities. On April 3, 2013, Atkins entered into a First Lien Credit Agreement, or First Lien, and a Second Lien Credit Agreement, or Second Lien, with Credit Suisse. The First Lien consists of a $20 million revolving line of credit and a $255 million term loan. The First Lien revolving line of credit bears interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR, with a floor of 1.25%, plus 5.0%, and matures on April 3, 2018. The First Lien requires quarterly principal and interests payments, bears interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR, with a floor of 1.25%, plus 5.0%, and matures on January 2, 2019. The First Lien also provides for an excess cash flow prepayment based on a contractual formula, payable within 120 days of the end of each fiscal year. The Second Lien consists of a $100 million term loan that requires annual interest payments, bears interest a rate per annum equal to LIBOR, with a floor of 1.25%, plus 8.5%, and matures on April 3, 2019.

Under the First Lien and Second Lien, Atkins has granted the lenders a security interest in substantially all of its assets, including the assets of its subsidiaries and an affiliate. In addition, the First Lien and Second Lien contain various restrictions, including restrictions on the payment of dividends and other distributions to equity and warrant holders, the incurrence of debt and the provision of liens and provide for the maintenance of certain financial ratios, including a maximum net leverage ratio ranging from 4.50:1:00 to 7:00:1:00. As of February 25, 2017, Atkins was in compliance with these covenants.

Seasonality

Atkins has experienced in the past, and expects to continue to experience, seasonal fluctuations in its retail sales as a result of consumer spending patterns. Historically, the months of January to May result in the greatest retail sales due to renewed consumer focus on healthy living following New Year’s Day, as well as significant customer merchandising around that time. Atkins believes these consumer spending patterns are driven primarily by the predisposition of consumers to adjust their approach to nutrition at certain times of the year as well as the timing of its advertising linked with key customer promotion windows.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of February 25, 2017, Atkins had no material off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on its financial condition, changes in financial condition, income or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes Atkins’ expected material contractual payment obligations as of August 27, 2016.

		Payments due by period
(in thousands)		Total			Less than 1 year			1-3 years			3-5 years			More than 5 years
Long term debt obligations		$	337,209		$	—		$	337,209		$	—		$	—
Operating leases(1)			3,166			1,839			1,058			269			—
Interest payments			59,340			24,434			34,906			—			—
Total		$	399,715		$	26,273		$	373,173		$	269		$	—

____________

(1)      As of August 27, 2016, Atkins is obligated under multiple non-cancelable operating leases, which continue through 2021. Rent expense, inclusive of real estate taxes, utilities and maintenance incurred under operating leases, which totaled $2.3 million during the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, is included in general and administrative expenses in Atkins’ consolidated statements of operations.

Critical Accounting Policies

General. Atkins’ discussion and analysis of the historical financial condition and results of operations for the periods described is based on its audited consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S., or U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these historical financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments in certain circumstances that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and contingencies as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Atkins

158

evaluates its assumptions and estimates on an ongoing basis. Atkins bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that Atkins’ believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Atkins has provided a summary of its significant accounting policies in Note 2 to its audited consolidated financial statements located elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus. The following critical accounting discussion pertains to accounting policies Atkins believes are most critical to the portrayal of its historical financial condition and results of operations and that require significant, difficult, subjective or complex judgments. Other companies in similar businesses may use different estimation policies and methodologies, which may impact the comparability of Atkins’ financial condition, results of operations and cash flows to those of other companies.

Revenue recognition, trade promotions, and accounts receivable. Atkins recognizes revenue from the sale of product when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the price is fixed or determinable, (iii) title and risk of loss pass to the customer at the time of delivery and (iv) there is reasonable assurance of collection of the sales proceeds. Atkins records estimated reductions to revenue for customer programs, slotting fees and incentive offerings, including special pricing agreements, price protection, promotions and other volume-based incentives at the time the incentive is offered or at the time of revenue recognition for the underlying transaction that results in progress by the customer toward earning the incentive. Some of these incentives are recorded by estimating costs based on Atkins’ historical experience and expected levels of performance of the trade promotion.

Atkins maintains allowances to reflect commitments made to customers for customer-executed promotional activities and other incentive offerings, including special pricing agreements, price protection, promotions and volume-based incentives, as well as damaged and aged customer inventory. These allowances are based on historical evaluations, both qualitative and quantitative, as well as Atkins’ best estimate of current activity. The allowances for customer programs and other incentive offerings are recorded at the time the incentive is offered or at the time or revenue recognition for the underlying transaction that results in progress by the customer toward earning the incentive. Atkins’ allowances for these commitments are recorded as a reduction trade receivables.

Atkins estimates the allowance for doubtful accounts based upon a review of outstanding receivables and historical collection information by customer. Normally, accounts receivable are due within 30 days after the date of the invoice. Accounts receivable are written off when they are determined to be uncollectible. Atkins’ policy for estimating allowances for doubtful accounts with respect to receivables is to record an allowance based on a historical evaluation of write-offs, aging of balances and other quantitative and qualitative analyses.

Goodwill and intangible assets. Atkins’ goodwill and intangible assets result primarily from acquisitions and primarily include brands and trademarks with indefinite lives and customer-related relationships with definite lives. Atkins records goodwill for all acquisitions as the excess of purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired. In accordance with accounting standards related to goodwill and other intangible assets, Atkins does not amortize those assets which have indefinite useful lives. Instead, Atkins conducts impairment tests on an annual basis to determine whether it is more likely than not the book value of the assets exceeds its estimated fair value. Amortizable intangible assets are only evaluated for impairment upon a significant change in the operating environment.

A quantitative assessment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles was performed in 2014 and 2015 and a qualitative assessment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles was performed for 2016. Atkins assessed the economic conditions and industry and market considerations, in addition to its overall financial performance and the overall financial performance of its trade names. Based on the results of its assessment, Atkins determined that it was not more likely than not that any of its reporting units had a carrying value in excess of the fair value. Accordingly, no further impairment testing was completed and Atkins did not recognize an impairment charges related to goodwill or indefinite-lived intangibles during 2014, 2015 or 2016.

Income taxes. Income taxes include federal, state and foreign taxes currently payable and deferred taxes arising from temporary differences between income for financial reporting and income tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statement balances and the tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the year that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized.

159

Share-based compensation. Share-based compensation expense is recognized for equity awards over the vesting period based on their grant-date fair value. The fair value of option awards is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The exercise price of each stock option equals or exceeds the estimated fair value of its stock price on the date of grant. Options can generally be exercised over a maximum term of ten years. Compensation expense is recognized only for equity awards expected to vest, and we estimate forfeitures at the date of grant and at each reporting date based on historical experience and future expectations. Share-based compensation expense is included within the same financial statement caption where the recipient’s other compensation is reported.

Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

New accounting pronouncements that are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) or other standards setting bodies are adopted by Atkins as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, Atkins’ management believes that the impact of recently issued standards that are not yet effective will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The amended standard simplifies how an entity tests goodwill by eliminating Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. The amended standard also modifies the concept of impairment from the condition that exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value to the condition that exists when the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value. The new guidance is effective for Atkins beginning in fiscal 2020. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. Atkins is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its goodwill impairment testing.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The pronouncement simplifies the accounting for income tax consequences of share-based payment transactions. The new guidance requires that all of the tax related to share-based payments be recorded in earnings at settlement (or expiration). This guidance is effective for Atkins beginning in fiscal 2017. Early adoption is permitted. Atkins is currently evaluating the effects adoption of this guidance will have on Atkins’ consolidated financial statements or financial statement disclosures.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The standard requires lessees to recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases on the balance sheet. A lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. The new guidance is effective for Atkins beginning in fiscal 2019. The amendments should be applied at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. Atkins is currently evaluating the effects adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, Atkins changed the manner in which it reports deferred taxes due to electing early adoption of ASU No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. Deferred tax liabilities and assets are now all reported as non-current amounts. Atkins adjusted its prior period consolidated balance sheet as a result of the adoption of ASU No. 2015-17.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330) — Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. The amendments clarify that an entity should measure inventory within the scope of this update at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. Substantial and unusual losses that result from subsequent measurement of inventory should be disclosed in the financial statements. Atkins adopted the new accounting standard in the interim period ending February 25, 2017 and there are no adjustments made to the inventory balance as a result of the adoption.

In April 2015, Atkins changed the manner in which it reports debt issuance costs due to the adoption of ASU No. 2015-03, Interest — Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. Debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability previously reported as assets have been reclassified as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of debt liabilities in Atkins’ consolidated financial statements in all periods presented. Atkins adopted this standard in 2016 on a retrospective basis.

160

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The objective of ASU No. 2014-09 is to outline a new, single comprehensive model to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. The new revenue recognition model provides a five-step analysis for determining when and how revenue is recognized, depicting the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. On July 9, 2015, the FASB voted to delay the implementation of ASU No. 2014-09 by one year to fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017. An entity may elect to early adopt as of the original effective date, fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2016. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing which provides additional clarification regarding identifying performance obligations and licensing. In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-19, 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. These ASUs will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP and will be effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2018. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or modified retrospective (cumulative effect) transition method and Atkins has not yet selected which transition method to apply. Atkins is currently evaluating recently issued guidance on practical expedients as part of the transition decision. Upon initial evaluation, Atkins believes the key changes in the standard that impact revenue recognition relate to the recognition of customer programs and incentive offerings, including special pricing agreements, price protection, promotion, and other volume-based incentives. Atkins is still in the process of evaluating these impacts.

Inflation

While inflation may impact Atkins’ revenue and cost of services and products, Atkins believes the effects of inflation, if any, on its results of operations and financial condition have not been significant. However, there can be no assurance that its results of operations and financial condition will not be materially impacted by inflation in the future.

JOBS Act

Atkins qualifies as an “emerging growth company” pursuant to the provisions of the JOBS Act, enacted on April 5, 2012. Section 102 of the JOBS Act provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. However, Atkins is choosing to “opt out” of such extended transition period, and as a result, Atkins will comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth companies. Atkins’ decision to opt out of the extended transition period is irrevocable.

Subject to certain conditions set forth in the JOBS Act, Atkins is not required to, among other things, (1) provide an auditor’s attestation report on our systems of internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404, (2) provide all of the compensation disclosure that may be required of non-emerging growth public companies under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, (3) comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements (auditor discussion and analysis), and (4) disclose certain executive compensation-related items such as the correlation between executive compensation and performance and comparisons of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation to median employee compensation. These exemptions will apply until Atkins no longer meets the requirements of being an emerging growth company. Atkins will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (a) the last day of the fiscal year (i) following the fifth anniversary of the completion of Conyers Park’s initial public offering, which was July 20, 2016, (ii) in which Atkins has total annual gross revenue of at least $1.0 billion or (iii) in which Atkins is deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of its common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of its prior second fiscal quarter, and (b) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period.

161

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures of Market Risks

Atkins’ future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are dependent upon prevalent market interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates.

Concentration of credit risk. Atkins maintains cash balances in five financial institutions. The balances are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000 per institution. From time to time, Atkins’ balances may exceed this limit. As of August 27, 2016, uninsured cash balances were approximately $78 million. Atkins believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash.

As of August 27, 2016, approximately 36% of gross accounts receivable were derived from two customers, and approximately 44% of gross sales were derived from the same two customers.

Interest rate risk. Atkins is subject to interest rate risk in connection with borrowing based on a variable interest rate. Derivative financial instruments, such as interest rate swap agreements and interest rate cap agreements, may be used for the purpose of managing fluctuating interest rate exposures that exist from Atkins’ variable rate debt obligations that are expected to remain outstanding. Interest rate changes do not affect the market value of such debt, but could impact the amount of Atkins’ interest payments, and accordingly, Atkins’ future earnings and cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant.

Although all of Atkins’ current debt reported in the financials will be retired as part of the transaction, we are in the process of securing new financing and it is likely that this will have a variable rate component.

Foreign currency risk. Atkins is exposed to changes in currency rates as a result of its investments in foreign operations and revenue generated in currencies other than U.S. dollar. Revenue and profit generated by international operations will increase or decrease compared to prior periods as a result of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. However, the operations that are impacted by foreign currency risk are less than 5% of Atkins’ Adjusted EBITDA for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 and therefore, the risk of this is insignificant.

162

MANAGEMENT AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS AFTER THE BUSINESS COMBINATION

Management and Board of Directors

The Company anticipates that the current executive officers of Atkins will become executive officers of the post-combination company following the Business Combination. For biographical information concerning the current executive officers of Atkins see the section entitled “Information About Atkins — Executive Officers.” The following persons are anticipated to be the directors and executive officers of the post-combination company. The information below is as of April 10, 2017:

Name		Age		Position
Joseph E. Scalzo(a)		58		Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
Shaun P. Mara		52		Chief Administrative Officer, Chief Financial Officer
Annita M. Menogan		62		Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
C. Scott Parker		60		Chief Marketing Officer
Robert C. Gandert		50		Chief Customer/Business Development Officer
Hanno E. Holm		45		Vice President and Chief Operations Officer
Timothy A. Matthews		37		Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
James M. Kilts(c)		68		Chairman of the Board of Directors
David J. West(c)		54		Executive Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors
Brian K. Ratzan(c)		46		Director
Clayton C. Daley, Jr.(b)		64		Director
Nomi P. Ghez(b)		70		Director
James E. Healey(b)		75		Director
Robert G. Montgomery(a)		63		Director
Arvin “Rick” Kash(a)		75		Director
Richard T. Laube(c)		61		Director

____________

(a)      Class I director (to serve until the first annual meeting of stockholders)

(b)      Class II director (to serve until the second annual meeting of stockholders)

(c)      Class III director (to serve until the third annual meeting of stockholders)

Arvin “Rick” Kash, served as Vice Chairperson of Nielsen Holdings Plc (or its predecessor) from January 2012 to January 2017. Mr. Kash is the founder of The Cambridge Group, a growth strategy consulting firm, which became a subsidiary of Nielsen in March 2009. He served as its Chairman from December 2010 until December 2011 and prior to that was its Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Kash is a director of Woodstream Corporation, Linus Oncology and Genus Oncology, Blue Moose of Boulder and Northwestern Memorial Foundation Hospital. He is a graduate of DePaul University. Conyers Park believes that Mr. Kash’s extensive operational and board experience make him well qualified to serve as a Director.

Richard T. Laube has served as the Chairman of the board of directors of Atkins Nutritionals Inc. since February 2011. From April 2011 to April 2016, Mr. Laube was the Chief Executive Officer of Nobel Biocare. From April 2005 to August 2010, Mr. Laube was an Executive Board member of Nestle SA, and from November 2005 to August 2010 was CEO of Nestle SA’s Nestle Nutrition division. Prior to this, Mr. Laube was CEO of Roche Consumer Health and a Roche Holding AG Executive Committee member. He held positions of increasing responsibility in brand and general management at Procter & Gamble, including international assignments in Switzerland, Japan, Germany and Brazil. From September 2008 to September 2012 Mr. Laube served as a Director of Logitech SA. Since March 2017 he serves as a Director of GnuBiotics Sciences and since April 2017 a Director of Piqur Therapeutics SA. Following the Business Combination Mr. Laube is anticipated to serve as a Director of Conyers Park pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement with Atkins Holding LLC. Conyers Park believes Mr. Laube’s broad operational and board experience make him well qualified to serve as a Director.

For biographical information concerning Messrs. Kilts, West, Ratzan, Daley, Healey, Montgomery and Ms. Ghez, see the section entitled “Information About Parent — Management — Directors and Executive Officers.”

163

Director Independence

NASDAQ listing standards will require that a majority of our board of directors be independent. An “independent director” is defined generally as a person other than an officer or employee of the company or its subsidiaries or any other individual having a relationship which in the opinion of our board of directors, would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

We anticipate that Messrs. Kilts, Ratzan, Daley, Jr., Healey, Montgomery, Kash and Laube and Ms. Ghez will be “independent directors” as defined in the NASDAQ listing standards and applicable SEC rules.

Information about the Anticipated Executive Officers and Directors Upon the Closing of the Business Combination

Upon the closing of the Business Combination, we anticipate that the size of the post-combination company’s board of directors will be nine directors.

Audit Committee

Upon consummation of the Business Combination, our Audit Committee will consist of Messrs. Healey, Daley, Jr. and Laube, with Mr. Healey serving as the chair of the committee. We believe that Messrs. Healey, Daley, Jr. and Laube qualify as independent directors according to the rules and regulations of the SEC with respect to audit committee membership. We also believe that Mr. Healey qualifies as our “audit committee financial expert,” as such term is defined in Item 401(h) of Regulation S-K. Our board of directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which will be available on our corporate website at www.thesimplygoodfoodscompany.com upon the completion of the Business Combination. The information on our website is not part of this proxy statement/prospectus.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other matters: (1) reviewing key employee compensation goals, policies, plans and programs; (2) reviewing and approving the compensation of our directors, chief executive officer and other executive officers; (3) reviewing and approving employment agreements and other similar arrangements between us and our executive officers; and (4) administering our stock plans and other incentive compensation plans.

Upon consummation of the Business Combination, our Compensation Committee will consist of Messrs. Daley, Jr., Ratzan and Montgomery, with Mr. Daley, Jr. serving as the chair of the committee. Our board of directors has adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee, which will be available on our corporate website at www.thesimplygoodfoodscompany.com upon the completion of the Business Combination. The information on our website is not part of this proxy statement/prospectus.

Nominating and Governance Committee

Our Nominating and Governance Committee will be responsible for, among other matters: (1) identifying individuals qualified to become members of our board of directors, consistent with criteria approved by our board of directors; (2) overseeing the organization of our board of directors to discharge the board’s duties and responsibilities properly and efficiently; (3) identifying best practices and recommending corporate governance principles; and (4) developing and recommending to our board of directors a set of corporate governance guidelines and principles applicable to us.

Upon consummation of the Business Combination, our newly appointed board of directors will create the Nominating and Governance Committee and will appoint Messrs. Kilts and Kash and Ms. Ghez as members of the committee, with Ms. Ghez serving as chairman of the committee. We expect that our board of directors will adopt a written charter for the Nominating and Governance Committee, which will be available on our corporate website at www.thesimplygoodfoodscompany.com upon the completion of the Business Combination. The information on our website is not part of this proxy statement/prospectus.

Executive Vice Chairman

The Executive Vice Chairman will be responsible for working with the Chief Executive Officer in coordinating the post-combination company’s activities with key external stakeholders and parties. These activities will include

164

corporate governance matters, investor relations, financing and mergers and acquisitions. Additionally, the Executive Vice Chairman will work with the Chief Executive Officer to develop and gain approval from the board of directors of the growth strategy of the post-combination company.

Code of Ethics

Upon consummation of the Business Combination, our newly appointed board of directors will adopt a code of ethics applicable to our directors, officers and employees. In addition, a copy of the code of ethics will be provided without charge upon request from us. We intend to disclose any amendments to or waivers of certain provisions of our code of ethics in a Current Report on Form 8-K.

Post-Combination Company Executive Compensation

Following the closing of the Business Combination, the combined company intends to develop an executive compensation program that is designed to align compensation with the combined company’s business objectives and the creation of stockholder value, while enabling the combined company to attract, motivate and retain individuals who contribute to the long-term success of the combined company. Decisions on the executive compensation program will be made by the Compensation Committee of the board of directors.

2017 Long Term Incentive Plan

Simply Good Foods intends to establish a long term incentive compensation plan (the “2017 Long Term Incentive Plan”). The purpose of the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan is to provide incentives that will attract, retain and motivate high performing officers, non-employee directors, employees and consultants by providing them with appropriate incentives and rewards either through a proprietary interest in our long-term success or compensation based on their performance in fulfilling their personal responsibilities. The 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan as it is currently being contemplated could provide awards in a number of forms that include stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, performance awards, other stock-based awards and other cash-based awards. It is expected that officers, non-employee directors, employees and other consulting or advisory service providers of us and any of our subsidiaries and affiliates would be eligible for grants under the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan. Set forth below are the expected material terms of the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan.

Administration

The 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan will be administered by the compensation committee of our board of directors. Among the compensation committee’s powers will be to: (1) determine the form, amount and other terms and conditions of awards and the persons to whom awards will be granted; (2) administer and interpret the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan, including clarifying, construing and/or resolving any ambiguity in any provision of the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan or any award agreement issued thereunder; (3) amend the terms of outstanding awards; (4) adopt such rules, forms, instruments and guidelines for administering the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan as it deems necessary or proper; (5) make all other determinations in connection with the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan and the awards issued thereunder as it deems necessary and/or desirable; and (6) delegate authority under the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan to our executive officers.

Available Shares

The aggregate number of shares of our common stock which may be issued or used for reference purposes under the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan or with respect to which awards may be granted may not exceed 9,067,917 shares, subject to adjustment to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights granted to, or available for, participants under the plan. In the event stockholders exercise their redemption rights and the amount of issued and outstanding shares of Simply Good Foods common stock is reduced, the maximum number of shares issuable under the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan may be downwardly adjusted to prevent enlargement of the rights granted to participants. In general, if awards under the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan are cancelled for any reason, or expire or terminate unexercised, the shares of our common stock covered by such awards may again be available for the grant of awards under the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan.

With respect to any stock option, stock appreciation right, restricted stock award or other stock-based award that will be subject to the attainment of specified performance goals and intended to satisfy Section 162(m) of the

165

U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), the maximum number of shares of our common stock that may be granted under the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan during any fiscal year to any eligible individual will be 3,022,639 shares (per type of award). The total number of shares of our common stock with respect to all awards that may be granted under the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan during any fiscal year to any eligible individual will be 3,022,639 shares. With respect to restricted stock or other stock-based awards that are not subject to the attainment of specified performance goals, there are no annual limits on the number of shares of our common stock that may be granted to eligible individuals. The maximum number of shares of our common stock subject to any performance award which may be granted under the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan during any fiscal year to any eligible individual will be 3,022,639 shares.

Eligibility for Participation

Officers, non-employee directors, employees and other consulting or advisory service providers of us or any of our subsidiaries and affiliates will be eligible to receive awards under the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan. Awards granted under the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan are within the discretion of the compensation committee, and the compensation committee has not determined future awards, the form of such awards, or who might receive them.

Award Agreement

Awards granted under the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan will be evidenced by award agreements, which need not be identical, that provide additional terms, conditions, restrictions and/or limitations covering the grant of the award, including, without limitation, additional terms providing for the acceleration of exercisability or vesting of awards in the event of a change of control or conditions regarding the participant’s employment, in each case, as determined by the compensation committee.

Stock Options

The compensation committee will be able to grant nonqualified stock options to eligible individuals and incentive stock options only to eligible employees. The compensation committee will determine the number of shares of our common stock subject to each option, the term of each option, which may not exceed ten years, or five years in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a ten percent stockholder, the exercise price, the vesting schedule, if any, and the other material terms of each option. No incentive stock option or nonqualified stock option may have an exercise price less than the fair market value of a share of our common stock at the time of grant or, in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a ten percent stockholder, 110% of such share’s fair market value. Options will be exercisable at such time or times and subject to such terms and conditions as determined by the compensation committee at grant date, and the exercisability of such options may be accelerated by the compensation committee in its discretion.

Stock Appreciation Rights

The compensation committee will be able to grant stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), either with a stock option, which may be exercised only at such times and to the extent the related option is exercisable (“Tandem SAR”), or independent of a stock option (“Non-Tandem SAR”). A SAR is a right to receive a payment in shares of our common stock or cash, as determined by the compensation committee, equal in value to the excess of the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the date of exercise over the exercise price per share established in connection with the grant of the SAR. The term of each SAR may not exceed ten years. The exercise price per share covered by a SAR will be the exercise price per share of the related option in the case of a Tandem SAR and will be the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant in the case of a Non-Tandem SAR. The compensation committee will also be able to grant limited SARs, either as Tandem SARs or Non-Tandem SARs, which may become exercisable only upon the occurrence of a change of control, as defined in the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan, or such other event as the compensation committee may designate at the time of grant or thereafter.

Restricted Stock

The compensation committee will be able to award shares of restricted stock. Except as otherwise provided by the compensation committee upon the award of restricted stock, the recipient will generally have the rights of a stockholder with respect to the shares, including the right to receive dividends, the right to vote the shares of

166

restricted stock and, conditioned upon full vesting of shares of restricted stock, the right to tender such shares, subject to the conditions and restrictions generally applicable to restricted stock or specifically set forth in the recipient’s restricted stock agreement. The compensation committee will be able to determine at the time of award that the payment of dividends, if any, will be deferred until the expiration of the applicable restriction period.

Each recipient of restricted stock will be required to enter into a restricted stock agreement with us that states the restrictions to which the shares are subject, such as satisfaction of pre-established performance goals, and the criteria or date or dates on which such restrictions will lapse.

If the grant of restricted stock or the lapse of the relevant restrictions is based on the attainment of performance goals, the compensation committee will establish for each recipient the applicable performance goals, formulae or standards and the applicable vesting percentages with reference to the attainment of such goals or satisfaction of such formulae or standards while the outcome of the performance goals are substantially uncertain. Such performance goals may incorporate provisions for disregarding, or adjusting for, changes in accounting methods, corporate transactions, including, without limitation, dispositions and acquisitions, and other similar events or circumstances. Section 162(m) of the Code requires that performance awards be based upon objective performance measures.

Other Stock-Based Awards

The compensation committee will be able to, subject to limitations under applicable law, make a grant of such other stock-based awards, including, without limitation, performance units, dividend equivalent units, stock equivalent units, restricted stock units and deferred stock units under the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan that are payable in cash or denominated or payable in or valued by shares of our common stock or factors that influence the value of such shares. The compensation committee will be able to determine the terms and conditions of any such other awards, which may include the achievement of certain minimum performance goals for purposes of compliance with Section 162(m) of the Code and/or a minimum vesting period. The performance goals for performance-based and other stock-based awards will be based on one or more of the objective criteria set forth on Exhibit A to the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan and discussed in general below.

Other Cash-Based Awards

The compensation committee will be able to grant awards payable in cash. Cash-based awards will be in such form, and dependent on such conditions, as the compensation committee will determine, including, without limitation, being subject to the satisfaction of vesting conditions or awarded purely as a bonus and not subject to restrictions or conditions. If a cash-based award is subject to vesting conditions, the compensation committee will be able to accelerate the vesting of such award in its discretion.

Performance Awards

The compensation committee will be able to grant a performance award to a participant payable upon the attainment of specific performance goals. The compensation committee will be able to grant performance awards that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, as well as performance awards that are not intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code. If the performance award is payable in cash, it may be paid upon the attainment of the relevant performance goals either in cash or in shares of restricted stock, based on the then current fair market value of such shares, as determined by the compensation committee. Based on service, performance and/or other factors or criteria, the compensation committee will be able to, at or after grant, accelerate the vesting of all or any part of any performance award in its discretion.

Performance Goals

The compensation committee will be able to grant awards of restricted stock, performance awards, and other stock-based awards that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code. These awards may be granted, vest and be paid based on attainment of specified performance goals established by the compensation committee. These performance goals may be based on the attainment by the Company of a certain target level of, or a specified increase or decrease in, one or more of the following measures selected by the compensation committee: (1) earnings per share; (2) operating income; (3) gross income; (4) net income, before or

167

after taxes; (5) cash flow; (6) gross profit; (7) gross profit return on investment; (8) gross margin return on investment; (9) gross margin; (10) operating margin; (11) working capital; (12) income before interest and taxes; (13) income before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization; (14) return on equity; (15) return on assets; (16) return on capital; (17) return on invested capital; (18) net revenues; (19) gross revenues; (20) revenue growth; (21) annual recurring revenues; (22) recurring revenues; (23) license revenues; (24) sales or market share; (25) total stockholder return; (26) economic value added; (27) specified objectives with regard to limiting the level of increase in all or a portion of our bank debt or other long-term or short-term public or private debt or other similar financial obligations, which may be calculated net of cash balances and other off sets and adjustments as may be established by the compensation committee; (28) the fair market value of a share of our common stock; (29) the growth in the value of an investment in our common stock assuming the reinvestment of dividends; or (30) reduction in operating expenses.

To the extent permitted by law, the compensation committee will also be able to exclude the impact of an event or occurrence which the compensation committee determines should be appropriately excluded, such as (1) restructurings, discontinued operations, extraordinary items and other unusual or non-recurring charges; (2) an event either not directly related to our operations or not within the reasonable control of management; or (3) a change in tax law or accounting standards required by generally accepted accounting principles.

Performance goals may also be based on an individual participant’s performance goals, as determined by the compensation committee.

In addition, all performance goals may be based upon the attainment of specified levels of our performance, or the performance of a subsidiary, division or other operational unit, under one or more of the measures described above relative to the performance of other corporations. The compensation committee will be able to designate additional business criteria on which the performance goals may be based or adjust, modify or amend those criteria.

Change of Control

In connection with a change of control, as defined in the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan, the compensation committee will be able to accelerate vesting of outstanding awards under the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan. In addition, such awards may be, in the discretion of the compensation committee, (1) assumed and continued or substituted in accordance with applicable law; (2) purchased by us for an amount equal to the excess of the price of a share of our common stock paid in a change of control over the exercise price of the awards; or (3) cancelled if the price of a share of our common stock paid in a change of control is less than the exercise price of the award. The compensation committee will also be able to provide for accelerated vesting or lapse of restrictions of an award at any time.

Stockholder Rights

Except as otherwise provided in the applicable award agreement, and with respect to an award of restricted stock, a participant will have no rights as a stockholder with respect to shares of our common stock covered by any award until the participant becomes the record holder of such shares.

Amendment and Termination

Notwithstanding any other provision of the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan, our board of directors will be able to, at any time, amend any or all of the provisions of the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan, or suspend or terminate it entirely, retroactively or otherwise, subject to stockholder approval in certain instances; provided, however, that, unless otherwise required by law or specifically provided in the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan, the rights of a participant with respect to awards granted prior to such amendment, suspension or termination may not be adversely affected without the consent of such participant.

Transferability

Awards granted under the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan generally will be nontransferable, other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, except that the compensation committee will be able to provide for the transferability of nonqualified stock options at the time of grant or thereafter to certain family members.

168

Recoupment of Awards

The 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan will provide that awards granted under the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan are subject to any recoupment policy that we may have in place or any obligation that we may have regarding the clawback of “incentive-based compensation” under the Exchange Act or under any applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Effective Date; Term

The 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan will be adopted by our board of directors substantially simultaneously with the consummation of the Business Combination. No award will be granted under the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan on or after the tenth anniversary of the date that the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan is adopted. Any award outstanding under the 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan at the time of termination will remain in effect until such award is exercised or has expired in accordance with its terms.

169

DESCRIPTION OF PARENT SECURITIES

Conyers Park’s authorized capital stock consists of 200,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value, 20,000,000 shares of Class B common stock, $0.0001 par value, and 1,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock, $0.0001 par value. The following description summarizes the material terms of Conyers Park’s capital stock. Because it is only a summary, it may not contain all the information that is important to you.

Units

Each unit consists of one whole share of Class A common stock and one-third of one warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the holder thereof to purchase one share of Conyers Park Class A common stock at a price of $11.50 per share, subject to adjustment as described in its prospectus. Pursuant to the warrant agreement, a warrantholder may exercise its warrants only for a whole number of shares of Class A common stock. This means that only a whole warrant may be exercised at any given time by a warrantholder. No fractional warrants will be issued upon separation of the units and only whole warrants will trade. Accordingly, unless you purchase at least three units, you will not be able to receive or trade a whole warrant.

The Class A common stock and warrants comprising the units began separate trading on the September 6, 2016. Holders have the option to continue to hold units or separate their units into the component securities.

Common Stock

There are 40,250,000 shares of Conyers Park’s Class A common stock outstanding (which includes Class A common stock that are underlying the Company’s Units), and 10,062,500 shares of the Company’s Class B common stock held by Conyers Park’s initial stockholders.

Common stockholders of record are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters to be voted on by stockholders. Holders of the Class A common stock and holders of the Class B common stock will vote together as a single class on all matters submitted to a vote of Conyers Park’s stockholders, except as required by law. Unless specified in Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation or bylaws, or as required by applicable provisions of the DGCL or applicable stock exchange rules, the affirmative vote of a majority of Conyers Park’s shares of common stock that are voted is required to approve any such matter voted on by Conyers Park’s stockholders. Conyers Park’s board of directors will be divided into three classes, each of which will generally serve for a term of three years with only one class of directors being elected in each year. There is no cumulative voting with respect to the election of directors, with the result that the holders of more than 50% of the shares voted for the election of directors can elect all of the directors. Conyers Park’s stockholders are entitled to receive ratable dividends when, as and if declared by the board of directors out of funds legally available therefor.

Because Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 200,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, if we were to enter into a business combination, Conyers Park may (depending on the terms of such a business combination) be required to increase the number of shares of Class A common stock which Conyers Park is authorized to issue at the same time as Conyers Park’s stockholders vote on the business combination to the extent we seek stockholder approval in connection with the Business Combination.

In accordance with NASDAQ corporate governance requirements, Conyers Park is not required to hold an annual meeting until no later than one year after Conyers Park’s first fiscal year end following its listing on NASDAQ. Under Section 211(b) of the DGCL, Conyers Park is, however, required to hold an annual meeting of stockholders for the purposes of electing directors in accordance with its bylaws, unless such election is made by written consent in lieu of such a meeting. Conyers Park may not hold an annual meeting of stockholders to elect new directors prior to the consummation of its initial Business Combination, and thus Conyers Park may not be in compliance with Section 211(b) of the DGCL, which requires an annual meeting. Therefore, if Conyers Park’s stockholders want Conyers Park to hold an annual meeting prior to the consummation of its initial business combination, they may attempt to force Conyers Park to hold one by submitting an application to the Delaware Court of Chancery in accordance with Section 211(c) of the DGCL.

Conyers Park will provide its stockholders with the opportunity to redeem all or a portion of their public shares upon the completion of Conyers Park’s initial business combination at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account as of two business days prior to the consummation

170

of our initial business combination including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to us to pay up to $1,000,000 of Conyers Park’s working capital requirements as well as to pay its franchise and income taxes, divided by the number of then outstanding public shares, subject to the limitations described herein. The amount in the Trust Account is initially anticipated to be approximately $10.00 per public share. The per-share amount Conyers Park will distribute to investors who properly redeem their shares will not be reduced by the deferred underwriting commissions Conyers Park will pay to the underwriters. Sponsor, officers and directors have entered into a letter agreement with Conyers Park, pursuant to which they have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to any Founder Shares and any public shares held by them in connection with the completion of Conyers Park’s business combination. Unlike many blank check companies that hold stockholder votes and conduct proxy solicitations in conjunction with their initial business combinations and provide for related redemptions of public shares for cash upon completion of such initial business combinations even when a vote is not required by law, if a stockholder vote is not required by law and Conyers Park does not decide to hold a stockholder vote for business or other legal reasons, Conyers Park will, pursuant to its amended and restated certificate of incorporation, conduct the redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules of the SEC, and file tender offer documents with the SEC prior to completing its initial business combination. Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation will require these tender offer documents to contain substantially the same financial and other information about the initial business combination and the redemption rights as is required under the SEC’s proxy rules. If, however, a stockholder approval of the transaction is required by law, or Conyers Park decides to obtain stockholder approval for business or other legal reasons, Conyers Park will, like many blank check companies, offer to redeem shares in conjunction with a proxy solicitation pursuant to the proxy rules and not pursuant to the tender offer rules. If Conyers Park seeks stockholder approval, Conyers Park will complete its initial business combination only if a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock voted are voted in favor of the business combination. A quorum for such meeting will consist of the holders present in person or by proxy of shares of outstanding capital stock of the company representing a majority of the voting power of all outstanding shares of capital stock of the company entitled to vote at such meeting. However, the participation of Sponsor, officers, directors, advisors or their affiliates in privately-negotiated transactions (as described in this prospectus), if any, could result in the approval of Conyers Park’s business combination even if a majority of its public stockholders vote, or indicate their intention to vote, against such business combination. For purposes of seeking approval of the majority of its outstanding shares of common stock voted, non-votes will have no effect on the approval of Conyers Park’s business combination once a quorum is obtained. Conyers Park intends to give approximately 30 days (but not less than 10 days nor more than 60 days) prior written notice of any such meeting, if required, at which a vote shall be taken to approve our business combination. These quorum and voting thresholds, and the voting agreements of Conyers Park’s initial stockholders, may make it more likely that Conyers Park will consummate its initial business combination.

If Conyers Park seeks stockholder approval of its initial business combination and Conyers Park does not conduct redemptions in connection with its business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that a public stockholder, together with any affiliate of such stockholder or any other person with whom such stockholder is acting in concert or as a “group” (as defined under Section 13 of the Exchange Act), will be restricted from redeeming its shares with respect to more than an aggregate of 10% of the shares of common stock sold in Conyers Park’s IPO, which Conyers Park refers to as the Excess Shares. However, Conyers Park would not be restricting its stockholders’ ability to vote all of their shares (including Excess Shares) for or against Conyers Park’s business combination. Conyers Park’s stockholders’ inability to redeem the Excess Shares will reduce their influence over Conyers Park’s ability to complete Conyers Park’s business combination, and such stockholders could suffer a material loss in their investment if they sell such Excess Shares on the open market. Additionally, such stockholders will not receive redemption distributions with respect to the Excess Shares if Conyers Park completes the business combination. And, as a result, such stockholders will continue to hold that number of shares exceeding 10% and, in order to dispose such shares would be required to sell their stock in open market transactions, potentially at a loss.

If Conyers Park seeks stockholder approval in connection with its business combination, Conyers Park’s initial stockholders have agreed to vote their Founder Shares and any public shares purchased during or after the IPO in favor of Conyers Park’s initial business combination. As a result, in addition to Conyers Park’s initial stockholders’ Founder Shares, Conyers Park would need 15,093,751, or 37.5%, of the 40,250,000 public shares outstanding to be voted in favor of a transaction (assuming all outstanding shares are voted) in order to have Conyers Park’s initial business combination approved (assuming the over-allotment option is not exercised). Additionally, each public

171

stockholder may elect to redeem its public shares irrespective of whether they vote for or against the proposed transaction (subject to the limitation described in the preceding paragraph).

Pursuant to Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, if Conyers Park is unable to complete its business combination within 24 months from the closing of the IPO, Conyers Park will (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but no more than ten business days thereafter subject to lawfully available funds therefor, redeem the public shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to Conyers Park to pay up to $1,000,000 of Conyers Park’s working capital requirements as well as to pay Conyers Park’s franchise and income taxes (less up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of then outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public stockholders’ rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidating distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of Conyers Park’s remaining stockholders and Conyers Park’s board of directors, dissolve and liquidate, subject in each case to Conyers Park’s obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law. Sponsor, officers and directors have entered into a letter agreement with Conyers Park, pursuant to which they have agreed to waive their rights to liquidating distributions from the Trust Account with respect to any Founder Shares held by them if Conyers Park fails to complete its business combination within 24 months from the closing of the IPO. However, if Conyers Park’s initial stockholders acquire public shares after the IPO, they will be entitled to liquidating distributions from the Trust Account with respect to such public shares if Conyers Park fails to complete its business combination within the prescribed time period.

In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the company after a business combination, Conyers Park’s stockholders are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining available for distribution to them after payment of liabilities and after provision is made for each class of stock, if any, having preference over the common stock. Conyers Park’s stockholders have no preemptive or other subscription rights. There are no sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock, except that Conyers Park will provide its stockholders with the opportunity to redeem their public shares for cash equal to their pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to it to pay up to $1,000,000 of the Company’s working capital requirements as well as to pay the Company’s franchise and income taxes, upon the completion of its initial business combination, subject to the limitations described herein.

Founder Shares

The Founder Shares are identical to the shares of Class A common stock included in the units, and holders of Founder Shares have the same stockholder rights as public stockholders, except that (i) the Founder Shares are subject to certain transfer restrictions, as described in more detail below, (ii) Sponsor, officers and directors have entered into a letter agreement with Conyers Park, pursuant to which they have agreed (A) to waive their redemption rights with respect to any Founder Shares and any public shares held by them in connection with the completion of Conyers Park’s business combination and (B) to waive their rights to liquidating distributions from the Trust Account with respect to any Founder Shares held by them if Conyers Park fails to complete its business combination within 24 months from the closing of the IPO, although they will be entitled to liquidating distributions from the Trust Account with respect to any public shares they hold if Conyers Park fails to complete its business combination within such time period, (iii) the Founder Shares are shares of Conyers Park’s Class B common stock that will automatically convert into shares of Conyers Park’s Class A common stock at the time of its initial business combination, or at any time prior thereto at the option of the holder, on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment pursuant to certain anti-dilution rights, as described herein and (iv) are subject to registration rights. If Conyers Park submits its business combination to its public stockholders for a vote, Conyers Park’s initial stockholders have agreed to vote any Founder Shares held by them and any public shares purchased during or after the IPO in favor of Conyers Park’s initial business combination.

The shares of Class B common stock will automatically convert into shares of Class A common stock at the time of Conyers Park’s initial business combination on a one-for-one basis (subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like), and subject to further adjustment as provided herein. In the case that additional shares of Class A common stock, or equity-linked securities, are issued or deemed issued

172

in excess of the amounts offered in this prospectus and related to the closing of the business combination, including pursuant to a specified future issuance, the ratio at which shares of Class B common stock shall convert into shares of Class A common stock will be adjusted (unless the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Class B common stock agree to waive such adjustment with respect to any such issuance or deemed issuance, including a specified future issuance) so that the number of shares of Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of all shares of Class B common stock will equal, in the aggregate, on an as-converted basis, 20% of the sum of the total number of all shares of common stock outstanding plus all shares of Class A common stock and equity-linked securities issued or deemed issued in connection with the business combination (excluding any shares or equity-linked securities issued, or to be issued, to any seller in the business combination). Holders of Founder shares may also elect to convert their shares of Class B common stock into an equal number of shares of Class A common stock, subject to adjustment as provided above, at any time.

With certain limited exceptions, the Founder Shares are not transferable, assignable or salable (except to Conyers Park’s officers and directors and other persons or entities affiliated with Sponsor, each of whom will be subject to the same transfer restrictions) until the earlier of (A) one year after the completion of Conyers Park’s initial business combination or (B) subsequent to Conyers Park’s initial business combination, (x) if the last sale price of Conyers Park’s Class A common stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing at least 150 days after Conyers Park’s initial business combination, or (y) the date on which Conyers Park completes a liquidation, merger, capital stock exchange, reorganization or other similar transaction that results in all of Conyers Park’s stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property.

Preferred Stock

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that shares of preferred stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series. Conyers Park’s board of directors will be authorized to fix the voting rights, if any, designations, powers, preferences, the relative, participating, optional or other special rights and any qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof, applicable to the shares of each series. Conyers Park’s board of directors will be able to, without stockholder approval, issue preferred stock with voting and other rights that could adversely affect the voting power and other rights of the holders of the common stock and could have anti-takeover effects. The ability of Conyers Park’s board of directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control of Conyers Park or the removal of existing management. Conyers Park has no preferred stock outstanding at the date hereof. Although Conyers Park does not currently intend to issue any shares of preferred stock, Conyers Park cannot assure you that it will not do so in the future.

Warrants

Public Stockholders’ Warrants

Each whole warrant entitles the registered holder to purchase one whole share of Conyers Park’s Class A Common Stock at a price of $11.50 per share, subject to adjustment as discussed below, at any time commencing on the later of 12 months from the closing of the Conyers Park IPO or 30 days after the completion of Conyers Park’s initial business combination. Pursuant to the warrant agreement, a warrantholder may exercise its warrants only for a whole number of shares of Class A common stock. This means that only a whole warrant may be exercised at any given time by a warrantholder. No fractional warrants will be issued upon separation of the units and only whole warrants will trade. Accordingly, unless you purchase at least three units, you will not be able to receive or trade a whole warrant. The warrants will expire five years after the completion of Conyers Park’s initial business combination, at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, or earlier upon redemption or liquidation.

Conyers Park will not be obligated to deliver any shares of Class A common stock pursuant to the exercise of a warrant and will have no obligation to settle such warrant exercise unless a registration statement under the Securities Act with respect to the shares of Class A common stock underlying the warrants is then effective and a prospectus relating thereto is current, subject to Conyers Park’s satisfying its obligations described below with respect to registration. No warrant will be exercisable and Conyers Park will not be obligated to issue shares of Class A common stock upon exercise of a warrant unless Class A common stock issuable upon such warrant exercise

173

has been registered, qualified or deemed to be exempt under the securities laws of the state of residence of the registered holder of the warrants. In the event that the conditions in the two immediately preceding sentences are not satisfied with respect to a warrant, the holder of such warrant will not be entitled to exercise such warrant and such warrant may have no value and expire worthless. In the event that a registration statement is not effective for the exercised warrants, the purchaser of a unit containing such warrant will have paid the full purchase price for the unit solely for the share of Class A common stock underlying such unit.

Conyers Park has agreed that as soon as practicable, but in no event later than 15 business days after the closing of its initial business combination, Conyers Park will use its best efforts to file with the SEC a registration statement for the registration, under the Securities Act, of the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants. Conyers Park will use its best efforts to cause the same to become effective within 60 business days following Conyers Park’s initial business combination and to maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement, and a current prospectus relating thereto, until the expiration of the warrants in accordance with the provisions of the warrant agreement. Notwithstanding the above, if Conyers Park’s Class A common stock is at the time of any exercise of a warrant not listed on a national securities exchange such that it satisfies the definition of a “covered security” under Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act, Conyers Park may, at its option, require holders of public warrants who exercise their warrants to do so on a “cashless basis” in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act and, in the event Conyers Park so elects, Conyers Park will not be required to file or maintain in effect a registration statement, but we will be required to use its best efforts to register or qualify the shares under applicable blue sky laws to the extent an exemption is not available.

Once the warrants become exercisable, Conyers Park may call the warrants for redemption:

•         in whole and not in part;

•         at a price of $0.01 per warrant;

•         upon not less than 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption (the “30-day redemption period”) to each warrant holder; and

•         if, and only if, the reported last sale price of the Class A common stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period ending three business days before Conyers Park sends the notice of redemption to the warrant holders.

If and when the warrants become redeemable by Conyers Park, Conyers Park may exercise its redemption right even if Conyers Park is unable to register or qualify the underlying securities for sale under all applicable state securities laws.

Conyers Park has established the last of the redemption criterion discussed above to prevent a redemption call unless there is at the time of the call a significant premium to the warrant exercise price. If the foregoing conditions are satisfied and Conyers Park issues a notice of redemption of the warrants, each warrant holder will be entitled to exercise its warrant prior to the scheduled redemption date. However, the price of the Class A common stock may fall below the $18.00 redemption trigger price as well as the $11.50 (for whole shares) warrant exercise price after the redemption notice is issued.

If Conyers Park calls the warrants for redemption as described above, Conyers Park’s management will have the option to require any holder that wishes to exercise its warrant to do so on a “cashless basis.” In determining whether to require all holders to exercise their warrants on a “cashless basis,” Conyers Park’s management will consider, among other factors, its cash position, the number of warrants that are outstanding and the dilutive effect on Conyers Park’s stockholders of issuing the maximum number of shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise of our warrants. If Conyers Park’s management takes advantage of this option, all holders of warrants would pay the exercise price by surrendering their warrants for that number of shares of Class A common stock equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the product of the number of shares of Class A common stock underlying the warrants, multiplied by the difference between the exercise price of the warrants and the “fair market value” (defined below) by (y) the fair market value. The “fair market value” shall mean the average reported last sale price of the Class A common stock for the 10 trading days ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which the notice of redemption is sent to the holders of warrants. If Conyers Park’s management takes advantage of this option, the notice of redemption will contain the information necessary to calculate the number of shares of Class A Common Stock to be received upon exercise of the warrants, including the “fair market value” in such

174

case. Requiring a cashless exercise in this manner will reduce the number of shares to be issued and thereby lessen the dilutive effect of a warrant redemption. Conyers Park believes this feature is an attractive option to it if it does not need the cash from the exercise of the warrants after its initial business combination. If Conyers Park calls its warrants for redemption and Conyers Park’s management does not take advantage of this option, Sponsor and its permitted transferees would still be entitled to exercise their private placement warrants for cash or on a cashless basis using the same formula described above that other warrant holders would have been required to use had all warrant holders been required to exercise their warrants on a cashless basis, as described in more detail below.

A holder of a warrant may notify Conyers Park in writing in the event it elects to be subject to a requirement that such holder will not have the right to exercise such warrant, to the extent that after giving effect to such exercise, such person (together with such person’s affiliates), to the warrant agent’s actual knowledge, would beneficially own in excess of 9.8% (or such other amount as a holder may specify) of the shares of Class A common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to such exercise.

If the number of outstanding shares of Class A common stock is increased by a stock dividend payable in shares of Class A common stock, or by a split-up of shares of Class A common stock or other similar event, then, on the effective date of such stock dividend, split-up or similar event, the number of shares of Class A common stock issuable on exercise of each warrant will be increased in proportion to such increase in the outstanding shares of Class A common stock. A rights offering to holders of Class A common stock entitling holders to purchase shares of Class A common stock at a price less than the fair market value will be deemed a stock dividend of a number of shares of Class A common stock equal to the product of (i) the number of shares of Class A common stock actually sold in such rights offering (or issuable under any other equity securities sold in such rights offering that are convertible into or exercisable for Class A common stock) multiplied by (ii) one (1) minus the quotient of (x) the price per share of Class A common stock paid in such rights offering divided by (y) the fair market value. For these purposes (i) if the rights offering is for securities convertible into or exercisable for Class A common stock, in determining the price payable for Class A common stock, there will be taken into account any consideration received for such rights, as well as any additional amount payable upon exercise or conversion and (ii) fair market value means the volume weighted average price of Class A common stock as reported during the ten (10) trading day period ending on the trading day prior to the first date on which the shares of Class A common stock trade on the applicable exchange or in the applicable market, regular way, without the right to receive such rights.

In addition, if Conyers Park, at any time while the warrants are outstanding and unexpired, pays a dividend or make a distribution in cash, securities or other assets to the holders of Class A common stock on account of such shares of Class A common stock (or other shares of our capital stock into which the warrants are convertible), other than (a) as described above, (b) certain ordinary cash dividends, (c) to satisfy the redemption rights of the holders of Class A common stock in connection with a proposed initial business combination, (d) to satisfy the redemption rights of the holders of Class A common stock in connection with a stockholder vote to amend Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation to modify the substance or timing of its obligation to redeem 100% of its Class A common stock if Conyers Park does not complete its initial business combination within 24 months from the closing of the Conyers Park IPO, or (e) in connection with the redemption of its public shares upon its failure to complete its initial business combination, then the warrant exercise price will be decreased, effective immediately after the effective date of such event, by the amount of cash and/or the fair market value of any securities or other assets paid on each share of Class A common stock in respect of such event.

If the number of outstanding shares of our Class A common stock is decreased by a consolidation, combination, reverse stock split or reclassification of shares of Class A common stock or other similar event, then, on the effective date of such consolidation, combination, reverse stock split, reclassification or similar event, the number of shares of Class A common stock issuable on exercise of each warrant will be decreased in proportion to such decrease in outstanding shares of Class A common stock.

Whenever the number of shares of Class A common stock purchasable upon the exercise of the warrants is adjusted, as described above, the warrant exercise price will be adjusted by multiplying the warrant exercise price immediately prior to such adjustment by a fraction (x) the numerator of which will be the number of shares of Class A common stock purchasable upon the exercise of the warrants immediately prior to such adjustment, and (y) the denominator of which will be the number of shares of Class A common stock so purchasable immediately thereafter.

175

In case of any reclassification or reorganization of the outstanding shares of Class A common stock (other than those described above or that solely affects the par value of such shares of Class A common stock), or in the case of any merger or consolidation of Conyers Park with or into another corporation (other than a consolidation or merger in which Conyers Park is the continuing corporation and that does not result in any reclassification or reorganization of its outstanding shares of Class A common stock), or in the case of any sale or conveyance to another corporation or entity of the assets or other property of Conyers Park as an entirety or substantially as an entirety in connection with which Conyers Park is dissolved, the holders of the warrants will thereafter have the right to purchase and receive, upon the basis and upon the terms and conditions specified in the warrants and in lieu of the shares of Conyers Park’s Class A common stock immediately theretofore purchasable and receivable upon the exercise of the rights represented thereby, the kind and amount of shares of stock or other securities or property (including cash) receivable upon such reclassification, reorganization, merger or consolidation, or upon a dissolution following any such sale or transfer, that the holder of the warrants would have received if such holder had exercised their warrants immediately prior to such event. If less than 70% of the consideration receivable by the holders of Class A common stock in such a transaction is payable in the form of Class A common stock in the successor entity that is listed for trading on a national securities exchange or is quoted in an established over-the-counter market, or is to be so listed for trading or quoted immediately following such event, and if the registered holder of the warrant properly exercises the warrant within thirty days following public disclosure of such transaction, the warrant exercise price will be reduced as specified in the warrant agreement based on the Black-Scholes value (as defined in the warrant agreement) of the warrant.

The warrants were issued in registered form under a warrant agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent, and Conyers Park. The warrant agreement provides that the terms of the warrants may be amended without the consent of any holder to cure any ambiguity or correct any defective provision, but requires the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants to make any change that adversely affects the interests of the registered holders of public warrants.

The warrants may be exercised upon surrender of the warrant certificate on or prior to the expiration date at the offices of the warrant agent, with the exercise form on the reverse side of the warrant certificate completed and executed as indicated, accompanied by full payment of the exercise price (or on a cashless basis, if applicable), by certified or official bank check payable to Conyers Park, for the number of warrants being exercised. The warrant holders do not have the rights or privileges of holders of Class A common stock and any voting rights until they exercise their warrants and receive shares of Class A common stock. After the issuance of shares of Class A common stock upon exercise of the warrants, each holder will be entitled to one (1) vote for each share held of record on all matters to be voted on by stockholders.

No fractional shares will be issued upon exercise of the warrants. If, upon exercise of the warrants, a holder would be entitled to receive a fractional interest in a share, Conyers Park, upon exercise, will round down to the nearest whole number of shares of Class A common stock to be issued to the warrant holder.

Private Placement Warrants

Sponsor purchased an aggregate of 6,700,000 private placement warrants (including warrants required to be purchased in connection with the over-allotment option) at a price of $1.50 per warrant in a private placement that occurred simultaneously with the closing of the Public Offering (the “Private Placement Warrants”). Each Private Placement Warrant is exercisable for one whole share of the Company’s Class A common stock at a price of $11.50 per share. A portion of the purchase price of the Private Placement Warrants has been added to the proceeds from Conyers Park’s IPO Public Offering held in its Trust Account pending completion of the initial Business Combination such that at the closing of the Public Offering $402.5 million was held in the Trust Account. If the initial Business Combination is not completed within 24 months from the closing of the Conyers Park’s IPO, the proceeds from the sale of the Private Placement Warrants held in the Trust Account will be used to fund the redemption of common stock (subject to the requirements of applicable law) and the Private Placement Warrants will expire worthless.

The Private Placement Warrants are non-redeemable and exercisable on a cashless basis so long as they are held by Sponsor or its permitted transferees. The Sponsor and the Company’s officers and directors have agreed, subject to limited exceptions, not to transfer, assign or sell any of their Private Placement Warrants (including the Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the Private Placement Warrants) until 30 days after the completion of the Initial Business Combination.

176

Dividends

Conyers Park has not paid any cash dividends on its common stock to date and does not intend to pay cash dividends prior to the completion of its initial business combination. The payment of cash dividends in the future will be dependent upon its revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements and general financial condition subsequent to completion of its initial business combination. The payment of any cash dividends subsequent to Conyers Park’s initial business combination will be within the discretion of its board of directors at such time. In addition, Conyers Park’s board of directors is not currently contemplating and does not anticipate declaring any stock dividends in the foreseeable future. Further, if Conyers Park incurs any indebtedness in connection with its initial Business Combination, its ability to declare dividends may be limited by restrictive covenants it may agree to in connection therewith.

Conyers Park’s Transfer Agent and Warrant Agent

The transfer agent for Conyers Park’s common stock and warrant agent for Conyers Park’s warrants is Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company. Conyers Park has agreed to indemnify Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company in its roles as transfer agent and warrant agent, its agents and each of its stockholders, directors, officers and employees against all claims and losses that may arise out of acts performed or omitted for its activities in that capacity, except for any liability due to any gross negligence, willful misconduct or bad faith of the indemnified person or entity.

Conyers Park’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation

Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation contains certain requirements and restrictions that will apply to Conyers Park until the completion of its initial business combination. These provisions cannot be amended without the approval of the holders of 65% of Conyers Park’s common stock. Conyers Park’s initial stockholders, who will collectively beneficially own 20% of Conyers Park’s common stock will participate in any vote to amend Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and will have the discretion to vote in any manner they choose. Specifically, Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides, among other things, that:

•         if Conyers Park is unable to complete its initial business combination within 24 months from the closing of its IPO, Conyers Park will (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter subject to lawfully available funds therefor, redeem 100% of the public shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to us to pay up to $1,000,000 of Conyers Park’s working capital requirements as well as to pay its franchise and income taxes (less up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of then outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public stockholders’ rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidating distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of Conyers Park’s remaining stockholders and Conyers Park’s board of directors, dissolve and liquidate, subject in each case to Conyers Park’s obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law;

•         prior to Conyers Park’s initial business combination, Conyers Park may not issue additional shares of capital stock that would entitle the holders thereof to (i) receive funds from the Trust Account or (ii) vote on any initial business combination;

•         although Conyers Park does not intend to enter into a business combination with a target business that is affiliated with Sponsor, its directors or its officers, Conyers Park is not prohibited from doing so. In the event Conyers Park enters into such a transaction, Conyers Park, or a committee of independent directors, will obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm that is a member of FINRA or an independent accounting firm that such a business combination is fair to Conyers Park’s from a financial point of view;

177

•         if a stockholder vote on Conyers Park’s initial business combination is not required by law and we do not decide to hold a stockholder vote for business or other legal reasons, Conyers Park will offer to redeem its public shares pursuant to Rule 13e-4 and Regulation 14E of the Exchange Act, and will file tender offer documents with the SEC prior to completing its initial business combination which contain substantially the same financial and other information about its initial business combination and the redemption rights as is required under Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act;

•         Conyers Park’s initial business combination must occur with one or more target businesses that together have an aggregate fair market value of at least 80% of its assets held in the Trust Account (excluding the deferred underwriting commissions and taxes payable on the income earned on the Trust Account) at the time of the agreement to enter into the initial business combination;

•         if Conyers Park’s stockholders approve an amendment to its amended and restated certificate of incorporation that would affect the substance or timing of its obligation to redeem 100% of its public shares if Conyers Park does not complete its business combination within 24 months from the closing of its IPO, Conyers Park will provide its public stockholders with the opportunity to redeem all or a portion of their shares of Class A common stock upon such approval at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account, including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to it to pay up to $1,000,000 of the Company’s working capital requirements as well as to pay the Company’s franchise and income taxes (less up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of then outstanding public shares; and

•         Conyers Park will not effectuate its initial business combination with another blank check company or a similar company with nominal operations.

In addition, Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that under no circumstances will Conyers Park redeem its public shares in an amount that would cause its net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 upon consummation of its initial business combination.

Certain Anti-Takeover Provisions of Delaware Law and Conyers Park’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws

Conyers Park has opted out of Section 203 of the DGCL. However, Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation contains similar provisions providing that it may not engage in certain “business combinations” with any “interested stockholder” for a three-year period following the time that the stockholder became an interested stockholder, unless:

•         prior to such time, Conyers Park’s board of directors approved either the business combination or the transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder;

•         upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of Conyers Park’s voting stock outstanding at the time the transaction commenced, excluding certain shares; or

•         at or subsequent to that time, the business combination is approved by Conyers Park’s board of directors and by the affirmative vote of holders of at least 66⅔% of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the interested stockholder.

Generally, a “business combination” includes a merger, asset or stock sale or certain other transactions resulting in a financial benefit to the interested stockholder. Subject to certain exceptions, an “interested stockholder” is a person who, together with that person’s affiliates and associates, owns, or within the previous three years owned, 15% or more of Conyers Park’s voting stock.

Under certain circumstances, this provision will make it more difficult for a person who would be an “interested stockholder” to effect various business combinations with a corporation for a three-year period. This provision may encourage companies interested in acquiring Conyers Park to negotiate in advance with Conyers Park’s board of directors because the stockholder approval requirement would be avoided if Conyers Park’s board of directors approves either the business combination or the transaction which results in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder. These provisions also may have the effect of preventing changes in Conyers Park’s board of directors and may make it more difficult to accomplish transactions which stockholders may otherwise deem to be in their best interests.

178

Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that Centerview Capital Holdings LLC, the Sponsor and their respective affiliates, any of their respective direct or indirect transferees of at least 15% of Conyers Park’s outstanding common stock and any group as to which such persons are party to, do not constitute “interested stockholders” for purposes of this provision.

Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that its board of directors will be classified into three classes of directors. As a result, in most circumstances, a person can gain control of its board only by successfully engaging in a proxy contest at two or more annual meetings.

Conyers Park’s authorized but unissued common stock and preferred stock are available for future issuances without stockholder approval (including a specified future issuance) and could be utilized for a variety of corporate purposes, including future offerings to raise additional capital, acquisitions and employee benefit plans. The existence of authorized but unissued and unreserved common stock and preferred stock could render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by means of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise.

Exclusive Forum for Certain Lawsuits

Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation will require, to the fullest extent permitted by law, that derivative actions brought in Conyers Park’s name, actions against directors, officers and employees for breach of fiduciary duty and other similar actions may be brought only in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware and, if brought outside of Delaware, the stockholder bringing such suit will be deemed to have consented to service of process on such stockholder’s counsel. Although Conyers Park believes this provision benefits it by providing increased consistency in the application of Delaware law in the types of lawsuits to which it applies, the provision may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against Conyers Park’s directors and officers.

Special Meeting of Stockholders

Conyers Park’s bylaws provide that special meetings of its stockholders may be called only by a majority vote of Conyers Park’s board of directors, by its Chief Executive Officer or by its Chairman.

Advance Notice Requirements for Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations

Conyers Park’s bylaws provide that stockholders seeking to bring business before its annual meeting of stockholders, or to nominate candidates for election as directors at its annual meeting of stockholders, must provide timely notice of their intent in writing. To be timely, a stockholder’s notice will need to be received by the company secretary at its principal executive offices not later than the close of business on the 90th day nor earlier than the open of business on the 120th day prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of stockholders. Pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, proposals seeking inclusion in its annual proxy statement/prospectus must comply with the notice periods contained therein. Conyers Park’s bylaws also specify certain requirements as to the form and content of a stockholders’ meeting. These provisions may preclude its stockholders from bringing matters before its annual meeting of stockholders or from making nominations for directors at its annual meeting of stockholders.

Action by Written Consent

Subsequent to the consummation of the offering, any action required or permitted to be taken by Conyers Park’s common stockholders must be effected by a duly called annual or special meeting of such stockholders and may not be effected by written consent of the stockholders other than with respect to Conyers Park’s Class B common stock.

Classified Board of Directors

Conyers Park’s board of directors are divided into three classes, Class I, Class II and Class III, with members of each class serving staggered three-year terms. Conyers Park’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the authorized number of directors may be changed only by resolution of the board of directors. Subject to the terms of any preferred stock, any or all of the directors may be removed from office at any time, but only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the voting power of all then outstanding shares of Conyers Park’s capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class.

179

Any vacancy on Conyers Park’s board of directors, including a vacancy resulting from an enlargement of Conyers Park’s board of directors, may be filled only by vote of a majority of Conyers Park’s directors then in office.

Class B Common Stock Consent Right

For so long as any shares of Class B common stock remain outstanding, Conyers Park may not, without the prior vote or written consent of the holders of a majority of the shares of Class B common stock then outstanding, voting separately as a single class, amend, alter or repeal any provision our certificate of incorporation, whether by merger, consolidation or otherwise, if such amendment, alteration or repeal would alter or change the powers, preferences or relative, participating, optional or other or special rights of the Class B common stock. Any action required or permitted to be taken at any meeting of the holders of Class B common stock may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, if a consent or consents in writing, setting forth the action so taken, shall be signed by the holders of the outstanding Class B common stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares of Class B common stock were present and voted.

Securities Eligible for Future Sale

Rule 144

Pursuant to Rule 144, a person who has beneficially owned restricted shares of Conyers Park’s common stock or warrants for at least six months would be entitled to sell their securities provided that (i) such person is not deemed to have been one of Conyers Park’s affiliates at the time of, or at any time during the three months preceding, a sale and (ii) we are subject to the Exchange Act periodic reporting requirements for at least three months before the sale and have filed all required reports under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the 12 months (or such shorter period as we were required to file reports) preceding the sale.

Persons who have beneficially owned restricted shares of Conyers Park’s common stock or warrants for at least six months but who are Conyers Park’s affiliates at the time of, or at any time during the three months preceding, a sale, would be subject to additional restrictions, by which such person would be entitled to sell within any three-month period only a number of securities that does not exceed the greater of:

•         1% of the total number of shares of common stock then outstanding; or

•         the average weekly reported trading volume of the common stock during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to the sale.

Sales by Conyers Park’s affiliates under Rule 144 are also limited by manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of current public information about us.

Restrictions on the Use of Rule 144 by Shell Companies or Former Shell Companies

Rule 144 is not available for the resale of securities initially issued by shell companies (other than business combination related shell companies) or issuers that have been at any time previously a shell company. However, Rule 144 also includes an important exception to this prohibition if the following conditions are met:

•         the issuer of the securities that was formerly a shell company has ceased to be a shell company;

•         the issuer of the securities is subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;

•         the issuer of the securities has filed all Exchange Act reports and materials required to be filed, as applicable, during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports and materials), other than Current Reports on Form 8-K; and

•         at least one year has elapsed from the time that the issuer filed current Form 10 type information with the SEC reflecting its status as an entity that is not a shell company.

As a result, Conyers Park’s initial stockholders will be able to sell their Founder Shares and private placement warrants, as applicable, pursuant to Rule 144 without registration one year after Conyers Park has completed its initial business combination.

180

DESCRIPTION OF THE SIMPLY GOOD FOODS COMPANY’S SECURITIES

The following summary of the material terms of the post-combination company’s securities following the Business Combination is not intended to be a complete summary of the rights and preferences of such securities. The full text of the proposed amended and restated certificate of incorporation is attached as Annex B to this proxy statement/prospectus. We urge you to read our proposed amended and restated certificate of incorporation in its entirety for a complete description of the rights and preferences of the post-combination company’s securities following the Business Combination.

Authorized and Outstanding Stock

Simply Good Foods’ amended and restated certificate of incorporation will authorize it to issue up to 600,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, and 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share. As of the date of this prospectus, 1,000 shares of Simply Good Foods’ common stock were issued and outstanding, and no shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding.

The following description of Simply Good Foods’ capital stock and provisions of its amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws are summaries and are qualified by reference to Simply Good Foods’ amended and restated certificate of incorporation and its bylaws, which have been filed as an exhibit to Simply Good Foods’ registration statement of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part.

Common Stock

Voting Rights

Each holder of Simply Good Foods common stock is entitled to one vote for each share on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders, including the election of directors. Simply Good Foods stockholders do not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors. Accordingly, holders of a majority of the voting shares are able to elect all of the directors.

Dividend Rights

Holders of common stock will be entitled to receive such dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by our board of directors in its discretion out of funds legally available therefor. In no event will any stock dividends or stock splits or combinations of stock be declared or made on common stock unless the shares of common stock at the time outstanding are treated equally and identically.

Liquidation, Dissolution and Winding Up

In the event of the voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution, distribution of assets or winding-up of the post-combination company, the holders of the common stock will be entitled to receive an equal amount per share of all of our assets of whatever kind available for distribution to stockholders, after the rights of the holders of the preferred stock have been satisfied.

Preemptive or Other Rights

Our stockholders will have no preemptive or other subscription rights and there are no sinking fund or redemption provisions applicable to our common stock, except that we will provide our stockholders with the opportunity to redeem their public shares for cash equal to their pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to it to pay up to $1,000,000 of the Company’s working capital requirements as well as to pay the Company’s franchise and income taxes, upon the completion of our business combination, subject to the limitations described herein.

Election of Directors

Simply Good Foods’ amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides for its board of directors to be divided into three classes, Class I, Class II and Class III, with only one class of directors being elected in each

181

year and each class (except for those directors appointed prior to our first annual meeting of stockholders) serving a three-year term. There is no cumulative voting with respect to the election of directors, with the result that the holders of more than 50% of the shares of common stock outstanding will be able to elect all of its directors.

Preferred Stock

Simply Good Foods’ board of directors has the authority, without further action by Simply Good Foods’ stockholders, to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions thereof. No shares of preferred stock are outstanding and Simply Good Foods has no present plan to issue any shares of preferred stock.

Warrants

Effective upon the consummation of the Business Combination, each warrant outstanding for the purchase of shares of Conyers Park common stock prior to the consummation of the Business Combination will be exercisable for one warrant to purchase one share of Simply Good Foods’ common stock, with all other terms of such warrants remaining unchanged. For additional information about these warrants, see the section entitled “Description of Parent Securities — Warrants.”

Our Transfer Agent and Warrant Agent

Upon completion of the Business Combination, the transfer agent and registrar for Simply Good Foods common stock will be Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company.

Certain Anti-Takeover Provisions of Delaware Law, our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, and our Bylaws

Pursuant to Simply Good Foods’ amended and restated certificate of incorporation, Simply Good Foods will opt out of the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) regulating corporate takeovers and instead the amended and restated certificate of incorporation will include a provision that is substantially similar to Section 203 of the DGCL but will carve out Sponsor, its successors, certain affiliates and transferees from the definition of “interested stockholder” and make certain related changes. This provision will prevent Simply Good Foods, under certain circumstances, from engaging in a “business combination” with:

•         a stockholder (other than Sponsor) who owns 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock (otherwise known as an “interested stockholder”);

•         an affiliate of an interested stockholder; or

•         an associate of an interested stockholder, for three years following the date that the stockholder became an interested stockholder. A ‘‘business combination’’ includes a merger or sale of more than 10% of our assets. However, the above provisions of Section 203 do not apply if:

•         our board of directors approves the transaction that made the stockholder an ‘‘interested stockholder,’’ prior to the date of the transaction;

•         after the completion of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, that stockholder owned at least 85% of our voting stock outstanding at the time the transaction commenced, other than statutorily excluded shares of common stock; or

•         on or subsequent to the date of the transaction, the business combination is approved by our board of directors and authorized at a meeting of our stockholders, and not by written consent, by an affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock not owned by the interested stockholder.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that our board of directors will be classified into three classes of directors. As a result, in most circumstances, a person will be able to gain control of our board only by successfully engaging in a proxy contest at three or more annual meetings.

182

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will not only allow stockholders to act by written consent.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that directors may be removed prior to the expiration of their terms by stockholders only for cause or upon the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the voting power of all outstanding shares of the Company.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will require that changes or amendments to the amended and restated certificate of incorporation or the amended and restated bylaws must be approved by at least 75% of the voting power of outstanding common stock.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will not provide for cumulative voting in the election of directors; our board of directors will be empowered to elect a director to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the board of directors or the resignation, death, or removal of a director in certain circumstances; and our advance notice procedures will include requirements that the stockholders must comply with in order to nominate candidates to our board of directors or to propose matters to be acted upon at a stockholders’ meeting.

Our authorized but unissued common stock and preferred stock are available for future issuances without stockholder approval and could be utilized for a variety of corporate purposes, including future offerings to raise additional capital, acquisitions and employee benefit plans. The existence of authorized but unissued and unreserved common stock and preferred stock could render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by means of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise.

Investor Rights Agreement with Conyers Park

For a description of the Investor Rights Agreement between Simply Good Foods and Sponsor, please see “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — The Investor Rights Agreement with Conyers Park.”

Investor Rights Agreement with Atkins Holdings LLC

For a description of the Investor Rights Agreement between Simply Good Foods, Sponsor and Atkins Holdings LLC, please see “Proposal No. 1 — Approval of the Business Combination — The Investor Rights Agreement with Atkins Holdings LLC.”

Listing of Securities

We intend to apply to list Simply Good Foods’ common stock and warrants on NASDAQ under the symbols “SMPL” and “SMPL.W,” respectively, upon the closing of the Business Combination.

183

COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS OF CONYERS PARK AND SIMPLY GOOD FOODS

		SIMPLY GOOD FOODS		PARENT
Authorized Capital		Simply Good Foods is authorized to issue 600,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of which 1,000 shares were issued and outstanding as of April 11, 2017, and 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, of which no shares were issued and outstanding as of April 11, 2017.		Parent is authorized to issue 200,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of which 40,250,000 shares were issued and outstanding as of April 11, 2017, 20,000,000 shares of Class B common stock, par value of $0.0001 per share, of which 10,062,500 shares were issued to Parent’s Sponsor prior to the Conyers Park IPO and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of which no shares are issued and outstanding as of 11, 2017.
Voting Rights		The amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Simply Good Foods will state that each holder of common stock shall be entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held of record by such holder on all matters on which stockholders generally are entitled to vote.		The amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Parent states that holders of shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock shall be entitled to one vote for each such share of common stock held on each matter properly submitted to the stockholders on which the holders of the common stock are entitled to vote.
Number of Directors		The amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Simply Good Foods will state that the number of directors shall be fixed exclusively from time to time by resolution of the board of directors.		The amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Parent states that the number of directors of Parent, other than those who may be elected by the holders of one or more series of the preferred stock voting separately by class or series, shall be fixed from time to time exclusively by the board of directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the Board of Directors.
Election of Directors		The amended and restated bylaws will require that directors be elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the stockholders present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote thereon. Pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement among Simply Good Foods, Sponsor and Atkins Holdings LLC and subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, Atkins Holdings LLC will initially have the right to nominate one Class III director to serve on the Board of Directors.		The amended and restated bylaws of Parent require that the directors be elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the stockholders present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote thereon.

184

		SIMPLY GOOD FOODS		PARENT
		Pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement between Simply Good Foods and Sponsor and subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, Sponsor will initially have the right to nominate three directors to serve on the Board of Directors. The amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that the board of directors be divided into three classes, Class I, Class II and Class III, with only one class of directors being elected in each year and each class (except for those directors appointed prior to the first annual meeting of stockholders) serving a three-year term.
Manner of Acting by Board		The amended and restated bylaws will state that at any meeting of the board of directors at which a quorum is present, the vote of a majority of the directors present shall be sufficient to take any action, unless a different vote is specified by law, the certificate of incorporation or the bylaws. The amended and restated bylaws of Simply Good Foods will also permit the board of directors to take action by unanimous written consent.		The bylaws of Parent state that the act of a majority of the directors present at any meeting at which there is a quorum shall be the act of the board of directors, except as may be otherwise specifically provided by applicable law, the amended and restated certificate of incorporation or the bylaws. The bylaws of Parent also permit the board of directors to take action by unanimous written consent.
Removal of Directors		The amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that any or all of the directors may be removed from office at any time, but only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of stockholders of at least 75% of the voting power of all then outstanding shares of capital stock of Simply Good Foods entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class at a meeting of Simply Good Foods’ stockholders called for that purpose.		The amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Parent states that any or all of the directors may be removed from office at any time, but only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the voting power of all then outstanding shares of capital stock of Parent entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class.

185

		SIMPLY GOOD FOODS		PARENT
Nomination of Director Candidates		The amended and restated bylaws will state that for a nomination to be made by a stockholder, such stockholder must have given timely notice thereof in proper written form to the Secretary. To be timely, a stockholder’s notice to the Secretary must be received by the Secretary at the principal executive offices of Simply Good Foods (i) in the case of an annual meeting, not later than the close of business on the 90th day nor earlier than the 120th day before the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of stockholders; provided, however, that in the event that the annual meeting is called for a date that is not within 30 days before or after such anniversary date or if no annual meeting was held the preceding year, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be received by the later of the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the annual meeting was first made by Simply Good Foods and the date which is 90 days prior to the date of the annual meeting; and (ii) in the case of a special meeting of stockholders called for the purpose of electing directors, not earlier than the 120th day prior to such special meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such special meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the special meeting is first made by Simply Good Foods.		For a nomination to be made by a stockholder, such stockholder must have given timely notice thereof in proper written form to the Secretary. To be timely, a stockholder’s notice to the Secretary must be received by the Secretary at the principal executive offices of Parent (i) in the case of an annual meeting, not later than the close of business on the 90th day nor earlier than the opening of business on the 120th day before the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of stockholders; provided, however, that in the event that the annual meeting is called for a date that is not within 30 days before or after such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so received not earlier than the opening of business on the 120th day before the meeting and not later than the later of (x) the close of business on the 90th day before the meeting or (y) the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the annual meeting was first made by Parent; and (ii) in the case of a special meeting of stockholders called for the purpose of electing directors, not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the special meeting is first made by Parent.

186

		SIMPLY GOOD FOODS		PARENT
Business Proposals by Stockholders		The amended and restated bylaws of Simply Good Foods will state that business may be brought before an annual meeting of stockholders by any stockholder who is a stockholder of record on the date notice of the meeting is given and on the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to vote at such meeting and who complies with the notice procedures set forth in the amended and restated bylaws of Simply Good Foods. To be timely, a stockholder’s notice shall be received at the principal executive offices of Simply Good Foods not later than the close of business on the 90th day nor earlier than the 120th day before the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of stockholders; provided, however, that in the event that the annual meeting is called for a date that is not within 30 days before or after such anniversary date or if no annual meeting was held in the preceding year, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so received by the later of (A) the 10th day following the day the public announcement of the date of the of the date of the annual meeting is first made or (B) the date which is 90 days prior to the date of the annual meeting.		The bylaws of Parent state that business may be brought before an annual meeting of stockholders by any stockholder who is a stockholder of record on the date notice of the meeting is given and on the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to vote at such meeting and who complies with the notice procedures set forth in the bylaws. To be timely, a stockholder’s notice shall be received at the principal executive offices of Parent not later than the close of business on the 90th day nor earlier than the opening of business on the 120th day before the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of stockholders; provided, however, that in the event that the annual meeting is called for a date that is not within 30 days before or after such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so received not earlier than the opening of business on the 120th day before the meeting and not later than the later of (x) the close of business on the 90th day before the meeting or (y) the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the annual meeting is first made.
Special Meetings of the Board		The amended and restated bylaws of Simply Good Foods will state that special meetings of the Board of Directors of Simply Good Foods (a) may be called by the Chairman of the Board or (b) shall be called by the Secretary on the written request of at least a majority of directors then in office, and shall be held at such time, date and place as may be determined by the person calling the meeting. Notice of each special meeting of the Board of Directors of Simply Good Foods shall be given to each director (i) at least 24 hours before the meeting if such notice is by telephone or by being personally delivered or sent by telex, telecopy, electronic transmission, email or similar means or (ii) at least five days before the meeting if such notice is sent through the United States mail.		Special meetings of the Board of Directors (a) may be called by the Chairman of the Board of Directors or President and (b) shall be called by the Chairman of the Board of Directors, President or Secretary on the written request of at least a majority of directors then in office, or the sole director, as the case may be, and shall be held at such time, date and place (within or without the State of Delaware) as may be determined by the person calling the meeting or, if called upon the request of directors or the sole director, as specified in such written request. Notice of each special meeting of the Board of Directors shall be given to each director (i) at least 24 hours before the meeting if such notice is oral notice given personally or by telephone or written notice given by hand delivery or by means of a form of electronic transmission and delivery; (ii) at least two days before the meeting if such notice is sent by a nationally recognized overnight delivery service; and (iii) at least five days before the meeting if such notice is sent through the United States mail.

187

		SIMPLY GOOD FOODS		PARENT
		Any and all business may be transacted at a special meeting. Except as may be otherwise expressly provided by applicable law, the amended and restated certificate of incorporation or the amended and restated bylaws, neither the business to be transacted at, nor the purpose of, any special meeting need be specified in the notice or waiver of notice of such meeting.		If the Secretary shall fail or refuse to give such notice, then the notice may be given by the officer who called the meeting or the directors who requested the meeting. Any and all business that may be transacted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors may be transacted at a special meeting. Except as may be otherwise expressly provided by applicable law, the amended and restated certificate of incorporation, or the bylaws, neither the business to be transacted at, nor the purpose of, any special meeting need be specified in the notice or waiver of notice of such meeting. A special meeting may be held at any time without notice if all the directors are present or if those not present waive notice of the meeting.
Special Meetings of the Stockholders		The amended and restated certificate of incorporation will state that special meetings of stockholders of Simply Good Foods may be called only by or at the direction of the Board of Directors or the Chairman of the Board of Directors, and the ability of the stockholders to call a special meeting is hereby specifically denied. Except as provided in the foregoing sentence, special meetings of stockholders may not be called by another person or persons.		Special meetings of stockholders of Parent may be called only by the Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer of Parent, or the Board pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the Board of Directors, and the ability of the stockholders to call a special meeting is hereby specifically denied. Except as provided in the foregoing sentence, special meetings of stockholders may not be called by another person or persons.
Manner of Acting by Stockholders		The amended and restated bylaws of Simply Good Foods will state that all matters other than the election of directors shall be determined by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the stockholders present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote thereon, unless the matter is one upon which, by applicable law, the certificate of incorporation, the bylaws or applicable stock exchange rules, a different vote is required, in which case such provision shall govern and control the decision of such matter.		The bylaws of Parent state that all matters other than the election of directors shall be determined by the vote of a majority of the votes cast by the stockholders present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote thereon, unless the matter is one upon which, by applicable law, the amended and restated certificate of incorporation, the bylaws or applicable stock exchange rules, a different vote is required, in which case such provision shall govern and control the decision of such matter.
Stockholder Action Without Meeting		The amended and restated certificate of incorporation will state that any action required or permitted to be taken by the stockholders of Simply Good Foods must be effected by a duly called annual or special meeting of such stockholders and may not be effected by written consent of the stockholders.		Any action required or permitted to be taken by the stockholders of Parent must be effected by a duly called annual or special meeting of such stockholders and may not be effected by written consent of the stockholders other than with respect to Class B Common Stock with respect to which action may be taken by written consent.

188

		SIMPLY GOOD FOODS		PARENT
State Anti-Takeover Statutes		Simply Good Foods will expressly elect not to be governed by Section 203 of the DGCL and instead its amended and restated certificate of incorporation will include a provision that is substantially similar to Section 203 of the DGCL but will carve out Sponsor, its successors, certain affiliates and transferees from the definition of “interested stockholder” and make certain related changes.		Parent expressly elected not to be governed by Section 203 of the DGCL.
Indemnification of Directors and Officers		To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, as the same exists or may hereafter be amended, Simply Good Foods shall indemnify and hold harmless each person who was or is made a party or is threatened to be made a party to or is otherwise involved (including involvement, without limitation, as a witness) in any actual or threatened action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director or officer of Simply Good Foods or, while a director or officer of Simply Good Foods, is or was serving at the request of Simply Good Foods as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, including service with respect to an employee benefit plan, whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged action in an official capacity as a director or officer, or in any other capacity while serving as a director or officer shall be indemnified and held harmless by Simply Good Foods to the fullest extent authorized by the DGCL, against all expense, liability and loss (including attorneys’ fees and related disbursements, judgments, fines, ERISA excise taxes and penalties and amounts paid in settlement) reasonably incurred or suffered by such indemnitee in connection therewith and such indemnification shall continue as to an indemnitee who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee or agent and shall inure to the benefit of the indemnitee’s heirs, executors and administrators; provided, however, that, except as provided with respect to proceedings to enforce rights to indemnification, Simply Good Foods shall indemnify an indemnitee in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such indemnitee only if such proceeding (or part thereof) was authorized in the specific case by the Board of Directors of Simply Good Foods.		To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, as the same exists or may hereafter be amended, Parent shall indemnify and hold harmless each person who was or is made a party or is threatened to be made a party to or is otherwise involved in any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director or officer of Parent or, while a director or officer of Parent, is or was serving at the request of Parent as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust, other enterprise or nonprofit entity, including service with respect to an employee benefit plan, whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged action in an official capacity as a director, officer, employee or agent, or in any other capacity while serving as a director, officer, employee or agent, against all liability and loss suffered and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines, ERISA excise taxes and penalties and amounts paid in settlement) reasonably incurred by such Indemnitee in connection with such proceeding; provided, however, that, except as provided with respect to proceedings to enforce rights to indemnification, Parent shall indemnify an Indemnitee in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such Indemnitee only if such proceeding (or part thereof) was authorized by the Board of Directors of Parent.

189

		SIMPLY GOOD FOODS		PARENT
Limitation of Liability of Directors		The amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Simply Good Foods will state that except to the extent that the DGCL prohibits the elimination or limitation of liability of directors for breaches of fiduciary duty, no director of Simply Good Foods shall be personally liable to Simply Good Foods or its stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duty as a director, notwithstanding any provision of law imposing such liability. The amended and restated certificate of incorporation further states that no amendment to, repeal or modification of this provision shall apply to or have any effect on the liability or alleged liability of any director of Simply Good Foods for or with respect to any acts or omissions of such director occurring prior to such amendment. If the DGCL is amended to permit further elimination or limitation of personal liability of directors, the liability of a director of Simply Good Foods shall be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL.		A director of Parent shall not be personally liable to Parent or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except to the extent such exemption from liability or limitation thereof is not permitted under the DGCL as the same exists or may hereafter be amended unless they violated their duty of loyalty to Parent or its stockholders, acted in bad faith, knowingly or intentionally violated the law, authorized unlawful payments of dividends, unlawful stock purchases or unlawful redemptions, or derived improper personal benefit from their actions as directors. Any amendment, modification or repeal of the foregoing sentence shall not adversely affect any right or protection of a director of Parent hereunder in respect of any act or omission occurring prior to the time of such amendment, modification or repeal.
Amendments to Bylaws		The amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Simply Good Foods will state that the bylaws may be amended, altered or repealed and new bylaws may be adopted by (i) the Board of Directors or (ii) in addition to any other vote otherwise required by law, the affirmative vote of stockholders of at least 66 2/3% of the voting power of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Simply Good Foods entitled to vote with respect thereto, voting together as a single class.		The Board of Directors of Parent shall have the power to adopt, amend, alter or repeal the bylaws. The affirmative vote of a majority of the Board of Directors shall be required to adopt, amend, alter or repeal the bylaws. The bylaws also may be adopted, amended, altered or repealed by the stockholders; provided, however, that in addition to any vote of the holders of any class or series of capital stock of Parent required by applicable law or the amended and restated certificate of incorporation, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of all outstanding shares of capital stock of Parent entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, shall be required for the stockholders to adopt, amend, alter or repeal the bylaws.
Redemption Rights		None.		The amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Parent states that prior to the consummation of an initial business combination, Parent shall provide all holders of offering shares with the opportunity to have their offering shares redeemed upon the consummation of an initial business combination for cash equal to the applicable redemption price per share, less franchise and income tax payable.

190

		SIMPLY GOOD FOODS		PARENT
Corporate Opportunities		The amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Simply Good Foods states that to the extent allowed by law, the doctrine of corporate opportunity, or any other analogous doctrine, shall not apply with respect to Simply Good Foods or any of its officers or directors, and Simply Good Foods renounces any expectancy that any of the directors or officers of Simply Good Foods will offer any such corporate opportunity of which he or she may become aware to Simply Good Foods, except, the doctrine of corporate opportunity shall apply with respect to any of the directors or officers of Simply Good Foods only with respect to a corporate opportunity that was offered in writing to such person solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer of Simply Good Foods and such opportunity is one Simply Good Foods is legally and contractually permitted to undertake and would otherwise be reasonable for Simply Good Foods to pursue. No directors, officers, employees or representatives of Atkins Holdings LLC (“Atkins Holdings”), Conyers Park Sponsor LLC (“Conyers Park Sponsor”) Centerview Capital Holdings LLC (“Centerview Capital”), and Centerview Partners (and together with Centerview Capital, Conyers Park Sponsor and Atkins Holdings, each a “Sponsor Entity”) nor any of their respective affiliates shall have any duty to refrain from engaging directly or indirectly in the same or similar business activities or lines of business as Simply Good Foods and no Sponsor Entity nor any officer, director or representative thereof (except as provided in the first sentence of the paragraph above) shall be liable to Simply Good Foods or its stockholders for breach of any fiduciary duty solely by reason of any such activities of such Sponsor Entity or any of their respective affiliates. In the event that a Sponsor Entity or any of their respective affiliates acquires knowledge of a potential transaction or matter which may be a corporate opportunity for itself and Simply Good Foods, no Sponsor Entity nor any of their respective affiliates shall have any duty to communicate or offer such corporate opportunity to Simply Good Foods and shall not be liable to		The amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Parent states that to the extent allowed by law, the doctrine of corporate opportunity, or any other analogous doctrine, shall not apply with respect to the Company or any of its officers or directors, and the Company renounces any expectancy that any of the directors or officers of the Company will offer any such corporate opportunity of which he or she may become aware to the Company, except, the doctrine of corporate opportunity shall apply with respect to any of the directors or officers of the Company only with respect to a corporate opportunity that was offered to such person solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer of the Company and such opportunity is one the Company is legally and contractually permitted to undertake and would otherwise be reasonable for the Company to pursue.

191

		SIMPLY GOOD FOODS		PARENT
		Simply Good Foods or its stockholders for breach of any fiduciary duty as a stockholder of Simply Good Foods solely by reason of the fact that a Sponsor Entity or any of their respective affiliates pursues or acquires such corporate opportunity for itself, directs such corporate opportunity to another person, or does not communicate information regarding such corporate opportunity to Simply Good Foods.
		Except as provided in the first sentence of the first paragraph above, if a director or officer of Simply Good Foods who is also a director, officer, employee or representative of a Sponsor Entity or any of their respective affiliates acquires knowledge of a potential transaction or matter which may be a corporate opportunity, Simply Good Foods shall have no interest in such corporate opportunity and no expectancy that such corporate opportunity be offered to it, any such interest or expectancy being hereby renounced, so that such person shall have no duty to present such corporate opportunity to Simply Good Foods and shall have the right to hold and exploit any such corporate opportunity for its (and its officers’, employees’, directors’, agents’, stockholders’, members’, partners’, affiliates’ or subsidiaries’) own account or to direct, sell, assign or transfer such corporate opportunity to persons other than Simply Good Foods. Such person shall not breach any fiduciary duty to Simply Good Foods or to its stockholders by reason of the fact that such person does not present such corporate opportunity to Simply Good Foods or pursues, acquires or exploits such corporate opportunity for itself or directs, sells, assigns or transfers such corporate opportunity to another person.

192

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES

The following table sets forth information known to us regarding the beneficial ownership of Conyers Park common stock as of June 14, 2017 (pre-Business Combination) and, immediately following consummation of the Business Combination, ownership of shares of Simply Good Foods common stock, by:

•         each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Conyers Park common stock either on June 15, 2017 (pre-Business Combination) or of shares of Simply Good Foods common stock outstanding after the consummation of the Business Combination;

•         each of Conyers Park’s current officers and directors;

•         each person who will become an executive officer or director of Simply Good Foods upon consummation of the Business Combination; and

•         all executive officers and directors of Simply Good Foods as a group after consummation of the Business Combination.

Beneficial ownership is determined according to the rules of the SEC, which generally provide that a person has beneficial ownership of a security if he, she or it possesses sole or shared voting or investment power over that security, including options and warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days.

The beneficial ownership of shares of Simply Good Foods common stock immediately following consummation of the Business Combination is based on 70,562,500 shares to be outstanding and has been determined on the assumption that (i) no Conyers Park stockholder has exercised its redemption rights to receive cash from the Trust Account in exchange for their shares of Conyers Park (ii) 10,250,000 shares of Simply Good Foods common stock are issued to the Selling Equityholders as part of their merger consideration and (iii) 10,000,000 shares of Simply Good Foods common stock are issued to investors in the Common Stock Private Placement.

Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that all persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock beneficially owned by the individuals below:

		Class B Common Stock					Class A Common Stock								Simply Good Foods Post-Business Combination
Name of Beneficial Owners(1)		Number of Shares Beneficially Owned		Approximate Percentage of Class			Number of Shares Beneficially Owned		Approximate Percentage of Class			Approximate Percentage of Voting Control			Number of Shares Beneficially Owned		Approximate Percentage of Outstanding Common Stock
Wellington Management Group LLP(2)		—		—			7,205,244		17.21	%		14.32	%		7,205,244		10.21	%
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(3)		—		—			4,496,966		11.17	%		8.94	%		6,496,966		9.21	%
The Baupost Group, L.L.C.(4)		—		—			3,712,500		9.22	%		7.38	%		4,712,500		6.68	%
Glenhill Advisers, LLC(5)		—		—			2,855,901		7.10	%		5.68	%		2,855,901		4.05	%
TD Asset Management Inc.(6)		—		—			2,501,900		6.22	%		4.97	%		2,501,900		3.55	%
Manulife Asset Management Limited(7)		—		—			2,096,512		5.21	%		4.17	%		2,096,512		2.97	%
Atkins Holdings LLC(8)		—		—			—		—			—			8,924,207		12.65	%
Conyers Park Sponsor LLC(9)		9,962,500		99.01	%		—		—			19.80	%		9,962,500		14.12	%
FMR LLC(10)		—		—			—		—			—			4,000,000		5.67	%
James M. Kilts(9)		—		—			—		—			—			—		—
David J. West(9)		—		—			—		—			—			—		—
Brian K. Ratzan(9)		—		—			—		—			—			—		—
Clayton C. Daley Jr.		25,000		*			10,000		*			*			35,000		*
Nomi P. Ghez		25,000		*			25,000		*			*			50,000		*
James E. Healey		25,000		*			5,000		*			*			30,000		*
Robert G. Montgomery		25,000		*			—		—			*			25,000		*
Arvin “Rick” Kash		—		—			—		—			—			—		—
Richard T. Laube		—		—			—		—			—			—		—
Joseph E. Scalzo(11)		—		—			—		—			—			407,051		*
Shaun P. Mara(11)		—		—			—		—			—			108,338		*
Annita M. Menogan(11)		—		—			—		—			—			12,884		*
C. Scott Parker(11)		—		—			—		—			—			133,021		*
Robert C. Gandert(11)		—		—			—		—			—			99,908		*
Hanno E. Holm(11)		—		—			—		—			—			19,326		*
Timothy A. Matthews(11)		—		—			—		—			—			2,890		*
All directors and executive officers as a group (16 individuals)		100,000		*			40,000		*			*			923,418		1.31	%

____________

*         Less than 1 percent.

193

(1)      Unless otherwise noted, the business address of each of the following entities or individuals is c/o Conyers Park Acquisition Corp., 1 Greenwich Office Park, 2nd Floor, Greenwich, CT 06831.

(2)      As of April 28, 2017, as reported on Schedule 13G. Includes shares of Class A common stock that are part of Units. Wellington Management Company LLP is an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Wellington Management Company LLP is an indirect subsidiary of Wellington Management Group LLP. The business address of Welling Management Group LLP, Wellington Group Holdings LLP, Welling Investment Advisors Holdings LLP and Wellington Management Company LLP is 280 Congress Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210. The shares are owned of record by clients of the following investment advisers directly or indirectly owned by Wellington Management Group LLP (the “Wellington Investment Advisers”): Wellington Management Company LLP, Wellington Management Canada LLC, Wellington Management Singapore Pte Ltd, Wellington Management Hong Kong Ltd, Wellington Management International Ltd, Wellington Management Japan Pte Ltd and Wellington Management Australia Pty Ltd. These clients have the right to receive, or the power to direct the receipt of, dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of, such shares. Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP controls directly, or indirectly through Wellington Management Global Holdings, Ltd., the Wellington Investment Advisers. Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP is owned by Wellington Group Holdings LLP. Wellington Group Holdings LLP is owned by Wellington Management Group LLP. Wellington Management Group LLP holds shared voting power of 6,133,197 shares of Class A common stock and shares dispositive power over 7,205,244 shares of Class A common stock.

(3)      As of December 31, 2016, as reported on Schedule 13G. T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (“Price Associates”) is an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, The business address of Price Associates is 31 West 52nd Street, 22nd Floor, New York, New York 10019. Price Associates holds sole voting power of 819,133 shares of Class A common stock and sole dispositive power of 4,496,966 shares of Class A common stock. Price Associates does not serve as custodian of the assets of any of its clients; accordingly, in each instance only the client or the client’s custodian or trustee bank has the right to receive dividends paid with respect to, and proceeds from the sale of, such securities. The ultimate power to direct the receipt of dividends paid with respect to, and the proceeds from the sale of, such securities, is vested in the individual and institutional clients which Price Associates serves as investment adviser. Any and all discretionary authority which has been delegated to Price Associates may be revoked in whole or in part at any time. With respect to securities owned by any one of the T. Rowe Price Funds, only the custodian for each of such Funds, has the right to receive dividends paid with respect to, and proceeds from the sale of, such securities. No other person is known to have such right, except that the shareholders of each such Fund participate proportionately in any dividends and distributions so paid.

(4)      As of December 31, 2016, as reported on Schedule 13G. The Baupost Group, L.L.C. (“Baupost”) is a registered investment adviser and acts as the investment adviser to certain private investment limited partnerships on whose behalf these securities were purchased, and in such capacity has voting and investment power with respect to such securities. SAK Corporation is the manager of Baupost, and Mr. Seth A. Klarman is the sole owner of SAK Corporation. Mr. Klarman and SAK Corporation disclaim beneficial ownership of the securities. The business address of Baupost, SAK Corporation and Seth A. Klarman is 10 St. James Avenue, Suite 1700, Boston, MA 02116.

(5)      As of December 31, 2016, as reported on Schedule 13G. The business address of Glenhill Advisors, LLC, Glenn J. Krevlin, Glenhill Capital Advisors, LLC and Glenhill Capital Management, LLC (the “Glenhill Entities”) is 600 Fifth Avenue, 11th Floor, New York, New York 10020. Glenn J. Krevlin is the managing member and control person of Glenhill Advisors, LLC, and is the sole shareholder of Krevlin Management, Inc. Krevlin Management, Inc. is the managing member of Glenhill Capital Advisors, LLC, which is the investment manager of Glenhill Capital Overseas Master Fund, LP and Glenhill Long Fund, LP, each a security holder of the Issuer. Glenhill Advisors, LLC is the managing member of Glenhill Capital Management, LLC. Glenhill Capital Management, LLC is the managing member of Glenhill Long GP, LLC, and is sole shareholder of Glenhill Capital Overseas GP, Ltd. Glenhill Capital Overseas GP, Ltd. is general partner of Glenhill Capital Overseas Master Fund, LP. Glenhill Long GP, LLC is the general partner of Glenhill Long Fund, LP. Glenhill Capital Advisors, LLC is also the investment manager for certain third party accounts for which Units are held and managed by one or more of the Glenhill Entities for the benefit of such third parties. The Glenhill Entities have dispositive power and share certain voting power with respect to such Units, and receive management fees and performance-related fees in connection therewith. Includes shares of Class A common stock that are part of the 630,569 Units held in such third party managed accounts.

(6)      As of December 31, 2016, as reported on Schedule 13G. The business address of TD Asset Management Inc. (“TDAM”) and TDAM USA Inc. (“TDAM USA”) is Canada Trust Tower, BCE Place, 161 Bay Street, 35th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2T2. TDAM individually beneficially owns 2,496,600 shares. TDAM-USA individually beneficially owns 5,300 shares.

(7)      As of December 31, 2016, as reported on Schedule 13G. The business address of Manulife Financial Corporation (“MFC”) and MFC’s indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary Manulife Asset Management Limited (“MAML”) is 200 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4W 1E5. MAML has beneficial ownership of 2,096,512 shares of Income Trust Units. Through its parent-subsidiary relationship to MAML, MFC may be deemed to have beneficial ownership of these same shares. MAML has sole power to vote or to direct the voting of the shares of Income Trust Units beneficially owned.

194

(8)      This number represents the portion of the 10,250,000 shares of common stock to be issued to the Selling Equityholders that is anticipated to be retained by Atkins Holdings LLC as of the date hereof, which may be reduced (i) in the event of any distributions of the common stock of NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. held by Atkins Holdings LLC to the members of Atkins Holdings LLC and (ii) based on any option or warrant exercises by current holders of outstanding NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. options and warrants, in each case prior to the consummation of the Business Combination.

(9)      Excludes 6,700,000 shares which may be purchased by exercising warrants that are not presently exercisable. There are five managers of Sponsor’s board of managers, including Messrs. Kilts, West and Ratzan. Each manager has one vote, and the approval of three of the five members of the board of managers is required to approve an action of Sponsor. Under the so-called “rule of three,” if voting and dispositive decisions regarding an entity’s securities are made by three or more individuals, and a voting or dispositive decision requires the approval of a majority of those individuals, then none of the individuals is deemed a beneficial owner of the entity’s securities. This is the situation with regard to Sponsor. Based upon the foregoing analysis, no individual manager of Sponsor exercises voting or dispositive control over any of the securities held by Sponsor, even those in which he directly holds a pecuniary interest. Accordingly, none of them will be deemed to have or share beneficial ownership of such shares.

(10)   Includes 129,200 shares held by Fidelity Advisor Series I: Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund; 1,529,800 shares held by Fidelity Puritan Trust Fidelity Balanced Fund; 1,400,000 shares held by Variable Insurance Products Fund II: Contrafund Portfolio; 175,100 shares held by Variable Insurance Products Fund III: Balanced Portfolio; 156,100 shares held by Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios LLC: Fidelity Consumer Staples Central Fund; 359,900 shares held by Fidelity Select Portfolios: Consumer Staples Portfolio; 39,700 shares held by Variable Insurance Products Fund IV: Consumer Staples Portfolio; and 210,200 shares held by Fidelity Summer Street Trust: Fidelity Export and Multinational Fund. These accounts are managed by direct or indirect subsidiaries of FMR LLC. Abigail P. Johnson is a Director, the Vice Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer and the President of FMR LLC.

Members of the Johnson family, including Abigail P. Johnson, are the predominant owners, directly or through trusts, of Series B voting common shares of FMR LLC, representing 49% of the voting power of FMR LLC. The Johnson family group and all other Series B shareholders have entered into a shareholders’ voting agreement under which all Series B voting common shares will be voted in accordance with the majority vote of Series B voting common shares. Accordingly, through their ownership of voting common shares and the execution of the shareholders’ voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may be deemed, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, to form a controlling group with respect to FMR LLC.

Neither FMR LLC nor Abigail P. Johnson has the sole power to vote or direct the voting of the shares owned directly by the various investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act (“Fidelity Funds”) advised by Fidelity Management & Research Company (“FMR Co”), a wholly owned subsidiary of FMR LLC, which power resides with the Fidelity Funds’ Boards of Trustees. Fidelity Management & Research Company carries out the voting of the shares under written guidelines established by the Fidelity Funds’ Boards of Trustees.

(11)   Includes outstanding options to purchase units of NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. exercisable upon payment of the applicable cash exercise price prior to the Closing of the Business Combination, which, if exercised, will subsequently be converted to shares of common stock of Simply Goods Foods in the Business Combination. Assumes all such options are exercised prior to the Closing. Any unexercised options will be cancelled at the Closing.

195

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The Company’s Related Person Transactions

Founder Shares

In April 2016, Sponsor purchased an aggregate of 10,062,500 Founder Shares for an aggregate purchase price of $25,000 in cash, or approximately $0.002 per share.

Rights

The Founder Shares are identical to the shares of Class A common stock included in the units, and holders of Founder Shares have the same stockholder rights as public stockholders, except that (i) the Founder Shares are subject to certain transfer restrictions, as described in more detail below, (ii) Sponsor, officers and directors have entered into a letter agreement with us, pursuant to which they have agreed (A) to waive their redemption rights with respect to any Founder Shares and any public shares held by them in connection with the completion of our business combination and (B) to waive their rights to liquidating distributions from the Trust Account with respect to any Founder Shares held by them if Conyers Park fails to complete a business combination within 24 months from the closing of the IPO, although they will be entitled to liquidating distributions from the Trust Account with respect to any public shares they hold if Conyers Park fails to complete a business combination within such time period, (iii) the Founder Shares are shares of Conyers Park’s Class B common stock that will automatically convert into shares of the Company’s Class A common stock at the time of Conyers Park’s initial business combination, or at any time prior thereto at the option of the holder, on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment pursuant to certain anti-dilution rights, as described herein and (iv) are subject to registration rights.

Voting

If Conyers Park submits its business combination to its public stockholders for a vote, its initial stockholders have agreed to vote any Founder Shares held by them and any public shares purchased during or after the IPO in favor of the initial business combination.

Transfer Restrictions

With certain limited exceptions, the Founder Shares are not transferable, assignable or salable (except to Conyers Park’s officers and directors and other persons or entities affiliated with Sponsor, each of whom will be subject to the same transfer restrictions) until the earlier of (A) one year after the completion of Conyers Park’s initial business combination or (B) subsequent to Conyers Park’s initial business combination, (x) if the last sale price of its Class A common stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing at least 150 days after our initial business combination, or (y) the date on which Conyers Park completes a liquidation, merger, capital stock exchange, reorganization or other similar transaction that results in all of its stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property.

Private Placement Warrants

Simultaneously with the commencement of its IPO and the sale of the units, Conyers Park completed the private sale of 6,700,000 warrants at a purchase price of $1.50 per Placement Warrant, to its Sponsor, generating gross proceeds to us of $10,050,000. The private placement warrants are substantially similar to the Public Warrants sold as part of the public units issued in Conyers Park’s IPO, except that if held by the original holder or their permitted assigns, they (i) may be exercised for cash or on a cashless basis, (ii) are not subject to being called for redemption and (iii) subject to certain limited exceptions, will be subject to transfer restrictions until 30 days following the consummation of the Company’s initial business combination. If the Placement Warrants are held by holders other than its initial holder, the Placement Warrants will be redeemable by the Company and exercisable by holders on the same basis as the Public Warrants.

196

Registration Rights

The holders of Founder Shares, Private Placement Warrants and Warrants that may be issued upon conversion of working capital loans, if any, are entitled to registration rights (in the case of the Founder Shares, only after conversion of such shares to shares of Class A common stock) as stated in the registration rights agreement signed on the date of the prospectus for the IPO. These holders are entitled to certain demand and “piggyback” registration rights.

However, the registration rights agreement provides that the Company will not permit any registration statement filed under the Securities Act to become effective until termination of the applicable lock-up period for the securities to be registered. The Company will bear the expenses incurred in connection with the filing of any such registration statements.

Administrative Services

On July 14, 2016, in connection with its initial public offering, the Company entered into an Administrative Services Agreement with its Sponsor, pursuant to which the Company pays a total of $10,000 per month for office space, utilities and administrative support. Upon completion of the initial business combination or the Company’s liquidation, the Company will cease paying these monthly fees.

Policies and Procedures for Related Person Transactions

Conyers Park’s audit committee must review and approve any related person transaction it proposes to enter into. Conyers Park’s audit committee charter details the policies and procedures relating to transactions that may present actual, potential or perceived conflicts of interest and may raise questions as to whether such transactions are consistent with the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. A summary of such policies and procedures is set forth below.

Any potential related party transaction that is brought to the audit committee’s attention will be analyzed by the audit committee, in consultation with outside counsel or members of management, as appropriate, to determine whether the transaction or relationship does, in fact, constitute a related party transaction. At its meetings, the audit committee will be provided with the details of each new, existing or proposed related party transaction, including the terms of the transaction, the business purpose of the transaction and the benefits to us and to the relevant related party.

In determining whether to approve a related party transaction, the audit committee must consider, among other factors, the following factors to the extent relevant:

•         whether the terms of the transaction are fair to the Company and on the same basis as would apply if the transaction did not involve a related party;

•         whether there are business reasons for the Company to enter into the transaction;

•         whether the transaction would impair the independence of an outside director;

•         whether the transaction would present an improper conflict of interest for any director or executive officer; and

•         any pre-existing contractual obligations.

Any member of the audit committee who has an interest in the transaction under discussion must abstain from any voting regarding the transaction, but may, if so requested by the chairman of the audit committee, participate in some or all of the audit committee’s discussions of the transaction. Upon completion of its review of the transaction, the audit committee may determine to permit or to prohibit the transaction.

Atkins Related Party Transactions

Management Agreement

Atkins is a party to an amended and restated management advisory and consulting services agreement, dated April 3, 2013, or the management agreement, with Roark Capital Management, LLC, or Roark Capital

197

Management, pursuant to which Roark Capital Management provides management consulting services to Atkins and receives specified consideration for such services. The management consulting services generally consist of advice concerning management, finance, marketing, strategic planning and such other services as may be requested from time to time by Atkins’ board of directors.

Pursuant to an arrangement with the current majority stockholder of Atkins, Atkins is obligated to pay a management fee of the greater of $900,000 or an amount equal to 2% of consolidated adjusted EBITDA, as defined by the First Lien and Second Lien, which can be prorated upon a fiscal year-end change. Annual reimbursements for out-of-pocket expenses are limited to $200,000. During the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 and the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013, the management fee expense was approximately $1.7 million, $0.9 million, $1.6 million and $1.4 million, respectively. The management agreement also includes customary indemnification provisions in favor of Roark Capital Management.

Atkins expects to terminate the management agreement in connection with the Business Combination; provided, that certain indemnification obligations will remain in effect.

Subscription Agreements

On March 27, 2013, Atkins entered into a subscription agreement with Joseph Scalzo, its Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to which Atkins received $1,250,255.16 in consideration for the issuance of 2,331 shares of its common stock. On June 3, 2013, Atkins entered into an additional subscription agreement with Mr. Scalzo, pursuant to which Atkins received $300,294.98 in consideration for the issuance of 766 shares of its common stock.

Stock Purchase Agreement

On January 10, 2014, Atkins entered into a contingent stock purchase agreement with Bob Gandert, its Chief Customer/Business Development Officer, pursuant to which Mr. Gandert has the right to sell and to require Atkins to purchase 750 shares of Atkins common stock held by Mr. Gandert for an aggregate purchase price of $891,088. The agreement is subject to Mr. Gandert’s continued employment with Atkins, and contains other provisions relating to, among other things, a general release of claims against Atkins and Roark Capital Management. Atkins intends to complete the transactions contemplated by the stock purchase agreement in connection with the Business Combination.

Shareholder Agreements

Atkins and its principal stockholder, Atkins Holdings LLC, previously entered into shareholder agreements with each of the other stockholders of Atkins, including Mr. Scalzo, its chief executive officer, and Mr. Gandert, its Chief Customer/Business Development Officer, which set forth certain rights and restrictions with respect to the ownership of shares of Atkins common stock, including:

•         drag-along rights in the event Atkins or Atkins Holdings LLC proposes to sell any shares of its common stock;

•         tag-along rights in the event Atkins Holdings LLC proposes to sell its shares of its common stock in a transaction that would result in Atkins Holdings LLC and its affiliates owning less than 50% of its common stock;

•         restrictions on the transfer of shares of Atkins common stock; and

•         other provisions relating to, among other things, non-disparagement.

Atkins expects to terminate these shareholder agreements in connection with the Business Combination, pursuant to the terms of such agreements.

198

PRICE RANGE OF SECURITIES AND DIVIDENDS

Conyers Park

Price Range of the Company’s Securities

Conyers Park’s units, each of which consists of one share of common stock and one-third of one warrant to purchase one share of common stock, began trading on NASDAQ under the symbol “CPAA.U” on July 20, 2016. On September 2, 2016, Conyers Park announced that holders of its units could elect to separately trade their common stock and the warrants included in the units, or to continue to trade the units without separating them. On September 6, 2016, Conyers Park’s common stock and warrants began trading on NASDAQ under the symbols “CPAA” and “CPAA.W,” respectively. Each whole warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of Conyers Park common stock at a price of $11.50 per share, subject to adjustments as described in Conyers Park’s final prospectus dated July 14, 2016, which was filed with the SEC. Warrants may only be exercised for a whole number of shares of Conyers Park’s common stock and will become exercisable 30 days after the completion of an initial business combination. Conyers Park’s warrants will expire five years after the completion of an initial business combination or earlier upon redemption or liquidation as described in its final prospectus.

The following table sets forth, for the calendar quarter indicated, the high and low sales prices per unit, share of common stock and warrants as reported on NASDAQ for the periods presented.

		Units (CPAA.U)						Class A Common Stock (CPAA)						Warrants (CPAA.W)
		High			Low			High			Low			High			Low
2017:
Second Quarter (through June 13, 2017)		$	13.60		$	10.95		$	12.50		$	10.48		$	3.45		$	1.62
First Quarter		$	11.95		$	10.85		$	11.00		$	10.25		$	2.59		$	2.18
2016:
Fourth Quarter		$	11.40		$	10.07		$	10.00		$	10.00		$	4.23		$	1.25
Third Quarter (beginning July 15, 2016)		$	10.08		$	10.21		$	10.98		$	10.00		$	1.56		$	1.25

Dividend Policy of the Company

Conyers Park has not paid any cash dividends on its shares of common stock to date and does not intend to pay cash dividends prior to the completion of an initial business combination. The payment of cash dividends in the future will be dependent upon its revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements and general financial condition subsequent to completion of a business combination. The payment of any dividends subsequent to a business combination will be within the discretion of our board of directors at such time. It is the present intention of Conyers Park’s board of directors to retain all earnings, if any, for use in its business operations and, accordingly, its board of directors does not anticipate declaring any dividends in the foreseeable future. Further, if Conyers Park incurs any indebtedness, its ability to declare dividends may be limited by restrictive covenants we may agree to in connection therewith.

Atkins

Price Range of Atkins Securities

Historical market price information regarding Atkins is not provided because there is no public market for Atkins’ securities. See “Atkins’ Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

199

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Representatives of Conyers Park’s independent registered public accounting firm, WithumSmith+Brown, PC, will be present at the special meeting of the stockholders. The representatives will have the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and they are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

APPRAISAL RIGHTS

Conyers Park’s stockholders do not have appraisal rights in connection with the Business Combination under Delaware law.

LEGAL MATTERS

Certain legal matters relating to the validity of the common stock to be issued hereunder will be passed upon for us by Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, New York.

EXPERTS

The audited financial statements of Conyers Park Acquisition Corp. as of December 31, 2016 and for the period from April 20, 2016 (inception) to December 31, 2016 included in this proxy statement/prospectus of Conyers Park Acquisition Corp. and the Registration Statement of The Simply Good Foods Company have been so included in reliance on a report of WithumSmith+Brown, PC, an independent registered public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere herein given on the authority of said firm, as experts in auditing and accounting.

The consolidated financial statements of NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries at August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015 and December 27, 2014, and for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 and the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013, included in this proxy statement/prospectus of Conyers Park Acquisition Corp. and the Registration Statement of The Simply Good Foods Company, have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in their report appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR

The transfer agent for Conyers Park’s securities is Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company.

SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Conyers Park’s board of directors is aware of no other matter that may be brought before the special meeting. Under Delaware law, only business that is specified in the notice of special meeting to stockholders may be transacted at the special meeting.

FUTURE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

We anticipate that the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders will be held no later than July 1, 2018. For any proposal to be considered for inclusion in Conyers Park’s proxy statement and form of proxy for submission to the stockholders at our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, it must be submitted in writing and comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act and our bylaws. Assuming the meeting is held on or about July 1, 2018, such proposals must be received by the Company at its offices at Conyers Park Acquisition Corp. c/o Conyers Park Sponsor LLC, 1 Greenwich Office Park, 2nd Floor, Greenwich, CT 06831 no later than April 6, 2018 and no earlier than March 7, 2018.

In addition, Conyers Park’s bylaws provide notice procedures for stockholders to nominate a person as a director and to propose business to be considered by stockholders at a meeting. To be timely, a stockholder’s notice must be delivered to Conyers Park at the principal executive offices of the Company not later than the close of business on the 90th day nor earlier than the opening of business on the 120th day before the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of stockholders; provided, however, that in the event that the annual meeting is called for a date that is not within 30 days before or after such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so received no earlier than the opening of business on the 120th day before the meeting and not

200

later than the later of (x) the close of business on the 90th day before the meeting or (y) the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the annual meeting was first made by the Corporation. Accordingly, for Conyers Park’s 2018 Annual Meeting, assuming the meeting is held on July 1, 2018, notice of a nomination or proposal must be delivered to Conyers Park no later than April 6, 2018 and no earlier than March 7, 2018. Nominations and proposals also must satisfy other requirements set forth in the bylaws. The Chairman of Conyers Park’s board of directors may refuse to acknowledge the introduction of any stockholder proposal not made in compliance with the foregoing procedures.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

Simply Good Foods has filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-4, as amended, under the Securities Act with respect to the securities offered by this proxy statement/prospectus. This proxy statement/prospectus does not contain all of the information included in the registration statement. For further information pertaining to Simply Good Foods and its securities, you should refer to the registration statement and to its exhibits. Whenever reference is made in this proxy statement/prospectus to any of Conyers Park’s or Atkins’ contracts, agreements or other documents, the references are not necessarily complete, and you should refer to the annexes to the proxy statement/prospectus and the exhibits attached to the registration statement for copies of the actual contract, agreement or other document.

Upon the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part, Simply Good Foods will be subject to the information and periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and will file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You can read Simply Good Foods’ and Conyers Park’s SEC filings, including Simply Good Foods’ registration statement over the internet at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. You may also read and copy any document Simply Good Foods or Conyers Park files with the SEC at the SEC public reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580 Washington, D.C., 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You may also obtain copies of the materials described above at prescribed rates by writing to the SEC, Public Reference Section, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.

If you would like additional copies of this proxy statement/prospectus or if you have questions about the Business Combination or the proposals to be presented at the special meeting, you should contact the Company at the following address and telephone number:

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp. c/o Conyers Park Sponsor LLC
1 Greenwich Office Park, 2nd Floor, Greenwich, CT 06831
(212) 429-2211
E-mail: bratzan@centerviewcapital.com

You may also obtain these documents by requesting them in writing or by telephone from the Company’s proxy solicitation agent at the following address and telephone number:

    
Stockholders, please call toll free: (800) 662-5200
Banks and Brokerage Firms, please call collect: (203) 658-9400
Email: CPAA.info@morrowsodali.com

If you are a stockholder of the Company and would like to request documents, please do so by June 27, 2017, in order to receive them before the special meeting. If you request any documents from us, we will mail them to you by first class mail, or another equally prompt means.

All information contained or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus relating to the Company has been supplied by the Company, and all such information relating to Atkins has been supplied by Atkins. Information provided by either the Company or Atkins does not constitute any representation, estimate or projection of any other party.

This document is a proxy statement of the Company for the special meeting. We have not authorized anyone to give any information or make any representation about the Business Combination, the Company or Atkins that is different from, or in addition to, that contained in this proxy statement. Therefore, if anyone does give you information of this sort, you should not rely on it. The information contained in this document speaks only as of the date of this document unless the information specifically indicates that another date applies.

201

Index to Financial Statements

		Page Number
Audited Financial Statements of Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-2
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2016		F-3
Statement of Operations for the period from April 20, 2016 (inception) through December 31, 2016		F-4
Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the period from April 20, 2016 (inception) through December 31, 2016		F-5
Statement of Cash Flows for the period from April 20, 2016 (inception) through December 31, 2016		F-6
Notes to Financial Statements		F-7
Unaudited Condensed Interim Financial Statements of Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
Unaudited Condensed Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016		F-15
Unaudited Condensed Statement of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017		F-16
Unaudited Condensed Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017		F-17
Unaudited Condensed Statement of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017		F-18
Unaudited Notes to Condensed Financial Statements		F-19
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-28
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015 and December 27, 2014		F-29
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 and the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013		F-30
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the 52-week periods ended December 28, 2013 and December 27, 2014 and the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 and the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016		F-31
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 and the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013		F-32
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-33
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 25, 2017 and August 27, 2016		F-52
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the 26-week periods ended February 25, 2017 and February 27, 2016		F-53
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the 26-week periods ended February 25, 2017 and February 27, 2016		F-54
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements		F-55

F-1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholder of
Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Conyers Park Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”), as of December 31, 2016, and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the period from April 20, 2016 (inception) to December 31, 2016. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Conyers Park Acquisition Corp. as of December 31, 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the period from April 20, 2016 (inception) to December 31, 2016, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ WithumSmith+Brown, PC

Morristown, New Jersey
March 31, 2017

F-2

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
Balance Sheet

		As of December 31, 2016
ASSETS:
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	954,102
Prepaid expenses			336,458
Total current assets			1,290,560
Investments held in Trust Account			402,794,587
Total assets		$	404,085,147
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		$	1,404
Accounts payable - related party			185,424
Accrued franchise tax			126,000
Total current liabilities			312,828
Deferred underwriting compensation			14,087,500
Total liabilities			14,400,328
Class A Common Stock subject to possible redemption; 38,468,481 (at redemption value of $10.00 per share)			384,684,810
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding			—
Class A Common Stock, $0.0001 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 1,781,519 shares issued and outstanding (excluding 38,468,481 shares subject to redemption)			178
Class B common stock, $0.0001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 10,062,500 issued and outstanding			1,006
Additional paid-in capital			5,191,328
Accumulated deficit			(192,503	)
Total stockholders’ equity			5,000,009
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	404,085,147

See accompanying notes to financial statements

F-3

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
Statement of Operations

		For the Period From April 20, 2016 (Inception) to December 31, 2016
Revenues		$	—
General and administrative expenses			487,090
Loss from operations			(487,090	)
Interest income			294,587
Net loss		$	(192,503	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted			11,201,093
Net loss per common share:
Basic and diluted		$	(0.02	)

See accompanying notes to financial statements

F-4

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

		Class A Common Stock							Class B Common Stock					Additional Paid-in				Accumulated				Stockholders’
		Shares			Amount				Shares		Amount			Capital				Deficit				Equity
Balance at April 20, 2016 (date of inception)		—			$	—			—		$	—		$	—			$	—			$	—
Sale of Class B common stock to Sponsor		—				—			10,062,500			1,006			23,994				—				25,000
Sale of Class A Common Stock to public		40,250,000				4,025			—			—			402,495,975				—				402,500,000
Sale of 6,700,000 Private Placement Warrants to Sponsor		—				—			—			—			10,050,000				—				10,050,000
Underwriters’ discount and offering costs		—				—			—			—			(22,697,678	)			—				(22,697,678	)
Class A Common Stock subject to possible redemption		(38,468,481	)		$	(3,847	)		—			—			(384,680,963	)			—				(384,684,810	)
Net loss		—				—			—			—			—				(192,503	)			(192,503	)
Balance at December 31, 2016		1,781,519			$	178			10,062,500		$	1,006		$	5,191,328			$	(192,503	)		$	5,000,009

See accompanying notes to financial statements

F-5

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
Statement of Cash Flows

		For the Period from April 20, 2016 (Inception) to December 31, 2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss		$	(192,503	)
Changes in prepaid expenses			(336,458	)
Changes in accounts payable and accrued expenses			1,404
Changes in accounts payable – related party			185,424
Changes in accrued franchise tax			126,000
Net cash used by operating activities			(216,133	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Cash deposited in Trust Account			(402,500,000	)
Interest earned in Trust Account			(294,587	)
Net cash used by investing activities			(402,794,587	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from sale of Class A Common Stock to public			402,500,000
Proceeds from sale of Class B common stock to Sponsor			25,000
Proceeds from sale of Private Placement Warrants to Sponsor			10,050,000
Payment of underwriters’ discount			(8,050,000	)
Payment of offering costs			(560,178	)
Net cash provided by financing activities			403,964,822
Increase in cash			954,102
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period			—
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		$	954,102
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities:
Deferred underwriting compensation		$	14,087,500

See accompanying notes to financial statements

F-6

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements

Note 1 — Description of Organization and Business Operations

Organization and General

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) was incorporated in Delaware on April 20, 2016. The Company was formed for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses (the “Initial Business Combination”). The Company is an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the “Securities Act,” as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”).

At December 31, 2016, the Company had not commenced any operations. All activity for the period from April 20, 2016 (Inception) through December 31, 2016 relates to the Company’s formation and the initial public offering (“Public Offering”) described below and since the Public Offering, the search for a target business with which to consummate an Initial Business Combination. The Company will not generate any operating revenues until after completion of its Initial Business Combination, at the earliest. The Company will generate non-operating income in the form of interest income on cash and cash equivalents from the proceeds derived from the Public Offering.

Sponsor and Proposed Financing

The Company’s sponsor is Conyers Park Sponsor LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Sponsor”). The registration statement for the Company’s Public Offering was declared effective by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on July 14, 2016. The Company intends to finance its Initial Business Combination with proceeds from the $402,500,000 Public Offering of Units and a $10,050,000 private placement (Note 4). Upon the closing of the Public Offering and the private placement, $402,500,000 was placed in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) (discussed below).

The Trust Account

The proceeds held in the Trust Account may be invested only in U.S. government treasury bills with a maturity of one hundred eighty (180) days or less or in money market funds that meet certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and that invest only in direct U.S. government obligations. Funds will remain in the Trust Account until the earlier of (i) the consummation of the Initial Business Combination or (ii) the distribution of the Trust Account proceeds as described below. The remaining proceeds outside the Trust Account may be used to pay for business, legal and accounting due diligence on prospective acquisitions and continuing general and administrative expenses.

The Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that, other than the withdrawal of interest to fund working capital requirements of up to $1,000,000 and to pay taxes, if any, none of the funds held in the Trust Account will be released until the earlier of: (i) the completion of the Initial Business Combination; (ii) the redemption of any shares of Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value (the “Class A Common Stock”) included in the Units (the “Public Shares”) sold in the Public Offering that have been properly tendered in connection with a stockholder vote to amend the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation to modify the substance or timing of its obligation to redeem 100% of such shares of Class A Common Stock if it does not complete the Initial Business Combination within 24 months from the closing of the Public Offering; and (iii) the redemption of 100% of the shares of Class A Common Stock included in the Units sold in the Public Offering if the Company is unable to complete an Initial Business Combination within 24 months from the closing of the Public Offering (subject to the requirements of law). The proceeds deposited in the Trust Account could become subject to the claims of the Company’s creditors, if any, which could have priority over the claims of the Company’s public stockholders.

F-7

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements

Note 1 — Description of Organization and Business Operations (cont.)

Initial Business Combination

The Company’s management has broad discretion with respect to the specific application of the net proceeds of the Public Offering, although substantially all of the net proceeds of the Public Offering are intended to be generally applied toward consummating an Initial Business Combination. The Initial Business Combination must occur with one or more target businesses that together have an aggregate fair market value of at least 80% of the assets held in the Trust Account (excluding the deferred underwriting commissions and taxes payable on income earned on the Trust Account) at the time of the agreement to enter into the Initial Business Combination. Furthermore, there is no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully effect an Initial Business Combination.

The Company, after signing a definitive agreement for an Initial Business Combination, will either (i) seek stockholder approval of the Initial Business Combination at a meeting called for such purpose in connection with which stockholders may seek to redeem their shares, regardless of whether they vote for or against the Initial Business Combination, for cash equal to their pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account as of two business days prior to the consummation of the Initial Business Combination, including interest but less taxes payable and amounts permitted to be withdrawn for working capital purposes, or (ii) provide stockholders with the opportunity to sell their Public Shares to the Company by means of a tender offer (and thereby avoid the need for a stockholder vote) for an amount in cash equal to their pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account as of two business days prior to the consummation of the Initial Business Combination, including interest but less taxes payable and amounts permitted to be withdrawn for working capital purposes. The decision as to whether the Company will seek stockholder approval of the Initial Business Combination or will allow stockholders to sell their Public Shares in a tender offer will be made by the Company, solely in its discretion, and will be based on a variety of factors such as the timing of the transaction and whether the terms of the transaction would otherwise require the Company to seek stockholder approval, unless a vote is required by law or under NASDAQ rules. If the Company seeks stockholder approval, it will complete its Initial Business Combination only if a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock voted are voted in favor of the Initial Business Combination. However, in no event will the Company redeem its Public Shares in an amount that would cause its net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001. In such case, the Company would not proceed with the redemption of its Public Shares and the related Initial Business Combination, and instead may search for an alternate Initial Business Combination.

If the Company holds a stockholder vote or there is a tender offer for shares in connection with an Initial Business Combination, a public stockholder will have the right to redeem its shares for an amount in cash equal to its pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account as of two business days prior to the consummation of the Initial Business Combination, including interest but less taxes payable and amounts permitted to be withdrawn for working capital purposes. As a result, such shares of Class A Common Stock will be recorded at redemption amount and classified as temporary equity upon the completion of the Public Offering, in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.”

Pursuant to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, if the Company is unable to complete the Initial Business Combination within 24 months from the closing of the Public Offering, the Company will (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but no more than ten business days thereafter subject to lawfully available funds therefore, redeem the Public Shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to us to pay up to $1,000,000 of the Company’s working capital requirements as well as to pay the Company’s franchise and income taxes (less up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of then outstanding Public Shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public stockholders’ rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidating distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of the Company’s remaining stockholders and the Company’s board of directors, dissolve and liquidate, subject in each case to the Company’s obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law.

F-8

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements

Note 1 — Description of Organization and Business Operations (cont.)

The Sponsor and the Company’s officers and directors entered into a letter agreement with the Company, pursuant to which they agreed to waive their rights to liquidating distributions from the Trust Account with respect to any Founder Shares (as defined below) held by them if the Company fails to complete the Initial Business Combination within 24 months of the closing of the Public Offering. However, if the Sponsor or any of the Company’s directors, officers or affiliates acquires shares of Class A common stock in or after the Public Offering, they will be entitled to liquidating distributions from the Trust Account with respect to such shares if the Company fails to complete the Initial Business Combination within the prescribed time period.

In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company after an Initial Business Combination, the Company’s stockholders are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining available for distribution to them after payment of liabilities and after provision is made for each class of stock, if any, having preference over the common stock. The Company’s stockholders have no preemptive or other subscription rights. There are no sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock, except that the Company will provide its stockholders with the opportunity to redeem their Public Shares for cash equal to their pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account, upon the completion of the Initial Business Combination, subject to the limitations described herein.

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and pursuant to the accounting and disclosure rules and regulations of the SEC.

Liquidity

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had a balance of cash and cash equivalents of approximately $954,000, which excludes interest income available to the Company for tax obligations of approximately $295,000 from the Company’s investments in the Trust account.

The Company intends to use substantially all of the funds held in the Trust Account, including any amounts representing interest earned on the Trust Account (less taxes payable and deferred underwriting commissions) to complete its initial business combination. To the extent that the Company’s equity or debt is used, in whole or in part, as consideration to complete the initial business combination, the remaining proceeds held in the Trust Account will be used as working capital to finance the operations of the target business or businesses, make other acquisitions and pursue its growth strategies.

Based on the foregoing, management believes that the Company will have sufficient working capital to meet the Company’s needs for the next twelve months. Over this time period, the Company will be using these funds for paying existing accounts payable, identifying and evaluating prospective acquisition candidates, performing business due diligence on prospective target businesses, traveling to and from the offices, plants or similar locations of prospective target businesses, reviewing corporate documents and material agreements of prospective target businesses, selecting the target business to acquire and structuring, negotiating and consummating the business combination.

Emerging Growth Company

Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to

F-9

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont.)

non-emerging growth companies but any such an election to opt out is irrevocable. The Company has elected not to opt out of such extended transition period which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, the Company, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard.

This may make comparison of the Company’s financial statements with another public company, which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period, difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.

Net Loss Per Common Share

Net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus, to the extent dilutive, the incremental number of shares of common stock to settle warrants, as calculated using the treasury stock method. At December 31, 2016, the Company had outstanding warrants to purchase 20,116,667 shares of common stock. For the period presented, these shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share of common stock because their inclusion would have been antidilutive. As a result, diluted loss per common share is the same as basic loss per common share for the period.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist of cash accounts in a financial institution, which, at times, may exceed the Federal depository insurance coverage of $250,000. The Company had not experienced losses on these accounts and management believes the Company is not exposed to significant risks on such accounts.

Financial Instruments

The fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities, which qualify as financial instruments under FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” approximates the carrying amounts represented in the balance sheet.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Offering Costs

The Company complies with the requirements of FASB ASC 340-10-S99-1 and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 5A — “Expenses of Offering.” Offering costs were $22,697,678 (including $22,137,500 in underwriters’ fees), consisting principally of costs incurred in connection with formation and preparation for the Public Offering. These costs, together with the underwriters’ discount were charged to additional paid-in capital upon closing of the Public Offering on July 20, 2016.

Redeemable Class A Common Stock

As discussed in Note 1, all of the 40,250,000 shares of Class A common stock sold as parts of the Units in the Public Offering contain a redemption feature which allows for the redemption of Class A common stock under the Company’s Liquidation or Tender Offer/Stockholder Approval provisions. In accordance with FASB ASC 480, redemption provisions not solely within the control of the Company require the security to be classified outside of

F-10

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont.)

permanent equity. Ordinary liquidation events, which involve the redemption and liquidation of all of the entity’s equity instruments, are excluded from the provisions of FASB ASC 480. Although the Company has not specified a maximum redemption threshold, its amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that in no event will the Company redeem its public shares in an amount that would cause its net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001.

The Company recognizes changes in redemption value immediately as they occur and will adjust the carrying value of the security to equal the redemption value at the end of each reporting period. Increases or decreases in the carrying amount of redeemable Class A common stock shall be affected by charges against additional paid-in capital. Accordingly, at December 31, 2016, 38,468,481 of the 40,250,000 shares of Class A common stock included in the Units were classified outside of permanent equity at its redemption value.

Income Taxes

The Company follows the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes under FASB ASC 740, “Income Taxes.” Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that included the enactment date. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

FASB ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. There were no unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2016. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. No amounts were accrued for the payment of interest and penalties at December 31, 2016. The Company is currently not aware of any issues under review that could result in significant payments, accruals or material deviation from its position. The Company is subject to income tax examinations by major taxing authorities since inception.

Marketable Securities Held in Trust Account

The amounts held in the Trust Account represent proceeds from the Public Offering and the Private Placement of $402,500,000 which were invested in a money market instrument that invests in United States Treasury Securities with original maturities of six months or less and can only be used by the Company in connection with the consummation of an Initial Business Combination.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2014, FASB issued ASU 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements — Going Concern” (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. ASU 2014-15 provides guidance on management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. For each reporting period, management will be required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year from the date the financial statements are issued. The amendments in ASU 2014-15 are effective for annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2016 and for annual and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has adopted and incorporated the methodologies prescribed by ASU 2014-15 in the accompanying financial statements.

The Company’s management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

F-11

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements

Note 3 — Public Offering

On July 20, 2016, in the Public Offering, the Company sold 40,250,000 units at a price of $10.00 per unit (the “Units”), including the full exercise of the underwriter’s overallotment option. The Sponsor purchased an aggregate of 6,700,000 warrants at a price of $1.50 per warrant in a private placement that occurred simultaneously with the closing of the Public Offering.

Each Unit consists of one share of the Company’s Class A common stock, and one-third of one warrant to purchase shares of Class A common stock (each, a “Warrant” and, collectively, the “Warrants”). Each whole Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of Class A common stock at a price of $11.50 per share. No fractional shares will be issued upon separation of the Units and only whole Warrants will trade. Each Warrant will become exercisable on the later of 30 days after the completion of the Company’s Initial Business Combination or 12 months from the closing of the Public Offering and will expire five years after the completion of the Company’s Initial Business Combination or earlier upon redemption or liquidation. Once the Warrants become exercisable, the Company may redeem the outstanding Warrants in whole and not in part at a price of $0.01 per Warrant upon a minimum of 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption, if and only if the last sale price of the Company’s Class A common stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which the Company sent the notice of redemption to the Warrant holders.

The Company paid an underwriting discount of $8,050,000 to the underwriters at the closing of the Public Offering, with an additional fee (the “Deferred Discount”) of $14,087,500, payable upon the Company’s completion of an Initial Business Combination. The Deferred Discount will become payable to the underwriters from the amounts held in the Trust Account solely in the event the Company completes its Initial Business Combination.

Note 4 — Related Party Transactions

Founder Shares

On April 29, 2016, the Sponsor purchased 10,062,500 shares of Class B common stock for an aggregate price of $25,000, or approximately $0.002 per share. As used herein, unless the context otherwise requires, “Founder Shares” shall be deemed to include the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon conversion thereof. The Founder Shares are identical to the Class A common stock included in the Units sold in the Public Offering except that the Founder Shares automatically convert into shares of Class A common stock at the time of the Company’s Initial Business Combination and are subject to certain transfer restrictions, as described in more detail below. Holders of Founder Shares may also elect to convert their shares of Class B common stock into an equal number of shares of Class A common stock, subject to adjustment as provided above, at any time.

The Company’s initial stockholders have agreed, subject to limited exceptions, not to transfer, assign or sell any of their Founder Shares until the earlier to occur of: (A) one year after the completion of the Initial Business Combination or (B) subsequent to the Initial Business Combination, (x) if the last sale price of the Company’s Class A common stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing at least 150 days after the Initial Business Combination, or (y) the date on which the Company completes a liquidation, merger, stock exchange or other similar transaction that results in all of the Company’s stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property.

Private Placement Warrants

The Sponsor has purchased an aggregate of 6,700,000 private placement warrants (including warrants required to be purchased in connection with the over-allotment option) at a price of $1.50 per warrant in a private placement that occurred simultaneously with the closing of the Public Offering (the “Private Placement Warrants”). Each Private Placement Warrant is exercisable for one whole share of the Company’s Class A common stock at a price of $11.50 per share. A portion of the purchase price of the Private Placement Warrants has been added to the proceeds from the Public Offering held in the Trust Account pending completion of the Initial Business Combination such that at the closing of the Public Offering $402.5 million was held in the Trust Account. If the Initial Business

F-12

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements

Note 4 — Related Party Transactions (cont.)

Combination is not completed within 24 months from the closing of the Public Offering, the proceeds from the sale of the Private Placement Warrants held in the Trust Account will be used to fund the redemption of the Public Shares (subject to the requirements of applicable law) and the Private Placement Warrants will expire worthless. The Private Placement Warrants are non-redeemable and exercisable on a cashless basis so long as they are held by the Sponsor or its permitted transferees.

The Sponsor and the Company’s officers and directors have agreed, subject to limited exceptions, not to transfer, assign or sell any of their Private Placement Warrants (including the Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the Private Placement Warrants) until 30 days after the completion of the Initial Business Combination.

Registration Rights

The holders of Founder Shares, Private Placement Warrants and Warrants that may be issued upon conversion of working capital loans, if any, are entitled to registration rights (in the case of the Founder Shares, only after conversion of such shares to shares of Class A common stock) as stated in the registration rights agreement signed on the date of the prospectus for the Public Offering. These holders are entitled to certain demand and “piggyback” registration rights.

However, the registration rights agreement provides that the Company will not permit any registration statement filed under the Securities Act to become effective until termination of the applicable lock-up period for the securities to be registered. The Company will bear the expenses incurred in connection with the filing of any such registration statements.

Related Party Loans

On April 29, 2016, the Sponsor agreed to loan the Company an aggregate of up to $300,000 to cover expenses related to the Public Offering pursuant to a promissory note (the “Note”). This note was non-interest bearing and payable on the earlier of December 31, 2016 or the completion of the Public Offering. On April 29, 2016, the Company borrowed $100,000 under the Note. From April 30, 2016 through July 19, 2016, the Company borrowed an additional $125,000 under the Note. On July 20, 2016, the total balance of $225,000 of the Note was repaid to the Sponsor.

Administrative Support Agreement

The Company has agreed to pay an affiliate of the Sponsor a total of $10,000 per month for office space, utilities and secretarial and administrative support. Services commenced on July 15, 2016, the date the securities were first listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market and will terminate upon the earlier of the completion of the Initial Business Combination or the Company’s liquidation.

Accounts Payable — Related Party

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had a balance of $185,424 payable to related parties for expenses paid on behalf of the Company in the amount of $125,424 and $60,000 payable under the administrative support agreement. These borrowings are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on demand.

Note 5 — Investments Held in Trust Account

Upon the closing of the Public Offering and the Private Placement, $402,500,000 was placed in the Trust Account. At December 31, 2016, funds in the Trust Account totaled $402,794,587 and were held in investment securities and cash, with investment securities consisting only of money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, which invest only in direct U.S. government obligations. Such investment securities are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.

F-13

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
Notes to Financial Statements

Note 6 — Fair Value Measurements

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets that are measured on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2016 and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques that the Company utilized to determine such fair value. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize data points that are observable, such as quoted prices, interest rates and yield curves. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs are unobservable data points for the asset or liability, and includes situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.

		December 31,			Quoted Prices in Active Markets			Significant Other Observable Inputs			Significant Other Unobservable Inputs
		2016			(Level 1)			(Level 2)			(Level 3)
Investments in money market fund held in Trust Account		$	402,794,587		$	402,794,587		$	—		$	—
Total		$	402,794,587		$	402,794,587		$	—		$	—

Note 7 — Deferred Underwriting Commission

The Company is committed to pay the Deferred Discount of 3.5% of the gross proceeds of the Public Offering, or $14,087,500, to the underwriters upon the Company’s completion of an Initial Business Combination. The underwriters are not entitled to receive any of the interest earned on Trust Account funds that would be used to pay the Deferred Discount, and no Deferred Discount is payable to the underwriters if an Initial Business Combination is not completed within 24 months after the Public Offering.

Note 8 — Stockholders’ Equity

Common Stock

The authorized common stock of the Company consists of 200,000,000 shares of Class A common stock and 20,000,000 shares of Class B common stock. If the Company enters into an Initial Business Combination, it may (depending on the terms of such an Initial Business Combination) be required to increase the number of shares of Class A common stock which the Company is authorized to issue at the same time as the Company’s stockholders vote on the Initial Business Combination to the extent the Company seeks stockholder approval in connection with the Initial Business Combination. Holders of the Company’s common stock are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock. At December 31, 2016, there were 40,250,000 shares of Class A (of which 38,468,481 was classified outside of permanent equity) and 10,062,500 shares of Class B common stock issued and outstanding.

Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock with such designations, voting and other rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by the Company’s board of directors. At December 31, 2016, there were no shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding.

Outstanding Warrants

The Company issued warrants to purchase 13,416,667 shares of Class A common stock as part of the units sold in the Initial Public Offering and, simultaneously with the closing of our Initial Public Offering, the Company issued Private Placement Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 6,700,000 shares of Class A common stock at $11.50 per share. At December 31, 2016, the Company had outstanding warrants to purchase 20,116,667 shares of common stock.

F-14

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

		March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016
		(unaudited)				(audited)
ASSETS:
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	701,522			$	954,102
Prepaid expenses			283,333				336,458
Total current assets			984,855				1,290,560
Investments held in Trust Account			403,146,657				402,794,587
Total assets		$	404,131,512			$	404,085,147
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses			41,209				1,404
Accounts payable – related party			302,006				185,424
Accrued franchise and income taxes			106,400				126,000
Total current liabilities			449,615				312,828
Deferred underwriting compensation			14,087,500				14,087,500
Total liabilities			14,537,115				14,400,328
Class A common stock subject to possible redemption; 38,459,439 and 38,468,481 as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively (at redemption value of $10.00 per share)			384,594,387				384,684,810
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016			—				—
Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 1,790,561 and 1,781,519 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively (excluding 38,459,439 and 38,468,481 shares subject to redemption as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively)			179				178
Class B common stock, $0.0001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 10,062,500 issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016			1,006				1,006
Additional paid-in-capital			5,281,750				5,191,328
Accumulated deficit			(282,925	)			(192,503	)
Total stockholders’ equity			5,000,010				5,000,009
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	404,131,512			$	404,085,147

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

F-15

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

		For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
Revenues		$	—
General and administrative expenses			442,492
Loss from operations			(442,492	)
Interest income			352,070
Net loss		$	(90,422	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted			11,844,120
Net loss per common share:
Basic and diluted		$	(0.01	)

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

F-16

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017

(Unaudited)

		Class A Common Stock					Class B Common Stock					Additional Paid-in			Accumulated				Stockholders’
		Shares		Amount			Shares		Amount			Capital			Deficit				Equity
Balance at December 31, 2016		1,781,519		$	179		10,062,500		$	1,006		$	5,191,328		$	(192,503	)		$	5,000,009
Class A common stock subject to possible redemption		9,042			1		—			—			90,422			—				90,423
Net loss		—			—		—			—			—			(90,422	)			(90,422	)
Balance at March 31, 2017		1,790,561		$	179		10,062,500		$	1,006		$	5,281,750		$	(282,925	)		$	5,000,010

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

F-17

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

For Three Months Ended March 31, 2017

(Unaudited)

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss		$	(90,422	)
Changes in prepaid expenses			53,125
Changes in accounts payable and accrued expenses			39,805
Changes in accounts payable - related party			116,582
Changes in accrued franchise and income taxes			(19,600	)
Net cash provided by operating activities			99,490
Cash flows from investing activities:
Interest earned in Trust Account			(352,070	)
Net cash used by investing activities			(352,070	)
Increase in cash			(252,580	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period			954,102
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		$	701,522

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

F-18

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1 — Description of Organization and Business Operations

Organization and General

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) was incorporated in Delaware on April 20, 2016. The Company was formed for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses (the “Initial Business Combination”). The Company is an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the “Securities Act,” as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”).

At March 31, 2017, the Company had not commenced any operations. All activity for the period from April 20, 2016 (Inception) through March 31, 2017 relates to the Company’s formation and the initial public offering (“Public Offering”) described below and since the Public Offering, the search for a target business with which to consummate an Initial Business Combination. The Company will not generate any operating revenues until after completion of its Initial Business Combination, at the earliest. The Company will generate non-operating income in the form of interest income on cash and cash equivalents from the proceeds derived from the Public Offering.

Sponsor and Proposed Financing

The Company’s sponsor is Conyers Park Sponsor LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Sponsor”). The registration statement for the Company’s Public Offering was declared effective by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on July 14, 2016. The Company intends to finance its Initial Business Combination with proceeds from the $402,500,000 Public Offering of Units and a $10,050,000 private placement (Note 4). Upon the closing of the Public Offering and the private placement, $402,500,000 was placed in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) (discussed below).

The Trust Account

The proceeds held in the Trust Account may be invested only in U.S. government treasury bills with a maturity of one hundred eighty (180) days or less or in money market funds that meet certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and that invest only in direct U.S. government obligations. Funds will remain in the Trust Account until the earlier of (i) the consummation of the Initial Business Combination or (ii) the distribution of the Trust Account proceeds as described below. The remaining proceeds outside the Trust Account may be used to pay for business, legal and accounting due diligence on prospective acquisitions and continuing general and administrative expenses.

The Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that, other than the withdrawal of interest to fund working capital requirements of up to $1,000,000 and to pay taxes, if any, none of the funds held in the Trust Account will be released until the earlier of: (i) the completion of the Initial Business Combination; (ii) the redemption of any shares of Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value (the “Class A Common Stock”) included in the Units (the “Public Shares”) sold in the Public Offering that have been properly tendered in connection with a stockholder vote to amend the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation to modify the substance or timing of its obligation to redeem 100% of such shares of Class A Common Stock if it does not complete the Initial Business Combination within 24 months from the closing of the Public Offering; and (iii) the redemption of 100% of the shares of Class A Common Stock included in the Units sold in the Public Offering if the Company is unable to complete an Initial Business Combination within 24 months from the closing of the Public Offering (subject to the requirements of law). The proceeds deposited in the Trust Account could become subject to the claims of the Company’s creditors, if any, which could have priority over the claims of the Company’s public stockholders.

F-19

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1 — Description of Organization and Business Operations (cont.)

Initial Business Combination

The Company’s management has broad discretion with respect to the specific application of the net proceeds of the Public Offering, although substantially all of the net proceeds of the Public Offering are intended to be generally applied toward consummating an Initial Business Combination. The Initial Business Combination must occur with one or more target businesses that together have an aggregate fair market value of at least 80% of the assets held in the Trust Account (excluding the deferred underwriting commissions and taxes payable on income earned on the Trust Account) at the time of the agreement to enter into the Initial Business Combination. Furthermore, there is no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully effect an Initial Business Combination.

The Company, after signing a definitive agreement for an Initial Business Combination, will either (i) seek stockholder approval of the Initial Business Combination at a meeting called for such purpose in connection with which stockholders may seek to redeem their shares, regardless of whether they vote for or against the Initial Business Combination, for cash equal to their pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account as of two business days prior to the consummation of the Initial Business Combination, including interest but less taxes payable and amounts permitted to be withdrawn for working capital purposes, or (ii) provide stockholders with the opportunity to sell their Public Shares to the Company by means of a tender offer (and thereby avoid the need for a stockholder vote) for an amount in cash equal to their pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account as of two business days prior to the consummation of the Initial Business Combination, including interest but less taxes payable and amounts permitted to be withdrawn for working capital purposes. The decision as to whether the Company will seek stockholder approval of the Initial Business Combination or will allow stockholders to sell their Public Shares in a tender offer will be made by the Company, solely in its discretion, and will be based on a variety of factors such as the timing of the transaction and whether the terms of the transaction would otherwise require the Company to seek stockholder approval, unless a vote is required by law or under NASDAQ rules. If the Company seeks stockholder approval, it will complete its Initial Business Combination only if a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock voted are voted in favor of the Initial Business Combination. However, in no event will the Company redeem its Public Shares in an amount that would cause its net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001. In such case, the Company would not proceed with the redemption of its Public Shares and the related Initial Business Combination, and instead may search for an alternate Initial Business Combination.

If the Company holds a stockholder vote or there is a tender offer for shares in connection with an Initial Business Combination, a public stockholder will have the right to redeem its shares for an amount in cash equal to its pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account as of two business days prior to the consummation of the Initial Business Combination, including interest but less taxes payable and amounts permitted to be withdrawn for working capital purposes. As a result, such shares of Class A Common Stock are recorded at redemption amount and classified as temporary equity since the completion of the Public Offering, in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.”

Pursuant to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, if the Company is unable to complete the Initial Business Combination within 24 months from the closing of the Public Offering, the Company will (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but no more than ten business days thereafter subject to lawfully available funds therefore, redeem the Public Shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to us to pay up to $1,000,000 of the Company’s working capital requirements as well as to pay the Company’s franchise and income taxes (less up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of then outstanding Public Shares, which

F-20

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1 — Description of Organization and Business Operations (cont.)

redemption will completely extinguish public stockholders’ rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidating distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of the Company’s remaining stockholders and the Company’s board of directors, dissolve and liquidate, subject in each case to the Company’s obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law.

The Sponsor and the Company’s officers and directors entered into a letter agreement with the Company, pursuant to which they agreed to waive their rights to liquidating distributions from the Trust Account with respect to any Founder Shares (as defined below) held by them if the Company fails to complete the Initial Business Combination within 24 months of the closing of the Public Offering. However, if the Sponsor or any of the Company’s directors, officers or affiliates acquires shares of Class A Common Stock in or after the Public Offering, they will be entitled to liquidating distributions from the Trust Account with respect to such shares if the Company fails to complete the Initial Business Combination within the prescribed time period.

In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company after an Initial Business Combination, the Company’s stockholders are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining available for distribution to them after payment of liabilities and after provision is made for each class of stock, if any, having preference over the common stock. The Company’s stockholders have no preemptive or other subscription rights. There are no sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock, except that the Company will provide its stockholders with the opportunity to redeem their Public Shares for cash equal to their pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account, upon the completion of the Initial Business Combination, subject to the limitations described herein.

On April 10, 2017, the Company and NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. (“Atkins”) an affiliate of Atkins Nutritionals, Inc., a leading developer, marketer and seller of branded nutritional food and snacking products currently owned by affiliates of Roark Capital Group, announced that they have entered into a definitive agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company and Atkins will combine under a new holding company, The Simply Good Foods Company (“Simply Good Foods”), which is expected to be listed on the NASDAQ stock exchange under the symbol “SMPL” upon closing of the proposed transaction. The closing is subject to customary closing conditions. Additional information regarding the announcement is described under Note 9 — Subsequent Events.

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The unaudited interim condensed financial statements of the Company are presented in U.S. dollars in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and pursuant to the accounting and disclosure rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position as of March 31, 2017 and the results of operations and cash flows for the period presented. Certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.

The unaudited interim condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Form 10-K annual report and Form S-4 documents filed by the Company with the SEC on March 31, 2017 and April 11, 2017. All dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest thousand dollars.

F-21

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont.)

Liquidity

As of March 31, 2017, the Company had a balance of cash and cash equivalents of approximately $702,000, which excludes interest income available to the Company for tax obligations and general working capital purposes of approximately $647,000 from the Company’s investments in the Trust Account.

The Company intends to use substantially all of the funds held in the Trust Account, including any amounts representing interest earned on the Trust Account (less taxes payable, general working capital needs and deferred underwriting commissions) to complete its Initial Business Combination. To the extent that the Company’s equity or debt is used, in whole or in part, as consideration to complete the Initial Business Combination, the remaining proceeds held in the Trust Account will be used as working capital to finance the operations of the target business or businesses, make other acquisitions and pursue its growth strategies.

Based on the foregoing, management believes that the Company will have sufficient working capital to meet the Company’s needs for the next twelve months.

Emerging Growth Company

Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such an election to opt out is irrevocable. The Company has elected not to opt out of such extended transition period which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, the Company, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard.

This may make comparison of the Company’s financial statements with another public company, which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period, difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.

Net Loss Per Common Share

Net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus, to the extent dilutive, the incremental number of shares of common stock to settle warrants, as calculated using the treasury stock method. At March 31, 2017, the Company had outstanding warrants to purchase 20,116,667 shares of common stock. For the period presented, these shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share of common stock because their inclusion would have been antidilutive. As a result, diluted loss per common share is the same as basic loss per common share for the period.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist of cash accounts in a financial institution, which, at times, may exceed the Federal depository insurance coverage of $250,000. The Company had not experienced losses on these accounts and management believes the Company is not exposed to significant risks on such accounts.

Financial Instruments

The fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities, which qualify as financial instruments under FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” approximates the carrying amounts represented in the balance sheet.

F-22

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont.)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Redeemable Class A Common Stock

As discussed in Note 1, all of the 40,250,000 shares of Class A common stock sold as parts of the Units in the Public Offering contain a redemption feature which allows for the redemption of Class A common stock under the Company’s Liquidation or Tender Offer/Stockholder Approval provisions. In accordance with FASB ASC 480, redemption provisions not solely within the control of the Company require the security to be classified outside of permanent equity. Ordinary liquidation events, which involve the redemption and liquidation of all of the entity’s equity instruments, are excluded from the provisions of FASB ASC 480. Although the Company has not specified a maximum redemption threshold, its amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that in no event will the Company redeem its public shares in an amount that would cause its net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001.

The Company recognizes changes in redemption value immediately as they occur and will adjust the carrying value of the security to equal the redemption value at the end of each reporting period. Increases or decreases in the carrying amount of redeemable Class A common stock shall be affected by charges against additional paid in capital. Accordingly, at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, 38,459,439 and 38,468,481, respectively of the 40,250,000 shares of Class A common stock included in the Units were classified outside of permanent equity at its redemption value.

Income Taxes

The Company follows the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes under FASB ASC 740, “Income Taxes.” Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that included the enactment date. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

FASB ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. There were no unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 2017. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. No amounts were accrued for the payment of interest and penalties at March 31, 2017. The Company is currently not aware of any issues under review that could result in significant payments, accruals or material deviation from its position. The Company is subject to income tax examinations by major taxing authorities since inception.

At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had no material deferred tax assets.

Marketable Securities Held in Trust Account

The amounts held in the Trust Account represent proceeds from the Public Offering and the Private Placement of $402,500,000 which were invested in a money market instrument that invests in United States Treasury Securities

F-23

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont.)

with original maturities of six months or less and can only be used by the Company in connection with the consummation of an Initial Business Combination.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Company’s management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

Note 3 — Public Offering

On July 20, 2016, in the Public Offering, the Company sold 40,250,000 units at a price of $10.00 per unit (the “Units”), including the full exercise of the underwriter’s overallotment option. The Sponsor purchased an aggregate of 6,700,000 warrants at a price of $1.50 per warrant in a private placement that occurred simultaneously with the closing of the Public Offering.

Each Unit consists of one share of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, and one-third of one warrant to purchase shares of Class A Common Stock (each, a “Warrant” and, collectively, the “Warrants”). Each whole Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of Class A Common Stock at a price of $11.50 per share. No fractional shares will be issued upon separation of the Units and only whole Warrants will trade. Each Warrant will become exercisable on the later of 30 days after the completion of the Company’s Initial Business Combination or 12 months from the closing of the Public Offering and will expire five years after the completion of the Company’s Initial Business Combination or earlier upon redemption or liquidation. Once the Warrants become exercisable, the Company may redeem the outstanding Warrants in whole and not in part at a price of $0.01 per Warrant upon a minimum of 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption, if and only if the last sale price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which the Company sent the notice of redemption to the Warrant holders.

The Company paid an underwriting discount of $8,050,000 to the underwriters at the closing of the Public Offering, with an additional fee (the “Deferred Discount”) of $14,087,500, payable upon the Company’s completion of an Initial Business Combination. The Deferred Discount will become payable to the underwriters from the amounts held in the Trust Account solely in the event the Company completes its Initial Business Combination.

Note 4 — Related Party Transactions

Founder Shares

On April 29, 2016, the Sponsor purchased 10,062,500 shares of Class B Common Stock (the “Founder Shares” or “Class B Common Stock”) for an aggregate price of $25,000, or approximately $0.002 per share. As used herein, unless the context otherwise requires, “Founder Shares” shall be deemed to include the shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon conversion thereof. The Founder Shares are identical to the Class A Common Stock included in the Units sold in the Public Offering except that the Founder Shares automatically convert into shares of Class A Common Stock at the time of the Company’s Initial Business Combination and are subject to certain transfer restrictions, as described in more detail below. Holders of Founder Shares may also elect to convert their shares of Class B Common Stock into an equal number of shares of Class A Common Stock, subject to adjustment as provided above, at any time.

The Company’s initial stockholders have agreed, subject to limited exceptions, not to transfer, assign or sell any of their Founder Shares until the earlier to occur of: (A) one year after the completion of the Initial Business Combination or (B) subsequent to the Initial Business Combination, (x) if the last sale price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing

F-24

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 4 — Related Party Transactions (cont.)

at least 150 days after the Initial Business Combination, or (y) the date on which the Company completes a liquidation, merger, stock exchange or other similar transaction that results in all of the Company’s stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property.

Private Placement Warrants

The Sponsor has purchased an aggregate of 6,700,000 private placement warrants (including warrants required to be purchased in connection with the over-allotment option) at a price of $1.50 per warrant in a private placement that occurred simultaneously with the closing of the Public Offering (the “Private Placement Warrants”). Each Private Placement Warrant is exercisable for one whole share of the Company’s Class A Common Stock at a price of $11.50 per share. A portion of the purchase price of the Private Placement Warrants has been added to the proceeds from the Public Offering held in the Trust Account pending completion of the Initial Business Combination such that at the closing of the Public Offering $402.5 million was held in the Trust Account. If the Initial Business Combination is not completed within 24 months from the closing of the Public Offering, the proceeds from the sale of the Private Placement Warrants held in the Trust Account will be used to fund the redemption of the Public Shares (subject to the requirements of applicable law) and the Private Placement Warrants will expire worthless. The Private Placement Warrants are non-redeemable and exercisable on a cashless basis so long as they are held by the Sponsor or its permitted transferees.

The Sponsor and the Company’s officers and directors have agreed, subject to limited exceptions, not to transfer, assign or sell any of their Private Placement Warrants (including the Class A Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Private Placement Warrants) until 30 days after the completion of the Initial Business Combination.

Registration Rights

The holders of Founder Shares, Private Placement Warrants and Warrants that may be issued upon conversion of working capital loans, if any, are entitled to registration rights (in the case of the Founder Shares, only after conversion of such shares to shares of Class A Common Stock) as stated in the registration rights agreement signed on the date of the prospectus for the Public Offering. These holders are entitled to certain demand and “piggyback” registration rights.

However, the registration rights agreement provides that the Company will not permit any registration statement filed under the Securities Act to become effective until termination of the applicable lock-up period for the securities to be registered. The Company will bear the expenses incurred in connection with the filing of any such registration statements.

Related Party Loans

On April 29, 2016, the Sponsor agreed to loan the Company an aggregate of up to $300,000 to cover expenses related to the Public Offering pursuant to a promissory note (the “Note”). This note was non-interest bearing and payable on the earlier of December 31, 2016 or the completion of the Public Offering. On April 29, 2016, the Company borrowed $100,000 under the Note. From April 30, 2016 through July 19, 2016, the Company borrowed an additional $125,000 under the Note. On July 20, 2016, the total balance of $225,000 of the Note was repaid to the Sponsor.

Administrative Support Agreement

The Company has agreed to pay an affiliate of the Sponsor a total of $10,000 per month for office space, utilities and secretarial and administrative support. Services commenced on July 15, 2016, the date the securities were first listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market and will terminate upon the earlier of the completion of the Initial Business Combination or the Company’s liquidation.

F-25

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 5 — Investments Held in Trust Account

Upon the closing of the Public Offering and the Private Placement, $402,500,000 was placed in the Trust Account. At March 31, 2017, funds in the Trust Account totaled $403,146,657 and were held in investment securities consisting only of money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a- 7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, which invest only in direct U.S. government obligations. Such investment securities are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.

Note 6 — Fair Value Measurements

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets that are measured on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2017 and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques that the Company utilized to determine such fair value. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize data points that are observable, such as quoted prices, interest rates and yield curves. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs are unobservable data points for the asset or liability, and includes situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.

		March 31, 2017			Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Other Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Investments in money market fund held in Trust Account		$	403,146,657		$	403,146,657		$	—		$	—
Total		$	403,146,657		$	403,146,657		$	—		$	—

Note 7 — Deferred Underwriting Commission

The Company is committed to pay the Deferred Discount of 3.5% of the gross proceeds of the Public Offering, or $14,087,500, to the underwriters upon the Company’s completion of an Initial Business Combination. The underwriters are not entitled to receive any of the interest earned on Trust Account funds that would be used to pay the Deferred Discount, and no Deferred Discount is payable to the underwriters if an Initial Business Combination is not completed within 24 months after the Public Offering.

Note 8 — Stockholders’ Equity

Common Stock

The authorized common stock of the Company consists of 200,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock and 20,000,000 shares of Class B Common Stock. If the Company enters into an Initial Business Combination, it may (depending on the terms of such an Initial Business Combination) be required to increase the number of shares of Class A Common Stock which the Company is authorized to issue at the same time as the Company’s stockholders vote on the Initial Business Combination to the extent the Company seeks stockholder approval in connection with the Initial Business Combination. Holders of the Company’s common stock are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock. At March 31, 2017, there were 40,250,000 shares of Class A (of which 38,459,439 was classified outside of permanent equity) and 10,062,500 shares of Class B Common Stock issued and outstanding.

Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock with such designations, voting and other rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by the Company’s board of directors. At March 31, 2017, there were no shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding.

F-26

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 9 — Subsequent Events

The Merger Agreement

On April 10, 2017, the Company and Atkins, a leading developer, marketer and seller of branded nutritional food and snacking products currently owned by affiliates of Roark Capital Group, announced that they have entered into a definitive agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company and Atkins will combine under a new holding company, Simply Good Foods, which is expected to be listed on the NASDAQ stock exchange under the symbol “SMPL” upon closing of the proposed transaction. The closing is subject to customary closing conditions.

This transaction will be funded through a combination of cash, stock, and debt financing. The selling equity owners of Atkins will receive $730,125,000 in total consideration, inclusive of 10,250,000 shares of common stock of Simply Good Foods valued at $10.00 per share, subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of the definitive agreement. The selling equity owners will also be entitled to cash payments pursuant to a tax receivable agreement.

Along with the $402.5 million of cash held in the Company’ s Trust Account, the Company has secured commitments for a $100 million common stock private placement at $10.00 per share from large institutional investors. The proposed transaction includes committed debt financing.

Completion of the proposed transaction, which is expected in June 2017, is subject to customary and other closing conditions, including regulatory approvals, receipt of approvals from the Company’s stockholders, and completion of the offer for the Company’s stockholders to have their shares redeemed.

F-27

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015, and December 27, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014, and the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries at August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015, and December 27, 2014, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014, and the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Denver, Colorado
April 11, 2017

F-28

NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(dba Atkins Nutritionals)

Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In Thousands)

		August 27, 2016				August 29, 2015				December 27, 2014
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	78,492			$	57,094			$	39,914
Accounts receivable, net			42,839				28,404				53,794
Inventories, net			27,544				33,642				31,201
Prepaid expenses			1,753				1,362				3,286
Other current assets			8,353				6,407				10,555
Total current assets			158,981				126,909				138,750
Long-term assets:
Property and equipment, net			2,273				2,550				2,222
Intangible assets, net			185,688				194,779				201,410
Goodwill			40,724				40,724				40,844
Other long term assets			1,846				1,991				1,989
Total assets		$	389,512			$	366,953			$	385,215
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	18,750			$	16,452			$	20,596
Accrued interest			4,028				4,237				6,225
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities			16,629				10,505				10,539
Current maturities of long-term debt			11,387				6,765				9,015
Total current liabilities			50,794				37,959				46,375
Long-term liabilities:
Long-term debt, less current maturities			321,638				331,565				330,758
Warrant liabilities			15,722				15,000				16,689
Deferred income taxes			29,192				23,751				27,610
Total liabilities			417,346				408,275				421,432
See Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
Common stock			5				5				5
Additional paid-in capital			(43,551	)			(46,384	)			(46,620	)
Retained earnings			16,155				6,121				11,435
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)			(443	)			(1,064	)			(1,037	)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)			(27,834	)			(41,322	)			(36,217	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)		$	389,512			$	366,953			$	385,215

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-29

NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(dba Atkins Nutritionals)

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(In Thousands)

		52-Week Period Ended				35-Week Period Ended				52-Week Period Ended				52-Week Period Ended
		August 27, 2016				August 29, 2015				December 27, 2014				December 28, 2013
Net Sales		$	427,858			$	252,898			$	429,858			$	393,929
Cost of goods sold			248,464				151,978				249,832				221,120
Gross profit			179,394				100,920				180,026				172,809
Operating expenses:
Distribution			18,489				11,429				19,481				19,544
Selling			18,513				14,632				22,282				23,211
Marketing			37,751				30,515				33,548				31,951
General and administrative			46,961				29,028				41,000				40,008
Depreciation and amortization			10,179				7,267				11,195				11,304
Other expense			1,542				65				146				603
Total operating expenses			133,435				92,936				127,652				126,621
Income from operations			45,959				7,984				52,374				46,188
Other income (expense):
Change in warrant liabilities			(722	)			1,689				143				(3,173	)
Interest expense			(27,195	)			(18,331	)			(27,823	)			(35,402	)
Loss on foreign currency transactions			(619	)			(1,045	)			(1,211	)			1,198
Other income			118				55				96				297
Total other expense			(28,418	)			(17,632	)			(28,795	)			(37,080	)
Income (loss) before income taxes			17,541				(9,648	)			23,579				9,108
Income tax expense (benefit)			7,507				(4,334	)			9,623				5,859
Net income (loss)			10,034				(5,314	)			13,956				3,249
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustments			621				(27	)			292				(1,822	)
Comprehensive income (loss)		$	10,655			$	(5,341	)		$	14,248			$	1,427

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-30

NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(dba Atkins Nutritionals)

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
(In Thousands, Except for Shares)

											Retained				Accumulated
		Common Stock					Additional Paid-in				Earnings (Accumulated				Other Comprehensive
		Shares		Amount			Capital				Deficit)				Income (Loss)				Total
Balance, December 29, 2012		488,675		$	5		$	16,842			$	(5,770	)		$	493			$	11,570
Net Income		—			—			—				3,249				—				3,249
Stock compensation		—			—			1,511				—				—				1,511
Foreign currency translation adjustments		—			—			—				—				(1,822	)			(1,822	)
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation		—			—			760				—				—				760
Exercise of options to purchase common stock		9,343			—			1,476				—				—				1,476
Purchases of common stock		3,097			—			1,550				—				—				1,550
Distribution to stockholders		—			—			(72,205	)			—				—				(72,205	)
Balance, December 28, 2013		501,115			5			(50,066	)			(2,521	)			(1,329	)			(53,911	)
Net Income		—			—			—				13,956				—				13,956
Stock compensation		—			—			1,428				—				—				1,428
Foreign currency translation adjustments		—			—			—				—				292				292
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation		—			—			97				—				—				97
Exercise of options to purchase common stock		4,833			—			1,921				—				—				1,921
Balance, December 27, 2014		505,948			5			(46,620	)			11,435				(1,037	)			(36,217	)
Net loss		—			—			—				(5,314	)			—				(5,314	)
Stock compensation		—			—			225				—				—				225
Foreign currency translation adjustments		—			—			—				—				(27	)			(27	)
Exercise of options to purchase common stock		72			—			11				—				—				11
Balance, August 29, 2015		506,020			5			(46,384	)			6,121				(1,064	)			(41,322	)
Net Income		—			—			—				10,034				—				10,034
Stock compensation		—			—			2,104				—				—				2,104
Foreign currency translation adjustments		—			—			—				—				621				621
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation		—			—			403				—				—				403
Exercise of options to purchase common stock		2,112			—			326				—				—				326
Balance, August 27, 2016		508,132		$	5		$	(43,551	)		$	16,155			$	(443	)		$	(27,834	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-31

NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(dba Atkins Nutritionals)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In Thousands)

		52-Week Period Ended				35-Week Period Ended				52-Week Period Ended				52-Week Period Ended
		August 27, 2016				August 29, 2015				December 27, 2014				December 28, 2013
Cash from operating activities
Net income (loss)		$	10,034			$	(5,314	)		$	13,956			$	3,249
Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization			10,179				7,267				11,195				11,304
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount			2,159				1,285				2,126				2,352
Write off of extinguished deferred financing costs			—				—				—				7,136
Stock compensation			2,104				225				1,428				1,511
Change in warrant liabilities			722				(1,689	)			(143	)			3,173
Unrealized loss on foreign currency transactions			619				1,045				1,211				(1,198	)
Deferred income taxes			5,505				(3,852	)			8,786				7,110
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net			(14,854	)			24,852				(8,676	)			(17,707	)
Inventories, net			6,078				(2,734	)			833				(720	)
Prepaid expenses			(391	)			1,924				453				(1,188	)
Other current assets			(1,309	)			(574	)			(4,735	)			(987	)
Accounts payable			2,247				(3,872	)			(205	)			116
Accrued interest			(211	)			(1,986	)			(113	)			4,680
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities			6,029				4,126				(2,619	)			3,035
Other			112				(277	)			(18	)			75
Net cash provided by operating activities			29,023				20,426				23,479				21,941
Investing activities
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment			(815	)			(968	)			(875	)			(1,229	)
Net cash used in investing activities			(815	)			(968	)			(875	)			(1,229	)
Financing activities
Purchases of common stock			—				—				—				1,550
Proceeds from option exercises			326				11				1,921				1,476
Cash paid to warrant holder			—				—				—				(3,499	)
Distribution to stockholders			—				—				—				(72,205	)
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation			403				—				97				760
Borrowings of long-term debt			—				—				—				355,000
Principal payments of long-term debt			(7,464	)			(2,176	)			(6,875	)			(271,476	)
Payment on credit line			—				—				—				(2,000	)
Financing costs			—				—				—				(11,335	)
Net cash used in financing activities			(6,735	)			(2,165	)			(4,857	)			(1,729	)
Effect of exchange rate on cash			(75	)			(113	)			(249	)			(52	)
Net Increase in cash			21,398				17,180				17,498				18,931
Cash at beginning of period			57,094				39,914				22,416				3,485
Cash end of period		$	78,492			$	57,094			$	39,914			$	22,416
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Cash paid for interest		$	25,247			$	19,067			$	25,798			$	21,035
Cash paid for taxes		$	812			$	368			$	3,624			$	1,693

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-32

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for shares)

1. Nature of Operations and Principles of Consolidation

NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. (dba Atkins Nutritionals and referred to herein as “Atkins” or “the Company”) operates in the healthy snacking category. The Atkins approach focuses on a healthy diet with reduced levels of refined carbohydrates and refined sugars and encourages the consumption of lean protein, fiber, fruits, vegetables, and good fats. The Company sells a variety of nutrition bars, shakes, and frozen meals designed around the nutrition principles of the Atkins Diet.

The Company has experienced in the past, and expects to continue to experience, seasonal fluctuations in sales as a result of consumer spending patterns. Historically, sales have been greatest in the first calendar quarter, which corresponds with second fiscal quarter, and lowest in the fourth calendar quarter, which corresponds with first fiscal quarter. The Company believes these consumer spending patterns are driven primarily by the predisposition of consumers to adjust their approach to nutrition at certain times of the year as well as the timing of the Company’s advertising linked with key customer promotion windows.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).

The Company maintains its accounting records on a 52/53-week year. During 2015, the Company changed its fiscal year-end to the last Saturday in August. The accompanying financial statements include the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 and the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements. Estimates also affect the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Accounts Receivable

The Company estimates the allowance for doubtful accounts based upon a review of outstanding receivables, historical collection information and fiscal strength of customer. Normally, accounts receivable are due within 30 days after the date of the invoice. Receivables more than 90 days old are considered past due. Accounts receivable are written off when they are determined to be uncollectible. The Company’s policy for estimating allowances for doubtful accounts with respect to receivables is to record an allowance based on a historical evaluation of write-offs, aging of balances, and other quantitative and qualitative analyses. At August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015 and December 27, 2014, the allowance for doubtful accounts was $336, $57 and $62, respectively.

The Company estimates allowances to reflect commitments made to customers for customer-executed promotional activities and other incentive offerings, including special pricing agreements, price protection, promotions, and volume-based incentives, as well as damaged and aged customer inventory. These allowances are based on historical evaluations, both qualitative and quantitative, as well as the Company’s best estimate of current activity. The allowances for customer programs and other incentive offerings are recorded at the time the incentive is offered or at the time of revenue recognition for the underlying transaction that results in progress by the customer toward earning the incentive. The Company’s allowances for these commitments are recorded as a reduction to both accounts receivables and net sales. At August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015 and December 27, 2014, the allowance for these commitments was $9,567, $7,848 and $9,227, respectively.

F-33

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for shares)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont.)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, deposits available on demand, and other short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Because of the short maturity of these investments, the carrying amounts approximate their fair value.

Inventories

Inventories, which consist of nutrition bars, shakes, frozen meals and packaging material, are valued at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined using standard costs which approximate costs determined on the first-in, first-out method, and with market defined as the lower of replacement cost or realizable value.

Obsolete inventory is reserved at 50% for inventory four to six months from expiration, and 100% for items within three months of expiration. Reserves are also taken for certain products or packaging materials when it is determined their cost may not be recoverable. At August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015 and December 27, 2014, the provision for obsolete inventory was $998, $503 and $545, respectively.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost or the allocated fair value in purchase accounting, net of accumulated depreciation. The costs of additions and betterments that substantially extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized and the expenditures for ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed in the period incurred. When items of property and equipment are sold or retired, the related costs and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any gain or loss is included in other income.

The Company capitalizes costs of materials and consultants involved in developing its website and mobile applications for smart phones (collectively, “website development costs”). Costs incurred during the preliminary project and post-implementation stages are charged to expense. Website development costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of three years. Included in property and equipment are website development costs as follows:

		August 27, 2016			August 29, 2015			December 27, 2014
Website development costs, gross		$	2,063		$	1,782		$	925
Accumulated amortization			1,215			634			340
Website development costs, net		$	848		$	1,148		$	585

Amortization of capitalized website development costs was $581, $293, $767 and $533 during the fiscal periods ended August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015, December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013, respectively. There were no disposals of fully amortized website development costs during the fiscal periods ended August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015 and December 28, 2013. For the fiscal year ended December 27, 2014, the total disposals of fully amortized website development costs was $1,902.

Depreciation of property and equipment is provided utilizing the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets as follows:

Furniture and fixtures		7 years
Computer equipment, software, and website development costs		3–5 years
Machinery and equipment		7 years
Office equipment		3–5 years

F-34

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for shares)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont.)

Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the remaining term of the lease or the useful life of the improvement utilizing the straight-line method.

The Company determines whether there has been an impairment of long-lived assets, excluding goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying value of any long-lived assets may not be fully recoverable. There were no indicators of impairment in the fiscal periods ended August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015, December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill and intangible assets result primarily from acquisitions including the 2011 acquisition of the Company. Intangible assets primarily include brands and trademarks with indefinite lives and customer-related relationships with finite lives. Upon acquisition, the purchase price is first allocated to identifiable assets and liabilities, including customer-related intangible assets and trademarks, with any remaining purchase price recorded as goodwill.

Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized utilizing the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. The Company reviews for impairment indicators of finite-lived intangibles and other long-lived assets as described in the “Property and Equipment” significant accounting policy.

For goodwill and other intangible assets that have indefinite lives, those assets are not amortized. Rather impairment tests are conducted on an annual basis or more frequently if indicators of impairment are present.

A quantitative impairment assessment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles was performed in 2013 and a qualitative assessment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles was performed in 2014, 2015, and 2016. In 2016, the impairment assessment was performed as of August 27, 2016. Qualitative assessment includes consideration for the economic, industry and market conditions in addition to the overall financial performance of the Company and these assets. Based on the results of assessment, it was determined that it is more likely than not the reporting unit had a fair value in excess of carrying value. Accordingly, no further impairment testing was completed and no impairment charges related to goodwill or indefinite-lived intangibles were recognized during the fiscal periods ended August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015, December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. To increase the comparability of fair value measurements, a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies, is as follows:

Level 1 — Valuations based on quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 — Valuations based on observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 — Valuations based on unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s own assumptions, consistent with reasonably available assumptions made by other market participants. These valuations require significant judgment.

F-35

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for shares)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont.)

The following table set forth the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) by level within the fair value hierarchy.

Fair value at August 27, 2016.

Description		Level 1			Level 2			Level 3			Total
Liabilities
Warrants		$	—		$	—		$	15,722		$	15,722

Fair value at August 29, 2015.

Description		Level 1			Level 2			Level 3			Total
Liabilities
Warrants		$	—		$	—		$	15,000		$	15,000

Fair value at December 27, 2014.

Description		Level 1			Level 2			Level 3			Total
Liabilities
Warrants		$	—		$	—		$	16,689		$	16,689

From August 29, 2015 to August 27, 2016 and December 27, 2014 to August 29, 2015, the fair value of the warrants changed by $722 and $(1,689) respectively, which is included in “Change in warrant liabilities” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (loss). The fair value of the warrant has been calculated based on estimating future cash payments to be made to the former owner, in part based on the probability-weighted present value of various payout scenarios. Key fair value inputs are the discount rate; expected future cash flows under various payout scenarios, which are derived in part from an estimate of various transaction prices on a future change in a control event; and a probability analysis of the payout scenarios. The methodology for measuring fair value is sensitive to the volatility of key inputs mentioned above.

At August 27, 2016, the carrying value of the Company’s debt approximates its fair value as (i) it is based on a variable interest rate that changes based on market conditions and (ii) the margin applied to the variable rate is based on the Company’s credit risk, which has not changed since entering into the debt instrument.

Deferred Financing Costs and Debt Discounts

Costs incurred in obtaining long-term financing paid to parties other than creditors are considered a debt discount and are amortized over the terms of the long-term financing agreements using the effective-interest method. Amounts paid to creditors are recorded as a reduction in the proceeds received by the creditor and are considered a discount on the issuance of debt.

Research and development activities

The Company’s research and development activities primarily consist of generating and testing new product concepts, new flavors, and packaging and are primarily internal. The Company expenses research and development costs as incurred as they primarily relate to compensation, facility costs and purchased research and development services, materials and supplies. The Company’s total research and development expenses were $2,100, $1,400, $2,100 and $1,810 for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 and the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013, respectively. Research and development costs are included in “General and administrative” expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (loss).

F-36

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for shares)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont.)

Income Taxes

Income taxes include federal, state, and foreign taxes currently payable and deferred taxes arising from temporary differences between income for financial reporting and income tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statement balances and the tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the fiscal year that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized.

Foreign Currency Translation

For all foreign operations, the functional currency is the local currency. Assets and liabilities of these operations are translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate in effect at the end of each reporting period. Income statement accounts are translated at the average rate of exchange prevailing during each reporting period. Translation adjustments arising from the translation of these amounts are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (loss).

Unrealized foreign currency gains and losses arising from the remeasurement of intercompany positions within the Company’s international subsidiaries are recorded as a component of other income (expense).

Revenue Recognition

The Company is a growing developer, marketer and seller of branded nutritional foods and snacking products. The Company highly-focused product portfolio consists primarily of nutrition bars, RTD shakes, snacks and confectionery products marketed under the Atkins®, SimplyProtein®, Atkins Harvest Trail, Atkins Endulge and Atkins Lift brand names. The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of product when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the price is fixed or determinable, (iii) title and risk of loss pass to the buyer at the time of delivery, and (iv) there is reasonable assurance of collection of the sales proceeds. The Company records estimated reductions to revenue for customer programs and incentive offerings, including special pricing agreements, price protection, promotion, and other volume-based incentives at the time the incentive is offered or at the time of revenue recognition for the underlying transaction that results in progress by the customer toward earning the incentive. Some of these incentives are recorded by estimating costs based on the Company’s historical experience and expected levels of performance of the trade promotion.

Advertising Costs

Production costs related to television commercials are expensed when first aired. All other advertising costs are expensed when incurred. Total advertising costs were $27,810, $22,983, $27,658 and $28,145 for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 and the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013, respectively. Production costs of $0, $0 and $1,460 related to television commercials not yet aired at August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015 and December 27, 2014, respectively, are included in the prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Share-Based Compensation

Share-based compensation is rewarded to employees, directors, and consultants of the Company. Share-based compensation expense is recognized for equity awards over the vesting period based on their grant-date fair value. The fair value of option awards is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The exercise price of each stock option equals or exceeds the estimated fair value of the Company’s stock price on the date of grant. Options can generally be exercised over a maximum term of ten years. Compensation expense is recognized only for equity awards expected to vest, and the Company estimates forfeitures at the date of grant and at each reporting date based on its historical experience and future expectations. Share-based compensation expense is included within the same financial statement caption where the recipient’s other compensation is reported.

F-37

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for shares)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont.)

Shipping and Handling Costs

Costs of $18,489, $11,429 $19,481 and $19,544 associated with products shipped to customers in the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 and the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013, respectively, are recognized in “Distribution” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (loss). The Company’s cost of sales does not include shipping and handling amounts related to the delivery to the buyer.

Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The objective of ASU No. 2014-09 is to outline a new, single comprehensive model to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. The new revenue recognition model provides a five-step analysis for determining when and how revenue is recognized, depicting the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. On July 9, 2015, the FASB voted to delay the implementation of ASU No. 2014-09 by one year to fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017. An entity may elect to early adopt as of the original effective date, fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2016. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing which provides additional clarification regarding identifying performance obligations and licensing. In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-19, 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. These ASUs will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP and will be effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2018. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or modified retrospective (cumulative effect) transition method and the Company has not yet selected which transition method to apply. The Company is currently evaluating recently issued guidance on practical expedients as part of the transition decision. Upon initial evaluation, the Company believes the key changes in the standard that impact revenue recognition relate to the recognition of customer programs and incentive offerings, including special pricing agreements, price protection, promotion, and other volume-based incentives. The Company is still in the process of evaluating these impacts.

In April 2015, the Company changed the manner in which it reports debt issuance costs due to the adoption of ASU No. 2015-03, Interest — Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. Debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability previously reported as assets have been reclassified as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of debt liabilities in the Company’s consolidated financial statements in all periods presented. As of August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015 and December 27, 2014, $1,000, $1,600 and $1,300, respectively, have been reclassified from other assets to long-term debt on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330) — Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. The amendments clarify that an entity should measure inventory within the scope of this update at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. Substantial and unusual losses that result from subsequent measurement of inventory should be disclosed in the financial statements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those annual periods. The amendments are to be applied prospectively with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company has not elected to early adopt and not expected this new accounting update to have a material impact on the financial statements.

In November 2015, the Company changed the manner in which it reports deferred taxes due to electing early adoption of ASU No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. Deferred tax liabilities and assets are now all reported as non-current amounts. The Company adjusted its prior period consolidated balance sheet as a result of the adoption of ASU No. 2015-17. As of August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015 and December 27, 2014, $5,200, $4,400 and $2,800, respectively, of short-term deferred tax assets have been reclassified on the consolidated balance sheet into long-term deferred income tax liabilities.

F-38

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for shares)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont.)

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The standard requires lessees to recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases on the balance sheet. A lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. The new guidance is effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2019. The amendments should be applied at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the effects adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The pronouncement simplifies the accounting for income tax consequences of share-based payment transactions. The new guidance requires that all of the tax related to share-based payments be recorded in earnings at settlement (or expiration). This guidance is effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effects adoption of this guidance will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or financial statement disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles — Goodwill and other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The amended standard simplifies how an entity tests goodwill by eliminating Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. The amended standard also modifies the concept of impairment from the condition that exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value to the condition that exists when the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value. The new guidance is effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2020. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its goodwill impairment testing.

3. Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company maintains cash balances in five financial institutions. The balances are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250 per institution. From time to time, the Company’s balances may exceed this limit. At August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015 and December 27, 2014, uninsured cash balances were $78,205, $56,838 and $39,613, respectively.

4. Property and Equipment, Net

Property and equipment, net, are summarized as follows:

		August 27, 2016			August 29, 2015			December 27, 2014
Furniture and fixtures		$	917		$	887		$	928
Computer equipment and software			717			597			568
Machinery and equipment			638			525			526
Website development costs			2,063			1,782			925
Leasehold improvements			958			980			480
Construction in progress			256			—			472
			5,549			4,771			3,899
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization			3,276			2,221			1,677
Total		$	2,273		$	2,550		$	2,222

Depreciation and amortization expenses during the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 and the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013, were $1,087, $636, $1,248 and $1,357, respectively.

F-39

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for shares)

5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net

The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 and the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 are as follows:

		Total
Balance as of December 28, 2013		$	41,033
Goodwill acquired during the period			—
Effect of exchange rate changes			(189)
Balance as of December 27, 2014			40,844
Goodwill acquired during the period			—
Effect of exchange rate changes			120
Balance as of August 29, 2015			40,724
Goodwill acquired during the period			—
Effect of exchange rate changes			—
Balance as of August 27, 2016		$	40,724

There were no impairment charges related to goodwill during these periods or since the inception of the Company.

Intangible assets, net, consist of the following:

				August 27, 2016
		Useful Life		Gross carrying amount			Accumulated amortization			Net carrying amount
Intangible assets with indefinite life:
Brands and trademarks		Indefinite life		$	109,900		$	—		$	109,900
Intangible assets with finite lives:
Customer relationships		15 years			121,000			46,087			74,913
Proprietary recipes and formulas		7 years			4,760			3,885			875
				$	235,660		$	49,972		$	185,688

 

				August 29, 2015
		Useful Life		Gross carrying amount			Accumulated amortization			Net carrying amount
Intangible assets with indefinite life:
Brands and trademarks		Indefinite life		$	109,900		$	—		$	109,900
Intangible assets with finite lives:
Customer relationships		15 years			121,000			38,020			82,980
Proprietary recipes and formulas		7 years			4,760			3,205			1,555
Covenant not to compete		5 years			6,000			5,656			344
				$	241,660		$	46,881		$	194,779

 

				December 27, 2014
		Useful Life		Gross carrying amount			Accumulated amortization			Net carrying amount
Intangible assets with indefinite life:
Brands and trademarks		Indefinite life		$	109,900		$	—		$	109,900
Intangible assets with finite lives:
Customer relationships		15 years			121,000			32,642			88,358
Proprietary recipes and formulas		7 years			4,760			2,752			2,008
Covenant not to compete		5 years			6,000			4,856			1,144
				$	241,660		$	40,250		$	201,410

F-40

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for shares)

5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net (cont.)

Amortization expenses related to intangible assets during the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 and the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013 were $9,092, $6,631, $9,947 and $9,947, respectively.

Estimated future amortization for each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter is as follows:

Fiscal year ending:
2017		$	8,747
2018			8,262
2019			8,067
2020			8,067
2021			8,067
Thereafter			34,578
		$	75,788

6. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities were comprised of the following:

		August 27, 2016			August 29, 2015			December 27, 2014
Professional fees		$	518		$	508		$	814
Accrued advertising allowances and claims			876			604			300
Accrued bonus			5,282			4,203			2,502
Freight accrual			1,391			1,382			2,300
Payroll-related accruals			1,033			374			749
Commissions			1,119			677			1,046
Income taxes payable			51			248			212
VAT payable			1,366			1,102			1,392
Other			4,993			1,407			1,224
		$	16,629		$	10,505		$	10,539

7. Long-Term Debt and Line of Credit

On April 3, 2013, the Company entered into a First Lien Credit Agreement (the “First Lien”) and a Second Lien Credit Agreement (the “Second Lien”) with Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC. The First Lien consists of a $20,000 revolving line of credit and a $255,000 term loan. The First Lien revolving line of credit bears interest at a rate per annum equal to the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), with a floor of 1.25%, plus 5.0%, and matures on April 3, 2018. The First Lien term loan requires quarterly principal and interest payments; bears interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR, with a floor of 1.25%, plus 5.0%; and matures on January 2, 2019. The First Lien also provides for an excess cash flow prepayment based on a contractual formula, payable within 120 days of the end of each fiscal year. Each term lender has the right to refuse any such prepayment. Prepayments are applied against the future principal payments in a manner that is set forth in the First Lien credit agreement. The Second Lien consists of a $100,000 term loan that requires annual interest payments, bears interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR, with a floor of 1.25%, plus 8.5%, and matures on April 3, 2019.

Under the First Lien and Second Lien, the Company has granted the lenders a security interest in substantially all of the assets of the Company, including its subsidiaries. In addition, the First Lien and Second Lien contain various restrictions, including restrictions on the payment of dividends and other distributions to equity and warrant

F-41

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for shares)

7. Long-Term Debt and Line of Credit (cont.)

holders, and provide for the maintenance of certain financial ratios. The Company was in compliance with these covenants at August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015 and December 27, 2014.

Upon entering into the First Lien and Second Lien in April 2013, the Company incurred $11,335 in financing costs, of which $2,780 were considered deferred financing charges paid to third parties other than the creditors, and $8,555 were reductions in proceeds paid to creditors and considered a discount on the issuance of debt. At August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015 and December 27, 2014, deferred financing costs were $4,184, $6,344 and $7,077, respectively, net of accumulated amortization of $7,151, $4,991 and $934, respectively. During the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 and the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014, $2,159, $1,285 and $2,126, respectively, was amortized using the effective-interest method in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (loss). Total interest expense for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015 and the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014, was $27,195, $18,331 and 27,823, respectively, which includes the amortization of deferred financing costs.

At August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015 and December 27, 2014, there were no amounts drawn against the Company’s lines of credit, and long-term debt consists of the following:

		August 27, 2016			August 29, 2015			December 27, 2014
First Lien and Second Lien term loans		$	337,209		$	344,674		$	346,850
Less: deferred financing fees			4,184			6,344			7,077
Total debt			333,025			338,330			339,773
Less: current maturities, net of deferred financing fees of $1,822 at August 27, 2016, $1,431 at August 29, 2015 and $1,551 at December 27, 2014			11,387			6,765			9,015
Long-term debt, net of deferred financing fees		$	321,638		$	331,565		$	330,758

Aggregate maturities of debt are as follows:

Fiscal year ending:
2017		$	11,387
2018			1,848
2019			323,974
		$	337,209

8. Income Taxes

The sources of income (loss) before income taxes are as follows for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 and the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013:

		August 27, 2016				August 29, 2015				December 27, 2014				December 28, 2013
Domestic		$	17,674			$	(9,171	)		$	23,752			$	8,916
Foreign			(133	)			(477	)			(173	)			192
Total		$	17,541			$	(9,648	)		$	23,579			$	9,108

F-42

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for shares)

8. Income Taxes (cont.)

Income tax expense (benefit) were comprised of the following for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 and the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013:

		August 27, 2016			August 29, 2015				December 27, 2014				December 28, 2013
Current:
Federal		$	1,413		$	(926	)		$	51			$	(1,740	)
State and local			135			101				49				94
Foreign			454			343				737				395
Total current			2,002			(482	)			837				(1,251	)
Deferred:
Federal			4,796			(3,443	)			8,351				5,966
State and local			686			(470	)			585				872
Foreign			23			61				(150	)			272
Total deferred income tax expense (benefit)			5,505			(3,852	)			8,786				7,110
Income tax expense (benefit)		$	7,507		$	(4,334	)		$	9,623			$	5,859

The period ending August 2015 presented represents 35 weeks of activity versus 52 weeks included for other periods disclosed. In addition to the shorter timeframe shown, the period not included generally results in strong sales for the Company. Therefore, the resulting book loss and ultimately the income tax benefit is not reflective of comparative results.

Reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate is as follows:

		August 27, 2016			August 29, 2015			December 27, 2014			December 28, 2013
Statutory income tax expense:		34.0	%		34.0	%		35.0	%		35.0	%
State income tax expense, net of federal		3.9			2.9			4.0			5.5
Valuation allowance		2.2			(4.3	)		1.7			9.9
Taxes on foreign income above (below) the U.S. tax		0.5			(0.9	)		0.5			0.8
Warrant liabilities		1.4			5.9			(0.2	)		12.2
Change in tax rate		0.6			8.8			(0.5	)		0.5
Other permanent items		0.2			(1.6	)		0.3			0.4
Income tax expense (benefit)		42.8	%		44.8	%		40.8	%		64.3	%

For all periods reported, including the 52 week period ended August 2016, the effective rate is higher than the U.S. statutory rate primarily because of state income tax expense, tax losses recognized in jurisdictions for which a tax benefit is not realized, and related to tax expense associated with nondeductible permanent adjustments. Further, the Company’s tax provision has also been impacted by periodic statutory tax rate changes that cause deferred tax balances to be revalued. The decrease in the effective tax rate recorded in 2016 versus 2015 was primarily driven by reduced impacts of nondeductible permanent adjustments and statutory rate changes not recurring during 2016.

F-43

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for shares)

8. Income Taxes (cont.)

The tax effects of temporary differences that gave rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities at August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015 and December 27, 2014 were as follows:

		August 27, 2016				August 29, 2015				December 27, 2014
Deferred Tax Assets:
Accounts receivable allowances		$	2,823			$	2,506			$	2,986
Inventories reserves			372				177				167
Accrued expenses			1,951				1,514				73
Net operating loss carryforwards			12,264				10,782				3,310
Stock Compensation			2,107				1,375				1,336
Other			1,414				1,407				1,105
Deferred Tax Assets:			20,931				17,761				8,977
Valuation allowance			(3,891	)			(3,509	)			(3,097	)
Deferred tax asset, net of valuation allowance			17,040				14,252				5,880
Deferred tax liabilities:
Prepaid expense			(606	)			(426	)			(1,125	)
Excess tax over book depreciation			(54	)			(96	)			(66	)
Website development costs			(317	)			(428	)			(225	)
Intangible amortization			(44,862	)			(36,338	)			(31,969	)
Other			(393	)			(607	)			—
Deferred tax liabilities			(46,232	)			(37,895	)			(33,385	)
Net Deferred tax liabilities		$	(29,192	)		$	(23,643	)		$	(27,505	)

As of August 27, 2016, the Company recorded U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards of $22,101 ($22,048 at August 29, 2015), state net operating loss carryforwards of $29,540 ($29,832 at August 29, 2015) and foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $13,710 ($12,347 at August 29, 2015), which are subject to varying expiry periods, beginning in 2018, though a significant portion can be carried forward indefinitely. The federal net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2035, while state net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2022.

The Company considers non-U.S. subsidiary earnings to be permanently invested outside the United States under the provisions of ASC Topic 740-30-25-17. As such, no income or withholding taxes have been provided for approximately $8,700 of unremitted earnings of subsidiaries operating outside of the U.S., under certain foreign subsidiaries. These earnings are estimated to represent the excess of the financial reporting over the tax basis in the Company’s investments in those subsidiaries, which are held below certain foreign subsidiaries. These earnings, which are considered to be indefinitely reinvested, would become subject to U.S. income tax if they were remitted to the U.S. The amount of unrecognized deferred U.S. federal income tax liability on the unremitted earnings has not been determined because the hypothetical calculation is not practicable.

During the 52 weeks ended August 2016, the Company recorded additional tax loss carryforwards in certain European jurisdictions and New Zealand, in the amount of $1,400, primarily driven by operational losses recognized on a local statutory accounting basis. As the carryforwards were generated in jurisdictions where the Company has historically recognized book losses or does not have strong future earnings projections, the Company concluded it was more likely than not that the operating losses would not be realized, and thus recorded full valuation allowances on the associated deferred tax assets. As of August 2016, the Company maintains a valuation allowance of $3,900. In the period of December 27, 2014 to August 29, 2015, the Company increased its valuation allowance by $411 against certain deferred tax assets which are not more likely than not to be realized. In the period of August 29, 2015

F-44

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for shares)

8. Income Taxes (cont.)

to August 27, 2016, the Company increased its valuation allowance by $389K against certain deferred tax assets which are not more likely than not to be realized. The recognition of these deferred tax assets and full valuation allowances result in a net zero impact to the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (loss). As of August 27, 2016, the Company has recorded additional valuation allowances on deferred tax assets of approximately $3,600 related to foreign net operating loss carryforwards recognized during the year. This amount represents a full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets of foreign entities within the United Kingdom, New Zealand, Netherlands, and Spain. The remaining $300 valuation allowance on deferred tax assets relates to state net operating losses. As of August 27, 2016, there is not sufficient positive evidence to conclude that those losses will be recognized.

As of August 27, 2016 and August 29, 2015, the Company has no unrecognized tax benefits. Below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending unrecognized tax benefits, gross, recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheet:

		August 27, 2016		August 29, 2015		December 27, 2014
Beginning of period		—		—		133
Increases for tax positions related to the current period		—		—		—
Increases for tax positions related to prior periods		—		—		—
Decreases for tax positions related to prior periods		—		—		(133	)
Decreases related to settlements		—		—		—
Decreases due to lapsed statute of limitations		—		—		—
End of period		—		—		—

The Company records interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits as a component of tax expense. As of August 27, 2016, the Company has not accrued interest or penalties on unrecognized tax benefits, as there is no position recorded as of the fiscal 2016. No changes to the uncertain tax position balance are anticipated within the next 12 months, and are not expected to materially impact the financial statements.

As of August 27, 2016, tax years 2011 to 2015 remain subject to examination in the United States and the tax years 2011 to 2015 remain subject to examination in other major foreign jurisdictions where Atkins conducts business. State income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period of three to five years after the filing of the respective return.

9. Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

The Company has non-cancelable operating leases for seven buildings. Future annual aggregate minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:

Fiscal year ending:
2017		$	1,839
2018			855
2019			203
2020			150
2021			119
		$	3,166

Rent expense charged to operations amounted to $2,347 and $1,503, $2,057 and $1,744 for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 and the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013, respectively.

F-45

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for shares)

9. Commitments and Contingencies (cont.)

Litigation

The Company is a party to certain litigation and claims that are considered normal to the operations of the business. Management is of the opinion that the outcome of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Other

The Company has entered into endorsement contracts with certain celebrity figures to promote and endorse the Atkins brand and line of products. These contracts contain endorsement fees, which are expensed ratably over the life of the contract, and performance fees, that are recognized at the time of achievement. Based on the terms of the contracts in place and achievement of performance conditions as of August 26, 2016, the Company will be required to make payments of up to $1,586 over the next year.

10. Stockholders’ Equity

Common Stock

The Company has authorized 600,000 shares of common stock at $0.01 par value per share. The holders of the Company’s common stock are entitled to one vote per share.

Warrant

As stated in the Stock Purchase Agreement dated October 26, 2010, and the Warrant Agreement, dated December 8, 2010, the former owner (the “Holder”) received a warrant to purchase 24,243 shares of common stock of the Company, at a purchase price of $309 per share.

The Holder has a right (the “Put Right”) to require the Company to purchase the warrant, or cause it to be purchased for cash, in connection with the consummation of a change of control transaction or a qualified public offering (each, an “Exit Event”). The Holder may exercise the Put Right by delivering written notice (the “Put Notice”) to the Company at least five business days prior to consummation of such Exit Event. The closing of the exercise of the Put Right will be held concurrently with the closing of such Exit Event. If the Holder has not delivered a Put Notice in accordance with the agreement, then the Company shall have the right to require the Holder to sell the warrant to the Company, or its designee, on or prior to the consummation of the Exit Event on the same terms and conditions as set forth in the Warrant agreement as if the Holder had exercised the Put Right. At the Exit Event, the Holder will receive the greater of the put price (a minimum value of $10,000 and a maximum of $15,000 when certain adjusted EBITDA and/or exit price thresholds have been met) or the net proceeds from the exercise of the warrant.

The Warrant Agreement also provides for an additional payment to be made to the Holder if dividends or other cash distribution paid to the current owners exceed a certain threshold of the initial investment.

Due to the Put Right, the value of the warrant is reflected as a liability in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and adjusted to fair value each reporting period through “Change in warrant liabilities” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). “Change in warrant liabilities” reflects changes in fair value of $(722), $1,689, $143 and $(3,173) for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 and the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013, respectively. The fair value at August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015 and December 27, 2014, of $15,722, $15,000 and $16,689, respectively, is recorded in warrants on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

F-46

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for shares)

11. Defined Contribution Plan and Bonus Program

The Company sponsors a defined contribution plan, a 401(k) tax-deferred savings plan (the “Plan”), under which eligible employees may elect to defer a portion of their salary as a contribution to the Plan. The Company contributes to the Plan a discretionary matching 401(k) contribution in an amount not to exceed 50% of each participant’s elective deferrals that are not in excess of 6% of the participant’s compensation. For the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 and the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013, the Company matched an amount of $345, $265, $311 and $278, respectively.

The Company maintains a performance bonus program for employees and a supplemental performance program for certain executive employees subject to the Company achieving certain targeted goals. Under the terms of the program, the Company will pay cash bonuses to eligible participants on the effective date pursuant to existing letter agreements. At August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015 and December 27, 2014, the Company accrued $5,282, $4,203 and $2,502 for these bonuses, respectively, which are included in general and administrative in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

12. Stock Option Plan

In January 2011, the Board of Directors adopted the NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. 2010 Stock Option Plan (the “Option Plan”). Under the terms of the Option Plan, nonqualified stock options may be granted to employees, directors, and consultants of the Company. An option certificate for each grant sets forth the exercise price, vesting period, performance thresholds if applicable, and other terms. Options with service conditions generally vest over a period of five years, and the Company recognizes share-based compensation expense ratably over the vesting period. Options with performance conditions generally vest over five successive years, based on the achievement of certain annual financial targets. Typically, each performance option contains five separate tranches, with each tranche vesting based on a specific year’s target. Compensation cost for each tranche is recognized over the period from grant date to vesting date. Options typically expire after ten years.

During the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the company has made a significant modification of the existing Option Plan by removing the performance condition requirement for 5 employees, this modification resulted in an incremental compensation cost of approximately $732. Upon a change in control, a portion of the stock option will vest automatically if the option holder remains continuously employed by the Company through the change effective date. The portion of stock option to vest automatically upon change in control is calculated based on specific details outlined in each stock option agreement. The unvested portion of the stock option will forfeit as of change effective date and the vested portion of the stock option must be exercised within 5 calendar days following receipt by option holder of written notice of change in control. If not exercised, these vested stock options will cancel.

As of August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015 and December 27, 2014, the Company’s authorized common stock includes 75,872, 60,872 and 60,872 shares, respectively, reserved for issuance under the Option Plan. As of August 27, 2016, the Company had granted 75,872 options, and 3,213 options are available for future grant.

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant based on Level 3 inputs using the Black-Scholes valuation model, and the following assumptions were used for grants occurring in the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 and the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013:

		August 27, 2016		August 29, 2015		December 27, 2014		December 28, 2013
Expected volatility		55%		55%		40% to 45%		40% to 45%
Expected dividend yield		0%		0%		0%		0%
Expected option term		5.1 – 6.5 years		5.1 – 6.5 years		6.25 years		6.25 years
Risk-free rate of return		1.62% to 1.74%		1.62% to 1.74%		1.08% to 1.16%		1.08% to 1.16%

F-47

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for shares)

12. Stock Option Plan (cont.)

The expected term of the options represents the estimated period of time until exercise and considers vesting schedules and expectations of future employee and director behavior. Expected stock price volatility is based on a sampling of comparable publicly traded companies. The Company believes this sector to most closely model the nature of its own business. The risk-free rates are based on the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with an equivalent remaining term. The Company paid a cash distribution to stockholders related to fiscal year 2013 financing activities but has no current plans to pay a cash dividend in the future.

A summary of the option activity under the plans for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016 is presented below.

		Shares			Weighted average exercise price			Weighted average contractual life in years		Aggregate intrinsic value
Outstanding at beginning of period		38,676			$	380.29
Granted		16,141			$	837.15
Exercised		(2,112	)		$	154.58
Forfeited, cancelled and expired		(232	)		$	154.58
Outstanding at end of period		52,473			$	534.78		8		$	28,049
Options vested and expected to vest at the end of the period		26,627			$	336.21		6		$	8,946
Exercisable at end of period		14,089			$	269.78		6		$	3,798

The following table summarizes information about options outstanding at the period ended August 27, 2016:

		Options outstanding							Options exercisable
Range of exercise prices		Number outstanding		Weighted average remaining contractual life in years		Weighted average exercise price			Number exercisable		Weighted average exercise price
$154.58 – $190.75		14,416		5		$	156.88		9,612		$	156.88
$376.25		1,758		6		$	376.25		918		$	376.25
$514.83 – $588.12		17,006		7		$	522.48		3,348		$	527.10
$837.15 – $869.46		19,293		10		$	842.43		210		$	869.46

 

		August 27, 2016			August 29, 2015			December 27, 2014			December 28, 2013
Weighted average grant date fair value per share of options granted		$	261.80		$	142.28		$	142.28		$	172.95
Intrinsic value of options exercised			326			11			1,023			3,527
Fair value of shares vested			2,145			757			1,485			1,072
Tax benefit related to stock option expense			595			20			395			1,234

During the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 and the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013, the Company received $326, $11, $1,921 and $1,476 of cash from stock option exercises, respectively. At August 27, 2016, there was $6,383 of total unrecognized stock option expense, all of which is related to unvested options. The remaining compensation expense is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining vesting period of approximately two years.

F-48

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for shares)

13. Related-Party Transactions

Pursuant to an arrangement with the majority stockholder of Atkins, the Company is obligated to pay a management fee of the greater of $900 or an amount equal to 2% of consolidated adjusted Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), as defined by the First Lien and Second Lien, which can be prorated upon a fiscal year-end change. Annual reimbursements for out-of-pocket expenses are limited to $200. During the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 and the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013, the management fee expense was $1,670, $854, $1,574 and $1,401, respectively.

14. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 and the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013 were as follows:

		Foreign Currency Translation
Balance at December 29, 2012		$	493
Change in other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications			(1,822	)
Net current-period change			(1,822	)
Balance at December 28, 2013			(1,329	)
Change in other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications			292
Net current-period change			292
Balance at December 27, 2014			(1,037	)
Change in other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications			(27	)
Net current-period change			(27	)
Balance at August 29, 2015			(1,064	)
Change in other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications			621
Net current-period change			621
Balance at August 27, 2016		$	(443	)

15. Segment and Customer Information

The Company has organized its operations into one operating segment that sells its branded nutritional foods and snacking products designed around the nutrition principles of the Atkins Diet. The results of the operating segment is reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker to make decisions about resource expenditures and assessing financial performance. This operating segment is therefore the Company’s reportable segment.

The financial information relating to the Company’s segment is as follows:

		August 27, 2016				August 29, 2015				December 27, 2014				December 28, 2013
Revenues from external customers		$	427,858			$	252,898			$	429,858			$	393,929
Interest expense			(27,195	)			(18,331	)			(27,823	)			(35,402	)
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization expense			10,179				7,267				11,195				11,304
Income tax expense or benefit			7,507				(4,334	)			9,623				5,859
Income from operations			45,959				7,984				52,374				46,188
Income (loss) before income taxes			17,541				(9,648	)			23,579				9,108
Total assets			389,512				366,953				385,215				367,033
Expenditures for long-lived assets			815				968				875				1,229

F-49

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for shares)

15. Segment and Customer Information (cont.)

Reconciliations of the totals of reported segment revenues, profit, or loss measurement, assets, and other significant items reported by segment to the corresponding GAAP totals is not applicable to Atkins as the Company only has one reportable segment.

The following is a summary of geographical information:

		August 27, 2016			August 29, 2015			December 27, 2014			December 28, 2013
Revenues from external customers:
North America		$	399,922		$	234,564		$	398,321		$	364,338
International			27,936			18,334			31,537			29,591
Total		$	427,858		$	252,898		$	429,858		$	393,929
Long lived assets:
North America		$	2,226		$	2,481		$	2,172		$	2,546
International			47			69			50			106
Total		$	2,273		$	2,550		$	2,222		$	2,652

Revenues from transactions with external customers for each of Atkins’ products would be impracticable to disclose. Management does not view its business by product line.

Significant customers

Credit risk for the Company was concentrated in the following customers who each comprised more than 10% of the Company’s total sales for the 52-, 35-, 52-, and 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015, December 27, 2014, and December 28, 2013:

		August 27, 2016			August 29, 2015			December 27, 2014			December 28, 2013
Customer 1		41	%		38	%		40	%		41	%

At August 27, 2016, August 29, 2015, December 27, 2014, and December 28, 2013, the significant customers accounted for the following amounts of the Company’s accounts receivable:

		August 27, 2016						August 29, 2015						December 27, 2014						December 28, 2013
Customer 1		$	14,884		34	%		$	8,661		30	%		$	19,314		35	%		$	15,073		32	%
Customer 2			*		*				*		*				*		*				5,919		13	%
Customer 3			*		*				*		*				*		*				4,860		10	%
Total of accounts receivable, net		$	14,884		34	%		$	8,661		30	%		$	19,314		35	%		$	25,852		55	%

____________

*         Customer did not account for more than 10% of account receivables during the period indicated.

No other customers of the Company accounted for more than 10% of sales during these periods. The Company generally does not require collateral from its customers and has not incurred any significant losses on uncollectible accounts receivable.

16. Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated all events or transactions that occurred through the original issuance date of December 14, 2016, and from that date to April 11, 2017, the date the consolidated financial statements were available to be issued. During this period, the Company entered into an exclusive license agreement with Bellisio Foods, Inc. (Bellisio) to license Atkins frozen meals effective September 1, 2016. Length of the agreement is up

F-50

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for shares)

16. Subsequent Events (cont.)

to fourteen years with initial term of seven years and renewable for another seven. Under this agreement, Bellisio will be responsible for the manufacture of Atkins frozen meals and the sale of such to retailers and ANI will receive quarterly royalty payments throughout the term of the agreement.

In December 2016, the Company purchased Wellness Foods, Inc. (“Wellness Foods”), a Canadian-based company and owner of the “SimplyProtein” line of products for $21,039 in cash. Wellness Foods, Inc. is based in Toronto, Canada and manufactures, markets and distributes protein rich snack foods that offer clean eating, optimal ingredients and innovative nutrition. The acquisition of Wellness Foods expanded the Wellness Foods’ portfolio of protein rich products and provided new product capabilities to support Atkins’ brand of “low-carb,” “effective weight-management” and “protein-rich” diet.

In July 2016, the Company entered into an Exclusive License Agreement (the “License Agreement”) with a co-manufacturer to use the Atkins name and licensed marks to develop, market, distribute and sell frozen food products. In accordance with and subject to terms and conditions of the License Agreement, Atkins will receive a minimum annual royalty payment of $4,000 in the first year of the License Agreement and increasing annually 3% through the seventh year. The License Agreement became effective on September 1, 2016 and all related revenue will be recorded on the Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income as net sales.

In January 2017, the Company entered into a non-binding, confidential letter agreement (the “Letter”) with Conyers Park Acquisition Corp. (“’Buyer”), a special-purpose acquisition company with respect to the potential acquisition of Atkins. As part of the parties’ desire to move forward, they have agreed to enter into this Letter in advance of entering into a definitive agreement. The Letter is subject to (a) the satisfactory completion by the Buyer and its advisors of updated business, tax, accounting and legal due diligence, (b) the negotiation and execution of a definitive agreement between Buyer and the Company setting forth the terms and conditions of the potential transaction and containing representations, warranties, covenants, and closing conditions customary for a transaction of this type, and the satisfaction of the conditions set forth in the Letter, and (c) the receipt of any necessary governmental or regulatory consents and approvals.

F-51

NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(dba Atkins Nutritionals)

Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In Thousands)

		February 25, 2017				August 27, 2016
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	72,917			$	78,492
Accounts receivable, net			42,153				42,839
Inventories, net			22,381				27,544
Prepaid expenses			1,804				1,753
Other current assets			11,743				8,353
Total current assets			150,998				158,981
Long-term assets:
Property and equipment, net			2,014				2,273
Intangible assets, net			185,874				185,688
Goodwill			55,053				40,724
Other long term assets			2,299				1,846
Total assets		$	396,238			$	389,512
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	13,308			$	18,750
Accrued interest			4,077				4,028
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities			20,470				16,629
Current maturities of long-term debt			—				11,387
Total current liabilities			37,855				50,794
Long-term liabilities:
Long-term debt, less current maturities			330,437				321,638
Warrant liabilities			16,119				15,722
Deferred income taxes			27,823				29,192
Total liabilities			412,234				417,346
See Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
Common stock			5				5
Additional paid-in capital			(42,379	)			(43,551	)
Retained earnings			26,405				16,155
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)			(27	)			(443	)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)			(15,996	)			(27,834	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)		$	396,238			$	389,512

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

F-52

NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(dba Atkins Nutritionals)

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(In Thousands)

		26-Week Period Ended
		February 25, 2017				February 27, 2016
Net sales		$	202,111			$	219,777
Cost of goods sold			106,826				126,489
Gross profit			95,285				93,288
Operating expenses:
Distribution			9,329				9,075
Selling			8,271				9,369
Marketing			19,236				19,464
General and administrative			21,699				21,865
Depreciation and amortization			4,927				5,247
Other Expense			58				425
Total operating expenses			63,520				65,445
Income from operations			31,765				27,843
Other income (expense):
Change in warrant liabilities			(397	)			—
Interest expense			(13,629	)			(13,733	)
Loss on foreign currency transactions			(718	)			(401	)
Other income			199				116
Total other expense			(14,545	)			(14,018	)
Income before income taxes			17,220				13,825
Income tax expense			6,970				5,726
Net income			10,250				8,099
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation adjustments			416				125
Comprehensive income		$	10,666			$	8,224

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

F-53

NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(dba Atkins Nutritionals)

Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Cash flows
(In Thousands)

		26-Week Period Ended
		February 25, 2017				February 27, 2016
Operating activities
Net income		$	10,250			$	8,099
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization			4,927				5,247
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount			983				896
Stock compensation expense			1,063				1,052
Change in warrant liabilities			397				—
Unrealized loss on foreign currency transactions			718				401
Deferred income taxes			(1,369	)			5,438
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net			1,584				(19,247	)
Inventories, net			6,474				(2,155	)
Prepaid expenses			(51	)			327
Other current assets			(3,345	)			1,514
Accounts payable			(6,050	)			1,952
Accrued interest			49				(6	)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities			3,748				980
Other			9				33
Net cash provided by operating activities			19,387				4,531
Investing activities
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment			(284	)			(312	)
Wellness Foods investment			(21,039	)			—
Net cash used in investing activities			(21,323	)			(312	)
Financing activities
Proceeds from option exercises			109				—
Principal payments of long-term debt			(3,586	)			(7,464	)
Net cash used in financing activities			(3,477	)			(7,464	)
Effect of exchange rate on cash			(162	)			(278	)
Net decrease in cash			(5,575	)			(3,523	)
Cash at beginning of period			78,492				57,094
Cash and cash equivalents, end of fiscal year		$	72,917			$	53,571
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Cash paid for interest		$	12,444			$	12,820
Cash paid for taxes		$	1,710			$	49

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

F-54

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for Shares)

1. Nature of Operations and Principles of Consolidation

NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. (dba Atkins Nutritionals and referred to herein as “Atkins” or “the Company”) operates in the healthy snacking category. The Atkins approach focuses on a healthy diet with reduced levels of refined carbohydrates and refined sugars and encourages the consumption of lean protein, fiber, fruits, vegetables, and good fats. The Company sells a variety of nutrition bars, shakes, and frozen meals designed around the nutrition principles of the Atkins Diet.

The Company has experienced in the past, and expects to continue to experience, seasonal fluctuations in sales as a result of consumer spending patterns. Historically, sales have been greatest in the first calendar quarter, which corresponds with second fiscal quarter, and lowest in the fourth calendar quarter, which corresponds with first fiscal quarter. The Company believes these consumer spending patterns are driven primarily by the predisposition of consumers to adjust their approach to nutrition at certain times of the year as well as the timing of the Company’s advertising linked with key customer promotion windows.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).

The interim financial information as of February 25, 2017 and February 27, 2016 has been prepared without an audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and pursuant to Regulation S-X. Certain information and footnote disclosures, which are normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP, have been omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations. The interim consolidated financial information should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto, included in the Company’s audited financial statements for the 52-week period ended August 27, 2016, the 35-week period ended August 29, 2015, the 52-week period ended December 27, 2014 and the 52-week period ended December 28, 2013.

2. Acquisition of Wellness Foods

In December 21, 2016, the Company completed the acquisition of Wellness Foods, Inc. (“Wellness Foods”), a Canadian-based company and owner of the “Simply Protein” line of products for $21,039 in cash. Wellness Foods, Inc. is based in Toronto, Canada and manufactures, markets and distributes protein rich snack foods that offer clean eating, optimal ingredients and innovative nutrition. The acquisition of Wellness Foods expanded our portfolio of protein rich products and provided new product capabilities to support Atkins’ brand of “low-carb,” “effective weight-management” and “protein-rich” diet. The Company has included Wellness Foods’ results of operations in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Income from the date of acquisition.

The acquisition was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the acquisition have been recorded at their fair values. The fair values were determined by management based in part on an independent valuation of assets acquired, which includes intangible assets of approximately $4,560 and relate primarily to tradenames and customer relationships. Intangible assets subject to amortization of approximately $747 are being amortized over a 15 year term and relate primarily to customer relationships.

The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed for the 26-week period ending acquisition. The purchase price allocations are based upon preliminary valuations. The Company’s estimates and assumptions are subject to change within the measurement period as valuations are finalized. Any change in the estimated fair value of the net assets will change the purchase price allocation.

F-55

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for Shares)

2. Acquisition of Wellness Foods (cont.)

		December 21, 2016
Assets acquired:
Accounts receivable, net		$	1,122
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			48
Inventories, net			1,388
Property and equipment, net			13
Intangible Assets			4,560
Income taxes receivable			305
Liabilities assumed:
Accounts payable			765
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities			97
Other taxes payable (VAT)			2
Total identifiable net assets			6,572
Goodwill			14,467
Total purchase price		$	21,039

3. Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The objective of ASU No. 2014-09 is to outline a new, single comprehensive model to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. The new revenue recognition model provides a five-step analysis for determining when and how revenue is recognized, depicting the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. On July 9, 2015, the FASB voted to delay the implementation of ASU No. 2014-09 by one year to fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017. An entity may elect to early adopt as of the original effective date, fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2016. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing which provides additional clarification regarding identifying performance obligations and licensing. In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-19, 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. These ASUs will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP and will be effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2018. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or modified retrospective (cumulative effect) transition method and the Company has not yet selected which transition method to apply. The Company is currently evaluating recently issued guidance on practical expedients as part of the transition decision. Upon initial evaluation, the Company believes the key changes in the standard that impact revenue recognition relate to the recognition of customer programs and incentive offerings, including special pricing agreements, price protection, promotion, and other volume-based incentives. The Company is still in the process of evaluating these impacts.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements (Subtopic 205-40) — Going Concern: Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. ASU No. 2014-15 explicitly requires management to evaluate, at each annual or interim reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that exist which raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related disclosures. ASU No. 2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and annual and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. The Company has evaluated the adoption of this new standard on its financial statement disclosures and does not anticipate a material impact.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330) — Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. The amendments clarify that an entity should measure inventory within the scope of this update at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of

F-56

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for Shares)

3. Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements (cont.)

business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. Substantial and unusual losses that result from subsequent measurement of inventory should be disclosed in the financial statements. The Company has adopted the new accounting standard in the interim period ending February 25, 2017 and there are no adjustments made to the inventory balance as a result of the adoption.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The standard requires lessees to recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases on the balance sheet. A lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. The new guidance is effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2019. The amendments should be applied at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the effects adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The pronouncement simplifies the accounting for income tax consequences of share-based payment transactions. The new guidance requires that all of the tax related to share-based payments be recorded in earnings at settlement (or expiration). This guidance is effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effects adoption of this guidance will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or financial statement disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles — Goodwill and other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The amended standard simplifies how an entity tests goodwill by eliminating Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. The amended standard also modifies the concept of impairment from the condition that exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value to the condition that exists when the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value. The new guidance is effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2020. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its goodwill impairment testing.

4. Goodwill and Intangibles

The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 is as follows:

		Total
Balance as of August 27, 2016		$	40,724
Goodwill acquired during the period			14,467
Effect of exchange rate changes			(138)
Balance as of February 25, 2017		$	55,053

Intangible assets, net, consist of the following:

				February 25, 2017
		Useful Life		Gross carrying amount			Accumulated amortization			Net carrying amount
Intangible assets with indefinite life:
Brands and trademarks		Indefinite life		$	113,713		$	—		$	113,713
Intangible assets with finite lives:
Customer relationships		15 years			121,747			50,120			71,627
Proprietary recipes and formulas		7 years			4,760			4,226			534
				$	240,220		$	54,346		$	185,874

F-57

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for Shares)

4. Goodwill and Intangibles (cont.)

				August 27, 2016
		Useful Life		Gross carrying amount			Accumulated amortization			Net carrying amount
Intangible assets with indefinite life:
Brands and trademarks		Indefinite life		$	109,900		$	—		$	109,900
Intangible assets with finite lives:
Customer relationships		15 years			121,000			46,087			74,913
Proprietary recipes and formulas		7 years			4,760			3,885			875
				$	235,660		$	49,972		$	185,688

Amortization expense related to intangible assets during the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 and February 27, 2016, was $4,373 and $4,717, respectively.

5. Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company maintains cash balances in five financial institutions. The balances are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250 per institution. From time to time, the Company’s balances may exceed this limit. At February 25, 2017 and August 27, 2016, uninsured cash balances were $72,640 and $78,205, respectively.

6. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. To increase the comparability of fair value measurements, a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies, is as follows:

Level 1 — Valuations based on quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 — Valuations based on observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 — Valuations based on unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s own assumptions, consistent with reasonably available assumptions made by other market participants. These valuations require significant judgment.

The following table set forth the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) by level within the fair value hierarchy.

Fair value at February 25, 2017.

Description		Level 1			Level 2			Level 3			Total
Liabilities
Warrants		$	—		$	—		$	16,119		$	16,119

Fair value at August 27, 2016.

Description		Level 1			Level 2			Level 3			Total
Liabilities
Warrants		$	—		$	—		$	15,722		$	15,722

F-58

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for Shares)

6. Fair Value of Financial Instruments (cont.)

From August 27, 2016 to February 25, 2017, the fair value of the warrants increased $397 which is included in “Change in warrant liabilities” in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income. The fair value of the warrant has been calculated based on estimating future cash payments to be made to the former owner, in part based on the probability-weighted present value of various payout scenarios. Key fair value inputs are the discount rate; expected future cash flows under various payout scenarios, which are derived in part from an estimate of various transaction prices on a future change in a control event; and a probability analysis of the payout scenarios. The methodology for measuring fair value is sensitive to the volatility of key inputs mentioned above.

At February 25, 2017, the carrying value of the Company’s debt approximates its fair value as (i) it is based on a variable interest rate that changes based on market conditions and (ii) the margin applied to the variable rate is based on the Company’s credit risk, which has not changed since entering into the debt instrument.

7. Income Taxes

The following table shows the tax expense and the effective tax rate for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 and February 27, 2016 resulting from operations:

		February 25, 2017				February 27, 2016
Income before income taxes		$	17,220			$	13,825
Provision for income taxes			6,970				5,726
Effective tax rate			40.5	%			41.4	%

8. Long-Term Debt and Line of Credit

At February 25, 2017 and August 27, 2016, there were no amounts drawn against the Company’s lines of credit, and long-term debt consists of the following:

		February 25, 2017			August 27, 2016
First Lien and Second Lien term loans		$	333,663		$	337,209
Less: deferred financing fees			3,226			4,184
Total debt			330,437			333,025
Less: current maturities, net of deferred financing fees of $0 at February 25, 2017 and $1,822 at August 27, 2016			—			11,387
Long-term debt, net of deferred financing fees		$	330,437		$	321,638

9. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 and February 26, 2016 were as follows:

		Foreign Currency Translation
Balance at August 27, 2016		$	(443	)
Change in other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications			416
Net current-period change			416
Balance at February 25, 2017		$	(27	)

F-59

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for Shares)

9. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (cont.)

		Foreign Currency Translation
Balance at August 29, 2015		$	(1,064	)
Change in other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications			125
Net current-period change			125
Balance at February 28, 2016		$	(939	)

10. Defined Contribution Plan and Bonus Program

The Company sponsors a defined contribution plan, a 401(k) tax-deferred savings plan (the “Plan”), under which eligible employees may elect to defer a portion of their salary as a contribution to the Plan. The Company contributes to the Plan a discretionary matching 401(k) contribution in an amount not to exceed 50% of each participant’s elective deferrals that are not in excess of 6% of the participant’s compensation. For the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 and February 27, 2016, the Company matched an amount of $176 and $153, respectively.

The Company maintains a performance bonus program for employees and a supplemental performance program for certain executive employees subject to the Company achieving certain targeted goals. Under the terms of the program, the Company will pay cash bonuses to eligible participants on the effective date pursuant to existing letter agreements. For the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 and February 27, 2016, the Company has incurred $845 and $1,039 bonus expenses, respectively, which are included in “General and administrative” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.

11. Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

The Company has non-cancelable operating leases for seven buildings. Rent expense charged to operations amounted to $910 and $1,112 for the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 and February 27, 2016, respectively.

Litigation

The Company is a party to certain litigation and claims that are considered normal to the operations of the business. Management is of the opinion that the outcome of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Other

The Company has entered into endorsement contracts with certain celebrity figures to promote and endorse the Atkins brand and line of products. These contracts contain endorsement fees, which are expensed ratably over the life of the contract, and performance fees, that are recognized at the time of achievement. Based on the terms of the contracts in place and achievement of performance conditions as of February 25, 2017, the Company will be required to make payments of up to $232 over the next six months.

12. Segment and Customer Information

The Company has organized its operations into one operating segment that sells its branded nutritional foods and snacking products designed around the nutrition principles of the Atkins Diet. The results of the operating segment is reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker to make decisions about resource expenditures and assessing financial performance. This operating segment is therefore the Company’s reportable segment.

F-60

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except for Shares)

12. Segment and Customer Information (cont.)

The financial information relating to the Company’s segment is as follows:

		26-Week Period Ended
		February 25, 2017			February 27, 2016
Revenues from external customers		$	202,111		$	219,777
Income from operations			31,765			27,843
Income before income taxes			17,220			13,825
Total assets			396,238			389,512

Reconciliations of the totals of reported segment revenues, profit, or loss measurement, assets, and other significant items reported by segment to the corresponding GAAP totals is not applicable to Atkins as it only has one reportable segment.

Significant Customers

At February 25, 2017 and August 27, 2016, approximately 44% and 41% of accounts receivable, respectively, were derived from one customer. For the 26-week period ended February 25, 2017 and February 27, 2016, approximately 54% and 43% of gross sales, respectively, were derived from the same customer.

13. Significant Agreement

In July 2016, the Company entered into an Exclusive License Agreement (the “License Agreement”) with a co-manufacturer to use the Atkins name and licensed marks to develop, market, distribute and sell frozen food products. In accordance with and subject to terms and conditions of the License Agreement, Atkins will receive a minimum annual royalty payment of $4,000 in the first year of the License Agreement and increasing annually 3% through the seventh year. The License Agreement became effective on September 1, 2016 and all related revenue will be recorded in “Net sales” in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income as net sales.

On January 19, 2017, the Company entered into a non-binding, confidential letter agreement (the “Letter”) with Conyers Park Acquisition Corp (“’Buyer”), a special-purpose acquisition company with respect to the potential acquisition of Atkins. As part of the parties’ desire to move forward, they have agreed to enter into this Letter in advance of entering into a definitive agreement. The Letter is subject to (a) the satisfactory completion by the Buyer and its advisors of updated business, tax, accounting and legal due diligence, (b) the negotiation and execution of a definitive agreement between Buyer and the Company setting forth the terms and conditions of the potential transaction and containing representations, warranties, covenants, and closing conditions customary for a transaction of this type, and the satisfaction of the conditions set forth in the Letter, and (c) the receipt of any necessary governmental or regulatory consents and approvals.

F-61